Why weren't King Piccolo's off-springs Nameks?
Moderators: Kanzenshuu Staff, General Help
Why weren't King Piccolo's off-springs Nameks?
Ignoring the real-world reason that Toriyama hadn't created the Namek race yet, why were King Piccolo's off springs a bunch of demons instead of a bunch of Namek's?
We've never seen any other Namek create creatures like Tambourine, Piano, Drum, etc. Why do they look the way they do and why is only King Piccolo able to make them?
We've never seen any other Namek create creatures like Tambourine, Piano, Drum, etc. Why do they look the way they do and why is only King Piccolo able to make them?
- sayian_nation_
- Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
- Posts: 327
- Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2015 12:44 pm
Re: Why weren't King Piccolo's off-springs Nameks?
Good question! Can't really answer that but maybe it has something to do with him being evil? Dragonball portrayed him as a demon which is why anyone who is killed by him get stuck in "limbo" instead of being sent to heaven. WIKI has him as a "Dark Namekian" could be something to do with it but I don't usually go off that site lol.
- Hellspawn28
- Patreon Supporter
- Posts: 15500
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 9:50 pm
- Location: Maryland, USA
Re: Why weren't King Piccolo's off-springs Nameks?
Evil nameks could create their own monsters of their own most likely.
She/Her
PS5 username: Guyver_Spawn_27
LB Profile: https://letterboxd.com/Hellspawn28/
PS5 username: Guyver_Spawn_27
LB Profile: https://letterboxd.com/Hellspawn28/
- nickzambuto
- I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
- Posts: 1702
- Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2015 7:53 pm
Re: Why weren't King Piccolo's off-springs Nameks?
King Piccolo was a mutant. Not only was he a being of pure evil among a race of pure heart, but he was also only half a being in the first place. His kids were basically inverse inbreds, because he made them himself.
- Sandubadear
- I Live Here
- Posts: 2152
- Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2015 8:39 am
- Location: Space Amazon
Re: Why weren't King Piccolo's off-springs Nameks?
Apparently Piccolo can choose how his children will look like. He makes Cymbal look like a dragon because he will be hunting Dragon Balls. My guess is that he just wanted to make random demons for his demon clan, and didn't want anyone similar to him (since he is the demon king, another one similar to him would look bad) but then he made Piccolo Jr. look like him because he was going to reincarnate.
"The life is the hardest video games of ever. Because you have only one life and the powers are kinda lame. And sometimes a stage takes years"
"The life is a game, the objective of the game is trying to find the objective of the game, and then, finish the game"
--by Ranely Jr
時空の主/齊天大聖
Lazy Xenoverse characters: Kuriza, Neko Majin Abra
"The life is a game, the objective of the game is trying to find the objective of the game, and then, finish the game"
--by Ranely Jr
時空の主/齊天大聖
Lazy Xenoverse characters: Kuriza, Neko Majin Abra
Re: Why weren't King Piccolo's off-springs Nameks?
Because the Namek race wasn't a thing back then
Re: Why weren't King Piccolo's off-springs Nameks?
In-universe: He's an actual demon -- a being of pure evil. I guess that lets him create monstrous offspring.
Re: Why weren't King Piccolo's off-springs Nameks?
I'm pretty sure one or two of the guidebooks point out that King Piccolo's egg-laying was a corrupted version of what Namekians normally do. So maybe his evil nature prevented him from birthing anything but lesser demon-spawn unless he actually put all his life-force into it, or something like that.
[ BlueSky | Bsky: DBS Plots | DeviantArt | Twitter (Depreciated) ]
[PSN/Steam: KaboomKrusader | Switch FC: SW-4304-7361-2824 | ACNH Dream Address: DA-1637-4046-7415 ("SlamZone") ]
[PSN/Steam: KaboomKrusader | Switch FC: SW-4304-7361-2824 | ACNH Dream Address: DA-1637-4046-7415 ("SlamZone") ]
Re: Why weren't King Piccolo's off-springs Nameks?
Daizenshuu #4 lists Piccolo Daimao's demons under the Namekian category, so they seem to be at least partially Namekian.
NAMEKIAN
A people of the universe whose existence was revealed through the arrival of Piccolo Daimao. There exist the two "Dragon Clan" and "warrior-type" varieties, as well as the "Demon Clan" who split off due to their hearts being stained with evil.
Namekians: The Eldest, Nail, Muri, Dende, Cargo, Ma Junior (Piccolo), God, Piccolo, Piano, Drum, Tambourine, Cymbal, Piccolo Daimao
- Neo-Makaiōshin
- I Live Here
- Posts: 2443
- Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 8:31 pm
- Location: Argentina
- Contact:
Re: Why weren't King Piccolo's off-springs Nameks?
Shouldn´t this be on the In-Universe discussion ?
Dragon Ball was always a kid series and fans should stop being in denial.
Re: Why weren't King Piccolo's off-springs Nameks?
Because Namek wasn't a thing when King Piccolo was being called a demon.
Re: Why weren't King Piccolo's off-springs Nameks?
He is a demon. He's a Namekian demon.FoolsGil wrote:Because Namek wasn't a thing when King Piccolo was being called a demon.
- Herms
- Kanzenshuu Admin Emeritus
- Posts: 10550
- Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 6:40 pm
- Location: Jupiter
- Contact:
Re: Why weren't King Piccolo's off-springs Nameks?
This is probably the key factor: Piccolo could fully customize his own Namekians however he saw fit, years before DB Online. Though I guess we don't know for sure if this is only something he could do because of the whole born-from-evil thing, or if regular Namekians could pull it off as well. Maybe what we think of as a "regular" Namekian is simply the result of the Great Elder being very unimaginative.Sandubadear wrote:Apparently Piccolo can choose how his children will look like. He makes Cymbal look like a dragon because he will be hunting Dragon Balls. My guess is that he just wanted to make random demons for his demon clan, and didn't want anyone similar to him (since he is the demon king, another one similar to him would look bad) but then he made Piccolo Jr. look like him because he was going to reincarnate.
Kanzenshuu: Is that place still around?
Sometimes, I tweet things
We might, if they screamed all the time, for no good reason.
Sometimes, I tweet things
We might, if they screamed all the time, for no good reason.
- SylentEcho
- OMG CRAZY REGEN
- Posts: 809
- Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2006 7:36 pm
- Contact:
Re: Why weren't King Piccolo's off-springs Nameks?
I never fully understood this. His backstory was retconned in the Saiyan arc, yet for some reason all of his victims before that never went to the afterlife. Raditz was the only one up until that point whose soul went to Enma and I don't understand that either.Cipher wrote:He is a demon. He's a Namekian demon.FoolsGil wrote:Because Namek wasn't a thing when King Piccolo was being called a demon.
How exactly is he a demonic Namekian?

Re: Why weren't King Piccolo's off-springs Nameks?
Because he's a man's evil given flesh. Seems pretty demonic to me.SylentEcho wrote:I never fully understood this. His backstory was retconned in the Saiyan arc, yet for some reason all of his victims before that never went to the afterlife. Raditz was the only one up until that point whose soul went to Enma and I don't understand that either.Cipher wrote:He is a demon. He's a Namekian demon.FoolsGil wrote:Because Namek wasn't a thing when King Piccolo was being called a demon.
How exactly is he a demonic Namekian?
Re: Why weren't King Piccolo's off-springs Nameks?
They specified in the Saiyan arc that Piccolo was no longer a demon by the time he fought Raditz with Goku.SylentEcho wrote:I never fully understood this. His backstory was retconned in the Saiyan arc, yet for some reason all of his victims before that never went to the afterlife. Raditz was the only one up until that point whose soul went to Enma and I don't understand that either.Cipher wrote:He is a demon. He's a Namekian demon.FoolsGil wrote:Because Namek wasn't a thing when King Piccolo was being called a demon.
How exactly is he a demonic Namekian?
-
- Banned Alternate Account
- Posts: 2313
- Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2015 12:32 pm
Re: Why weren't King Piccolo's off-springs Nameks?
Because they weren't Nameks at that point, they were demons.
-
- Beyond Newbie
- Posts: 294
- Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2014 7:34 pm
Re: Why weren't King Piccolo's off-springs Nameks?
In-Universe? Evil-Corrupted Poko Priest Demon Clan Namek.
Out-Of-Universe? He was a demonic monster originally. Nameks didn't exist at that point.
Out-Of-Universe? He was a demonic monster originally. Nameks didn't exist at that point.
- Pantalones
- Advanced Regular
- Posts: 1432
- Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 2:30 pm
Re: Why weren't King Piccolo's off-springs Nameks?
Well, Tambourine and Drum at least could mostly pass for Namekians, albeit really weird-looking Namekians, especially with Tambourine having wings. I've always considered them to be mutated demon Nameks who basically "came out wrong" due to Piccolo Daimao's "Demon Clan" status, with Piccolo Jr. being his first "pure Namekian" offspring (though he still counted as a demon at first due to having the reincarnated pure-evil soul of his dad, and that didn't change until he grew up and developed his own personality a bit more.)
The dragon/dinosaur-like traits of the others (and Tambourine's wings) are a bit weird, and that (along with the way that they're already adult sized when they hatch) is probably the result of Piccolo tampering with their traits before spitting up their eggs. That's probably what the purpose of the chant and such he does before spitting them up is -- he's basically combining Namekian reproduction with some demon technique to create fully-formed mutant demon babies rather than normal infant Namekians.
Though, if you go by Online and Xenoverse's character-creation options, there's actually a bit more variety to the possibilities of Namekian appearance than what we've seen previously -- their antennae can sometimes be more like horns or crests instead, some have lighter colored patches on their face, etc. -- so it's possible that Namekians with more unusual traits like Piccolo's spawn could have existed in the distant past before the crisis that dropped the population of Namek to almost zero happened. Those features could've been more common if present Namek's population wasn't all descended from the same guy like they are.
The dragon/dinosaur-like traits of the others (and Tambourine's wings) are a bit weird, and that (along with the way that they're already adult sized when they hatch) is probably the result of Piccolo tampering with their traits before spitting up their eggs. That's probably what the purpose of the chant and such he does before spitting them up is -- he's basically combining Namekian reproduction with some demon technique to create fully-formed mutant demon babies rather than normal infant Namekians.
Though, if you go by Online and Xenoverse's character-creation options, there's actually a bit more variety to the possibilities of Namekian appearance than what we've seen previously -- their antennae can sometimes be more like horns or crests instead, some have lighter colored patches on their face, etc. -- so it's possible that Namekians with more unusual traits like Piccolo's spawn could have existed in the distant past before the crisis that dropped the population of Namek to almost zero happened. Those features could've been more common if present Namek's population wasn't all descended from the same guy like they are.
Re: Why weren't King Piccolo's off-springs Nameks?
It's a rather off-topic discussion, but does anyone find themselves thinking that the term "Nameks" sounds oddly racist? It's "Namekian(s)", people. 
