What If Eiichiro Oda wrote Dragon Ball?

Discussion regarding the entirety of the franchise in a general (meta) sense, including such aspects as: production, trends, merchandise, fan culture, and more.

Moderators: Kanzenshuu Staff, General Help

User avatar
The Monkey King
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1193
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 7:53 am

Re: What If Eiichiro Oda wrote Dragon Ball?

Post by The Monkey King » Sun Jan 19, 2014 9:32 am

Saiga wrote:
SaiyanZ wrote:The only thing saving Naruto atm is Madara Uchiha. Naruto and Sasuke have taken nosedives as characters in Part II, the Konoha 11 is pretty much useless, Tsunade sucks as a Hokage, Yamato is forgotten, Obito is one of the worst villains ever......yeah Naruto isn't as good as One Piece imo even though I like them equally, though Part I is really good. Ever since the declaration of the 4th World War, Naruto just hasn't be as good. Plot isn't near One Piece's right now, but pace is most certainly better.
Yamato is straight up dead, apparently, according to a recent interview. So not forgotten, his "death" was just given absolutely no focus. Kind of sad, I liked him.
I don't know why but this makes me suprisingly sad :cry:
Oh yeah and how could Kishimoto

User avatar
Saiga
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8311
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2011 8:36 pm
Location: Space Australia

Re: What If Eiichiro Oda wrote Dragon Ball?

Post by Saiga » Sun Jan 19, 2014 10:32 am

I think that given how
I'm re-watching Dragon Ball GT in full on my blog. Check it out if you're interested in my thoughts on the series as I watch through it!

User avatar
DBZAOTA482
Banned
Posts: 6995
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2012 4:04 pm
Contact:

Re: What If Eiichiro Oda wrote Dragon Ball?

Post by DBZAOTA482 » Sun Jan 19, 2014 11:38 am

SaiyanZ wrote:The only thing saving Naruto atm is Madara Uchiha. Naruto and Sasuke have taken nosedives as characters in Part II, the Konoha 11 is pretty much useless, Tsunade sucks as a Hokage, Yamato is forgotten, Obito is one of the worst villains ever......yeah Naruto isn't as good as One Piece imo even though I like them equally, though Part I is really good. Ever since the declaration of the 4th World War, Naruto just hasn't be as good. Plot isn't near One Piece's right now, but pace is most certainly better.
It's not her fault that she's a female in Naruto.
fadeddreams5 wrote:
DBZGTKOSDH wrote:... Haven't we already gotten these in GT? Goku dies, the DBs go away, and the Namekian DBs most likely won't be used again because of the Evil Dragons.
Goku didn't die in GT. The show sucked him off so much, it was impossible to keep him in the world of the living, so he ascended beyond mortality.
jjgp1112 wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2020 6:31 am I'm just about done with the concept of reboots and making shows that were products of their time and impactful "new and sexy" and in line with modern tastes and sensibilities. Let stuff stay in their era and give today's kids their own shit to watch.

I always side eye the people who say "Now my kids/today's kids can experience what I did as a child!" Nigga, who gives a fuck about your childhood? You're an adult now and it was at least 15 years ago. Let the kids have their own experience instead of picking at a corpse.

User avatar
DBZGTKOSDH
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 12401
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 7:45 pm
Location: Greece

Re: What If Eiichiro Oda wrote Dragon Ball?

Post by DBZGTKOSDH » Sun Jan 19, 2014 12:57 pm

Saiga wrote:Yamato is straight up dead, apparently, according to a recent interview. So not forgotten, his "death" was just given absolutely no focus. Kind of sad, I liked him.
What interview?!
James Teal (Animerica 1996) wrote:When you think about it, there are a number of similarities between the Chinese-inspired Son Goku and that most American of superhero icons, Superman. Both are aliens sent to Earth shortly after birth to escape the destruction of their homeworlds; both possess super-strength, flight, super-speed, heightened senses and the ability to cast energy blasts. But the crucial difference between them lies not only in how they view the world, but in how the world views them.

Superman is, and always has been, a symbol for truth, justice, and upstanding moral fortitude–a role model and leader as much as a fighter. The more down-to-earth Goku has no illusions about being responsible for maintaining social order, or for setting some kind of moral example for the entire world. Goku is simply a martial artist who’s devoted his life toward perfecting his fighting skills and other abilities. Though never shy about risking his life to save either one person or the entire world, he just doesn’t believe that the balance of the world rests in any way on his shoulders, and he has no need to shape any part of it in his image. Goku is an idealist, and believes that there is some good in everyone, but he is unconcerned with the big picture of the world…unless it has to do with some kind of fight. Politics, society, law and order don’t have much bearing on his life, but he’s a man who knows right from wrong.

User avatar
SaiyanZ
OMG CRAZY REGEN
Posts: 814
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 11:04 pm

Re: What If Eiichiro Oda wrote Dragon Ball?

Post by SaiyanZ » Sun Jan 19, 2014 2:58 pm

Saiga wrote:
SaiyanZ wrote:The only thing saving Naruto atm is Madara Uchiha. Naruto and Sasuke have taken nosedives as characters in Part II, the Konoha 11 is pretty much useless, Tsunade sucks as a Hokage, Yamato is forgotten, Obito is one of the worst villains ever......yeah Naruto isn't as good as One Piece imo even though I like them equally, though Part I is really good. Ever since the declaration of the 4th World War, Naruto just hasn't be as good. Plot isn't near One Piece's right now, but pace is most certainly better.
Yamato is straight up dead, apparently, according to a recent interview. So not forgotten, his "death" was just given absolutely no focus. Kind of sad, I liked him.
Really?! Could you send me/link that interview? That's actually kind of funny and sad at the same time
DBZAOTA482 wrote:
SaiyanZ wrote:The only thing saving Naruto atm is Madara Uchiha. Naruto and Sasuke have taken nosedives as characters in Part II, the Konoha 11 is pretty much useless, Tsunade sucks as a Hokage, Yamato is forgotten, Obito is one of the worst villains ever......yeah Naruto isn't as good as One Piece imo even though I like them equally, though Part I is really good. Ever since the declaration of the 4th World War, Naruto just hasn't be as good. Plot isn't near One Piece's right now, but pace is most certainly better.
It's not her fault that she's a female in Naruto.
:lol:
Tim Duncan is dope and forever.

My favorite anime and manga (characters included): https://myanimelist.net/profile/SaiyanZ?q=SaiyanZ

User avatar
DonZ
Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
Posts: 341
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2013 1:33 pm

Re: What If Eiichiro Oda wrote Dragon Ball?

Post by DonZ » Sun Jan 19, 2014 3:50 pm

Naruto has turned into complete SHIT since the 4th shinobi war. i can't believe anyone could enjoy such a boring, never-ending war. and all the fight sucks, we didn't get anything like "Naruto vs Sasuke" or "3rd Hokage vs Orochimaru" or "Jiraya vs Pain" or "Lee vs Gara"
i can't believe the guy -Kishimoto- who wrote the first part is the same guy who's writing this shitty arc. talk about downgrade :crazy: !

User avatar
Kid Buu
I Live Here
Posts: 4149
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 4:02 am
Location: United Kingdom

Re: What If Eiichiro Oda wrote Dragon Ball?

Post by Kid Buu » Sun Jan 19, 2014 5:36 pm

Neji and Choji should have both died in the Sound Four arc. Neji doesn't really do anything noticeable in Shippuden anyway. Chojis role in the Immortals arc could have been taken by Temari, and the Asuma battle could have been changed to Shikamaru & Ino Vs. Choji & Asuma.
Rocketman wrote:"Shonen" basically means "stupid sentimental shit" anyway, so it's ok to be anti-shonen.

User avatar
thatdbzguy
Banned
Posts: 880
Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2013 12:27 am

Re: What If Eiichiro Oda wrote Dragon Ball?

Post by thatdbzguy » Sun Jan 19, 2014 5:53 pm

So is this a Naruto thread now, or what?
Khalid Shahin wrote:
Dragon Soul Funimation Lyrics wrote:Nothing ever dies; we will rise again!
Yeah, pretty much sums the show up right there.

User avatar
Kid Buu
I Live Here
Posts: 4149
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 4:02 am
Location: United Kingdom

Re: What If Eiichiro Oda wrote Dragon Ball?

Post by Kid Buu » Sun Jan 19, 2014 6:18 pm

Image

Of course it is!

In more seriousness, if Oda wrote DB, the artwork would be a lot worse and too sentimental.
Rocketman wrote:"Shonen" basically means "stupid sentimental shit" anyway, so it's ok to be anti-shonen.

User avatar
Daimo-Rukiri
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1529
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 11:44 am
Location: U..S..A..

Re: What If Eiichiro Oda wrote Dragon Ball?

Post by Daimo-Rukiri » Sun Jan 19, 2014 6:20 pm

DonZ wrote:Naruto has turned into complete SHIT since the 4th shinobi war. i can't believe anyone could enjoy such a boring, never-ending war. and all the fight sucks, we didn't get anything like "Naruto vs Sasuke" or "3rd Hokage vs Orochimaru" or "Jiraya vs Pain" or "Lee vs Gara"
i can't believe the guy -Kishimoto- who wrote the first part is the same guy who's writing this shitty arc. talk about downgrade :crazy: !
Kishimoto knows how to troll his readers, surprised we haven't seen the ramen guy swoop in and end the war. Wishful funny thinking though :lol:

User avatar
dprez
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1381
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:52 pm

Re: What If Eiichiro Oda wrote Dragon Ball?

Post by dprez » Sun Jan 19, 2014 8:20 pm

The lore of the Dragon Ball universe would've been greatly expanded upon if Oda were the author. We all love Dragon Ball because it's so carefree and doesn't take itself to seriously, but at the same time is epic and intriguing. This is because Toriyama really is a great mangaka and knew what he was doing. His personality shows in his work, as well as Oda's in his, but you can tell the guy ( Oda ) cares more and puts way more thought into his story. Some say the emotions in One Piece are to overblown and the art is suspect, but I love the art and the interactions with the characters and the situations that cause such emotional outbursts. Both series are loved for different reasons, but at the same time both series are great for similar reasons.

When I honestly think about it, if I had to only watch/read one shonen series for the rest of my life, it would be Dragon Ball. There's just so much to love as a Dragon Ball fan.

User avatar
Saiga
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8311
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2011 8:36 pm
Location: Space Australia

Re: What If Eiichiro Oda wrote Dragon Ball?

Post by Saiga » Sun Jan 19, 2014 9:03 pm

DBZGTKOSDH wrote:
Saiga wrote:Yamato is straight up dead, apparently, according to a recent interview. So not forgotten, his "death" was just given absolutely no focus. Kind of sad, I liked him.
What interview?!
Jump Festa 2014. The information is taken from 2chan, so might not be true, but:

JFの岸影発言
ヤマトは死にました
生き返ったりもしません

Kishi (Jump Festa 14): "Yamato is dead and he isn't coming back."
I'm re-watching Dragon Ball GT in full on my blog. Check it out if you're interested in my thoughts on the series as I watch through it!

User avatar
cpuguy18
Newbie
Posts: 26
Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2013 11:13 pm

Re: What If Eiichiro Oda wrote Dragon Ball?

Post by cpuguy18 » Mon Jan 20, 2014 1:37 am

Saiga wrote:That's because it's overrated as all hell. It's never been able to top Water 7 - Enies Lobby, which is about 9 years old now.

edit: I didn't even like Fishman Island DBZGTKOSDH. :P Too much time spent hyping up villains who went down too easily.
Marineford was better than Water 7 - Enies Lobby in my opinon.

User avatar
DBZGTKOSDH
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 12401
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 7:45 pm
Location: Greece

Re: What If Eiichiro Oda wrote Dragon Ball?

Post by DBZGTKOSDH » Mon Jan 20, 2014 7:23 am

Saiga wrote:Jump Festa 2014. The information is taken from 2chan, so might not be true, but:

JFの岸影発言
ヤマトは死にました
生き返ったりもしません

Kishi (Jump Festa 14): "Yamato is dead and he isn't coming back."
Sounds too weird to be true. Why would Kishimoto spoil such an important thing? And why is he even dead when the point of his capture was to stay alive? And why would he even die? Until it's confirmed as legit, I take this statement as a fake.
James Teal (Animerica 1996) wrote:When you think about it, there are a number of similarities between the Chinese-inspired Son Goku and that most American of superhero icons, Superman. Both are aliens sent to Earth shortly after birth to escape the destruction of their homeworlds; both possess super-strength, flight, super-speed, heightened senses and the ability to cast energy blasts. But the crucial difference between them lies not only in how they view the world, but in how the world views them.

Superman is, and always has been, a symbol for truth, justice, and upstanding moral fortitude–a role model and leader as much as a fighter. The more down-to-earth Goku has no illusions about being responsible for maintaining social order, or for setting some kind of moral example for the entire world. Goku is simply a martial artist who’s devoted his life toward perfecting his fighting skills and other abilities. Though never shy about risking his life to save either one person or the entire world, he just doesn’t believe that the balance of the world rests in any way on his shoulders, and he has no need to shape any part of it in his image. Goku is an idealist, and believes that there is some good in everyone, but he is unconcerned with the big picture of the world…unless it has to do with some kind of fight. Politics, society, law and order don’t have much bearing on his life, but he’s a man who knows right from wrong.

User avatar
Jodaku
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 223
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 5:29 am
Location: Birmingham, UK

Re: What If Eiichiro Oda wrote Dragon Ball?

Post by Jodaku » Mon Jan 20, 2014 7:48 am

It's interesting reading the debate on how much of a chance you should give a series before deciding that if it's worth proceeding with in the long run. I think of the Django Unchained quote from DiCaprio "...you had my curiosity, but now you have my attention".

If something I was curious about checking out is able to hold my attention, then I'm good to go along with it to see where it goes. I'm not looking for greatness, just something to hook me in to hold my attention and keep me interested, even if it's just the basic premise.

In some ways One Piece and Breaking Bad are similar in that they're very, almost severely hyped franchises, touted as one of the all time greats in their respective mediums. The strength of that hype combined with friends recommendations led me to checking out both of those series. With One Piece I didn't last more than 4 volumes of the manga. It just didn't hold my attention long enough to get to the supposedly good parts. I didn't find it bad, I just didn't find it particularly interesting. From what I've gathered here and elsewhere, it seems like it's roughly volume 8 or 9 where One Piece really gets going, but for me that's way too long for something to supposedly hook you. Am I missing out on some great stuff for not persevering longer? Most likely, but I don't actually feel like I'm missing out based on what I read, even if what I read was not the best representation of One Piece, it should have done a better job of keeping my interest before getting to that point.

In comparison, Breaking Bad had me hooked from the first episode. No, I wasn't seeing early signs of the greatness that was being touted (which really didn't start to become evident until season 3 at the earliest) , but it did more than enough to hold my attention, to keep me entertained and to keep going with it. It earns its trust from the audience in the early episodes to stick with it while not necessarily blowing you away , whereas I feel like I have to trust One Piece to get better while being apathetic getting there, which is not something I'm prepared to do.

To bring this back to Dragon Ball, and for a more direct comparison 4 volumes in, while the Pilaf/Hunt for the Dragon Balls would have definitely fall into that apathetic territory, Master Roshi's training/Krillin's introduction/21st Tenkaichi Budokai would have more than saved it for me if I was reading it first time round without knowledge of what's to come.
Last edited by Jodaku on Mon Jan 20, 2014 2:03 pm, edited 2 times in total.

rereboy
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10262
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 8:42 pm

Re: What If Eiichiro Oda wrote Dragon Ball?

Post by rereboy » Mon Jan 20, 2014 8:04 am

Jodaku wrote: From what I've gathered here and elsewhere, it seems like it's roughly volume 8 or 9 where One Piece really gets going, but for me that's way too long for something to supposedly hook you. Am I missing out on some great stuff for not persevering longer? Most likely, but I don't actually feel like I'm missing out based on what I read, even if what I read was not the best representation of One Piece, it should have done a better job of keeping my interest before getting to that point.
Like I said before, if I had done as you did, I would never have ended up considering One Piece as one of my favorite manga (and one of the best manga I know). Like you, I wouldn't have considered it all that great.

There's really no way to actually properly judge One Piece without at least reading most of it. Its a long series that fulfills itself in the long run. You stick with it and the more you read, the more you know of it, you will love it more. By the time you've read all of it or most of it, it usually is one of your favorites and you are in awe with the capacity of the author to create that world with all its complexities.

User avatar
Flame Dragon
Regular
Posts: 619
Joined: Fri May 11, 2012 9:52 am
Location: Italy

Re: What If Eiichiro Oda wrote Dragon Ball?

Post by Flame Dragon » Mon Jan 20, 2014 10:06 am

Saiga wrote:I agree with the sentiment that it's a significant flaw if a series takes multiple volumes to get interesting. And Water 7 starts at volume 34, it is waaay to much to expect someone to wait over 30 volumes before they see something interesting.

So no, for anyone who dropped the series before than, that's being fair. It's up to the work to keep people interested enough to continue reading.
I watched the end of the Alabasta Arc, and i must say that you guys are overblowing this.
It's not like One Piece is AWFUL until Volume 34!

To me, the show started becoming awesome at the Arlong Arc, and it keeps getting better!
It was pretty good before Arlong too. I found the Captain Kuro arc pretty interesting.

User avatar
helsinkirocks
Not-So-Newbie
Posts: 64
Joined: Sat Aug 03, 2013 5:08 am
Location: Ohio
Contact:

Re: What If Eiichiro Oda wrote Dragon Ball?

Post by helsinkirocks » Mon Jan 20, 2014 10:21 am

Kuro is my favorite of the pre-Grand Line villains (Kuro, Buggy, Kreig, Arlong).

User avatar
DonZ
Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
Posts: 341
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2013 1:33 pm

Re: What If Eiichiro Oda wrote Dragon Ball?

Post by DonZ » Mon Jan 20, 2014 10:24 am

Enel easily is the best villain in One Piece. he's freaking scary!
and his background story is amazing.i like Doflamingo too.

User avatar
helsinkirocks
Not-So-Newbie
Posts: 64
Joined: Sat Aug 03, 2013 5:08 am
Location: Ohio
Contact:

Re: What If Eiichiro Oda wrote Dragon Ball?

Post by helsinkirocks » Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:18 am

My personal favorite villain is Rob Lucci, but at this point it's just getting SUPER off topic.

Post Reply