Same level of likelihood, logical progression, coherence with the original story, etc.
Then no.
The reason why I brought up Uub knowing the Kaioken in the canonical storyline was because the other members seem to have thought I was saying that my idea actually happened in the original, when I wasn't. Since it's not proven whether Uub knows the Kaioken in the canonical storyline, I used it as an example of how the other members were misunderstanding me
Same level of likelihood, logical progression, coherence with the original story, etc.
Then no.
The reason why I brought up Uub knowing the Kaioken in the canonical storyline was because the other members seem to have thought I was saying that my idea actually happened in the original, when I wasn't. Since it's not proven whether Uub knows the Kaioken in the canonical storyline, I used it as an example of how the other members were misunderstanding me
No offence. I mean this with all due respect. But the way you word your opinions and theories are shitty. Sorry but I'm blunt. The way you word them makes you stating things as facts. Please for future debates work on your wording. Asit's very easy for people to think you're speaking like you're saying facts. Thanks have a nice day. ~ TheGMGoken.
TheGmGoken wrote:
No offence. I mean this with all due respect. But the way you word your opinions and theories are shitty. Sorry but I'm blunt. The way you word them makes you stating things as facts. Please for future debates work on your wording. Asit's very easy for people to think you're speaking like you're saying facts. Thanks have a nice day. ~ TheGMGoken.
I didn't word them as if I was stating a fact at all.
TheGmGoken wrote:
No offence. I mean this with all due respect. But the way you word your opinions and theories are shitty. Sorry but I'm blunt. The way you word them makes you stating things as facts. Please for future debates work on your wording. Asit's very easy for people to think you're speaking like you're saying facts. Thanks have a nice day. ~ TheGMGoken.
I didn't word them as if I was stating a fact at all.
A lot of people seem to agree that you can word your posts better. You are honestly wording them like they're fact. Just please try better on wording and supporting your post. I won't say this again. So don't argue with me about it. Just take the advice or ignore it. If you reply to me it'll be pointlesss. Have a nice day ~TheGMGoken.
No, dude, there was nothing wrong with my wording. All I did was come up with an idea. When one comes up with an idea, they don't have to rely on just canonical information. They can come up with their own information, because it's their idea. If I were to come up with a followup to the Dragonball manga, I wouldn't have to rely on just canonical information. Draken and dbzfan7 misunderstood, thinking that I was saying that my idea actually happened. I wasn't proposing a theory to the Dragonball story (if I was, I would actually need canonical evidence); I was coming up with an idea.
Last edited by Dr. Machismo on Wed Jun 26, 2013 4:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
Dr. Machismo wrote:No, dude, there was nothing wrong with my wording. All I did was come up with an idea. When one comes up with an idea, I don't have to rely on just canonical information. I can come up with my own information, because it's my idea. If I were to come up with a followup to the Dragonball manga, I wouldn't have to rely on canonical information. Draken and dbzfan7 misunderstood, thinking that I was saying that my idea actually happened.
I told you it's pointless to reply to me. That's all I'm going to say. Have a nice day ~TheGMGoken.
Dr. Machismo wrote:No, dude, there was nothing wrong with my wording. All I did was come up with an idea. When one comes up with an idea, I don't have to rely on just canonical information. I can come up with my own information, because it's my idea. If I were to come up with a followup to the Dragonball manga, I wouldn't have to rely on canonical information. Draken and dbzfan7 misunderstood, thinking that I was saying that my idea actually happened.
I told you it's pointless to reply to me. That's all I'm going to say. Have a nice day ~TheGMGoken.
No need to bother. He believes he's right over you, myself, and 5 other users. It's 7-1.
Why Dragon Ball Consistency in something such as power levels matter!
Spoiler:
Doctor. wrote:I've explained before, I'll just paraphrase myself.
Power levels establish tension and drama. People who care about them (well, people who care about them in a narrative) don't care about the big numbers or the fancy explosions. If you have character A who's so much above character B, who's the main character, you're gonna be left wondering how in the hell character B, the character we're supposed to care and root for, is going to escape the situation or overcome the odds. It makes us emotionally invested.
If character B doesn't escape the situation in a believable way that's consistent with previous events, then that emotional investment is gone. It was pointless tension, pointless drama made just to suck in the viewer. It has no critical value whatsoever. The audience is left believing that the author can just create whatever scenarios he wants and what happens to the characters is decided by whatever the author wants to happen, regardless of the events that happened in the story. Which, in fairness, is what happens, but the audience wants to be fooled. The audience wants to know that the world they're following has rules. That the world they're invested in isn't going to bend to external factors that are irrelevant to them.
An author can do whatever he wants with the characters, that's not false. But the author should also have the responsibility to make sure it fits in cohesively with the other events in the narrative he has created.
TheGmGoken wrote:I told you it's pointless to reply to me. That's all I'm going to say. Have a nice day ~TheGMGoken.
Sir, don't think you're in the right here. You're not. I don't have to take your advice because there is no need. In case there was something wrong with my wording, I might backtrack on what I said, but I doubt I'll have to.
TheGmGoken wrote:I told you it's pointless to reply to me. That's all I'm going to say. Have a nice day ~TheGMGoken.
Sir, don't think you're in the right here. You're not. I don't have to take your advice because there is no need. In case there was something wrong with my wording, I might backtrack on what I said, but I doubt I'll have to.
Take my advice or Ignore it. Replying is useless. Just saying. Have a nice day ~TheGmGoken.
P.S. : When someone say ignore the advice. that means to ignore(Don't pay attention) and don't talk about it.
Yeah, but I think it's lame that he's throwing a fit already. He apparently has no idea what's going on, so why should he get all pissed? I think he should have first took the time to think about what had happened, and went to the Vargas.
Dr. Machismo wrote:Yeah, but I think it's lame that he's throwing a fit already. He apparently has no idea what's going on, so why should he get all pissed? I think he should have first took the time to think about what had happened, and went to the Vargas.
Dr. Machismo wrote:Yeah, but I think it's lame that he's throwing a fit already. He apparently has no idea what's going on, so why should he get all pissed? I think he should have first took the time to think about what had happened, and went to the Vargas.
That's the Vegeta side talking .
Vegeta's not a reckless person. If something happened and Vegeta didn't know what was going on, he'd take his time to figure things out.
Dr. Machismo wrote:Yeah, but I think it's lame that he's throwing a fit already. He apparently has no idea what's going on, so why should he get all pissed? I think he should have first took the time to think about what had happened, and went to the Vargas.
That's the Vegeta side talking .
Vegeta's not a reckless person. If something happened and Vegeta didn't know what was going on, he'd take his time to figure things out.
Dr. Machismo wrote:Goku's not a very reckless person, not in battle. Both fighters would take time to understand something better.
That's the Vegeta side talking .
Guess I didn't get it ... so it was a bad joke.
No it's called high level comedy. Takes longer to understand. Not meant to be funny but challenging. Which makes it funny for the person who made the joke. So it's a good joke.
