Didn't that movie come out back when Fusion was still the new hot thing in the manga and TV-series though? I seem to recall someone bringing up that several of the DBZ-movies were basically playing on whatever the new thing in the series at that time was. Fighting the Saiyans? Here, have a movie where Goku faces a Saiyan who looks just like him! Namek, and talk of the legendary Super Saiyan? Here's a movie where Goku fights a Namekian and becomes a Super Saiyan! Freeza, the ACTUAL Super Saiyan? Goku fights his brother and transforms again! Scientific creations, Vegeta has learned to transform? Vegeta and Goku team up against an army of mecha-Coolas! And so on... With that said, does "Revival of Fusion" really make sense when it hadn't even gone anywhere at that point in the serialization? I actually see more sense in the "Fusion of the Revival"-interpretation, in the sense that Goku and Vegeta are fighting a losing battle but ultimately make a comeback and manage to win the fight afer fusing.Herms wrote:he idea is that the Fusion technique is making a comeback, so "Revival of Fusion" fits that. Something like "Fusion of the Revival" arguably works as a literal translation, but makes very little sense and so doesn't really convey the title's intended meaning.
...And on that note I also think "F for Revival" makes more sense for the title of this movie. Double-meanings and all that. The title itself specifies the letter as meaning Revival, but it can also be short for Freeza.













