Your biggest problem with Dragon Ball logic

Discussion, generally of an in-universe nature, regarding any aspect of the franchise (including movies, spin-offs, etc.) such as: techniques, character relationships, internal back-history, its universe, and more.
User avatar
dbzfan7
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 13045
Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2012 3:55 am
Location: Earth
Contact:

Your biggest problem with Dragon Ball logic

Post by dbzfan7 » Sat Jun 29, 2013 5:26 pm

This can be an inconsistency or problem that stemmed from the anime, movie, special, etc. What problem whenever you think about it just annoys you.
Why Dragon Ball Consistency in something such as power levels matter!

User avatar
RandomGuy96
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8881
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:57 pm
Location: San Diego, California, USA

Re: Your biggest problem with Dragon Ball logic

Post by RandomGuy96 » Sat Jun 29, 2013 5:31 pm

The collateral damage being so damn low. The planet not being destroyed by tiny finger beams from guys like Krillin.
The Monkey King wrote:
RandomGuy96 wrote:
dbgtFO wrote: Please elaborate as I do not know what you mean by "pushing Vegeta's destruction"
He's probably referring to the Bardock special. Zarbon was the one who first recommended destroying Planet Vegeta because the saiyans were rapidly growing in strength.
It was actually Beerus disguised as Zarbon #StayWoke
Herms wrote:The fact that the ridiculous power inflation is presented so earnestly makes me just roll my eyes and snicker. Like with Freeza, where he starts off over 10 times stronger than all his henchmen except Ginyu (because...well, just because), then we find out he can transform and get even more powerful, and then he reveals he can transform two more times, before finally coming out with the fact that he hasn't even been using anywhere near 50% of his power. Oh, and he can survive in the vacuum of space. All this stuff is just presented as the way Freeza is, without even an attempt at rationalizing it, yet the tone dictates we're supposed to take all this silly grasping at straws as thrilling danger. So I guess I don't really take the power inflation in the Boo arc seriously, but I don't take the power inflation in earlier arcs seriously either, so there's no net loss of seriousness. I think a silly story presented as serious is harder to accept than a silly story presented as silly.

User avatar
TheMightyOzaru
Banned
Posts: 6255
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2012 6:50 pm
Location: Capsule Corp

Re: Your biggest problem with Dragon Ball logic

Post by TheMightyOzaru » Sat Jun 29, 2013 5:35 pm

My biggest problem with Dragon Ball isn't the logic, it's the fact that a lot of the characters become useless. I often find myself considering Avatar a better show because EVERYONE is useful, even non-benders like Sokka.
Vegeta: "Funny... I seem to recall Kakarot being fed the same information right before he transformed; the distinct look on your faces when he went Super Saiyan didn't exactly inspire confidence. One does not predict or calculate power like ours."
Youtube channel:
http://www.youtube.com/user/ThePrinceOfSaiyajins
My 3DS Friend Code:
2707-1669-7946

User avatar
Legendary Saiya-Jin
OMG CRAZY REGEN
Posts: 777
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 7:33 am

Re: Your biggest problem with Dragon Ball logic

Post by Legendary Saiya-Jin » Sat Jun 29, 2013 7:16 pm

I like Dragonball logic; I like its flow, but I suppose I sort of agree about characters, although, making characters important for every new arc can be systematically repetitive. I don't mind to an extent some characters becoming useless.

User avatar
TheMightyOzaru
Banned
Posts: 6255
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2012 6:50 pm
Location: Capsule Corp

Re: Your biggest problem with Dragon Ball logic

Post by TheMightyOzaru » Sat Jun 29, 2013 7:23 pm

Legendary Saiya-Jin wrote:I like Dragonball logic; I like its flow, but I suppose I sort of agree about characters, although, making characters important for every new arc can be systematically repetitive. I don't mind to an extent some characters becoming useless.
Dragon Ball practically has to have characters fall form usefulness to make sense. That's just something inherently wrong with the series. It's not the end of the world or anything, but it's not something that can't be fixed and still make sense.
Vegeta: "Funny... I seem to recall Kakarot being fed the same information right before he transformed; the distinct look on your faces when he went Super Saiyan didn't exactly inspire confidence. One does not predict or calculate power like ours."
Youtube channel:
http://www.youtube.com/user/ThePrinceOfSaiyajins
My 3DS Friend Code:
2707-1669-7946

User avatar
Kamiccolo9
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10371
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2013 9:32 pm
Location: Regensburg, Germany

Re: Your biggest problem with Dragon Ball logic

Post by Kamiccolo9 » Sat Jun 29, 2013 7:28 pm

RandomGuy96 wrote:The collateral damage being so damn low. The planet not being destroyed by tiny finger beams from guys like Krillin.
This is my problem. These people go every day restraining themselves to tiny fractions of their full power, and I don't see how at least one of them hasn't slipped up and at least blown up a city.
And how did Vegeta's Big Bang against 19 not blow up the planet?
Champion of the 1st Kanzenshuu Short Story Tenkaichi Budokai
Kamiccolo9's Kompendium of Short Stories
Cipher wrote:If Vegeta does not kill Gohan, I will stop illegally streaming the series.
Malik_DBNA wrote:
Scarz wrote:Malik, stop. People are asking me for lewd art of possessed Bra (with Vegeta).
"Achievement Unlocked: Rule 34"

User avatar
TheMightyOzaru
Banned
Posts: 6255
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2012 6:50 pm
Location: Capsule Corp

Re: Your biggest problem with Dragon Ball logic

Post by TheMightyOzaru » Sat Jun 29, 2013 7:31 pm

Kamiccolo9 wrote:
RandomGuy96 wrote:The collateral damage being so damn low. The planet not being destroyed by tiny finger beams from guys like Krillin.
This is my problem. These people go every day restraining themselves to tiny fractions of their full power, and I don't see how at least one of them hasn't slipped up and at least blown up a city.
And how did Vegeta's Big Bang against 19 not blow up the planet?
Honestly, there is an easy explanation for this. They simply condense their energy.
Vegeta: "Funny... I seem to recall Kakarot being fed the same information right before he transformed; the distinct look on your faces when he went Super Saiyan didn't exactly inspire confidence. One does not predict or calculate power like ours."
Youtube channel:
http://www.youtube.com/user/ThePrinceOfSaiyajins
My 3DS Friend Code:
2707-1669-7946

User avatar
TheGmGoken
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10592
Joined: Sun Apr 07, 2013 5:19 pm
Location: Capsule Corps

Re: Your biggest problem with Dragon Ball logic

Post by TheGmGoken » Sat Jun 29, 2013 7:38 pm

TheMightyOzaru wrote:My biggest problem with Dragon Ball isn't the logic, it's the fact that a lot of the characters become useless. I often find myself considering Avatar a better show because EVERYONE is useful, even non-benders like Sokka.
even Momo!

But my issue is that even 100x stronger than they were in the Saiyan Arc they can't cause big craters at least. I understand them not blowing up the planet because they can simply condense their power to NOT destroy the planet but a crater or dents in the Earth is kinda needed. I mean even at a fraction of their power. They should be able to cause dents. Hell sometimes the water just stands there like nothing happens. Another issue is how Earth haven't evolve to fighting races like apparently 80% of the universe did.You'll think with all the shit that happen to Earth they would have evolve to a fighting race.
Last edited by TheGmGoken on Sat Jun 29, 2013 7:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
TheMightyOzaru
Banned
Posts: 6255
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2012 6:50 pm
Location: Capsule Corp

Re: Your biggest problem with Dragon Ball logic

Post by TheMightyOzaru » Sat Jun 29, 2013 7:39 pm

TheGmGoken wrote:
TheMightyOzaru wrote:My biggest problem with Dragon Ball isn't the logic, it's the fact that a lot of the characters become useless. I often find myself considering Avatar a better show because EVERYONE is useful, even non-benders like Sokka.
even Momo!
Yup :lol: .
Vegeta: "Funny... I seem to recall Kakarot being fed the same information right before he transformed; the distinct look on your faces when he went Super Saiyan didn't exactly inspire confidence. One does not predict or calculate power like ours."
Youtube channel:
http://www.youtube.com/user/ThePrinceOfSaiyajins
My 3DS Friend Code:
2707-1669-7946

User avatar
Ajay
Moderator
Posts: 6222
Joined: Sun May 26, 2013 6:15 pm
Location: Surrey, UK
Contact:

Re: Your biggest problem with Dragon Ball logic

Post by Ajay » Sat Jun 29, 2013 7:40 pm

I've always hated that the Dragon Balls instantly became a deus ex machina for near enough every problem in Z. Oh hey, remember that one wish that didn't work with the dragon balls before? Don't worry! WE CHANGED THEM! There's just so many times they've been used as a straight up lazy plot device.

In Dragon Ball, I always felt that they were mostly used as a way to have the events of the tale told. We're searching for Dragon Balls and on the way we encountered this, this and this. That was always fine to me. I didn't mind so much when it was just something as kid-friendly as saving Upa's father but the moment we got to Z and the stakes were made much higher, it just totally defeated any kind of real tension the show could have had since you always had at the back of your mind 'ah, it doesn't matter, we'll just wish whatever goes wrong back to normal'. I get that it's pretty much a staple of the series and something most fans just laugh off and to an extent, I certainly do too but I can't help but think about how things might have turned out differently should they have had far stricter rules.

That's not to say that the show doesn't have tense or epic moments, it certainly does but the extremity of those moments always seemed dampened to me because of the possibility of using the dragon balls over and over.
Last edited by Ajay on Sat Jun 29, 2013 7:45 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Follow me on Twitter for countless shitposts.

Deadtuber.

User avatar
TheMightyOzaru
Banned
Posts: 6255
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2012 6:50 pm
Location: Capsule Corp

Re: Your biggest problem with Dragon Ball logic

Post by TheMightyOzaru » Sat Jun 29, 2013 7:43 pm

Yeah, I suppose the Deus Ex Machina Dragon Balls were pretty dumb. Dragon Ball GT fixed that in a way but it's GT :lol: .
Last edited by TheMightyOzaru on Sat Jun 29, 2013 7:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Vegeta: "Funny... I seem to recall Kakarot being fed the same information right before he transformed; the distinct look on your faces when he went Super Saiyan didn't exactly inspire confidence. One does not predict or calculate power like ours."
Youtube channel:
http://www.youtube.com/user/ThePrinceOfSaiyajins
My 3DS Friend Code:
2707-1669-7946

User avatar
RandomGuy96
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8881
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:57 pm
Location: San Diego, California, USA

Re: Your biggest problem with Dragon Ball logic

Post by RandomGuy96 » Sat Jun 29, 2013 7:44 pm

Other things I hate: zenkais and the ROSAT.
The Monkey King wrote:
RandomGuy96 wrote:
dbgtFO wrote: Please elaborate as I do not know what you mean by "pushing Vegeta's destruction"
He's probably referring to the Bardock special. Zarbon was the one who first recommended destroying Planet Vegeta because the saiyans were rapidly growing in strength.
It was actually Beerus disguised as Zarbon #StayWoke
Herms wrote:The fact that the ridiculous power inflation is presented so earnestly makes me just roll my eyes and snicker. Like with Freeza, where he starts off over 10 times stronger than all his henchmen except Ginyu (because...well, just because), then we find out he can transform and get even more powerful, and then he reveals he can transform two more times, before finally coming out with the fact that he hasn't even been using anywhere near 50% of his power. Oh, and he can survive in the vacuum of space. All this stuff is just presented as the way Freeza is, without even an attempt at rationalizing it, yet the tone dictates we're supposed to take all this silly grasping at straws as thrilling danger. So I guess I don't really take the power inflation in the Boo arc seriously, but I don't take the power inflation in earlier arcs seriously either, so there's no net loss of seriousness. I think a silly story presented as serious is harder to accept than a silly story presented as silly.

User avatar
TheGmGoken
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10592
Joined: Sun Apr 07, 2013 5:19 pm
Location: Capsule Corps

Re: Your biggest problem with Dragon Ball logic

Post by TheGmGoken » Sat Jun 29, 2013 7:46 pm

AjayLikesGaming wrote:I've always hated that the Dragon Balls instantly became a deus ex machinima for near enough every problem in Z. Oh hey, remember that one wish that didn't work with the dragon balls before? Don't worry! WE CHANGED THEM! There's just so many times they've been used as a straight up lazy plot device.

In Dragon Ball, I always felt that they were mostly used as a way to have the events of the tale told. We're searching for Dragon Balls and on the way we encountered this, this and this. That was always fine to me. I didn't mind so much when it was just something as kid-friendly as saving Upa's father but the moment we got to Z and the stakes were made much higher, it just totally defeated any kind of real tension the show could have had since you always had at the back of your mind 'ah, it doesn't matter, we'll just wish whatever goes wrong back to normal'. I get that it's pretty much a staple of the series and something most fans just laugh off and to an extent, I certainly do too but I can't help but think about how things might have turned out differently should they have had far stricter rules.

That's not to say that the show doesn't have tense or epic moments, it certainly does the extremity of those moments always seemed dampened to me because of the possibility of using the dragon balls over and over.
Yeah I love how in the first portion of the manga/ Dragonball the anime the Dragonballs wasn't abused. But in Z it's like Fairy Odd Parents. "I WISH FOR EVERYTHING TO BE BACK TO NORMAL!" http://fairlyoddparents.wikia.com/wiki/Unwish
Other things I hate: zenkais and the ROSAT.
They should have made the ROAST for the humans. Have some type of plot device saying "Only people from this planet can enter". At that time Piccolo was with Kami so in a way it would't work for Piccolo. Goku could just train Gohan the natural way and Humans would be useless. Imagine Cell Jr's vs Humans. Then Goku, Piccolo, Vegeta, Trunks, and Gohan will fight Cell.

User avatar
TheMightyOzaru
Banned
Posts: 6255
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2012 6:50 pm
Location: Capsule Corp

Re: Your biggest problem with Dragon Ball logic

Post by TheMightyOzaru » Sat Jun 29, 2013 7:47 pm

I've got no problems with Zenkais and the ROSAT.
Vegeta: "Funny... I seem to recall Kakarot being fed the same information right before he transformed; the distinct look on your faces when he went Super Saiyan didn't exactly inspire confidence. One does not predict or calculate power like ours."
Youtube channel:
http://www.youtube.com/user/ThePrinceOfSaiyajins
My 3DS Friend Code:
2707-1669-7946

User avatar
RandomGuy96
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8881
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:57 pm
Location: San Diego, California, USA

Re: Your biggest problem with Dragon Ball logic

Post by RandomGuy96 » Sat Jun 29, 2013 7:52 pm

I do. They're lazy bullshit plot devices that were thought up solely to put the saiyans above Piccolo, and negate all of his build-up and reduce him to a jobber for the new ultra-OP bad guy. Then they were used in an even more bullshit way to make Goku ultra powerful to fight the OP bad guy.

Actually, was there ever a reason for why the ROSAT boosted them so much, and why they didn't use it earlier?
The Monkey King wrote:
RandomGuy96 wrote:
dbgtFO wrote: Please elaborate as I do not know what you mean by "pushing Vegeta's destruction"
He's probably referring to the Bardock special. Zarbon was the one who first recommended destroying Planet Vegeta because the saiyans were rapidly growing in strength.
It was actually Beerus disguised as Zarbon #StayWoke
Herms wrote:The fact that the ridiculous power inflation is presented so earnestly makes me just roll my eyes and snicker. Like with Freeza, where he starts off over 10 times stronger than all his henchmen except Ginyu (because...well, just because), then we find out he can transform and get even more powerful, and then he reveals he can transform two more times, before finally coming out with the fact that he hasn't even been using anywhere near 50% of his power. Oh, and he can survive in the vacuum of space. All this stuff is just presented as the way Freeza is, without even an attempt at rationalizing it, yet the tone dictates we're supposed to take all this silly grasping at straws as thrilling danger. So I guess I don't really take the power inflation in the Boo arc seriously, but I don't take the power inflation in earlier arcs seriously either, so there's no net loss of seriousness. I think a silly story presented as serious is harder to accept than a silly story presented as silly.

User avatar
TheGmGoken
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10592
Joined: Sun Apr 07, 2013 5:19 pm
Location: Capsule Corps

Re: Your biggest problem with Dragon Ball logic

Post by TheGmGoken » Sat Jun 29, 2013 7:54 pm

RandomGuy96 wrote:I do. They're lazy bullshit plot devices that were thought up solely to put the saiyans above Piccolo, and negate all of his build-up and reduce him to a jobber for the new ultra-OP bad guy.

Actually, was there ever a reason for why the ROSAT boosted them so much, and why they didn't use it earlier?
Only Goku knew of it. Piccolo didn't know till he fused with Kami. I want to know why ROSAT makes them super strong. We've seen many times the Z fighters train for MORE than 1 year. Let those boast was SHIT compare to ROSAT

User avatar
TheMightyOzaru
Banned
Posts: 6255
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2012 6:50 pm
Location: Capsule Corp

Re: Your biggest problem with Dragon Ball logic

Post by TheMightyOzaru » Sat Jun 29, 2013 7:57 pm

It was the sensible way to power scale the story IMO. Zenkai's gave Saiyans something special prior to SSJ, and the ROSAT gave, again, a sensible way to surpass Cell.
Vegeta: "Funny... I seem to recall Kakarot being fed the same information right before he transformed; the distinct look on your faces when he went Super Saiyan didn't exactly inspire confidence. One does not predict or calculate power like ours."
Youtube channel:
http://www.youtube.com/user/ThePrinceOfSaiyajins
My 3DS Friend Code:
2707-1669-7946

User avatar
Saiga
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8311
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2011 8:36 pm
Location: Space Australia

Re: Your biggest problem with Dragon Ball logic

Post by Saiga » Sat Jun 29, 2013 11:12 pm

The Saiyans were already above Piccolo when Zenkai were introduced... and I like them. It was a clever way to have Vegeta get stronger when there was no opportunity to train, they were handled rather poorly with Goku but that's more a problem with Goku & Freeza rather than the Zenkai themselves.

RoSaT, I don't have much of a problem with either. The gains were more about gaining the new Super Saiyan grades and mastering the form, they just needed time to do it and the RoSaT was a good way to give them that time.

My biggest problem with Dragon Ball logic is probably Toriyama's logic that Gohan was suited to be the main character. :lol: For something in-universe, probably Freeza's strength.
I'm re-watching Dragon Ball GT in full on my blog. Check it out if you're interested in my thoughts on the series as I watch through it!

User avatar
TheGmGoken
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10592
Joined: Sun Apr 07, 2013 5:19 pm
Location: Capsule Corps

Re: Your biggest problem with Dragon Ball logic

Post by TheGmGoken » Sat Jun 29, 2013 11:16 pm

TheMightyOzaru wrote:It was the sensible way to power scale the story IMO. Zenkai's gave Saiyans something special prior to SSJ, and the ROSAT gave, again, a sensible way to surpass Cell.
I don't find it sensible to be honest. The power boast to me was to high. That's why I think it should have been Earth-From People only. Trunks and Gohan could have went together. As it would have created a reverse role as Trunks the teacher and Gohan the student. Then Goku could train Gohan.

User avatar
Saiga
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8311
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2011 8:36 pm
Location: Space Australia

Re: Your biggest problem with Dragon Ball logic

Post by Saiga » Sat Jun 29, 2013 11:24 pm

While I don't have any problem with the RoSaT, I like your idea of the RoSaT only working with Earthlings, and having Trunks go in with Gohan.
I'm re-watching Dragon Ball GT in full on my blog. Check it out if you're interested in my thoughts on the series as I watch through it!

Post Reply