Are saiyans aboriginals of Planet Vegeta?

Discussion, generally of an in-universe nature, regarding any aspect of the franchise (including movies, spin-offs, etc.) such as: techniques, character relationships, internal back-history, its universe, and more.
User avatar
SingleFringe&Sparks
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1642
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:55 pm
Location: Mt. Paozu/East District

Re: Are saiyans aboriginals of Planet Vegeta?

Post by SingleFringe&Sparks » Sun Jun 08, 2014 11:07 pm

TheDevilsCorpse wrote:It's a bit complicated, I guess. Toriyama designed Chilled and the manga version of Episode of Bardock is included in the manga based Chozenshu. BUT, Toriyama never really acknowledges what he actually considers it and even somewhat contradicts it with his newest additions to the franchise with Jaco, interviews, etc. So the answer is, we don't really know what it is considered.

That being said, regardless of who likes it or not, Episode of Bardock is part of the franchise and does present valid points to discuss about the topic at hand. So there is no reason to just shun it like a leper.
My assumption is he respects it in the same way he respects GT, it just wasnt written by him but for Ooshi to make her inner Bardock crush happy. In reality, we cant accept it as canon because of how it makes even less sense than most of Z's own filler did. I for sure can't make sense of it.
Zephyr wrote:The fandom's collective fetishizing of "moments" is also ridiculous to me. No, not everyone needs a fucking "shine" moment. If that's all you want, then all you want is fanservice, rather than an actual coherent story. And of course those aren't mutually exclusive; you could have a coherent story with "shine" moments! But if a story is perfectly coherent (and I'm really not seeing any compelling arguments that this one is anything but, despite constantly recurring, really poorly reasoned, attempts to argue otherwise), and you're bemoaning the lack of "shine" moments as a reason for the story's poor quality, then you're letting your thirst for "shine" moments obfuscate your ability to detect basic storytelling when it's right in front of you.

Thouser
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 169
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 6:18 pm
Location: Texas

Re: Are saiyans aboriginals of Planet Vegeta?

Post by Thouser » Mon Jun 09, 2014 12:40 am

SingleFringe&Sparks wrote:In reality, we cant accept it as canon because of how it makes even less sense than most of Z's own filler did. I for sure can't make sense of it.
I'm not crazy about Bardock being the original Super Saiyan, but I don't remember anything about the special that really confused me. What exactly didn't make sense to you about Episode of Bardock?
"Like that bald punk? Killyin... You're talking about Killyin?!!" - Anime Labs

「他们並不是我孫兒... 是我弟弟。」 - 龜仙人

User avatar
Pantalones
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1432
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 2:30 pm

Re: Are saiyans aboriginals of Planet Vegeta?

Post by Pantalones » Mon Jun 09, 2014 1:32 am

Well, there's Freeza's magic time-travel-inducing ki blast that started off the whole thing, to point out the obvious.

Which is probably the biggest(/only?) problem I have with Episode of Bardock. Everything that happens after he's in the past is fine, but why the heck should a big ki blast randomly throw somebody back in time? And why Freeza's blast used to destroy Planet Vegeta, specifically? Why only Bardock, and not any other Saiyans? Why didn't Cell's explosion send Bubbles back in time or something? Why didn't Kid Buu's blast send some of the few surviving people on Earth back in time? "Planet-destroying blasts sometimes randomly send people back in time" is just too far into the crazy nonsense zone for me. It doesn't even make sense in the context of the rest of DB/Z.

It's especially nonsensical if we're supposed to believe that Bardock went back and became the same Super Saiyan that everyone knows about through the old legends, considering that Dragonball time travel works by sending you to alternate timelines, not the past of your own timeline. Maybe Bardock is the Super Saiyan mentioned in the legends of the timeline created by him being sent back to the past, but who was the Super Saiyan mentioned in the legends that Freeza and his men and the Saiyans that Freeza blew up had already heard of before he ever blew up Planet Vegeta? It can't just be Bardock, because DB time travel does not work that way...

User avatar
B
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5563
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 10:15 am
Contact:

Re: Are saiyans aboriginals of Planet Vegeta?

Post by B » Mon Jun 09, 2014 11:05 am

Pantalones wrote:but who was the Super Saiyan mentioned in the legends that Freeza and his men and the Saiyans that Freeza blew up had already heard of before he ever blew up Planet Vegeta? It can't just be Bardock, because DB time travel does not work that way...
Is the answer to this question really important? EoB never actually says Bardock is the Legendary Super Saiyan of any timeline.
Keen Observation of Dragon Ball Z Movie 4's Climax wrote:Slug shits to see the genki

User avatar
DBZGTKOSDH
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 12401
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 7:45 pm
Location: Greece

Re: Are saiyans aboriginals of Planet Vegeta?

Post by DBZGTKOSDH » Mon Jun 09, 2014 1:14 pm

Pantalones wrote:Which is probably the biggest(/only?) problem I have with Episode of Bardock. Everything that happens after he's in the past is fine, but why the heck should a big ki blast randomly throw somebody back in time? And why Freeza's blast used to destroy Planet Vegeta, specifically? Why only Bardock, and not any other Saiyans? Why didn't Cell's explosion send Bubbles back in time or something? Why didn't Kid Buu's blast send some of the few surviving people on Earth back in time? "Planet-destroying blasts sometimes randomly send people back in time" is just too far into the crazy nonsense zone for me. It doesn't even make sense in the context of the rest of DB/Z.
It's not Freeza's blast that sent Bardock back in time, it's the explosion of the planet. In EoB, Freeza's blast didn't touch Bardock, the explosion of the planet opened a portal in time, and Bardock was dragged in. It happens a lot in fiction.
It's especially nonsensical if we're supposed to believe that Bardock went back and became the same Super Saiyan that everyone knows about through the old legends, considering that Dragonball time travel works by sending you to alternate timelines, not the past of your own timeline. Maybe Bardock is the Super Saiyan mentioned in the legends of the timeline created by him being sent back to the past, but who was the Super Saiyan mentioned in the legends that Freeza and his men and the Saiyans that Freeza blew up had already heard of before he ever blew up Planet Vegeta? It can't just be Bardock, because DB time travel does not work that way...
Here is how I see it (these aren't the same timelines that Trunks created BTW):
  • Timeline 1: Bardock isn't the legendary Super Saiyan in the past, Freeza attacks, Bardock goes back in time, creates Timeline 2 (unseen).
  • Timeline 2: Bardock is the legendary Super Saiyan in the past, Freeza attacks, Bardock goes back in time, creates Timeline 3 (Beginning of EoB).
  • Timeline 3: Bardock is the legendary Super Saiyan in the past, Freeza attacks, Bardock goes back in time, creates Timeline 4 (The rest of EoB, manga. DBO).
  • Timeline 4: Bardock is the legendary Super Saiyan in the past, Freeza attacks, Bardock is saved by from Timeline 3's Miira (DBO past missions).
James Teal (Animerica 1996) wrote:When you think about it, there are a number of similarities between the Chinese-inspired Son Goku and that most American of superhero icons, Superman. Both are aliens sent to Earth shortly after birth to escape the destruction of their homeworlds; both possess super-strength, flight, super-speed, heightened senses and the ability to cast energy blasts. But the crucial difference between them lies not only in how they view the world, but in how the world views them.

Superman is, and always has been, a symbol for truth, justice, and upstanding moral fortitude–a role model and leader as much as a fighter. The more down-to-earth Goku has no illusions about being responsible for maintaining social order, or for setting some kind of moral example for the entire world. Goku is simply a martial artist who’s devoted his life toward perfecting his fighting skills and other abilities. Though never shy about risking his life to save either one person or the entire world, he just doesn’t believe that the balance of the world rests in any way on his shoulders, and he has no need to shape any part of it in his image. Goku is an idealist, and believes that there is some good in everyone, but he is unconcerned with the big picture of the world…unless it has to do with some kind of fight. Politics, society, law and order don’t have much bearing on his life, but he’s a man who knows right from wrong.

User avatar
Low Tone G
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1711
Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2014 8:34 am

Re: Are saiyans aboriginals of Planet Vegeta?

Post by Low Tone G » Mon Jun 09, 2014 4:58 pm

DBZGTKOSDH wrote:
Pantalones wrote:Which is probably the biggest(/only?) problem I have with Episode of Bardock. Everything that happens after he's in the past is fine, but why the heck should a big ki blast randomly throw somebody back in time? And why Freeza's blast used to destroy Planet Vegeta, specifically? Why only Bardock, and not any other Saiyans? Why didn't Cell's explosion send Bubbles back in time or something? Why didn't Kid Buu's blast send some of the few surviving people on Earth back in time? "Planet-destroying blasts sometimes randomly send people back in time" is just too far into the crazy nonsense zone for me. It doesn't even make sense in the context of the rest of DB/Z.
It's not Freeza's blast that sent Bardock back in time, it's the explosion of the planet. In EoB, Freeza's blast didn't touch Bardock, the explosion of the planet opened a portal in time, and Bardock was dragged in. It happens a lot in fiction.
It's especially nonsensical if we're supposed to believe that Bardock went back and became the same Super Saiyan that everyone knows about through the old legends, considering that Dragonball time travel works by sending you to alternate timelines, not the past of your own timeline. Maybe Bardock is the Super Saiyan mentioned in the legends of the timeline created by him being sent back to the past, but who was the Super Saiyan mentioned in the legends that Freeza and his men and the Saiyans that Freeza blew up had already heard of before he ever blew up Planet Vegeta? It can't just be Bardock, because DB time travel does not work that way...
Here is how I see it (these aren't the same timelines that Trunks created BTW):
  • Timeline 1: Bardock isn't the legendary Super Saiyan in the past, Freeza attacks, Bardock goes back in time, creates Timeline 2 (unseen).
  • Timeline 2: Bardock is the legendary Super Saiyan in the past, Freeza attacks, Bardock goes back in time, creates Timeline 3 (Beginning of EoB).
  • Timeline 3: Bardock is the legendary Super Saiyan in the past, Freeza attacks, Bardock goes back in time, creates Timeline 4 (The rest of EoB, manga. DBO).
  • Timeline 4: Bardock is the legendary Super Saiyan in the past, Freeza attacks, Bardock is saved by from Timeline 3's Miira (DBO past missions).

So I are imagining that there is one timeline with Bardock isn't Super Saiyan in past but he is also in the past, and there many in which Bardock is, and one of those timelines is the one which is our timeline? The must mean that there is a timeline whre Bardock do not go to the past and dies agaist Frieza. In that way there is an infinite number of timelines with Bardock coming from future to past and becomes a SSJ.
English is not my first language!
I'm still waiting for Dragon Ball in Super...

Post Reply