Why weren't King Piccolo's off-springs Nameks?

Discussion, generally of an in-universe nature, regarding any aspect of the franchise (including movies, spin-offs, etc.) such as: techniques, character relationships, internal back-history, its universe, and more.

Moderators: Kanzenshuu Staff, General Help

precita
Banned
Posts: 6037
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2015 3:10 pm

Why weren't King Piccolo's off-springs Nameks?

Post by precita » Mon Oct 05, 2015 9:08 pm

Ignoring the real-world reason that Toriyama hadn't created the Namek race yet, why were King Piccolo's off springs a bunch of demons instead of a bunch of Namek's?

We've never seen any other Namek create creatures like Tambourine, Piano, Drum, etc. Why do they look the way they do and why is only King Piccolo able to make them?

User avatar
sayian_nation_
Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
Posts: 327
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2015 12:44 pm

Re: Why weren't King Piccolo's off-springs Nameks?

Post by sayian_nation_ » Mon Oct 05, 2015 9:19 pm

Good question! Can't really answer that but maybe it has something to do with him being evil? Dragonball portrayed him as a demon which is why anyone who is killed by him get stuck in "limbo" instead of being sent to heaven. WIKI has him as a "Dark Namekian" could be something to do with it but I don't usually go off that site lol.

User avatar
Hellspawn28
Patreon Supporter
Posts: 15500
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 9:50 pm
Location: Maryland, USA

Re: Why weren't King Piccolo's off-springs Nameks?

Post by Hellspawn28 » Mon Oct 05, 2015 9:45 pm

Evil nameks could create their own monsters of their own most likely.
She/Her
PS5 username: Guyver_Spawn_27
LB Profile: https://letterboxd.com/Hellspawn28/

User avatar
nickzambuto
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1702
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2015 7:53 pm

Re: Why weren't King Piccolo's off-springs Nameks?

Post by nickzambuto » Mon Oct 05, 2015 10:11 pm

King Piccolo was a mutant. Not only was he a being of pure evil among a race of pure heart, but he was also only half a being in the first place. His kids were basically inverse inbreds, because he made them himself.

User avatar
Sandubadear
I Live Here
Posts: 2152
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2015 8:39 am
Location: Space Amazon

Re: Why weren't King Piccolo's off-springs Nameks?

Post by Sandubadear » Mon Oct 05, 2015 10:26 pm

Apparently Piccolo can choose how his children will look like. He makes Cymbal look like a dragon because he will be hunting Dragon Balls. My guess is that he just wanted to make random demons for his demon clan, and didn't want anyone similar to him (since he is the demon king, another one similar to him would look bad) but then he made Piccolo Jr. look like him because he was going to reincarnate.
"The life is the hardest video games of ever. Because you have only one life and the powers are kinda lame. And sometimes a stage takes years"

"The life is a game, the objective of the game is trying to find the objective of the game, and then, finish the game"
--by Ranely Jr

時空の主/齊天大聖
Lazy Xenoverse characters: Kuriza, Neko Majin Abra

Dbzfan94
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5712
Joined: Mon Dec 16, 2013 5:16 pm
Location: Mt. Paozu

Re: Why weren't King Piccolo's off-springs Nameks?

Post by Dbzfan94 » Mon Oct 05, 2015 10:41 pm

Because the Namek race wasn't a thing back then

Cipher
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 6388
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 11:54 pm
Location: Nagano
Contact:

Re: Why weren't King Piccolo's off-springs Nameks?

Post by Cipher » Mon Oct 05, 2015 11:09 pm

In-universe: He's an actual demon -- a being of pure evil. I guess that lets him create monstrous offspring.

User avatar
Kaboom
Moderator
Posts: 14472
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 6:07 pm

Re: Why weren't King Piccolo's off-springs Nameks?

Post by Kaboom » Mon Oct 05, 2015 11:15 pm

I'm pretty sure one or two of the guidebooks point out that King Piccolo's egg-laying was a corrupted version of what Namekians normally do. So maybe his evil nature prevented him from birthing anything but lesser demon-spawn unless he actually put all his life-force into it, or something like that.
[ BlueSky | Bsky: DBS Plots | DeviantArt | Twitter (Depreciated) ]

[PSN/Steam: KaboomKrusader | Switch FC: SW-4304-7361-2824 | ACNH Dream Address: DA-1637-4046-7415 ("SlamZone") ]

User avatar
Tyro
Patreon Supporter
Posts: 1648
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 12:04 pm
Location: USA

Re: Why weren't King Piccolo's off-springs Nameks?

Post by Tyro » Mon Oct 05, 2015 11:15 pm

Daizenshuu #4 lists Piccolo Daimao's demons under the Namekian category, so they seem to be at least partially Namekian.
NAMEKIAN

A people of the universe whose existence was revealed through the arrival of Piccolo Daimao. There exist the two "Dragon Clan" and "warrior-type" varieties, as well as the "Demon Clan" who split off due to their hearts being stained with evil.

Namekians: The Eldest, Nail, Muri, Dende, Cargo, Ma Junior (Piccolo), God, Piccolo, Piano, Drum, Tambourine, Cymbal, Piccolo Daimao

User avatar
Neo-Makaiōshin
I Live Here
Posts: 2443
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 8:31 pm
Location: Argentina
Contact:

Re: Why weren't King Piccolo's off-springs Nameks?

Post by Neo-Makaiōshin » Mon Oct 05, 2015 11:19 pm

Shouldn´t this be on the In-Universe discussion ?
Dragon Ball was always a kid series and fans should stop being in denial.

User avatar
FoolsGil
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5031
Joined: Tue May 21, 2013 10:37 pm

Re: Why weren't King Piccolo's off-springs Nameks?

Post by FoolsGil » Mon Oct 05, 2015 11:34 pm

Because Namek wasn't a thing when King Piccolo was being called a demon.

Cipher
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 6388
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 11:54 pm
Location: Nagano
Contact:

Re: Why weren't King Piccolo's off-springs Nameks?

Post by Cipher » Mon Oct 05, 2015 11:40 pm

FoolsGil wrote:Because Namek wasn't a thing when King Piccolo was being called a demon.
He is a demon. He's a Namekian demon.

User avatar
Herms
Kanzenshuu Admin Emeritus
Posts: 10550
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 6:40 pm
Location: Jupiter
Contact:

Re: Why weren't King Piccolo's off-springs Nameks?

Post by Herms » Tue Oct 06, 2015 12:30 am

Sandubadear wrote:Apparently Piccolo can choose how his children will look like. He makes Cymbal look like a dragon because he will be hunting Dragon Balls. My guess is that he just wanted to make random demons for his demon clan, and didn't want anyone similar to him (since he is the demon king, another one similar to him would look bad) but then he made Piccolo Jr. look like him because he was going to reincarnate.
This is probably the key factor: Piccolo could fully customize his own Namekians however he saw fit, years before DB Online. Though I guess we don't know for sure if this is only something he could do because of the whole born-from-evil thing, or if regular Namekians could pull it off as well. Maybe what we think of as a "regular" Namekian is simply the result of the Great Elder being very unimaginative.
Kanzenshuu: Is that place still around?
Sometimes, I tweet things
We might, if they screamed all the time, for no good reason.

User avatar
SylentEcho
OMG CRAZY REGEN
Posts: 809
Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2006 7:36 pm
Contact:

Re: Why weren't King Piccolo's off-springs Nameks?

Post by SylentEcho » Tue Oct 06, 2015 8:03 am

Cipher wrote:
FoolsGil wrote:Because Namek wasn't a thing when King Piccolo was being called a demon.
He is a demon. He's a Namekian demon.
I never fully understood this. His backstory was retconned in the Saiyan arc, yet for some reason all of his victims before that never went to the afterlife. Raditz was the only one up until that point whose soul went to Enma and I don't understand that either.

How exactly is he a demonic Namekian? :?

User avatar
Ookalf
Newbie
Posts: 34
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 8:01 pm

Re: Why weren't King Piccolo's off-springs Nameks?

Post by Ookalf » Tue Oct 06, 2015 11:42 am

SylentEcho wrote:
Cipher wrote:
FoolsGil wrote:Because Namek wasn't a thing when King Piccolo was being called a demon.
He is a demon. He's a Namekian demon.
I never fully understood this. His backstory was retconned in the Saiyan arc, yet for some reason all of his victims before that never went to the afterlife. Raditz was the only one up until that point whose soul went to Enma and I don't understand that either.

How exactly is he a demonic Namekian? :?
Because he's a man's evil given flesh. Seems pretty demonic to me.

singsing
OMG CRAZY REGEN
Posts: 776
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2014 11:40 pm

Re: Why weren't King Piccolo's off-springs Nameks?

Post by singsing » Tue Oct 06, 2015 12:35 pm

SylentEcho wrote:
Cipher wrote:
FoolsGil wrote:Because Namek wasn't a thing when King Piccolo was being called a demon.
He is a demon. He's a Namekian demon.
I never fully understood this. His backstory was retconned in the Saiyan arc, yet for some reason all of his victims before that never went to the afterlife. Raditz was the only one up until that point whose soul went to Enma and I don't understand that either.

How exactly is he a demonic Namekian? :?
They specified in the Saiyan arc that Piccolo was no longer a demon by the time he fought Raditz with Goku.

Kuririn Fan
Banned Alternate Account
Posts: 2313
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2015 12:32 pm

Re: Why weren't King Piccolo's off-springs Nameks?

Post by Kuririn Fan » Tue Oct 06, 2015 12:35 pm

Because they weren't Nameks at that point, they were demons.

DragonBallLove
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 294
Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2014 7:34 pm

Re: Why weren't King Piccolo's off-springs Nameks?

Post by DragonBallLove » Tue Oct 06, 2015 3:11 pm

In-Universe? Evil-Corrupted Poko Priest Demon Clan Namek.
Out-Of-Universe? He was a demonic monster originally. Nameks didn't exist at that point.

User avatar
Pantalones
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1432
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 2:30 pm

Re: Why weren't King Piccolo's off-springs Nameks?

Post by Pantalones » Tue Oct 06, 2015 3:32 pm

Well, Tambourine and Drum at least could mostly pass for Namekians, albeit really weird-looking Namekians, especially with Tambourine having wings. I've always considered them to be mutated demon Nameks who basically "came out wrong" due to Piccolo Daimao's "Demon Clan" status, with Piccolo Jr. being his first "pure Namekian" offspring (though he still counted as a demon at first due to having the reincarnated pure-evil soul of his dad, and that didn't change until he grew up and developed his own personality a bit more.)

The dragon/dinosaur-like traits of the others (and Tambourine's wings) are a bit weird, and that (along with the way that they're already adult sized when they hatch) is probably the result of Piccolo tampering with their traits before spitting up their eggs. That's probably what the purpose of the chant and such he does before spitting them up is -- he's basically combining Namekian reproduction with some demon technique to create fully-formed mutant demon babies rather than normal infant Namekians.

Though, if you go by Online and Xenoverse's character-creation options, there's actually a bit more variety to the possibilities of Namekian appearance than what we've seen previously -- their antennae can sometimes be more like horns or crests instead, some have lighter colored patches on their face, etc. -- so it's possible that Namekians with more unusual traits like Piccolo's spawn could have existed in the distant past before the crisis that dropped the population of Namek to almost zero happened. Those features could've been more common if present Namek's population wasn't all descended from the same guy like they are.

User avatar
Tyro
Patreon Supporter
Posts: 1648
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 12:04 pm
Location: USA

Re: Why weren't King Piccolo's off-springs Nameks?

Post by Tyro » Tue Oct 06, 2015 7:01 pm

It's a rather off-topic discussion, but does anyone find themselves thinking that the term "Nameks" sounds oddly racist? It's "Namekian(s)", people. :wink:

Post Reply