In defense of the Faulconer score

Discussion regarding any musical aspect of the franchise, from game soundtracks to BGM to remixes. Upcoming & classic CDs, reviews, where to find them, and more!
Post Reply
User avatar
cRookie_Monster
OMG CRAZY REGEN
Posts: 951
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 7:41 pm
Location: Seattle, WA
Contact:

Re: In defense of the Faulconer score

Post by cRookie_Monster » Tue Sep 10, 2013 3:46 pm

VegettoEX wrote: I'm not saying that, overall as an individual and throughout everything I've ever said in my life, that I don't dislike the Faulconer Productions score and think it's an absolutely terrible piece of art that should not have been included as a part of the production it was included as a part of. That much is clear,
I'm having trouble with all the negatives in this statement :D (-1)^3 ?
especially for folks that have been following me for the 15 years that I've been running my site (well, not that Faulconer Productions had a score going back 15 years... but you get the point!).
Faulconer Productions score goes back 14 years :)

I gotta say one serious thing. For the people who like the Faulconer Productions score, value was added. For people like Vegetto Ex, all they see is the divisiveness. Different viewpoints. Subjective. Maybe it's a simply popularity contest as to whether more harm or good was done? Meh.

I'll chime in that I enjoyed the Levi score. I did think it stayed too dark through silly moments though, always seemed odd to me. Someone said it set the stage for the Faulconer score. This is true. There were decisions made at FP that were made early on as an attempt to match the sound, similar to the way the much of the Funimation voice cast started out trying to imitate the Ocean cast.
Last edited by cRookie_Monster on Tue Sep 10, 2013 3:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Scott
http://morganstudios.com

User avatar
Kakarot88
OMG CRAZY REGEN
Posts: 842
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 11:48 pm

Re: In defense of the Faulconer score

Post by Kakarot88 » Tue Sep 10, 2013 3:48 pm

Re: VegetoEX

Thanks! That means a lot me being a newb on the site and all. And seriously I credit you with convincing me to go to Animazement so it'd take a heck of a lot more than a forum post for me to have any animosity towards you :D Different strokes for different folks indeed, but we can agree on one thing on this thread for sure: the Faulconer score has no place in the anime of Dragon Ball before the Z era. It'd have been totally wrong for the first saga and especially IMO the Budokai Tenkaichi fights...I love the song "Mezae Tenkaichi" that plays during those especially when they go "Numba Oooone...Numba OOOONE" and "Yamcha's Rōgafūfūken!"

And with that I think I am out of anything to contribute on this thread. Until next time :wave:
"You might think you know everything there is to know about me, but really, you're not even CLOSE."

"Never give in--never, never, never, never, in nothing great or small, large or petty, never give in except to convictions of honour and good sense. Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy." ~ Sir Winston Chruchill / Dragon Ball Z in a nutshell

How I enjoy the anime:

Piccolo Daimaoh
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5407
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 11:49 pm

Re: In defense of the Faulconer score

Post by Piccolo Daimaoh » Tue Sep 10, 2013 10:08 pm

VegettoEX wrote: I'm not saying that, overall as an individual and throughout everything I've ever said in my life, that I don't dislike the Faulconer Productions score and think it's an absolutely terrible piece of art that should not have been included as a part of the production it was included as a part of. That much is clear, especially for folks that have been following me for the 15 years that I've been running my site (well, not that Faulconer Productions had a score going back 15 years... but you get the point!).
VegettoEX wrote: There are countless examples of this. I have these conversations on the forum. I have these conversations in person at conventions. We're coming from two completely different viewing experiences of what is, sure, underneath at the base level the exact same story (strong guy beats up other strong guy), but when it's not a common viewing experience, it's not the same conversation we're having.

When I talk to someone who watched the original Japanese version - or a faithful dub that kept appropriate dialog and even at least just an instrumental of "Unmei no Hi" - I know that, even if we interpret different things about the scene (for example, what does the bird represent?), the actual scene itself came across the exact same way to our brains for them to in turn start doing the extra work.
Okay, so now I think the argument is that the dub is bad, not because the music itself is bad or because it doesn't fit the show, but because it's caused people to refer to a version that differs in crucial aspects from the original when they talk about the show. That's a valid point, and if you'd expressed that from the start, we would've saved time. As you say, you spoke about this in a previous thread, but I can't remember the last time this was discussed.


Well, that's not such a big problem, and it's more personal as it doesn't affect the series per se, but my response is to that is that the two versions don't differ in the two most crucial aspects. And that's the story and characters or at least for the most part. You still have Goku, Vegeta etc., and they still fight with other characters, form relationships etc. We can still discuss the progression of the plot, and how it builds tension, makes sense, doesn't make sense etc. I'm not going to argue with you when you say that the music is important to any show and sets the tone, and therefore the dub and the original do have considerable differences. But if it's clear which version someone's talking about and it's a version you're not familiar with, you don't have to talk to them. And on this forum, we don't really have this problem because you've made a rule that it's always assumed that the version you're referring to is the original.

User avatar
90sDBZ
I Live Here
Posts: 2659
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 11:34 am
Location: UK

Re: In defense of the Faulconer score

Post by 90sDBZ » Wed Sep 11, 2013 8:12 am

Kakarot88 wrote:Re: VegetoEX

Thanks! That means a lot me being a newb on the site and all. And seriously I credit you with convincing me to go to Animazement so it'd take a heck of a lot more than a forum post for me to have any animosity towards you :D Different strokes for different folks indeed, but we can agree on one thing on this thread for sure: the Faulconer score has no place in the anime of Dragon Ball before the Z era. It'd have been totally wrong for the first saga and especially IMO the Budokai Tenkaichi fights...I love the song "Mezae Tenkaichi" that plays during those especially when they go "Numba Oooone...Numba OOOONE" and "Yamcha's Rōgafūfūken!"

And with that I think I am out of anything to contribute on this thread. Until next time :wave:
I agree with you there that the Japanese score in the original DB era was perfect and was appropriate to leave as it was. Faulconer's score as it is in Z wouldn't work with it. However I'm sure that if Team Faulconer had been hired to work on DB they'd have come out with a very different score to their Z score. It would probably have been tailored to suit DB, just like how it sounds very different throughout the different parts of Z. But anyway the DB score was perfect and Funi were right to keep it as it was.

I'd actually have preferred it if Team Faulconer worked on GT rather than Mark Menza though. Menza's score sounds pretty generic and lots of variations of the same thing. As for GT's original Japanese score I have mixed feelings for it. There's certain tracks I love and others that just sound completely off. I think I enjoy GT's original score more than Kikuchi's Z score though.

User avatar
Gonstead
I Live Here
Posts: 3500
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 9:33 am
Location: New Zealand
Contact:

Re: In defense of the Faulconer score

Post by Gonstead » Wed Sep 11, 2013 8:39 am

Personally, I would have preferred they just re-hired Kikuchi to keep a more seamless flow with the 3 shows.

I've said it before and I'll keep saying it: Akito Tokunaga is the worst composer for Dragon Ball of all time (My opinion).
Visit DragonBallFigures for all your Dragon Ball figure info and needs!
Mayuri Kurotsuchi wrote:"In this world, nothing perfect exists. It may be a cliche after all but it's the way things are. That's precisely why ordinary men pursue the concept of perfection, it's infatuation. But ultimately I have to ask myself "What is the true meaning of being perfect?" and the answer I came up with was nothing. Not one thing. The truth of the matter is I despise perfection! If something is truly perfect, that's IT! The bottom line becomes there is no room for imagination! No space for intelligence or ability or improvement! Do you understand? To men of science like us, perfection is a dead end, a condition of hopelessness. Always strive to be better than anything that came before you but not perfect! Scientist's agonize over the attempt to achieve perfection! That's the kind of creatures we are! We take joy in trying to exceed our grasp, in trying to reach for something that in the end, we have to admit may in fact be unreachable!"
MY HOLY GRAIL (110% Serious. Please sell me one)

User avatar
Bullza
Banned
Posts: 8621
Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2013 12:48 am
Location: UK

Re: In defense of the Faulconer score

Post by Bullza » Sun Nov 03, 2013 4:04 pm

The Faulconer score was one of the best things to happen to DBZ. I don't think the series would have taken off anywhere as much as it did without it.

The Japanese soundtrack is very dated and ages the show beyond it's years. It's a very repetitive bland soundtrack that doesn't have the intensity that Faulconers soundtrack has. Some of the best scenes in DBZ like the Final Flash, the Kamehameha clash between Gohan and Cell, Goku going SSJ3 have no punch with the Japanese music.

User avatar
TheGmGoken
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10592
Joined: Sun Apr 07, 2013 5:19 pm
Location: Capsule Corps

Re: In defense of the Faulconer score

Post by TheGmGoken » Sun Nov 03, 2013 8:38 pm

Bullza wrote:The Faulconer score was one of the best things to happen to DBZ. I don't think the series would have taken off anywhere as much as it did without it.
Don't you mean anywhere that showed the Funimation dub? Other countries and areas aired DBZ without Bruce F. and DBZ was just as popular if not more popular there then in USA and Australia(I think some other countries got Funimation as well). So I don't think Bruce F. really impacted the series that much. Had they always used the original score. I'm sure people would still love it because of the action and continuous story(Instead of the random day storyline).

I agree Bruce F. wasn't all that bad(Especially as people made him out to be). In fact I like some of his work. I just don't think it fitted with the series. I think it could have worked for a maybe a different action series. But not DBZ. Just didn't feel right. Bruce does sound more modern though I'll admit.

User avatar
Bullza
Banned
Posts: 8621
Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2013 12:48 am
Location: UK

Re: In defense of the Faulconer score

Post by Bullza » Sun Nov 03, 2013 9:22 pm

TheGmGoken wrote:
Bullza wrote:The Faulconer score was one of the best things to happen to DBZ. I don't think the series would have taken off anywhere as much as it did without it.
Don't you mean anywhere that showed the Funimation dub? Other countries and areas aired DBZ without Bruce F. and DBZ was just as popular if not more popular there then in USA and Australia(I think some other countries got Funimation as well). So I don't think Bruce F. really impacted the series that much. Had they always used the original score. I'm sure people would still love it because of the action and continuous story(Instead of the random day storyline).

I agree Bruce F. wasn't all that bad(Especially as people made him out to be). In fact I like some of his work. I just don't think it fitted with the series. I think it could have worked for a maybe a different action series. But not DBZ. Just didn't feel right. Bruce does sound more modern though I'll admit.
Well I'd obviously mean that, it wouldn't make a difference to those who haven't heard it to begin with. I'm sure it made a big difference, look how many still watch the SSJ3 Goku and SSJ1 scene just for the music. The Faulconer score made for some very memorable scenes.

The Japanese music fit the original Dragon Ball but DBZ was on a much bigger scale and had a lot of intensity that the Japanese music did no justice whereas the Faulconer score did.

It was like mid 80's music in a mid 90's show, it made it appear older than it is and Faulconers score does the opposite. I doubt I'd have liked the show half as much without it.

User avatar
TheGmGoken
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10592
Joined: Sun Apr 07, 2013 5:19 pm
Location: Capsule Corps

Re: In defense of the Faulconer score

Post by TheGmGoken » Sun Nov 03, 2013 10:19 pm

Bullza wrote:
TheGmGoken wrote:
Bullza wrote:The Faulconer score was one of the best things to happen to DBZ. I don't think the series would have taken off anywhere as much as it did without it.
Don't you mean anywhere that showed the Funimation dub? Other countries and areas aired DBZ without Bruce F. and DBZ was just as popular if not more popular there then in USA and Australia(I think some other countries got Funimation as well). So I don't think Bruce F. really impacted the series that much. Had they always used the original score. I'm sure people would still love it because of the action and continuous story(Instead of the random day storyline).

I agree Bruce F. wasn't all that bad(Especially as people made him out to be). In fact I like some of his work. I just don't think it fitted with the series. I think it could have worked for a maybe a different action series. But not DBZ. Just didn't feel right. Bruce does sound more modern though I'll admit.
Well I'd obviously mean that, it wouldn't make a difference to those who haven't heard it to begin with. I'm sure it made a big difference, look how many still watch the SSJ3 Goku and SSJ1 scene just for the music. The Faulconer score made for some very memorable scenes.

The Japanese music fit the original Dragon Ball but DBZ was on a much bigger scale and had a lot of intensity that the Japanese music did no justice whereas the Faulconer score did.

It was like mid 80's music in a mid 90's show, it made it appear older than it is and Faulconers score does the opposite. I doubt I'd have liked the show half as much without it.
Honestly can't think of one scene Bruce Team did justice

User avatar
Bullza
Banned
Posts: 8621
Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2013 12:48 am
Location: UK

Re: In defense of the Faulconer score

Post by Bullza » Sun Nov 03, 2013 10:43 pm

The Japanese soundtrack did no justice when it made all the intense and exciting scenes dull and boring.

User avatar
TheGmGoken
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10592
Joined: Sun Apr 07, 2013 5:19 pm
Location: Capsule Corps

Re: In defense of the Faulconer score

Post by TheGmGoken » Sun Nov 03, 2013 11:10 pm

Bullza wrote:The Japanese soundtrack did no justice when it made all the intense and exciting scenes dull and boring.
Really? Show me please. Cause I never seen it

User avatar
Roland_ELoG
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 219
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2012 3:56 am
Contact:

Re: In defense of the Faulconer score

Post by Roland_ELoG » Mon Nov 04, 2013 4:12 am

TheGmGoken wrote: Honestly can't think of one scene Bruce Team did justice
I could spend many hours finding my favorite scenes, but really there's no point. You've already made up your mind, and if you don't like the American score you're never going to.

For me it's not a matter of better or worse, but a matter of nostalgia. Watching Dragon Ball Z in Japanese is for me, a new experience. I love it, I love rediscovering the show. BUT, nostalgia isn't about new experiences, it's about old experiences viewed through the lens of yourself as you are now. Whereas watching it in Japanese is, for me, academic, watching the old American broadcast version reminds me of the feelings I got watching it as a kid. The Japanese version can't do that for me.
A YouTube channel with no AMVs on it? I know, it's hard to believe.

User avatar
90sDBZ
I Live Here
Posts: 2659
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 11:34 am
Location: UK

Re: In defense of the Faulconer score

Post by 90sDBZ » Mon Nov 04, 2013 1:03 pm

TheGmGoken wrote:
Bullza wrote:The Japanese soundtrack did no justice when it made all the intense and exciting scenes dull and boring.
Really? Show me please. Cause I never seen it
There's really no point in him showing you as you're never going to agree. It is all subjective after all. You said above that you like some of Faulconer's work but don't think it fits DBZ. Out of curiosity which score did you first watch the show with? If it was Kikuchi could it be possible that you're just so used to that score that you automatically don't like Faulconer in DBZ? I'm not saying that's the case or anything but it does seem to be with some people.

User avatar
TheGmGoken
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10592
Joined: Sun Apr 07, 2013 5:19 pm
Location: Capsule Corps

Re: In defense of the Faulconer score

Post by TheGmGoken » Mon Nov 04, 2013 4:29 pm

90sDBZ wrote:
TheGmGoken wrote:
Bullza wrote:The Japanese soundtrack did no justice when it made all the intense and exciting scenes dull and boring.
Really? Show me please. Cause I never seen it
There's really no point in him showing you as you're never going to agree. It is all subjective after all. You said above that you like some of Faulconer's work but don't think it fits DBZ. Out of curiosity which score did you first watch the show with? If it was Kikuchi could it be possible that you're just so used to that score that you automatically don't like Faulconer in DBZ? I'm not saying that's the case or anything but it does seem to be with some people.
Db - i saw with original score
Dbz - At least 10 episodes

In fact when i first when to USA I did like Bruce on dbz saying it was better than db score. Then when i turned 14 I. hated it on dbz and finish the Korean dub

User avatar
penguintruth
Banned
Posts: 4861
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 5:49 pm

Re: In defense of the Faulconer score

Post by penguintruth » Mon Nov 04, 2013 6:46 pm

The counterfeit soundtrack, which is what I call any replacement music of DBZ, whether you prefer it or not, is certainly not the music intended for the show, and therefore can never truly be the music of the show.

That aside, most of it's still very superficial, shallow, factory manufactured filler sound bed material. A lot of droning and croaking electronics and machine sounds, not something I object to as a rule, but utilized coldly and in excess. The real problem is that there's actually some potential in several pieces, but, and this is even more true of full tracks, the precious little good lasts for but moments and then lapses into nonsense static sounds.

It's a perfect representation of the English dub itself, though, which is why the dub so ill fits the Kikuchi track. Shallow, droning, and obnoxious. Blaring and manufactured. Stripping the spirit of the show.
Kentai wrote:Son Gokuu is a fascinating character anyway, because he is - at face value, anyway - an idiot savant. The victim of violent head trauma as an infant [...] he's a simple bumpkin with a fair share of brain damage who's natural talents to work out what's wrong compensate for his broad lack of common sense. But he's also a fighter, through and through [...] he fight until he has, in no uncertain terms, beaten his enemy on terms they can both acknowledge. He doesn't want to kill anyone, or even prove that he can win... he just wants to know he can. He's an ineffably charming bastard who's manly leanings were really incendental, and yes, the fact that he was voiced by a squeaky woman made the combination perhaps all the more charming.


Dragon Ball (Z) Kai Reviews!

Can I get a Schemen?

User avatar
Roland_ELoG
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 219
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2012 3:56 am
Contact:

Re: In defense of the Faulconer score

Post by Roland_ELoG » Mon Nov 04, 2013 8:31 pm

penguintruth wrote:The counterfeit soundtrack, which is what I call any replacement music of DBZ, whether you prefer it or not, is certainly not the music intended for the show, and therefore can never truly be the music of the show.
But you say that because the Japanese version is, to you, the original. Regardless of what I wish to think, I can't extricate the Faulconer score from my original experience of the show. Like I said: academic. You can tell me that the replacement score is bad, or that it doesn't fit. I believe you. But my brain doesn't.

In any case, the quality of the Faulconer score is two things. First, variable. There were many synthesists working on the score, each with their own styles. Second, subjective. A lot of people really like it, regardless of their feelings about the Japanese score. Are they dumb? Or wrong? No, they just have a different taste in music (some of them are probably dumb, but that's just statistics).

I should append a massive flashing bold-face disclaimer here; comments vis a vis "the Japanese music sux" piss me off too. It is infuriating.
A YouTube channel with no AMVs on it? I know, it's hard to believe.

User avatar
cRookie_Monster
OMG CRAZY REGEN
Posts: 951
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 7:41 pm
Location: Seattle, WA
Contact:

Re: In defense of the Faulconer score

Post by cRookie_Monster » Mon Nov 04, 2013 8:57 pm

penguintruth wrote:The counterfeit soundtrack, which is what I call any replacement music of DBZ, whether you prefer it or not, is certainly not the music intended for the show, and therefore can never truly be the music of the show.

That aside, most of it's still very superficial, shallow, factory manufactured filler sound bed material. A lot of droning and croaking electronics and machine sounds, not something I object to as a rule, but utilized coldly and in excess. The real problem is that there's actually some potential in several pieces, but, and this is even more true of full tracks, the precious little good lasts for but moments and then lapses into nonsense static sounds.

It's a perfect representation of the English dub itself, though, which is why the dub so ill fits the Kikuchi track. Shallow, droning, and obnoxious. Blaring and manufactured. Stripping the spirit of the show.
Superficial and shallow are of course subjective terms that could be applied to any score whether inspired by 60s or 90s cliches, but I'd like to hear more about what makes a score "factory manufactured". What I remember was along the lines of two guys coming to work everyday, analyzing scenes, pouring heart and soul into a low paying job with little credit, trying to work meaningful and emotional themes into a score while having to transition between 20 minute chains of musical pieces matched to picture. I hope by "factory" you aren't implying that we simply did our job with zero thought and were just going through the motions. Maybe it didn't come across to you personally, but there was quite a bit of passion put into making the score dramatic, appropriate, emotional, thematic, and exciting.
- Scott
http://morganstudios.com

User avatar
Roland_ELoG
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 219
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2012 3:56 am
Contact:

Re: In defense of the Faulconer score

Post by Roland_ELoG » Mon Nov 04, 2013 9:06 pm

Thanks for weighing in Mr. Morgan. :)

I have always felt love in the score, but your perspective is clearer than any.
A YouTube channel with no AMVs on it? I know, it's hard to believe.

User avatar
penguintruth
Banned
Posts: 4861
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 5:49 pm

Re: In defense of the Faulconer score

Post by penguintruth » Mon Nov 04, 2013 9:11 pm

cRookie_Monster wrote: Superficial and shallow are of course subjective terms that could be applied to any score whether inspired by 60s or 90s cliches, but I'd like to hear more about what makes a score "factory manufactured". What I remember was along the lines of two guys coming to work everyday, analyzing scenes, pouring heart and soul into a low paying job with little credit, trying to work meaningful and emotional themes into a score while having to transition between 20 minute chains of musical pieces matched to picture. I hope by "factory" you aren't implying that we simply did our job with zero thought and were just going through the motions. Maybe it didn't come across to you personally, but there was quite a bit of passion put into making the score dramatic, appropriate, emotional, thematic, and exciting.
Regardless of the intention, you didn't succeed in capturing what the show really was. You produced detached, soulless mass dreck that understood the material as poorly as the English dub it accompanied: hokey, jokey, run-of-the-mill action fare filler programming. It will never be DBZ music. It will always be counterfeit, both in fact and in spirit.

I will not sparse my words with apologetic softening. That is the exact heart of what I feel. It was a track that, even if it was good (it isn't), never should have existed.
Last edited by penguintruth on Mon Nov 04, 2013 9:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Kentai wrote:Son Gokuu is a fascinating character anyway, because he is - at face value, anyway - an idiot savant. The victim of violent head trauma as an infant [...] he's a simple bumpkin with a fair share of brain damage who's natural talents to work out what's wrong compensate for his broad lack of common sense. But he's also a fighter, through and through [...] he fight until he has, in no uncertain terms, beaten his enemy on terms they can both acknowledge. He doesn't want to kill anyone, or even prove that he can win... he just wants to know he can. He's an ineffably charming bastard who's manly leanings were really incendental, and yes, the fact that he was voiced by a squeaky woman made the combination perhaps all the more charming.


Dragon Ball (Z) Kai Reviews!

Can I get a Schemen?

User avatar
cRookie_Monster
OMG CRAZY REGEN
Posts: 951
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 7:41 pm
Location: Seattle, WA
Contact:

Re: In defense of the Faulconer score

Post by cRookie_Monster » Mon Nov 04, 2013 9:19 pm

penguintruth wrote:
cRookie_Monster wrote: Superficial and shallow are of course subjective terms that could be applied to any score whether inspired by 60s or 90s cliches, but I'd like to hear more about what makes a score "factory manufactured". What I remember was along the lines of two guys coming to work everyday, analyzing scenes, pouring heart and soul into a low paying job with little credit, trying to work meaningful and emotional themes into a score while having to transition between 20 minute chains of musical pieces matched to picture. I hope by "factory" you aren't implying that we simply did our job with zero thought and were just going through the motions. Maybe it didn't come across to you personally, but there was quite a bit of passion put into making the score dramatic, appropriate, emotional, thematic, and exciting.
Regardless of the intention, you didn't succeed in capturing what the show really was. You produced detached, soulless mass dreck that understood the material as poorly as the English dub it accompanied. It will never be DBZ music. It will always be counterfeit, both in fact in spirit.

I will not sparse my words with apologetic softening. That is the exact heart of what I feel. It was a track that, even if it was good (it isn't), never should have existed.
You are entitled to your opinion, which many do not share. Just remember the difference.
- Scott
http://morganstudios.com

Post Reply