qjz123 wrote:I believe Steve Franco said a while back that Dbz would never generate the sales required to justify a full blown restoration. I guess he was right.KingofWisdom wrote:Properly remastering the footage is too expensive to justify cheap box sets, which is the only thing casual fans will buy. The anger is justified.
http://www.kanzenshuu.com/forum/viewtop ... &start=340Shenron002:
So let me get this right, when they went to down convert it for DVD at 480p, they managed to damage the composition? and has nothing to do with the remastering you and your team applied to it?
Is there any chance that you and your team could do a frame by frame remastering by hand and realigning of the frames, that is comparable to Dragon Box/PONY Canyon's?
And is there any chance of turning it back to 4:3? I know if you turned the original Star Trek/Wizard of Oz to 16:9 there would be a heavy backlash of complaints for the Original Aspect Ratio.
Steve Franko:
here's the deal, i color corrected 16mm release prints with optical sound tracks. these prints are several generations down from the original interpositives (IP). i have to say for the age of the prints, they have held up remarkably well. in any case, you are correct, the original format was 4x3. the decision was not mine to re-crop these prints to fit into a 16x9 hd frame. that decision was made by the people at funimation. transfer was done 16x9 to a 24psf hd master. my job is to try to faithfully restore these prints as best as possible with in a tight budget. you are correct you can color correct frame by frame, but that would be cost prohibitive. until this project reaches the status of star wars, wizard of oz, snow white and the seven dwarfs, Lawrence of Arabia, sand pebbles and the godfather trilogy, this process will not happen. you really need to see these transfers on a hi def projector from the master transfer reels, then you might see the difference.
and you can see full links at here Steve Frank Responds






