If we assume the movies are the result of a divergence

Discussion regarding the entirety of the franchise in a general (meta) sense, including such aspects as: production, trends, merchandise, fan culture, and more.
User avatar
Hellspawn28
Patreon Supporter
Posts: 15722
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 9:50 pm
Location: Maryland, USA

Re: If we assume the movies are the result of a divergence

Post by Hellspawn28 » Sat Feb 22, 2014 10:29 pm

Trunks is nowhere to be mention in Movie 5. Goku would have told Coola that he was not the one that killed Freeza.
She/Her
PS5 username: Guyver_Spawn_27
LB Profile: https://letterboxd.com/Hellspawn28/

User avatar
RandomGuy96
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8881
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:57 pm
Location: San Diego, California, USA

Re: If we assume the movies are the result of a divergence

Post by RandomGuy96 » Sat Feb 22, 2014 10:30 pm

Hellspawn28 wrote:Trunks is nowhere to be mention in Movie 5. Goku would have told Coola that he was not the one that killed Freeza.
Why would he do that? Why would he care when there was barley a moment where Cooler wasn't actively trying to kill him?
The Monkey King wrote:
RandomGuy96 wrote:
dbgtFO wrote: Please elaborate as I do not know what you mean by "pushing Vegeta's destruction"
He's probably referring to the Bardock special. Zarbon was the one who first recommended destroying Planet Vegeta because the saiyans were rapidly growing in strength.
It was actually Beerus disguised as Zarbon #StayWoke
Herms wrote:The fact that the ridiculous power inflation is presented so earnestly makes me just roll my eyes and snicker. Like with Freeza, where he starts off over 10 times stronger than all his henchmen except Ginyu (because...well, just because), then we find out he can transform and get even more powerful, and then he reveals he can transform two more times, before finally coming out with the fact that he hasn't even been using anywhere near 50% of his power. Oh, and he can survive in the vacuum of space. All this stuff is just presented as the way Freeza is, without even an attempt at rationalizing it, yet the tone dictates we're supposed to take all this silly grasping at straws as thrilling danger. So I guess I don't really take the power inflation in the Boo arc seriously, but I don't take the power inflation in earlier arcs seriously either, so there's no net loss of seriousness. I think a silly story presented as serious is harder to accept than a silly story presented as silly.

User avatar
Polyphase Avatron
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 6643
Joined: Wed Mar 27, 2013 10:48 am

Re: If we assume the movies are the result of a divergence

Post by Polyphase Avatron » Sun Feb 23, 2014 12:11 am

RandomGuy96 wrote:
Hellspawn28 wrote:Trunks is nowhere to be mention in Movie 5. Goku would have told Coola that he was not the one that killed Freeza.
Why would he do that? Why would he care when there was barley a moment where Cooler wasn't actively trying to kill him?
Goku is naive. He might think that if Cooler knew he wasn't responsible for his brother's death then he might stop attacking him.
Cool stuff that I upload here because Youtube will copyright claim it: https://vimeo.com/user60967147

User avatar
some_weirdGuy
Not-So-Newbie
Posts: 73
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 6:31 am

Re: If we assume the movies are the result of a divergence

Post by some_weirdGuy » Sun Feb 23, 2014 8:02 am

That reminds me of the other thing I thought of with the cooler movie, which was that maybe it was set in future trunk's timeline. ;)

That infographic on the first page was pretty neat, pretty much exactly the sort of thing I was going for with this thread. I kinda like to think there are maybe 4 'timelines' max, and that each movie fits into atleast one of them, bonus points if they'd also fit within the timelines of trunks' time travelling :P ('main' timeline, future timeline, alternate main [with only trunks not cell], and alternate future [where cell then came from])
Like collab writing and enjoy the universe of Dragonball? Check out World of Dragonball: Souls

User avatar
RandomGuy96
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8881
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:57 pm
Location: San Diego, California, USA

Re: If we assume the movies are the result of a divergence

Post by RandomGuy96 » Sun Feb 23, 2014 8:10 am

Polyphase Avatron wrote:
RandomGuy96 wrote:
Hellspawn28 wrote:Trunks is nowhere to be mention in Movie 5. Goku would have told Coola that he was not the one that killed Freeza.
Why would he do that? Why would he care when there was barley a moment where Cooler wasn't actively trying to kill him?
Goku is naive. He might think that if Cooler knew he wasn't responsible for his brother's death then he might stop attacking him.
I... don't think he's quite that dumb.
The Monkey King wrote:
RandomGuy96 wrote:
dbgtFO wrote: Please elaborate as I do not know what you mean by "pushing Vegeta's destruction"
He's probably referring to the Bardock special. Zarbon was the one who first recommended destroying Planet Vegeta because the saiyans were rapidly growing in strength.
It was actually Beerus disguised as Zarbon #StayWoke
Herms wrote:The fact that the ridiculous power inflation is presented so earnestly makes me just roll my eyes and snicker. Like with Freeza, where he starts off over 10 times stronger than all his henchmen except Ginyu (because...well, just because), then we find out he can transform and get even more powerful, and then he reveals he can transform two more times, before finally coming out with the fact that he hasn't even been using anywhere near 50% of his power. Oh, and he can survive in the vacuum of space. All this stuff is just presented as the way Freeza is, without even an attempt at rationalizing it, yet the tone dictates we're supposed to take all this silly grasping at straws as thrilling danger. So I guess I don't really take the power inflation in the Boo arc seriously, but I don't take the power inflation in earlier arcs seriously either, so there's no net loss of seriousness. I think a silly story presented as serious is harder to accept than a silly story presented as silly.

User avatar
Polyphase Avatron
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 6643
Joined: Wed Mar 27, 2013 10:48 am

Re: If we assume the movies are the result of a divergence

Post by Polyphase Avatron » Sun Feb 23, 2014 6:41 pm

RandomGuy96 wrote:I... don't think he's quite that dumb.
He let Raditz go and gave Cell a senzu bean.
Cool stuff that I upload here because Youtube will copyright claim it: https://vimeo.com/user60967147

User avatar
RandomGuy96
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8881
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:57 pm
Location: San Diego, California, USA

Re: If we assume the movies are the result of a divergence

Post by RandomGuy96 » Sun Feb 23, 2014 6:56 pm

Polyphase Avatron wrote:
RandomGuy96 wrote:I... don't think he's quite that dumb.
He let Raditz go and gave Cell a senzu bean.
I don't think those are the same as this. Not even remotely. MAYBE the case of Raditz, but that's still different, and Goku should know better by now.
The Monkey King wrote:
RandomGuy96 wrote:
dbgtFO wrote: Please elaborate as I do not know what you mean by "pushing Vegeta's destruction"
He's probably referring to the Bardock special. Zarbon was the one who first recommended destroying Planet Vegeta because the saiyans were rapidly growing in strength.
It was actually Beerus disguised as Zarbon #StayWoke
Herms wrote:The fact that the ridiculous power inflation is presented so earnestly makes me just roll my eyes and snicker. Like with Freeza, where he starts off over 10 times stronger than all his henchmen except Ginyu (because...well, just because), then we find out he can transform and get even more powerful, and then he reveals he can transform two more times, before finally coming out with the fact that he hasn't even been using anywhere near 50% of his power. Oh, and he can survive in the vacuum of space. All this stuff is just presented as the way Freeza is, without even an attempt at rationalizing it, yet the tone dictates we're supposed to take all this silly grasping at straws as thrilling danger. So I guess I don't really take the power inflation in the Boo arc seriously, but I don't take the power inflation in earlier arcs seriously either, so there's no net loss of seriousness. I think a silly story presented as serious is harder to accept than a silly story presented as silly.

User avatar
garnetjester
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 289
Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2014 10:42 am
Location: Colombia

Re: If we assume the movies are the result of a divergence

Post by garnetjester » Sun Feb 23, 2014 7:31 pm

Also, the Cell thing was different because he just wanted for Gohan to have a better opponent. I think he might be dense about a lot of stuff, but when it comes to fighting he's not that dumb (bar the Raditz thing and possibly Freeza's second chance, although he had already one in that occasion, so it didn't really matter what he did with Freeza by then) I think the rest of his stupid fight-related things were more irresponsible than dumb, like giving Piccolo and Cell senzu beans and letting Vegeta escape just because of the prospect of more exciting fights in the future.
"Giving up is something we can do anytime, so let's head on, even if it's just a little bit!"

User avatar
Zephyr
I Live Here
Posts: 4418
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 9:20 pm

Re: If we assume the movies are the result of a divergence

Post by Zephyr » Sun Feb 23, 2014 8:20 pm

Made a thread on this a while back:

http://www.kanzenshuu.com/forum/viewtop ... +timelines

To summarize:

Movie Timeline 1 [1, 2, 3, 4]:
Because Movie 1 occurs, Gohan's power is known prior to the Saiyan arc, resulting in him being trained a bit by Goku before Raditz, making him more capable during the fight with Nappa and Vegeta. This essentially saves Goku from getting as brutal of a beating, allowing him to travel with Bulma, Gohan, and Krillin to Namek. Because Goku and Freeza would be tough to deal with simultaneously, Vegeta teams up with them much earlier. This leads to Freeza being beaten in his first form. They revive their friends, and Movies 2, 3, and 4 are able to happen.

Movie Timeline 2 [5, 6]:
Goku doesn't linger in space, and never masters SSj transformation. Trunks comes back to tell of the Androids. This leads to Movie 5, where he cannot transform at will. Seeing how helpless they were against a random invader who is supposed to be drastically inferior to the Androids, Piccolo and Kami agree to fuse in order to give them an extra edge. Piccolo here isn't as strong as he is in the main timeline, because he has less training with SSj Goku under his belt at the time of his fusion with Kami. This prompts bringing Dende to Earth to be the new Kami. The Big Gete Star nabs Coola, and Movie 6 happens.

Movie Timeline 3 [7]:
Since Cell wasn't around, Kami wasn't convinced to fuse with Piccolo. The blueprints found in Gero's lab were used to build a controller, which shut down #17 and #18. Movie 7 stems from this.

Movie Timeline 4 [8, 10, 11]:
The "Vegeta doesn't ruin everyone's plans" timeline. He goes to finish off Semi-Perfect Cell, who escapes via Taiyoken and goes into hiding. Goku and Gohan leave the RoSaT early. Movie 8 occurs, because Paragus, who was keeping a close eye on Earth, saw that things were safe. Afterwards, Cell sneakily nabs #18 and becomes Perfect, announces the Cell Games, etc. Seven years later, Movie 10 happens while Gohan and co. train for the 25th TB. When The Saiyans are confronting Babidi, Vegeta stays patient long enough for Babidi and Dabura to be slain. He gets his rematch with Goku afterwards. Goku leaves. Later on, Movie 11 happens, because #18 still bribed Mr. Satan.

Movie Timeline 5 [12]:
Ultimate/Mystic Gohan finishes Buu without letting him pull any shenanigans. Universe is saved, Goku and Vegeta are dead still. Movie 12 goes down. Black haired Gohan can one-shot Final Form Freeza.

Movies 9, 13, the JSAT, and BoG all fit well enough in the main timeline that I don't feel any of them are the result of alternate universes.

User avatar
RandomGuy96
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8881
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:57 pm
Location: San Diego, California, USA

Re: If we assume the movies are the result of a divergence

Post by RandomGuy96 » Sun Feb 23, 2014 8:24 pm

Ultimate/Mystic Gohan finishes Buu without letting him pull any shenanigans. Universe is saved, Goku and Vegeta are dead still. Movie 12 goes down. Black haired Gohan can one-shot Final Form Freeza.

Movies 9, 13, the JSAT, and BoG all fit well enough in the main timeline that I don't feel any of them are the result of alternate universes.
Goku said Fat Janemba was the greatest power he ever felt, so Ultimate Gohan can't be a thing in this universe.

Movies 9 and 14 actually have faaaaaaaar more errors than Movie 5.
The Monkey King wrote:
RandomGuy96 wrote:
dbgtFO wrote: Please elaborate as I do not know what you mean by "pushing Vegeta's destruction"
He's probably referring to the Bardock special. Zarbon was the one who first recommended destroying Planet Vegeta because the saiyans were rapidly growing in strength.
It was actually Beerus disguised as Zarbon #StayWoke
Herms wrote:The fact that the ridiculous power inflation is presented so earnestly makes me just roll my eyes and snicker. Like with Freeza, where he starts off over 10 times stronger than all his henchmen except Ginyu (because...well, just because), then we find out he can transform and get even more powerful, and then he reveals he can transform two more times, before finally coming out with the fact that he hasn't even been using anywhere near 50% of his power. Oh, and he can survive in the vacuum of space. All this stuff is just presented as the way Freeza is, without even an attempt at rationalizing it, yet the tone dictates we're supposed to take all this silly grasping at straws as thrilling danger. So I guess I don't really take the power inflation in the Boo arc seriously, but I don't take the power inflation in earlier arcs seriously either, so there's no net loss of seriousness. I think a silly story presented as serious is harder to accept than a silly story presented as silly.

User avatar
xmysticgohanx
Regular
Posts: 736
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2014 4:07 pm
Location: Phoenix, AZ, US

Re: If we assume the movies are the result of a divergence

Post by xmysticgohanx » Mon Feb 24, 2014 1:01 pm

some_weirdGuy wrote:That reminds me of the other thing I thought of with the cooler movie, which was that maybe it was set in future trunk's timeline. ;)
I agree with this.
Canon is Jaco, Dragon Ball except for EoZ, Dragon Ball Super anime and manga (both are separate canons)
Kai >>> Z
Current Roshi/Kulilin >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SSJ3 Gotenks

User avatar
Kid Buu
I Live Here
Posts: 4250
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 4:02 am
Location: United Kingdom

Re: If we assume the movies are the result of a divergence

Post by Kid Buu » Mon Feb 24, 2014 1:30 pm

Movie 1 takes place if Goku didn't let go off Raditz tail.
Rocketman wrote:"Shonen" basically means "stupid sentimental shit" anyway, so it's ok to be anti-shonen.

User avatar
Zephyr
I Live Here
Posts: 4418
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 9:20 pm

Re: If we assume the movies are the result of a divergence

Post by Zephyr » Mon Feb 24, 2014 1:39 pm

RandomGuy96 wrote:Goku said Fat Janemba was the greatest power he ever felt, so Ultimate Gohan can't be a thing in this universe.

Movies 9 and 14 actually have faaaaaaaar more errors than Movie 5.
Well in that case I guess the point of divergence would have to be Goku finishing Buu off when he first demonstrates SSj3.

I know Movie 14 has plenty of (easily reconcilable) errors, but what mistakes does 9 have?

User avatar
RandomGuy96
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8881
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:57 pm
Location: San Diego, California, USA

Re: If we assume the movies are the result of a divergence

Post by RandomGuy96 » Mon Feb 24, 2014 1:43 pm

Gohan in the Buu Saga states he hasn't seen is father since the Cell Games.
The Monkey King wrote:
RandomGuy96 wrote:
dbgtFO wrote: Please elaborate as I do not know what you mean by "pushing Vegeta's destruction"
He's probably referring to the Bardock special. Zarbon was the one who first recommended destroying Planet Vegeta because the saiyans were rapidly growing in strength.
It was actually Beerus disguised as Zarbon #StayWoke
Herms wrote:The fact that the ridiculous power inflation is presented so earnestly makes me just roll my eyes and snicker. Like with Freeza, where he starts off over 10 times stronger than all his henchmen except Ginyu (because...well, just because), then we find out he can transform and get even more powerful, and then he reveals he can transform two more times, before finally coming out with the fact that he hasn't even been using anywhere near 50% of his power. Oh, and he can survive in the vacuum of space. All this stuff is just presented as the way Freeza is, without even an attempt at rationalizing it, yet the tone dictates we're supposed to take all this silly grasping at straws as thrilling danger. So I guess I don't really take the power inflation in the Boo arc seriously, but I don't take the power inflation in earlier arcs seriously either, so there's no net loss of seriousness. I think a silly story presented as serious is harder to accept than a silly story presented as silly.

User avatar
Zephyr
I Live Here
Posts: 4418
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 9:20 pm

Re: If we assume the movies are the result of a divergence

Post by Zephyr » Mon Feb 24, 2014 2:09 pm

That's not far more errors than Movie 5, though. That's not even as bad of an error. Movie 5's error involves what a specific character is capable of, which requires a divergent timeline to occur. Movie 9's error can simply be explained with semantics and interpreting Gohan's line differently.

User avatar
RandomGuy96
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8881
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:57 pm
Location: San Diego, California, USA

Re: If we assume the movies are the result of a divergence

Post by RandomGuy96 » Mon Feb 24, 2014 2:20 pm

Zephyr wrote:That's not far more errors than Movie 5, though. That's not even as bad of an error. Movie 5's error involves what a specific character is capable of, which requires a divergent timeline to occur. Movie 9's error can simply be explained with semantics and interpreting Gohan's line differently.
It is "far more", as M5 has no errors.

No divergent timeline required. It's just typical Toei fight logic. Have the hero fight in a lower form and get stomped even though he has a higher form he can use at any time. The exact same thing happens in Movie 13.
The Monkey King wrote:
RandomGuy96 wrote:
dbgtFO wrote: Please elaborate as I do not know what you mean by "pushing Vegeta's destruction"
He's probably referring to the Bardock special. Zarbon was the one who first recommended destroying Planet Vegeta because the saiyans were rapidly growing in strength.
It was actually Beerus disguised as Zarbon #StayWoke
Herms wrote:The fact that the ridiculous power inflation is presented so earnestly makes me just roll my eyes and snicker. Like with Freeza, where he starts off over 10 times stronger than all his henchmen except Ginyu (because...well, just because), then we find out he can transform and get even more powerful, and then he reveals he can transform two more times, before finally coming out with the fact that he hasn't even been using anywhere near 50% of his power. Oh, and he can survive in the vacuum of space. All this stuff is just presented as the way Freeza is, without even an attempt at rationalizing it, yet the tone dictates we're supposed to take all this silly grasping at straws as thrilling danger. So I guess I don't really take the power inflation in the Boo arc seriously, but I don't take the power inflation in earlier arcs seriously either, so there's no net loss of seriousness. I think a silly story presented as serious is harder to accept than a silly story presented as silly.

User avatar
Zephyr
I Live Here
Posts: 4418
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 9:20 pm

Re: If we assume the movies are the result of a divergence

Post by Zephyr » Mon Feb 24, 2014 2:26 pm

RandomGuy96 wrote:No divergent timeline required. It's just typical Toei fight logic. Have the hero fight in a lower form and get stomped even though he has a higher form he can use at any time. The exact same thing happens in Movie 13.
So you're saying Goku intentionally didn't transform? I never once gathered that from the movie. I feel like that's more of a stretch than a simple not-100%-literal-interpretation of Gohan's line in the Buu arc.

And by "higher form" in Movie 13, do you mean Goku's finishing attack on Hildegarn?

User avatar
RandomGuy96
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8881
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:57 pm
Location: San Diego, California, USA

Re: If we assume the movies are the result of a divergence

Post by RandomGuy96 » Mon Feb 24, 2014 2:47 pm

Zephyr wrote:
RandomGuy96 wrote:No divergent timeline required. It's just typical Toei fight logic. Have the hero fight in a lower form and get stomped even though he has a higher form he can use at any time. The exact same thing happens in Movie 13.
So you're saying Goku intentionally didn't transform? I never once gathered that from the movie. I feel like that's more of a stretch than a simple not-100%-literal-interpretation of Gohan's line in the Buu arc.

And by "higher form" in Movie 13, do you mean Goku's finishing attack on Hildegarn?
Not a stretch at all. He does this in literally every movie.

I mean SS3.

He also doesn't use KK in Movie 4 when Slug is beating him to death. He doesn't use SS in Movie 7 until after 13 kicks the shit out of him. Tries to fight SS Broly in base in Movie 8. Etc.
The Monkey King wrote:
RandomGuy96 wrote:
dbgtFO wrote: Please elaborate as I do not know what you mean by "pushing Vegeta's destruction"
He's probably referring to the Bardock special. Zarbon was the one who first recommended destroying Planet Vegeta because the saiyans were rapidly growing in strength.
It was actually Beerus disguised as Zarbon #StayWoke
Herms wrote:The fact that the ridiculous power inflation is presented so earnestly makes me just roll my eyes and snicker. Like with Freeza, where he starts off over 10 times stronger than all his henchmen except Ginyu (because...well, just because), then we find out he can transform and get even more powerful, and then he reveals he can transform two more times, before finally coming out with the fact that he hasn't even been using anywhere near 50% of his power. Oh, and he can survive in the vacuum of space. All this stuff is just presented as the way Freeza is, without even an attempt at rationalizing it, yet the tone dictates we're supposed to take all this silly grasping at straws as thrilling danger. So I guess I don't really take the power inflation in the Boo arc seriously, but I don't take the power inflation in earlier arcs seriously either, so there's no net loss of seriousness. I think a silly story presented as serious is harder to accept than a silly story presented as silly.

User avatar
Zephyr
I Live Here
Posts: 4418
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 9:20 pm

Re: If we assume the movies are the result of a divergence

Post by Zephyr » Mon Feb 24, 2014 3:40 pm

Well that's fair I guess. But that still seems erroneous, in every single one of those cases, from an in-universe perspective. Just feels out of character. I mean I guess you can use the "Goku's just being a silly Saiyan and dragging the battle on because he gets off on it" explanation, which he does numerous times in the manga. But in the manga, he only seemed to do that when he and his opponent were equals, not when he was getting pulverized by his opponent.

So I guess the real question at hand is "do out of character moments count as errors?"

User avatar
Hellspawn28
Patreon Supporter
Posts: 15722
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 9:50 pm
Location: Maryland, USA

Re: If we assume the movies are the result of a divergence

Post by Hellspawn28 » Mon Feb 24, 2014 6:00 pm

Movie 6 was most likely written as a what if given that the movie came out a year before the Cell Games happen in the manga. I still believe that both Coola movies take place in the same universe and Kami must have known about #17 & #18 arriving. Unless #17 and #18 are weak as shit in the Coola universe.
She/Her
PS5 username: Guyver_Spawn_27
LB Profile: https://letterboxd.com/Hellspawn28/

Post Reply