Was Stephanie Nadolny Really That Bad As Gohan?

Discussion regarding the entirety of the franchise in a general (meta) sense, including such aspects as: production, trends, merchandise, fan culture, and more.
User avatar
thatdbzguy
Banned
Posts: 880
Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2013 12:27 am

Was Stephanie Nadolny Really That Bad As Gohan?

Post by thatdbzguy » Mon Feb 24, 2014 12:50 am

I know most people here don't think too highly of Stephanie's voice work, particularly for Gohan. Now of course, I won't deny that she was pretty terrible when she first started out, like the rest of the cast of the old Funi dub, but what about her voice work for seasons 1 & 2 of the remastered sets?

In my opinion, I think she did a fine job there. Was her voice still a bit too deep for a 5-year-old? Probably, but not so much to the point where I couldn't go with it, and at least it wasn't grating to listen to like Colleen's, IMO. As far as her actual acting goes, she definitely shows improvement, and I feel that she was able to really bring out Gohan's character more than ever. Was her acting as good as Colleen's? Probably not, but I don't think that it was terrible by any means.

And what about the video games? Like with the remastered sets of seasons 1 & 2, I felt like she did a good job with Gohan for the same reasons stated before.

So is she really that bad?
Last edited by thatdbzguy on Mon Feb 24, 2014 12:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
Khalid Shahin wrote:
Dragon Soul Funimation Lyrics wrote:Nothing ever dies; we will rise again!
Yeah, pretty much sums the show up right there.

User avatar
Kid Buu
I Live Here
Posts: 4224
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 4:02 am
Location: United Kingdom

Re: Was Stephanie Nadolny Really That Bad As Gohan?

Post by Kid Buu » Mon Feb 24, 2014 12:54 am

I don't have a problem with her or her Gohan at all.
Rocketman wrote:"Shonen" basically means "stupid sentimental shit" anyway, so it's ok to be anti-shonen.

User avatar
Gyt Kaliba
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8869
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2007 1:38 am
Location: Arkansas
Contact:

Re: Was Stephanie Nadolny Really That Bad As Gohan?

Post by Gyt Kaliba » Mon Feb 24, 2014 12:56 am

I realize I'm in the minority on this one, but I can deal with her Gohan about 80% of the time. The only times I find it truly terrible are for Gohan when he's like 5 at the start of the series, and then back when they first started (though there it was more to do with her not having become as good of an actress yet than it did with her voice). Everything else, particularly her Cell Games work, I actually like pretty well. I can see why so many others don't, but for me it's enjoyable - but I admit I have some nostalgic bias there too.

And though slightly off topic, she's still my favorite English voice for young Goku.
AniManga Travelogue - Currently Reviewing: Dragon Ball (Z)
Twitter
Switch Friend Code: SW-0745-6427-7791 (let's play some Dragon Ball: The Breakers!)

User avatar
helsinkirocks
Not-So-Newbie
Posts: 64
Joined: Sat Aug 03, 2013 5:08 am
Location: Ohio
Contact:

Re: Was Stephanie Nadolny Really That Bad As Gohan?

Post by helsinkirocks » Mon Feb 24, 2014 1:03 am

I think her voice work captures the character of "Gohan" better than anyone, even Nozawa.

She's grating, annoying, whiny, and in general pretty sub-par- all qualities that make up the core of Gohan's character.

User avatar
thatdbzguy
Banned
Posts: 880
Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2013 12:27 am

Re: Was Stephanie Nadolny Really That Bad As Gohan?

Post by thatdbzguy » Mon Feb 24, 2014 1:13 am

helsinkirocks wrote:She's grating, annoying, whiny,
I personally think Colleen has Nadolny beat in those particular areas.
Khalid Shahin wrote:
Dragon Soul Funimation Lyrics wrote:Nothing ever dies; we will rise again!
Yeah, pretty much sums the show up right there.

RocktheDragon
Regular
Posts: 586
Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2014 7:03 pm
Location: North Orange County, California
Contact:

Re: Was Stephanie Nadolny Really That Bad As Gohan?

Post by RocktheDragon » Mon Feb 24, 2014 1:21 am

Nostalgia probably makes a huge difference for me too but I absolutely admire Stephanie Nadolny as Gohan. Especially during the Cell games and Androids arc, there is just way too many fond memories for anything to ever corrupt my opinion about her voice work.

Her voice was never an issue for me and is still probably my favorite English voice for any character in DBZ.
Kyle Broflovski wrote:It's all real. Think about it. Haven't Luke Skywalker and Santa Claus affected your lives more than most real people in this room? I mean, whether Jesus is real or not, he - he's had a bigger impact on the world than any of us have. And the same can be said for Bugs Bunny and - and Superman and Harry Potter. They've changed my life - changed the way I act on the earth. Doesn't that make them kind of real? They might be imaginary but, but they're more important than most of us here. And they're all gonna be around here long after we're dead. So, in a way, those things are more realer than any of us.

GS7X7
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1109
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 10:03 pm

Re: Was Stephanie Nadolny Really That Bad As Gohan?

Post by GS7X7 » Mon Feb 24, 2014 1:31 am

Her Gohan was fairly good but her Goku was great!
Sean Schemmel is THE MAN! :)

Me- "Also, before anyone mentions it, Schemmel's interview was from nearly 15 years ago. He paid a brief visit to Kanzenshuu's forums a few years back and earned legendary respect that cancels out anything he said from that long ago. :D"

User avatar
penguintruth
Banned
Posts: 4861
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 5:49 pm

Re: Was Stephanie Nadolny Really That Bad As Gohan?

Post by penguintruth » Mon Feb 24, 2014 1:56 am

That excessively husky voice, those constant whimpering noises she makes, the lack of genuine emotional dimension... and THAT LAUGH. I still wake up in a cold sweat some nights with that echoing in my skull. It is the sound of souls disintegrating in a blasphemous ancient fire breathed by an unforgiving Old One.

No, sir, I didn't like it.
Kentai wrote:Son Gokuu is a fascinating character anyway, because he is - at face value, anyway - an idiot savant. The victim of violent head trauma as an infant [...] he's a simple bumpkin with a fair share of brain damage who's natural talents to work out what's wrong compensate for his broad lack of common sense. But he's also a fighter, through and through [...] he fight until he has, in no uncertain terms, beaten his enemy on terms they can both acknowledge. He doesn't want to kill anyone, or even prove that he can win... he just wants to know he can. He's an ineffably charming bastard who's manly leanings were really incendental, and yes, the fact that he was voiced by a squeaky woman made the combination perhaps all the more charming.


Dragon Ball (Z) Kai Reviews!

Can I get a Schemen?

Codarik
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1030
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2010 2:20 am
Location: Snake Way

Re: Was Stephanie Nadolny Really That Bad As Gohan?

Post by Codarik » Mon Feb 24, 2014 2:09 am

The only time she was "bad" was at the beginning of Z, she made Gohan sound a lot older. Other than that she was just fine. Her Goku was great though.

User avatar
rs_chaosmaster
Regular
Posts: 716
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 1:40 pm

Re: Was Stephanie Nadolny Really That Bad As Gohan?

Post by rs_chaosmaster » Mon Feb 24, 2014 2:15 am

She wasn't a bad Gohan but i would rather have Colleen as gohan and her as kid goku think of it logically it is extremely unlikely that gohan and goku as a kid would both sound exactly the same. So I prefer having two different VA's for the two roles!!!

User avatar
Gyt Kaliba
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8869
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2007 1:38 am
Location: Arkansas
Contact:

Re: Was Stephanie Nadolny Really That Bad As Gohan?

Post by Gyt Kaliba » Mon Feb 24, 2014 2:27 am

penguintruth wrote:That excessively husky voice, those constant whimpering noises she makes, the lack of genuine emotional dimension... and THAT LAUGH. I still wake up in a cold sweat some nights with that echoing in my skull. It is the sound of souls disintegrating in a blasphemous ancient fire breathed by an unforgiving Old One.
Funny, replace 'husky' with 'screechy', and ignore the fact that she actually is a great actress despite how shrill she can be at times...and that's pretty much how I feel about Monica Rial at times.

HAYOO.
AniManga Travelogue - Currently Reviewing: Dragon Ball (Z)
Twitter
Switch Friend Code: SW-0745-6427-7791 (let's play some Dragon Ball: The Breakers!)

User avatar
DarkPrince_92
I Live Here
Posts: 3492
Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2011 2:09 pm
Location: Glendale, CA
Contact:

Re: Was Stephanie Nadolny Really That Bad As Gohan?

Post by DarkPrince_92 » Mon Feb 24, 2014 2:32 am

I like her as Kid Goku, not too much as Gohan. Goku's goofy as a kid, and she got it. Gohan is too serious as a kid, I think Coleen is better suited for him.
I am a freelance animator, check out my thangs. ART!

Check my webcomic series Off Guard now on webtoons!

PSN/Steam: MOSLittGaming

Gaming Channel/Socials: MOSLittGaming

User avatar
OmegaRockman
Patreon Supporter
Posts: 824
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 4:16 pm

Re: Was Stephanie Nadolny Really That Bad As Gohan?

Post by OmegaRockman » Mon Feb 24, 2014 3:36 am

I always thought she was good as Gohan, but I definitely prefer Clinkenbeard. I'm kind of a fanboy of hers, though, so it's not suprising. However, Nozawa blows them both away in my opinion. I do think that Nadolny was extremely unfitting for those early episodes when Gohan's four. Acting ability aside, she made Gohan sound too old. Other than that and Season 3, though, I thought she was fine.
The self-proclaimed World's Biggest Dragon Ball Kai Fan™

My YouTube

User avatar
ConfusedPhantom
Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
Posts: 405
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2010 1:16 am

Re: Was Stephanie Nadolny Really That Bad As Gohan?

Post by ConfusedPhantom » Mon Feb 24, 2014 3:39 am

I didn't care for her Gohan, but I don't mind her Goku, honestly.

User avatar
TheGreatness25
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5004
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 9:36 am

Re: Was Stephanie Nadolny Really That Bad As Gohan?

Post by TheGreatness25 » Mon Feb 24, 2014 4:31 am

She was okay. The early Gohan work was weak, but so was a lot of FUNimation. She got much better over time. She brought a cuteness to Goku somehow... Yeah, somehow she did.

What I don't get is that everyone is sooo happy with Colleen Clickenbeard's Gohan and yet...honestly, I don't see it as a huge difference from Nadolny's Gohan. Really, there is nothing "better" about Clickenbeard's performance. Now Saffron Henderson did an incredible job. I am not one of those people that claims the Ocean dub was much better, but Henderson's Gohan, McNeil's Piccolo and Corlette's Goku were awesome to me. I like Corlette the best, followed up by Schemmel (later work). I know Kelamis is the one that came closest to sounding like the Japanese version, but I never really cared for his performance.

Anyway, the train is falling off the rails here. I never minded Nadolny's work. And I feel that it was extremely useless to recast her. It's not like it's so much better now. It kind of sucks that everything was pretty much dubbed by the same voice actors and then boom, a huge character was changed just for the sake of being changed. I didn't like that, but oh well. I'm not an exec at FUNimation.

User avatar
Kid Buu
I Live Here
Posts: 4224
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 4:02 am
Location: United Kingdom

Re: Was Stephanie Nadolny Really That Bad As Gohan?

Post by Kid Buu » Mon Feb 24, 2014 4:33 am

TheGreatness25 wrote: It kind of sucks that everything was pretty much dubbed by the same voice actors and then boom, a huge character was changed just for the sake of being changed. I didn't like that, but oh well. I'm not an exec at FUNimation.
I agree with this. If it was up to me, I would have just made an entire new cast from scratch.
Rocketman wrote:"Shonen" basically means "stupid sentimental shit" anyway, so it's ok to be anti-shonen.

User avatar
penguintruth
Banned
Posts: 4861
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 5:49 pm

Re: Was Stephanie Nadolny Really That Bad As Gohan?

Post by penguintruth » Mon Feb 24, 2014 4:37 am

If I recall, Stephanie Nadolny wasn't available because she doesn't voice act anymore.

As for why Clinkenbeard's better, it's pretty clear. Her Gohan voice evolves and she's just got plain better acting chops. It's easier to believe the genuineness of Gohan's emotions with her behind the mic.

It was lucky Clinkenbeard came into the role. Nadolny was driving me crazy with those stupid sounds she would make and that empty delivery.
TheGreatness25 wrote:I like Corlette the best, followed up by Schemmel (later work). I know Kelamis is the one that came closest to sounding like the Japanese version, but I never really cared for his performance.
Corlett left zero impression on me. He was just a generic action cartoon lead voice, kind of bland, not offensive, but just kind of there. I have to keep finding videos of his performance to even remember him.
Kentai wrote:Son Gokuu is a fascinating character anyway, because he is - at face value, anyway - an idiot savant. The victim of violent head trauma as an infant [...] he's a simple bumpkin with a fair share of brain damage who's natural talents to work out what's wrong compensate for his broad lack of common sense. But he's also a fighter, through and through [...] he fight until he has, in no uncertain terms, beaten his enemy on terms they can both acknowledge. He doesn't want to kill anyone, or even prove that he can win... he just wants to know he can. He's an ineffably charming bastard who's manly leanings were really incendental, and yes, the fact that he was voiced by a squeaky woman made the combination perhaps all the more charming.


Dragon Ball (Z) Kai Reviews!

Can I get a Schemen?

User avatar
Kendamu
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 7000
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 10:31 am
Location: The Martial Arts World

Re: Was Stephanie Nadolny Really That Bad As Gohan?

Post by Kendamu » Mon Feb 24, 2014 4:51 am

It was a voice that I got used to hearing, but I didn't particularly love it or anything. People tend to talk about their nostalgia for the FUNi cast and whatnot but my nostalgia goes back a tiny bit further. At the time that DBZ was getting popular in the US, "my" Gohan was Saffron Henderson. So, Stephanie Nadolny was pretty much a cheap imitation of a voice I already loved.

Colleen Clinkenbeard, on the other hand, is a wonderful Gohan that reminds me of Henderson's take while not being a copy of it. When Kai came about, I never thought to myself, "They better replace Stephanie Nadolny," but the fact that they did was for the better when it comes to my preferences.

User avatar
DBZ Mick
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1130
Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 1:38 am
Location: Australia

Re: Was Stephanie Nadolny Really That Bad As Gohan?

Post by DBZ Mick » Mon Feb 24, 2014 4:54 am

I kinda liked her Goku in GT but I just think her voice was all wrong for Gohan. It just didn't sound like a kid at all.
It is in his character to be rude and a bit crass. He's a hick, with no formal education. That is Son Goku. That is who he is.

Superman in an orange Gi was the bastard son of FUNimation. Its not The real character, it is as false as Chatku.

-DemonRin

User avatar
Blade
I Live Here
Posts: 2267
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 2:45 pm
Location: Contrary to popular belief, not on Kanzenshuu forums.

Re: Was Stephanie Nadolny Really That Bad As Gohan?

Post by Blade » Mon Feb 24, 2014 5:13 am

Nadolny isn't bad as Gohan or Goku - just a little limited. Her performances only ever seem to cover a certain stretch of ground, and consequently can be pretty one dimensional.

I think most people's problems with her have more to do with the actual textual qualities of her voice, and whilst she's not a total ringer for Nozawa as far as Western counterparts go - if you scrub out the Southern drawl I don't think she's light years away.

I'd rather Nadolny than Clickenbeard, who I find to be equally as one dimensional but more grating on the ear.
'Multiculturalism means nothing in Japan, for every outside culture must pass first through the Japanese filter, rendering it entirely Japanese in the process.' - Julian Cope.

Post Reply