To be frank: Only an idiot would talk publicly about all the sensitive details involved in this. Part of being professional is discretion.ABED wrote:Here's my issue with statements like this, this is all based on personal anecdotes and intuition, not hard statistics. I could just as easily say that I don't think there's any discernible difference in people's perceptions of Yamcha, especially not amongst DB fans at large. He's more or less seen as he always was.dbzfan7 wrote:Nope. Only thing damaged was Yamcha. He's even more ridiculed now than ever before. Hope no one is a Yamcha fan.
Is there a gag order? What stops you from saying "we've had X effect..." if it's an empirical objective fact?Much like most of us here, which is why it's so interesting (read: questionable) to see such heated debate on the subject of our legality and how that relates to our positive or negative impact on the fandom..
I honestly wish I could speak openly about how much I know. But honestly? I've likely already said too much. Regardless, I know more about the specifics in dealing with us (not necessarily law, just how we relate to this whole mess) and I've already said my piece.
That's the last of that. Again: Said my piece. Draw from this what you will.





