ABED wrote:
By the way Rereboy, I didn't demand an explanation, I simply asked why. This isn't a subjective vs. objective debate. It's Coke vs. Pepsi.
If I told you I liked Pepsi, and you liked Coke, would you ask me why I like Pepsi instead of Coke and expect a response that actually made you understand my point of view?
Its just one of those things that I really don't think that can really be explained. I mean, I could have a very specific reason for it, like maybe it reminds of someone or something, but other than that, I don't see how it could.
Regarding voices for a character, I believe its basically the same. Its not as basic, but its perfectly comparable. We either have a very specific reason for it, like nostalgia or something like that, or we just prefer it. Sure, we can try to explain it... "I think the voice fits better", "I like the voice better", "I prefer the way that voice actor does this". But aren't those explanations like me trying to say that "I think pepsi tastes better", "I prefer the quantity of gas of a pepsi", and so on. Seems rather pointless to me, especially when only the unpopular opinions are asked to be explained, but ok.
AjayLikesGaming wrote:
He doesn't have to. I'm not demanding anything. I'm not a huge fan of the lack of explanation from others who've picked Ayres, either - but I do understand their viewpoint, at least. I'm not massively interested in hearing more, as a result.
Again, I don't think I've once said he has to do anything. I've simply explained why and how I'd like to hear more, and why it's not unreasonable to expect more. For some reason rereboy has taken this as some sort of cardinal sin.
I used demand as a figure of speech. If you feel more comfortable, I'll rephrase it to "asked to" or other equivalent phrasing. Its no biggie. There's no need to take offense by my posts, I never post with that intent.
I didn't imply that it was a cardinal sin or anything of the sort. I just don't get what you hope that he'll say that will make you understand his opinion. My example was an attempt at a demonstration of how something like that won't provide you with satisfying responses. The example was deliberately exaggerated but I disagree with them not being comparable. IMO, they are tremendously comparable, like I stated above.