It directly says that Buu reincarnated that fast because of him being pure evil. What wasn't said - wasn't said. So Enma doesn't have anything to do with this according to Toriyama.Darkprince410 wrote: Toriyama's statement doesn't say anything that contradicts the notion that Enma pulled strings to affect the reincarnation process, just that because Buu was pure evil, it helped speed things along quickly.
But you can't cheat the death. Every person who dies goes to the after life, with the only exception being people killed by members of Mazoku clan. Goku's assumptions always tend to be proven false. He thought he would defeat Cell, he lost. He thought that his son could defeat Cell, but it took Android 16 dying, Goku dying and Vegeta helping for this finally been able to happen. He also thought that kids would defeat Buu, they failed, he thought that Gohan would defeat Buu, he failed. Pretty much most of Goku's assumptions failed, I don't see why his assumptions should be viewed as something definite, while he barely knows something about how after life works and barely knows anything at all.Darkprince410 wrote:Daimao transferred his spirit into the egg moments before he died, so his "reincarnation" wasn't related to the afterlife at all. If anything, his actions cheated death. As for Freeza, again, Goku surmised that Enma pulled strings for Uub's reincarnation, and there's no reason to assume that his belief in that matter was baseless. So since Goku wanted to fight a good version of Buu, Enma pulled strings to get Uub reincarnated quickly, and since the same courtesy wasn't given to Freeza, the process of punishment/reincarnation was still in the works.
It can't be, though, that they can't use their usual ki now, it means, that they will never be able to be felt by anyone else now. And that means, that they lost their usual energy. How exactly this could have happened? Moreover Kaio's ki was felt by Goku, and he is a deity as well. They most likely have two forms of ki. As for why Goku didn't use this godly energy, why should he? Maybe it had too much of a strain for him in his child's body. For that exact reason he used SSJ3 only once in the whole GT series. We don't know how low capabilities of saiyans in children's body are. It is also very possible that SSJ4 exceeded the power of SSJ God, we don't know what is stronger as for now. These are just speculations. But again this doesn't matter much, as for me BoG and GT are two different timelines. And inconsistencies don't matter anyway.Darkprince410 wrote: The god ki is, currently though, a part of their base form. It's not something that they can just ignore or not. Besides, even if it was something they didn't have to manifest when they transformed (that their transformations could ignore any god ki they had), given how significantly both Goku and Vegeta get throttled in their non Ssj4 forms, don't you think that they'd want to use that god ki if they had access to it? People aren't going to say that Goku lost Ssj2 in GT because he clearly used it at least once. With Ssj God Ssj though, there's no sign of it at any point in GT, even when they're getting pummeled by their opponents.
Darkprince410 wrote: But Super Saiya-jin 3 is the only thing that Goku had over Vegeta at the time he stated that line. Thanks to the Ma-jin seal, which was established to bring an individual past their limits, Vegeta closed the gap he had with Goku, to where they were completely even in their respective forms.
But Vegeta didn't achieve it even now, and even after Ma-jin seal and rage boost in BoG, that means that Goku had muuuuuch more training than Vegeta, and he still didn't keep up with him even now.
Nah. He is exactly saying that he would draw a new manga using the story of GT if he wanted to, as for him not wanting to draw manga, he doesn't want to do it even now. Hence why there is a manga adaptation of FnF made by Toyble out of all people. There is no difference between his statement about BoG and GT, they are the same.Darkprince410 wrote: The context of the statement is what matters most. He isn't saying that he would write a continuation of the manga serialization using GT as the premise, but that he liked the idea of turning Goku young, and could have used that as a premise to continue the manga, but he didn't want to draw it.
No proof at all, just people's speculations. I may say that GT is in manga continuity as well, because Toriyama said:Darkprince410 wrote:
People are doing that with Battle of Gods and Revival of F because not only are we given the time frame of when the movies take place, but we're given indication that they take place in the same continuity as the manga, so naturally people are going to try and figure out how to make them work with one another. With GT though, it's always existed as a continuation of the anime, not the manga, and since Battle of Gods and Revival of F are in the manga's continuity, the two continuities don't align with one another.
He didn't say Z, he said "original Dragon Ball", which means his manga, which means that GT is a side-story of his manga, not anime.If you are able, along with me, to enjoy watching the original Dragon Ball's grand side-story Dragon Ball GT
And no one will be able to prove me otherwise. But I don't say it, because it doesn't make any sense, as anime can't be in the same continuity as manga. And there are countless examples including a lot of shonens.
Bardock's special was never in manga continuity.Bacon Skittles wrote:Actually Minus overrides Bardock's special from being manga canon, though it is canon to the anime canon.Demon187 wrote:The Bardock movie was actualy canon too




