My ass it does. Unless Gohan immediately transformed after reviving and then stayed in that transformed state for the next decade.DBZGTKOSDH wrote:The manga heavily implies that it works like a transformation.
How exactly Gohan could have been better in the Boo arc
Re: How exactly Gohan could have been better in the Boo arc
"It goes against his nature" is a weak argument when Mystic is outright stated to change Gohan's nature. There is absolutely no reason for him to slack off again after that...except ~gokuuuuuuuuuuu~.
- fadeddreams5
- Born 'n Bred Here
- Posts: 5266
- Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2014 10:53 pm
- Location: New York
Re: How exactly Gohan could have been better in the Boo arc
If that was SSJ2 Kid Gohan, he'd wave his hand back and throw a tornado at Vegeta.Avery wrote:Gohan in the boo arc...
Urgh...
But seriously, Toriyama made him so weak just to make Goku shine once more then comes up with that mystic ass-pull to make him relevant again then...er...makes him irrelevant again. -__-
The Boo arc was really weird.
"Dragon Ball once became a thing of the past to me, but after that, I got angry about the live action movie, re-wrote an entire movie script, and now I'm complaining about the quality of the new TV anime. It seems Dragon Ball has grown on me so much that I can't leave it alone." - Akira Toriyama on Dragon Ball Super
-
SSJ2FutureGohan
- I Live Here
- Posts: 2496
- Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2014 1:29 am
Re: How exactly Gohan could have been better in the Boo arc
How does Ultimate work like a transformation? Old Kaioshin said transformations are the wrong way of doing things.
- fadeddreams5
- Born 'n Bred Here
- Posts: 5266
- Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2014 10:53 pm
- Location: New York
Re: How exactly Gohan could have been better in the Boo arc
I assume 90% of this fanbase is confused over that form because of all the dubs, adaptations, and manga translations. In most English stuff, for example, the Old Kai tells him to transform into a SSJ to achieve it, implying he's transforming. In the Japanese manga, he says something like, "you’ll be fine if you just get the gist of that [super saiyan transformation], and throw in a kiai." Also why so many people believe SSJ and mystic cannot both exist for him. =PSSJ2FutureGohan wrote:How does Ultimate work like a transformation? Old Kaioshin said transformations are the wrong way of doing things.
"Dragon Ball once became a thing of the past to me, but after that, I got angry about the live action movie, re-wrote an entire movie script, and now I'm complaining about the quality of the new TV anime. It seems Dragon Ball has grown on me so much that I can't leave it alone." - Akira Toriyama on Dragon Ball Super
- SingleFringe&Sparks
- I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
- Posts: 1642
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:55 pm
- Location: Mt. Paozu/East District
Re: How exactly Gohan could have been better in the Boo arc
That one moment in the series along with his overhyped power potential seems to be the only reason why fans actually like the character.fadeddreams5 wrote:I found all those examples you listed badass too.
But SSJ2 Gohan was uncompromising, intimidating, mean-tempered, and just awesome. Did you not see what he did to those Cell Jrs?! And that punch to the gut against Cell. He was hands down the most brutal fighter ever in this entire series during those few minutes.
I think it was more so to give him a way to catch up because training for his power upkeep seemed too much for him to maintain, so him being able to just release all his ki at once seemed to be the alternative use of it. The only problem was that it ended up being completely useless for his character even after it was the better solution so he wouldnt have to train.Avery wrote:Gohan in the boo arc...Toriyama made him so weak just to make Goku shine once more then comes up with that mystic ass-pull to make him relevant again then...er...makes him irrelevant again. -__-
The Boo arc was really weird.
Zephyr wrote:The fandom's collective fetishizing of "moments" is also ridiculous to me. No, not everyone needs a fucking "shine" moment. If that's all you want, then all you want is fanservice, rather than an actual coherent story. And of course those aren't mutually exclusive; you could have a coherent story with "shine" moments! But if a story is perfectly coherent (and I'm really not seeing any compelling arguments that this one is anything but, despite constantly recurring, really poorly reasoned, attempts to argue otherwise), and you're bemoaning the lack of "shine" moments as a reason for the story's poor quality, then you're letting your thirst for "shine" moments obfuscate your ability to detect basic storytelling when it's right in front of you.
- fadeddreams5
- Born 'n Bred Here
- Posts: 5266
- Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2014 10:53 pm
- Location: New York
Re: How exactly Gohan could have been better in the Boo arc
Nope. I liked Gohan since he was introduced up until the Great Saiyaman saga. Then disliked him, and then hated him. Mystic moments were cool though.SingleFringe&Sparks wrote:That one moment in the series along with his overhyped power potential seems to be the only reason why fans actually like the character.fadeddreams5 wrote:I found all those examples you listed badass too.
But SSJ2 Gohan was uncompromising, intimidating, mean-tempered, and just awesome. Did you not see what he did to those Cell Jrs?! And that punch to the gut against Cell. He was hands down the most brutal fighter ever in this entire series during those few minutes.
"Dragon Ball once became a thing of the past to me, but after that, I got angry about the live action movie, re-wrote an entire movie script, and now I'm complaining about the quality of the new TV anime. It seems Dragon Ball has grown on me so much that I can't leave it alone." - Akira Toriyama on Dragon Ball Super
Re: How exactly Gohan could have been better in the Boo arc
Gohan's fight with Cell and his few minutes of glory against Super Boo were actually the only instances where I disliked him. He looked badass, and that's all. And those Vegeta faces he started making once he turned mystic...good thing Boo wiped that smirk off his face.
An angry Final Fantasy fan wrote: And after all the outrage, when I'm ready, I'll go out on to GameStop and buy a Persona 5 copy. And when my mother finds me investing my precious time trying to bond with this hot anime girl, I'll look straight into her eyes and say "but have you looked at the menu screen? have you actually seen the menu screen? In that very moment, she knows. She fucking knows. As she handles me the nugget pieces she previously cooked for me, she leaves my room with these words: "Persona 5 is the true savior of the JRPG".
VegettoEX wrote: In a blunt nutshell, no-one wants to read bullshit. Don't post bullshit. Be a cool person that posts cool things that other people would actually want to read. Don't be Zamasu from episode 63 talking to himself.
- DBZGTKOSDH
- Namekian Warrior
- Posts: 12401
- Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 7:45 pm
- Location: Greece
Re: How exactly Gohan could have been better in the Boo arc
The fully outlined eyes seem to be a permanent side-effect, but his hairstyle is different when he is fighting & when he doesn't. Plus, Goku believed that he would have been able to do Fusion with Gohan, and Rou Kaioshin didn't say anything about it being impossible, the problem was that Boo wouldn't leave them enough time to do it.Rocketman wrote:My ass it does. Unless Gohan immediately transformed after reviving and then stayed in that transformed state for the next decade.
James Teal (Animerica 1996) wrote:When you think about it, there are a number of similarities between the Chinese-inspired Son Goku and that most American of superhero icons, Superman. Both are aliens sent to Earth shortly after birth to escape the destruction of their homeworlds; both possess super-strength, flight, super-speed, heightened senses and the ability to cast energy blasts. But the crucial difference between them lies not only in how they view the world, but in how the world views them.
Superman is, and always has been, a symbol for truth, justice, and upstanding moral fortitude–a role model and leader as much as a fighter. The more down-to-earth Goku has no illusions about being responsible for maintaining social order, or for setting some kind of moral example for the entire world. Goku is simply a martial artist who’s devoted his life toward perfecting his fighting skills and other abilities. Though never shy about risking his life to save either one person or the entire world, he just doesn’t believe that the balance of the world rests in any way on his shoulders, and he has no need to shape any part of it in his image. Goku is an idealist, and believes that there is some good in everyone, but he is unconcerned with the big picture of the world…unless it has to do with some kind of fight. Politics, society, law and order don’t have much bearing on his life, but he’s a man who knows right from wrong.
Re: How exactly Gohan could have been better in the Boo arc
So you started disliking him when he got... weak?fadeddreams5 wrote:Nope. I liked Gohan since he was introduced up until the Great Saiyaman saga. Then disliked him, and then hated him. Mystic moments were cool though.SingleFringe&Sparks wrote:That one moment in the series along with his overhyped power potential seems to be the only reason why fans actually like the character.fadeddreams5 wrote:I found all those examples you listed badass too.
But SSJ2 Gohan was uncompromising, intimidating, mean-tempered, and just awesome. Did you not see what he did to those Cell Jrs?! And that punch to the gut against Cell. He was hands down the most brutal fighter ever in this entire series during those few minutes.
Re: How exactly Gohan could have been better in the Boo arc
No it isn't? What difference are you talking about?DBZGTKOSDH wrote:The fully outlined eyes seem to be a permanent side-effect, but his hairstyle is different when he is fighting & when he doesn't.
Re: How exactly Gohan could have been better in the Boo arc
Exactly. The common arguments are that, "Gohan is not a devoted fighter, he just wants a normal life. From the start, he was forced into fighting, when he was really interested in being a scholar," and "there were no signs of any future threats, so there's no need for training." I actually got into an arguement with a guy on Youtube about Gohan character, and he repeated those exact same things.Rocketman wrote:"It goes against his nature" is a weak argument when Mystic is outright stated to change Gohan's nature. There is absolutely no reason for him to slack off again after that...except ~gokuuuuuuuuuuu~.
My ass it does. Unless Gohan immediately transformed after reviving and then stayed in that transformed state for the next decade.DBZGTKOSDH wrote:The manga heavily implies that it works like a transformation.
The fact is: Gohan wanted to protect. If he so wanted a normal life and protection of people, then he should train so that he'll be strong enough to keep the peace. That fact that he isn't a devoted fighter is a problem. As for training going against his nature, I really don't understand that. As Beerus said, Gohan could've easily balanced his training and studies.
- ABED
- Namekian Warrior
- Posts: 20472
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
- Location: Sarasota, FL
- Contact:
Re: How exactly Gohan could have been better in the Boo arc
There's a difference between wanting to protect and wanting to fight. Often they coincide, like with Goku, but Gohan always struck me as someone who likes to help out, but otherwise is more than fine living a calm peaceful existence without fighting or doing vigorous training unless circumstances made him. He's much more reactive than proactive in this case.SMKirbyZX wrote:Exactly. The common arguments are that, "Gohan is not a devoted fighter, he just wants a normal life. From the start, he was forced into fighting, when he was really interested in being a scholar," and "there were no signs of any future threats, so there's no need for training." I actually got into an arguement with a guy on Youtube about Gohan character, and he repeated those exact same things.Rocketman wrote:"It goes against his nature" is a weak argument when Mystic is outright stated to change Gohan's nature. There is absolutely no reason for him to slack off again after that...except ~gokuuuuuuuuuuu~.
My ass it does. Unless Gohan immediately transformed after reviving and then stayed in that transformed state for the next decade.DBZGTKOSDH wrote:The manga heavily implies that it works like a transformation.
The fact is: Gohan wanted to protect. If he so wanted a normal life and protection of people, then he should train so that he'll be strong enough to keep the peace. That fact that he isn't a devoted fighter is a problem. As for training going against his nature, I really don't understand that. As Beerus said, Gohan could've easily balanced his training and studies.
I'm more than fine with Gohan not wanting to be a fighter, which is why I don't think he's best suited for the role of the main hero because it's not what he truly wants. He'd be doing it out of duty, not desire.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.
- fadeddreams5
- Born 'n Bred Here
- Posts: 5266
- Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2014 10:53 pm
- Location: New York
Re: How exactly Gohan could have been better in the Boo arc
I disliked his design (specifically, hair) in the Saiyaman arc and beyond. I still liked his antics in that saga, especially his first day of high school. But, when it was revealed he didn't follow up with his abilities, yeah, that turned me the hell off. It's a show about fighting, after all. Mystic is cool, but I sort of wish Old Kai established that Gohan had a special hidden power instead, and I wish he had to work hard to attain it too, instead of just sitting on his ass. And finally, post-Buu, he's portrayed even more as a nerd (design-wise), and he keeps getting weaker. Visuals and designs mean a lot to me in this show, and if something loses its "cool factor", I get turned off (e.g. SSJG, SSGSS, Fat Buu, etc.).Doctor. wrote: So you started disliking him when he got... weak?
Last edited by fadeddreams5 on Tue Jun 16, 2015 1:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Dragon Ball once became a thing of the past to me, but after that, I got angry about the live action movie, re-wrote an entire movie script, and now I'm complaining about the quality of the new TV anime. It seems Dragon Ball has grown on me so much that I can't leave it alone." - Akira Toriyama on Dragon Ball Super
Re: How exactly Gohan could have been better in the Boo arc
It should be noted that it might not be possible for Gohan to maintain his mystic power. It could be that maintaining it is too time intensive for him to have a normal life
Re: How exactly Gohan could have been better in the Boo arc
No offense, but aren't those reasons too superficial to be used as an argument? Presentation is honestly just a very, very minor aspect of a story.fadeddreams5 wrote:I disliked his design (specifically, hair) in the Saiyaman arc and beyond. I still liked his antics in that saga, especially his first day of high school. But, when it was revealed he didn't follow up with his abilities, yeah, that turned me the hell off. It's a show about fighting, after all. Mystic is cool, but I sort of wish Old Kai established that Gohan had a special hidden power instead, and I wish he had to work hard to attain it too, instead of just sitting on his ass. And finally, post-Buu, he's portrayed even more as a nerd (design-wise), and he keeps getting weaker. Visuals and designs mean a lot to me in this show, and if something loses its "cool factor", I get turned off (e.g. SSJG, SSGSS, Fat Buu, etc.).Doctor. wrote: So you started disliking him when he got... weak?
- fadeddreams5
- Born 'n Bred Here
- Posts: 5266
- Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2014 10:53 pm
- Location: New York
Re: How exactly Gohan could have been better in the Boo arc
Probably. But this is a young boy's series about fighting. Why do you think Broly has a tremendous fanbase? lol.Doctor. wrote:No offense, but aren't those reasons too superficial to be used as an argument? Presentation is honestly just a very, very minor aspect of a story.fadeddreams5 wrote:I disliked his design (specifically, hair) in the Saiyaman arc and beyond. I still liked his antics in that saga, especially his first day of high school. But, when it was revealed he didn't follow up with his abilities, yeah, that turned me the hell off. It's a show about fighting, after all. Mystic is cool, but I sort of wish Old Kai established that Gohan had a special hidden power instead, and I wish he had to work hard to attain it too, instead of just sitting on his ass. And finally, post-Buu, he's portrayed even more as a nerd (design-wise), and he keeps getting weaker. Visuals and designs mean a lot to me in this show, and if something loses its "cool factor", I get turned off (e.g. SSJG, SSGSS, Fat Buu, etc.).Doctor. wrote: So you started disliking him when he got... weak?
And as far as story is concerned, I enjoyed Gohan's growth as a character from the start of DBZ. I felt he hit a brick wall at the end of the Cell Games, and then just kept becoming weaker, rather than stronger. If the events of the Cell Games didn't motivate him, surely being overpowered by Buu should have, right? But no, then he becomes the strongest being on the planet, yet continues his old ways of slacking, even after attaining a family. He's gone no where. No progression what-so-ever. He's just lame in every single category.
"Dragon Ball once became a thing of the past to me, but after that, I got angry about the live action movie, re-wrote an entire movie script, and now I'm complaining about the quality of the new TV anime. It seems Dragon Ball has grown on me so much that I can't leave it alone." - Akira Toriyama on Dragon Ball Super
- ABED
- Namekian Warrior
- Posts: 20472
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
- Location: Sarasota, FL
- Contact:
Re: How exactly Gohan could have been better in the Boo arc
It's not progress only if you think his end goal should be to become stronger. I think him becoming a scholar is a perfectly suitable ending for Gohan. Leave the fighting and defending of Earth up to others who are better suited and are better fighters to begin with. Attaining a family is a good ending, that's hardly lame.But no, then he becomes the strongest being on the planet, yet continues his old ways of slacking, even after attaining a family. He's gone no where. No progression what-so-ever. He's just lame in every single category.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.
- DBZGTKOSDH
- Namekian Warrior
- Posts: 12401
- Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 7:45 pm
- Location: Greece
Re: How exactly Gohan could have been better in the Boo arc
Look at the bang.Rocketman wrote:No it isn't? What difference are you talking about?DBZGTKOSDH wrote:The fully outlined eyes seem to be a permanent side-effect, but his hairstyle is different when he is fighting & when he doesn't.
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
James Teal (Animerica 1996) wrote:When you think about it, there are a number of similarities between the Chinese-inspired Son Goku and that most American of superhero icons, Superman. Both are aliens sent to Earth shortly after birth to escape the destruction of their homeworlds; both possess super-strength, flight, super-speed, heightened senses and the ability to cast energy blasts. But the crucial difference between them lies not only in how they view the world, but in how the world views them.
Superman is, and always has been, a symbol for truth, justice, and upstanding moral fortitude–a role model and leader as much as a fighter. The more down-to-earth Goku has no illusions about being responsible for maintaining social order, or for setting some kind of moral example for the entire world. Goku is simply a martial artist who’s devoted his life toward perfecting his fighting skills and other abilities. Though never shy about risking his life to save either one person or the entire world, he just doesn’t believe that the balance of the world rests in any way on his shoulders, and he has no need to shape any part of it in his image. Goku is an idealist, and believes that there is some good in everyone, but he is unconcerned with the big picture of the world…unless it has to do with some kind of fight. Politics, society, law and order don’t have much bearing on his life, but he’s a man who knows right from wrong.
- fadeddreams5
- Born 'n Bred Here
- Posts: 5266
- Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2014 10:53 pm
- Location: New York
Re: How exactly Gohan could have been better in the Boo arc
It's a show about fighting! And this guy was established to have greater potential in this area than any other character, yet he never does anything with it after the Cell Games. He could do that scholarly stuff regardless, but as a viewer, I could give two craps and would prefer him to progress as a fighter and hero.ABED wrote:It's not progress only if you think his end goal should be to become stronger. I think him becoming a scholar is a perfectly suitable ending for Gohan. Leave the fighting and defending of Earth up to others who are better suited and are better fighters to begin with. Attaining a family is a good ending, that's hardly lame.But no, then he becomes the strongest being on the planet, yet continues his old ways of slacking, even after attaining a family. He's gone no where. No progression what-so-ever. He's just lame in every single category.
"Dragon Ball once became a thing of the past to me, but after that, I got angry about the live action movie, re-wrote an entire movie script, and now I'm complaining about the quality of the new TV anime. It seems Dragon Ball has grown on me so much that I can't leave it alone." - Akira Toriyama on Dragon Ball Super
- Lord Beerus
- Namekian Warrior
- Posts: 21430
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 5:20 pm
- Location: A temple on a giant tree
- Contact:
Re: How exactly Gohan could have been better in the Boo arc
Dragon Ball may be about fighting, but when the character(s) stops fighting, and I realize that I don't give a shit about him/her, then I won't give a shit about him/her when he/she is fighting. So that characters progress as a fighter would mean nothing to me and then the character becomes worthless in my mind.fadeddreams5 wrote:It's a show about fighting! And this guy was established to have greater potential in this area than any other character, yet he never does anything with it after the Cell Games. He could do that scholarly stuff regardless, but as a viewer, I could give two craps and would prefer him to progress as a fighter and hero.
Spoiler:









