Did Goku Need More Development?

Discussion regarding the entirety of the franchise in a general (meta) sense, including such aspects as: production, trends, merchandise, fan culture, and more.
User avatar
garnetjester
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 289
Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2014 10:42 am
Location: Colombia

Re: Did Goku Need More Development?

Post by garnetjester » Wed Apr 23, 2014 6:03 pm

I agree that if I had to pick a dad I'd go with Goku. He might be irresponsible (understatement of the year!) but he genuinely cares about his sons and shows affection towards them. Vegeta however, might be full of undying love for his wife and son but they're pretty close to never even knowing which is pretty awful. And even if Goku doesn't "get" the concept of family, I think he really cares about his, in his own flawed simplistic Goku way, but still.
"Giving up is something we can do anytime, so let's head on, even if it's just a little bit!"

superfunk
Not-So-Newbie
Posts: 84
Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2013 12:03 pm

Re: Did Goku Need More Development?

Post by superfunk » Wed Apr 23, 2014 8:21 pm

ABED wrote:
superfunk wrote:Automatically disqualifies him from being a good father? Not according to Toriyama and the DB universe it doesn't, in a fictional story that is all that counts, and even if he is a bad parent, Goku is worse.
Yeah, this is a fictional universe where you can pile up a mountain of dead bodies that would make Mao say, "that's extreme!"

What would ever lead you to say Vegeta's better? What actions specifically on his part scream that to be the case? He doesn't hang around Trunks, and he punches him out of frustration. Goku isn't always around, but he was around for the first years of Gohan's life, and the 3 or 4 years after he got back from Namek. It's clear that he loves his son, and shows affection for him. He never punched Gohan out of frustration. The one time he did hit him was to protect him from rushing to his death. When he comes back to life, the first thing he does is embrace the son he didn't know he had. And he comes back to life the next day and spends the next couple years with his family. Yes, he flies off with Uub, but he can teleport. Tell me what Vegeta has over him?
Sometimes simple characters are the best.
Very true. I love Community, clearly, and Abed doesn't really change, but he's the best character on the show.
There is evidence to suggest that Goku cares more about kulilin than his family, it certainly seems like it. In that scene where he saves dende and mr.satan instead of his sons, he literally looks at his sons first and decides to save dende and satan. There is no mention later that he maybe saved dende because of his healing powers. Vegeta is pissed that his son died, Goku shows no emotion and in the anime just gives a goofy grin to vegeta berating him for choosing them over their sons. Yeah vegeta punched trunks while training, he also was sorry for it and took him to the amusement park. What makes you say he doesn't hang around trunks? we don't see enough of their private lives for you to make that claim, he seems to be around him allot in the buu saga. This compared to Goku's record of "being around" is superb. There is another Toriyama interview on this site where Akira says something along the lines of goku being an unfit parent, sorry I don't know which one, there are so many interviews now. This along with the other interview in which Toriyama talks about Goku and his family would suggest that the creator himself thinks Vegeta is a better father(yeah, it is not expressly said). Goku "loves" his family while Vegeta loves his family.

User avatar
garnetjester
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 289
Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2014 10:42 am
Location: Colombia

Re: Did Goku Need More Development?

Post by garnetjester » Wed Apr 23, 2014 11:05 pm

That's not true. In the scene after Goku picks up Satan and Dende he thinks he can make it back to his sons, and then he realizes he won't even have time to do the shunkan ido which is when Kibitoshin helps him. In the manga right after the explosion of Earth Goku looks upset that the Earth blew up with Gohan and co, and when Vegeta berates him he seems pretty upset about it too.
"Giving up is something we can do anytime, so let's head on, even if it's just a little bit!"

superfunk
Not-So-Newbie
Posts: 84
Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2013 12:03 pm

Re: Did Goku Need More Development?

Post by superfunk » Thu Apr 24, 2014 5:44 am

I Know that. When he says there is no time left, doesn't change the fact that he looks at his sons first and then decides to save Dende and Satan first, for seemingly no practical reason. Just another example of Goku putting almost anyone before his family.

User avatar
Gonstead
I Live Here
Posts: 3500
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 9:33 am
Location: New Zealand
Contact:

Re: Did Goku Need More Development?

Post by Gonstead » Thu Apr 24, 2014 6:53 am

superfunk wrote:I Know that. When he says there is no time left, doesn't change the fact that he looks at his sons first and then decides to save Dende and Satan first, for seemingly no practical reason. Just another example of Goku putting almost anyone before his family.
garnetjester just explained the reason. Dende and Satan were closer, so naturally they would be picked up first before attempting to try and grab their sons and Piccolo. Goku tried to save everyone that he could, but just did not have enough time to do so.

Should we now start criticizing Goku for not saving Tien and Chaozu? Pretty sure they never made it out alive either.
Visit DragonBallFigures for all your Dragon Ball figure info and needs!
Mayuri Kurotsuchi wrote:"In this world, nothing perfect exists. It may be a cliche after all but it's the way things are. That's precisely why ordinary men pursue the concept of perfection, it's infatuation. But ultimately I have to ask myself "What is the true meaning of being perfect?" and the answer I came up with was nothing. Not one thing. The truth of the matter is I despise perfection! If something is truly perfect, that's IT! The bottom line becomes there is no room for imagination! No space for intelligence or ability or improvement! Do you understand? To men of science like us, perfection is a dead end, a condition of hopelessness. Always strive to be better than anything that came before you but not perfect! Scientist's agonize over the attempt to achieve perfection! That's the kind of creatures we are! We take joy in trying to exceed our grasp, in trying to reach for something that in the end, we have to admit may in fact be unreachable!"
MY HOLY GRAIL (110% Serious. Please sell me one)

superfunk
Not-So-Newbie
Posts: 84
Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2013 12:03 pm

Re: Did Goku Need More Development?

Post by superfunk » Thu Apr 24, 2014 8:04 am

In the anime his sons are closer, in the manga you can't see who's closer.

User avatar
Rukura
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1848
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 4:29 pm
Location: Space Lisbon, Space Portugal

Re: Did Goku Need More Development?

Post by Rukura » Thu Apr 24, 2014 12:03 pm

In response to the original post, and maybe this has already been pointed out (but is usually still the most accurate answer), Dragon Ball Z fans that want more Goku character development already missed 153 episodes of it.
Full checklist of all Xenoverse clothing pieces, accessories and Z-Souls (Many thanks to jrdemr for the Z-Souls sheet): https://www.dropbox.com/s/u8vxc8m0fehev ... .xlsx?dl=0

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20481
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: Did Goku Need More Development?

Post by ABED » Thu Apr 24, 2014 12:19 pm

What sort of development are people looking for from Goku?
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

User avatar
B
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5563
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 10:15 am
Contact:

Re: Did Goku Need More Development?

Post by B » Thu Apr 24, 2014 1:36 pm

Goku was fully developed when we met him and his job was to influence and inflict growth out of the tertiary cast. It wouldn't have been the worst thing in the world for Goku to have some inner turmoil, but ultimately that's not who he was and he plays his role to great effect.
Keen Observation of Dragon Ball Z Movie 4's Climax wrote:Slug shits to see the genki

User avatar
Marco Polo
I Live Here
Posts: 2973
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2012 9:44 pm

Re: Did Goku Need More Development?

Post by Marco Polo » Thu Apr 24, 2014 5:31 pm

ABED wrote:What sort of development are people looking for from Goku?
Marco Polo wrote:I disagree with penguintruth. Character development doesn't mean it has to be complex. Goku had plenty of development pre-Saiyan Saga yet that didn't particularly make him a complex character. Character development is just growth, and there's always room to grow as a fighter. I mean, isn't that the whole point of a shonen protagonist?

Goku is a guy that just wants to fight stronger and stronger opponents. When he loses to someone, all he has to do is find a way to get stronger and then he'll defeat the opponent. How does he find that way? Not through boring, mindless training. He does it through character development! For example:

-When we learned why he chose to master Full-Power SSJ instead of Ascended SSJ, that was character development.
-When he had to change plans after Piccolo made him realize Gohan doesn't like fighting, that was character development, as someone said above.
-When we saw newfound excitement in him when he met Uub because training with Goten just doesn't cut it anymore, that was character development.
-When he tried to find a way to beat Birus (and learned to stay SSJ God even after the spell had worn off), that was character development.

Notice how, in three of these examples, he grew through the actions of others. Other people change thanks to him, but the reverse is also true.

On the other hand, Goku didn't grow at all in the Buu Saga (aside from the random wish for Buu to reincarnate, at the very last end) -- he was already stronger than Fat Buu, and he messed up big time.

So I guess my point is that character development doesn't have to imply complexity, just growth as a fighter in the case of Goku. There was plenty of that pre-Saiyan Saga, but not as much in DBZ, and practically none in the Buu Saga.

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20481
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: Did Goku Need More Development?

Post by ABED » Thu Apr 24, 2014 7:22 pm

-When we learned why he chose to master Full-Power SSJ instead of Ascended SSJ, that was character development.
-When he had to change plans after Piccolo made him realize Gohan doesn't like fighting, that was character development, as someone said above.
-When we saw newfound excitement in him when he met Uub because training with Goten just doesn't cut it anymore, that was character development.
-When he tried to find a way to beat Birus (and learned to stay SSJ God even after the spell had worn off), that was character development.

Is that really character development?
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

User avatar
TheGmGoken
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10592
Joined: Sun Apr 07, 2013 5:19 pm
Location: Capsule Corps

Re: Did Goku Need More Development?

Post by TheGmGoken » Thu Apr 24, 2014 7:36 pm

Marco Polo wrote:
ABED wrote:What sort of development are people looking for from Goku?
Marco Polo wrote:I disagree with penguintruth. Character development doesn't mean it has to be complex. Goku had plenty of development pre-Saiyan Saga yet that didn't particularly make him a complex character. Character development is just growth, and there's always room to grow as a fighter. I mean, isn't that the whole point of a shonen protagonist?

Goku is a guy that just wants to fight stronger and stronger opponents. When he loses to someone, all he has to do is find a way to get stronger and then he'll defeat the opponent. How does he find that way? Not through boring, mindless training. He does it through character development! For example:

-When we learned why he chose to master Full-Power SSJ instead of Ascended SSJ, that was character development.
-When he had to change plans after Piccolo made him realize Gohan doesn't like fighting, that was character development, as someone said above.
-When we saw newfound excitement in him when he met Uub because training with Goten just doesn't cut it anymore, that was character development.
-When he tried to find a way to beat Birus (and learned to stay SSJ God even after the spell had worn off), that was character development.

Notice how, in three of these examples, he grew through the actions of others. Other people change thanks to him, but the reverse is also true.

On the other hand, Goku didn't grow at all in the Buu Saga (aside from the random wish for Buu to reincarnate, at the very last end) -- he was already stronger than Fat Buu, and he messed up big time.

So I guess my point is that character development doesn't have to imply complexity, just growth as a fighter in the case of Goku. There was plenty of that pre-Saiyan Saga, but not as much in DBZ, and practically none in the Buu Saga.
Freeza arc? Cell arc? I mean by time Boo arc began we didn't need ANYMORE development for Goku. He seen and fought it all by now. Why he needs more. Not every character need development every single arc.

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20481
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: Did Goku Need More Development?

Post by ABED » Thu Apr 24, 2014 7:49 pm

The person that needed development the most was Gohan in the Cell arc. If he's gonna take Goku's mantle, he should've been at the forefront of the story more, and by the end, I would've preferred it if his father didn't have to convince him not to throw in the towel against Cell.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

User avatar
MediaFanGirl93
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 283
Joined: Thu Nov 28, 2013 11:43 pm

Re: Did Goku Need More Development?

Post by MediaFanGirl93 » Thu Apr 24, 2014 8:00 pm

Well, this reminds me of a Tumblr post I made with me asking the others if they felt that Goku was a flat character. I don't really think he's flat, but I think Goku should have developed a lot more in the...say..Cell Arc, along with Gohan (even though I dislike how fans rag on him for his OOC behavior there).

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20481
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: Did Goku Need More Development?

Post by ABED » Thu Apr 24, 2014 8:01 pm

MediaFanGirl93 wrote:Well, this reminds me of a Tumblr post I made with me asking the others if they felt that Goku was a flat character. I don't really think he's flat, but I think Goku should have developed a lot more in the...say..Cell Arc, along with Gohan (even though I dislike how fans rag on him for his OOC behavior there).
It's Gohan's passivity that bothers me more, it's not a good trait in a main hero.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

User avatar
TheGmGoken
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10592
Joined: Sun Apr 07, 2013 5:19 pm
Location: Capsule Corps

Re: Did Goku Need More Development?

Post by TheGmGoken » Thu Apr 24, 2014 8:07 pm

ABED wrote:
MediaFanGirl93 wrote:Well, this reminds me of a Tumblr post I made with me asking the others if they felt that Goku was a flat character. I don't really think he's flat, but I think Goku should have developed a lot more in the...say..Cell Arc, along with Gohan (even though I dislike how fans rag on him for his OOC behavior there).
It's Gohan's passivity that bothers me more, it's not a good trait in a main hero.
Please don't turn this to a Gohan ooc topic. Anyways Goku did develop in the Cell arc @MediaFanGirl

User avatar
MediaFanGirl93
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 283
Joined: Thu Nov 28, 2013 11:43 pm

Re: Did Goku Need More Development?

Post by MediaFanGirl93 » Thu Apr 24, 2014 9:24 pm

ABED wrote:
MediaFanGirl93 wrote:Well, this reminds me of a Tumblr post I made with me asking the others if they felt that Goku was a flat character. I don't really think he's flat, but I think Goku should have developed a lot more in the...say..Cell Arc, along with Gohan (even though I dislike how fans rag on him for his OOC behavior there).
It's Gohan's passivity that bothers me more, it's not a good trait in a main hero.
With Gohan, it was more of him having self-esteem issues. Even Goku had to push him into believing himself to beat Cell in the final showdown.
TheGmGoken wrote:Please don't turn this to a Gohan ooc topic. Anyways Goku did develop in the Cell arc @MediaFanGirl
Okay, I will try not to. Also, how do you think Goku developed.?

User avatar
TheGmGoken
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10592
Joined: Sun Apr 07, 2013 5:19 pm
Location: Capsule Corps

Re: Did Goku Need More Development?

Post by TheGmGoken » Thu Apr 24, 2014 9:52 pm

Simple. He becomes similar to Muten Roshi during Ten Arc. He becomes a mentor to Gohan and pass the torch. Even in Boo arc he wants the New Generation to take over. Sounds familiar don't it.

User avatar
RandomGuy96
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8881
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:57 pm
Location: San Diego, California, USA

Re: Did Goku Need More Development?

Post by RandomGuy96 » Thu Apr 24, 2014 10:06 pm

superfunk wrote:
ABED wrote:
superfunk wrote:Automatically disqualifies him from being a good father? Not according to Toriyama and the DB universe it doesn't, in a fictional story that is all that counts, and even if he is a bad parent, Goku is worse.
Yeah, this is a fictional universe where you can pile up a mountain of dead bodies that would make Mao say, "that's extreme!"

What would ever lead you to say Vegeta's better? What actions specifically on his part scream that to be the case? He doesn't hang around Trunks, and he punches him out of frustration. Goku isn't always around, but he was around for the first years of Gohan's life, and the 3 or 4 years after he got back from Namek. It's clear that he loves his son, and shows affection for him. He never punched Gohan out of frustration. The one time he did hit him was to protect him from rushing to his death. When he comes back to life, the first thing he does is embrace the son he didn't know he had. And he comes back to life the next day and spends the next couple years with his family. Yes, he flies off with Uub, but he can teleport. Tell me what Vegeta has over him?
Sometimes simple characters are the best.
Very true. I love Community, clearly, and Abed doesn't really change, but he's the best character on the show.
There is evidence to suggest that Goku cares more about kulilin than his family, it certainly seems like it. In that scene where he saves dende and mr.satan instead of his sons, he literally looks at his sons first and decides to save dende and satan. There is no mention later that he maybe saved dende because of his healing powers. Vegeta is pissed that his son died, Goku shows no emotion and in the anime just gives a goofy grin to vegeta berating him for choosing them over their sons. Yeah vegeta punched trunks while training, he also was sorry for it and took him to the amusement park. What makes you say he doesn't hang around trunks? we don't see enough of their private lives for you to make that claim, he seems to be around him allot in the buu saga. This compared to Goku's record of "being around" is superb. There is another Toriyama interview on this site where Akira says something along the lines of goku being an unfit parent, sorry I don't know which one, there are so many interviews now. This along with the other interview in which Toriyama talks about Goku and his family would suggest that the creator himself thinks Vegeta is a better father(yeah, it is not expressly said). Goku "loves" his family while Vegeta loves his family.
Toriyama on Goku's parenting (or lack thereof):
Goku isn’t interested in child-rearing, probably. He’s completely unqualified to be a father. (laughs) He doesn’t even have a job. Goku wants nothing other than to get stronger, and it feels like he doesn’t have any other instincts. So he shows absolutely no interest in things he’s not interested in. I’d bet he wouldn’t have had any interest in marriage, eithe
Toriyama on Vegeta's family life:
Q: Since Saiyans are supposed to have no affection for family or friends, does this actually make Vegeta, who holds his family and wife dear, an even stranger (kinder) Saiyan than Goku?

A: Vegeta, whose pride had been deeply wounded, sought help from Bulma, and little by little, his ruthless personality changed. Nowadays, you certainly might be able to say that On the other hand, Goku might not have a sense of family members like Gohan and Chi-Chi except as one of his companions.
It seems that he really is saying Vegeta is a better father than Goku.
The Monkey King wrote:
RandomGuy96 wrote:
dbgtFO wrote: Please elaborate as I do not know what you mean by "pushing Vegeta's destruction"
He's probably referring to the Bardock special. Zarbon was the one who first recommended destroying Planet Vegeta because the saiyans were rapidly growing in strength.
It was actually Beerus disguised as Zarbon #StayWoke
Herms wrote:The fact that the ridiculous power inflation is presented so earnestly makes me just roll my eyes and snicker. Like with Freeza, where he starts off over 10 times stronger than all his henchmen except Ginyu (because...well, just because), then we find out he can transform and get even more powerful, and then he reveals he can transform two more times, before finally coming out with the fact that he hasn't even been using anywhere near 50% of his power. Oh, and he can survive in the vacuum of space. All this stuff is just presented as the way Freeza is, without even an attempt at rationalizing it, yet the tone dictates we're supposed to take all this silly grasping at straws as thrilling danger. So I guess I don't really take the power inflation in the Boo arc seriously, but I don't take the power inflation in earlier arcs seriously either, so there's no net loss of seriousness. I think a silly story presented as serious is harder to accept than a silly story presented as silly.

User avatar
garnetjester
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 289
Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2014 10:42 am
Location: Colombia

Re: Did Goku Need More Development?

Post by garnetjester » Thu Apr 24, 2014 10:55 pm

Sure, I don't really understand why Vegeta has become the "real good guy" nowadays though... While I agree that Goku isn't dad of the year, I don't think he's as terrible as most people say, I do think he cared for his children a lot, maybe not in a truly paternal way, since per Toriyama's words he doesn't even know what that is (which is ironic considering his parents were one of the very few loving saiyan families ever according to Minus), but in any case, he loves them, tries to protect them and isn't an emotionally distant jackass. I mean, he plays with them, hugs them etc. Vegeta, on the other hand, is apparently full of feelings of love and adoration for his family but he won't ever say so because of his pride or whatever, so I think it's still a matter of preference really. Goku isn't dying of love for his family or anything close to it, but he does care about them and it shows, and then there's Vegeta who apparently loves them very much but they might as well never now for all the emotions he displays.

As for Vegeta not being able to be a good dad, being a mass murderer doesn't necessarily mean he has to be a horrible father. Hell, even in real life I've heard of horrible criminals who love their families above anything else (Vegeta is a reformed murderer though, for what it's worth)
"Giving up is something we can do anytime, so let's head on, even if it's just a little bit!"

Post Reply