Does Gotenks have SSJ2?

Discussion, generally of an in-universe nature, regarding any aspect of the franchise (including movies, spin-offs, etc.) such as: techniques, character relationships, internal back-history, its universe, and more.
User avatar
VegettoEX
Kanzenshuu Co-Owner & Administrator
Posts: 17801
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2004 3:10 pm
Location: New Jersey
Contact:

Re: Does Gotenks have SSJ2?

Post by VegettoEX » Mon Mar 28, 2011 9:58 am

Infamous_666 wrote:You just need to be as unbiased as possible if you even want to hope to begin to see it.
Not that I give a lick about these conversations, but since I have to moderate them...

Isn't it completely hypocritical to say that you dismiss information from the daizenshuu and other guide books simply due to some contradictions, but then go on to say you need to be as unbiased as possible when considering the information at hand? That... doesn't make any sense at all.

I have no vested interest either way. I don't care who thinks what on their own time about which books (really, I don't), but if you're aiming for consistency and authority, you can't just toss things out willy-nilly like that and say you're being "unbiased". That's just silly.
:: [| Mike "VegettoEX" LaBrie |] ::
:: [| Kanzenshuu - Co-Founder/Administrator, Podcast Host, News Manager (note: our "job" titles are arbitrary and meaningless) |] ::
:: [| Website: January 1998 |] :: [| Podcast: November 2005 |] :: [| Fusion: April 2012 |] :: [| Wiki: 20XX |] ::

User avatar
dbgtFO
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 7971
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 5:07 pm
Contact:

Re: Does Gotenks have SSJ2?

Post by dbgtFO » Tue Mar 29, 2011 8:10 am

Infamous_666 wrote:P knows how I feel about the guidebooks... I feel there are a lot of contradictions between the Daiz and the manga which calls its credibility into question for me so I usually prefer using a manga information only approach. I feel that pretty much always, the manga gives us all of the information we need for this kind of stuff. You just need to be as unbiased as possible if you even want to hope to begin to see it.
Define "a lot."

The only ones I see that keep coming up is whether or not Gohan was using SSJ 2 against Dabra, Strength/Battle Power related issues(like the idea that there is a definite percentage of power you have to be before you rival your opponent or can perform certain feats against him/her) and the fabrication that any Daizenshuu claimed Recoom killed Gohan(which the persons claiming that have failed to provide proof of).

User avatar
Herms
Kanzenshuu Admin Emeritus
Posts: 10550
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 6:40 pm
Location: Jupiter
Contact:

Re: Does Gotenks have SSJ2?

Post by Herms » Tue Mar 29, 2011 10:52 am

dbgtFO wrote:and the fabrication that any Daizenshuu claimed Recoom killed Gohan(which the persons claiming that have failed to provide proof of).
Well, I think I'm kinda responsible for that. For Kanzentai I mistranslated Daizenshuu 2's description of Recoom's Eraser Gun as "It's a single blow that finishes off Vegeta, Gohan, and Krillin!", when it really ought to be something like "a single blow for finishing off Vegeta, Gohan, and Krillin". That is, it's intended to finish them off, as opposed to actually doing the job. This description comes from the manga, where before firing the technique Recoom announces that "this is the finish" (in the manga he uses the English word "finish", but Daizenshuu 2 uses todome, the Japanese equivalent). When I was translating Daizenshuu 2 I didn't have my manga to check and misremembered the attack as actually finishing the group off. Either way, "finish" doesn't mean "kill", just that it KOs them or otherwise decides the fight. The daizenshuu description is still a little off, because the attack was aimed at Vegeta, while Gohan and Krillin only step in to save Vegeta, but it's nothing as absurd as saying that any of them were actually killed by Recoom.

At any rate, while I'd certainly never claim that the daizenshuu are infallible or should be treated as gospel, people who "question their credibility" always seem to hold the books to an absurdly high standard of perfection, especially considering how contradictory the original manga actually is. In his Daizenshuu 4 introduction Toriyama even apologizes to the daizenshuu staff for having to make sense of a series that he drew in such a "hit-or-miss" fashion without thinking things through, and in his Daizenshuu 7 introduction he notes that there's many things about DB that he doesn't understand anymore, and says he wishes he had had a copy of Daizenshuu 7 around when actually making the series. They're official guidebooks put out by Shueisha, the same company that published the manga, and were made with Toriyama's full support and involvement. A few bum captions don't negate this. Keep in mind that the seven hardcover daizenshuu run for a total of over 1,600 pages. Can anyone identify 16 errors from the daizenshuu? If so, that shows that the daizenshuu average a single error every 100 pages. Frankly that sounds pretty damn good to me.

And the anti-daizenshuu crowd seems almost without exception to be concerned exclusively with strength debates and fan-made power level lists, both in their attitude towards the guides and with the series as a whole. There have been quite a few debates over the whole "Tenshinhan is descended from aliens" thing, but these are a drop in the ocean compared to the endless wankery over whether Gohan was a Super Saiyan or Super Saiyan 2 when fighting Dabra, what Raditz/Nappa/Freeza's numbers are, what the "multipliers" for the various forms of Super Saiyan are and whether or not they change over the course of the series, Boo's forms, Ultimate Gohan vs. Goku vs. Gotenks, etc etc, and so forth and so on, seemingly without end. All of this despite the undeniable fact that the author of the series neither knew nor cared about such minutiae, both when actually writing the series and afterward. All of these debates center primarily over "rules" about the characters' power that are invented entirely by fans, based on their own interpretation of carefully selected examples from a series that could hardly be less consistent or strict about such things (well OK, it's not quite up to Kinnikuman's level of craziness in this regard, but it's within spitting distance). While I'm not opposed to this kind of fan-fiction, there really is a problem when this sort of thing threatens to overwhelm the fandom as a whole, and fans forget that their elaborate systems are their own inventions rather than something laid out in the manga in any way. Once that happens, conversations that should be light-hearted and fun morph into interminable, heated debates over nothing.

And of course it leads people to say stupid things about the daizenshuu and other guidebooks once those books inevitably turn out not to support their elaborate and invented power level schemes. While this result isn't as bad as the pointlessly vicious arguments that spoil forums (it's not like the guidebooks have feelings, after all), it does reflect what a warped perspective many fans have. Someone who wasn't completely down the fan-made power level rabbit hole might pause before rejecting out of hand the books that constitute our major source of interviews with Toriyama and everyone else actually responsible for producing the series, both manga and anime. Personally I feel that getting to see pictures of Toriyama's original character designs for Goku (where he was first an actual monkey, then a tailless boy) outweighs by far any questionable estimates of Raditz or Nappa's power level. And that being provided the original air dates for every episode of the DB/Z anime and the premiere dates for the movies is somewhat more important than anything that could ever be said about how Gotenks stacks up in comparison to the other characters. Or that learning how Piccolo, Freeza, and Boo are each modeled after whichever editor Toriyama had at the time more than makes up for a little contradictory information on Super Saiyan 2 Gohan and Dabra. For that matter, being able to know about the different editors Toriyama had throughout the series and what portion of the series they were around for (something you'd never learn directly from the manga itself) leads to speculation over what influence each might have had on the story. It's things like this that are infinitely more fascinating than any speculation on power could possibly be. In short, I feel that people who reject the daizenshuu and other guidebooks for a few mistakes are shutting themselves off from a wealth of information on the series that far surpasses in interest and scope any strength debate.

tl;dr: Power levels aren't everything. Hell, power levels aren't anything, really. Anyone who reduces the series to them is just needlessly limiting their own enjoyment of the franchise and making the fandom a cramped, overheated place for the rest of us.
Kanzenshuu: Is that place still around?
Sometimes, I tweet things
We might, if they screamed all the time, for no good reason.

User avatar
Fox666
I Live Here
Posts: 4343
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 1:18 am

Re: Does Gotenks have SSJ2?

Post by Fox666 » Tue Mar 29, 2011 2:17 pm

The fans over-estimate the importance of the numeric Ki representations (battle powers), Toriyama never cared so much about them. He used them more to determine a character status (like a baseball card) rather than a perfect combat system. The fans forget that while Toriyama was drawing, he didn't have a calculator to determine the number of hits Freeza landed on Goku. Despite that, we have seen many other attributes from characters, such as strength, stamina, strategy and so on that determined the out-comes of battles rather than battle powers.

The manga itself is contradictory. Goku said to Piccolo that he told to Majin Boo to wait that a more powerfull warrior soon would come. However he never said that. This is a more astonoshing error than the Daizenshuu staff usual error of confusing the number of an android or the form of a certain character. It must be really boring to write tons of character descriptions, list of techniques and battles.

p123
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1358
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 2:34 am

Re: Does Gotenks have SSJ2?

Post by p123 » Wed Mar 30, 2011 3:46 pm

I think Infamous was talking more about specifically power debates regarding Daiz... I feel that the Daiz is great, and the tons and tons of information in it are definitely worth knowing about. Having debated with Infamous for a while too, I would think he agrees. His being questionable of power level stuff, is what he finds questionable about the Daiz.

I would happen to agree. I think the best bet is to take the manga statements, regarding power statements as the best source. That's in no way to downplay the Daiz and it's wealth of information, but there's nothing wrong with not holding the Daiz to a perfection of biblical proportions...

User avatar
Dabooyaka
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 266
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2011 6:43 pm
Location: Orlando, Fl
Contact:

Re: Does Gotenks have SSJ2?

Post by Dabooyaka » Wed Mar 30, 2011 3:51 pm

The Daizenshuu is nothing but glorified opinions, that's it.
I ignore it most of the times.

p123
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1358
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 2:34 am

Re: Does Gotenks have SSJ2?

Post by p123 » Wed Mar 30, 2011 3:55 pm

That's a good approach as well.

I think any of these options are fine.


1) Manga Purist
2) Manga + Filler that's not contradicted.
3) Manga + Daizenshuu that's not contradicted


I think all of those options are fine. I happen to be a manga purist, and do not agree with the other two, but there logic is just as good as mine, and has some official backing to boot as well.

I just don't like when people start flip flopping on ideas. If your a filler guy, you should accept all of the filler, as long as it's not contradicted. The cherry picking way is just meh you know?

I think the less personal opinions you put in , the better. The more personal opinions, the further you go away from the true sources of information IMO..

User avatar
Piccolo Daimao
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8749
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 7:23 am

Re: Does Gotenks have SSJ2?

Post by Piccolo Daimao » Wed Mar 30, 2011 4:02 pm

Dabooyaka wrote:The Diaz is nothing but glorified opinions, that's it.
I ignore it most of the times.
They're not just "glorified opinions", they're actually official Dragon Ball guidebooks. And, as such, holds more weight than fan opinions. You can ignore them all you like because they don't fit your battle power "rules", but that's kind of stupid, IMO. When the guidebooks contradict the manga, however, then the manga should override the guidebooks' word.
Holden Caulfield in [b][i]The Catcher in the Rye[/i][/b] wrote:I hope to hell when I do die somebody has sense enough to just dump me in the river or something. Anything except sticking me in a goddam cemetery. People coming and putting a bunch of flowers on your stomach on Sunday, and all that crap. Who wants flowers when you're dead? Nobody.

User avatar
dbgtFO
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 7971
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 5:07 pm
Contact:

Re: Does Gotenks have SSJ2?

Post by dbgtFO » Wed Mar 30, 2011 4:03 pm

Dabooyaka wrote:The Diaz is nothing but glorified opinions, that's it.
I ignore it most of the times.
Lol. Daizex's Dabooyaka = Neoseeker's xxskelterxx
Apparently...

User avatar
VegettoEX
Kanzenshuu Co-Owner & Administrator
Posts: 17801
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2004 3:10 pm
Location: New Jersey
Contact:

Re: Does Gotenks have SSJ2?

Post by VegettoEX » Wed Mar 30, 2011 4:11 pm

dbgtFO wrote:
Dabooyaka wrote:The Diaz is nothing but glorified opinions, that's it.
I ignore it most of the times.
Lol. Daizex's Dabooyaka = Neoseeker's xxskelterxx
Apparently...
I don't have a clue what any of that means. Unless there's some asinine, coordinated attempt from some other forum to devalue a conversation here (such as what I linked before), there's really no need to bring outside shenanigans into the mix.

Folks are expected to spell properly and conduct themselves as professional adults here. If they cannot do that, the moderators will be happy to take care of things.
:: [| Mike "VegettoEX" LaBrie |] ::
:: [| Kanzenshuu - Co-Founder/Administrator, Podcast Host, News Manager (note: our "job" titles are arbitrary and meaningless) |] ::
:: [| Website: January 1998 |] :: [| Podcast: November 2005 |] :: [| Fusion: April 2012 |] :: [| Wiki: 20XX |] ::

User avatar
Dabooyaka
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 266
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2011 6:43 pm
Location: Orlando, Fl
Contact:

Re: Does Gotenks have SSJ2?

Post by Dabooyaka » Wed Mar 30, 2011 4:48 pm

Dude, what? I didn't do anything!!
DBGT- How did you find out?

User avatar
dbgtFO
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 7971
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 5:07 pm
Contact:

Re: Does Gotenks have SSJ2?

Post by dbgtFO » Wed Mar 30, 2011 4:53 pm

Dabooyaka wrote: DBGT- How did you find out?
Your opinions and remarks about the Daizenshuus(which you call "Diaz") are the same as over on Neoseeker.

User avatar
Dabooyaka
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 266
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2011 6:43 pm
Location: Orlando, Fl
Contact:

Re: Does Gotenks have SSJ2?

Post by Dabooyaka » Wed Mar 30, 2011 4:55 pm

I will have to change my name now, thanks to you! :evil:

User avatar
dbgtFO
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 7971
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 5:07 pm
Contact:

Re: Does Gotenks have SSJ2?

Post by dbgtFO » Wed Mar 30, 2011 4:58 pm

You can't(not on this site at least) :twisted: .
It's not like it matters anyways.
There shouldn't be a problem with going by different usernames on different message boards.

User avatar
Dabooyaka
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 266
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2011 6:43 pm
Location: Orlando, Fl
Contact:

Re: Does Gotenks have SSJ2?

Post by Dabooyaka » Wed Mar 30, 2011 5:04 pm

I'm just messing, i don't really care. I dont post here to much, i find this place very uptight. We are talking Dragonball, yet we should behave like we are talking string theory and black holes.
:mrgreen:

User avatar
VegettoEX
Kanzenshuu Co-Owner & Administrator
Posts: 17801
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2004 3:10 pm
Location: New Jersey
Contact:

Re: Does Gotenks have SSJ2?

Post by VegettoEX » Wed Mar 30, 2011 5:26 pm

Dabooyaka wrote:I'm just messing, i don't really care. I dont post here to much, i find this place very uptight. We are talking Dragonball, yet we should behave like we are talking string theory and black holes.
:mrgreen:
There's nothing wrong with enjoying yourself and having a good conversation with your fellow fans (that's the whole point, isn't it?), but yeah, if you consider being asked (and agreeing) to type properly and conduct yourself like an adult while you're having that good time... well, yeah, I guess that's "uptight". Them's the breaks, and you said you'd be cool with it prior to registration. If you can't abide by that, it's all on you.

That goes for everyone, of course. Dare I point out yet again that it's only recently in these "strength" debate sub-topics that the moderators even have to consider pointing out the rules...? Not entirely sure what makes this so difficult...

This is all preventative talk, of course. Nothing recently has particularly warranted it in this thread, but it seems worth tossing out there.
:: [| Mike "VegettoEX" LaBrie |] ::
:: [| Kanzenshuu - Co-Founder/Administrator, Podcast Host, News Manager (note: our "job" titles are arbitrary and meaningless) |] ::
:: [| Website: January 1998 |] :: [| Podcast: November 2005 |] :: [| Fusion: April 2012 |] :: [| Wiki: 20XX |] ::

User avatar
petewentz
Newbie
Posts: 45
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 1:46 am

Re: Does Gotenks have SSJ2?

Post by petewentz » Wed Mar 30, 2011 6:09 pm

VegettoEX wrote: There's nothing wrong with enjoying yourself and having a good conversation with your fellow fans (that's the whole point, isn't it?), but yeah, if you consider being asked (and agreeing) to type properly and conduct yourself like an adult while you're having that good time... well, yeah, I guess that's "uptight". Them's the breaks, and you said you'd be cool with it prior to registration. If you can't abide by that, it's all on you.

That goes for everyone, of course. Dare I point out yet again that it's only recently in these "strength" debate sub-topics that the moderators even have to consider pointing out the rules...? Not entirely sure what makes this so difficult...

This is all preventative talk, of course. Nothing recently has particularly warranted it in this thread, but it seems worth tossing out there.
You do realize that strength debates are the formation of the story. If there were no "battles", if there were no "battle powers" then the story would be entirely different, and perhaps not as popular. It's because of strength debates that the fandom has continued on to this day. I feel that by limiting discussion, you are also limiting interest in what makes DB special, and that's the fights. While I agree with you that "hypothetical" fights are pointless, and outside of the original intent of the author, the fact remains that the series is now the fans to interpret and understand in the way any other form of art is. I agree that assigning specific power levels to characters later in the series is pointless, as there are no real justifications to do so, I would disagree and say that assigning character tiers over other characters isn't a pointless pursuit as the evidence is there. If you look at it unbiased and objectively, you can make a claim that has evidence supporting it's validity.

To use an analogy, it's a like a murder crime scene. We don't exactly see the murder(or the fight) but based on evidence, clues and some simple logic, we can piece together the proof and form a coherent claim of who the murderer is(or the winner). I feel as if the guidebooks are merely "witnesses" and their testimony can't be relied on in full. They could naturally contradict the visual evidence present, in which case you would go with the evidence.

That's just my take on how to view the series, and I know you disagree. I just feel like the series is still popular because of "power level" debates, not in spite of. Talking about dubbing and voice acting would only last so long, Dragonball however, has stood the test of time.

This came out way more convoluted than it was in my head, but I hope you understand the point.

User avatar
Kaboom
Moderator
Posts: 14506
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 6:07 pm

Re: Does Gotenks have SSJ2?

Post by Kaboom » Wed Mar 30, 2011 6:12 pm

There ARE far more and better things to talk about in relation to Dragon Ball than power and strength comparisons. My next big topic is going to be a virtual tour of a certain spaceship, and I'd say that's far more interesting than more of the same tired "A>B>C" debates that keep popping up.
[ BlueSky | Bsky: DBS Plots | DeviantArt | Twitter (Depreciated) ]

[PSN/Steam: KaboomKrusader | Switch FC: SW-4304-7361-2824 | ACNH Dream Address: DA-1637-4046-7415 ("SlamZone") ]

Powar Levuls! — DBZ | Movies & Specials | GT

User avatar
petewentz
Newbie
Posts: 45
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 1:46 am

Re: Does Gotenks have SSJ2?

Post by petewentz » Wed Mar 30, 2011 6:22 pm

Kaboom wrote:There ARE far more and better things to talk about in relation to Dragon Ball than power and strength comparisons. My next big topic is going to be a virtual tour of a certain spaceship, and I'd say that's far more interesting than more of the same tired "A>B>C" debates that keep popping up.
That's your opinion though. I hate to use that crutch, that trump card, but it really is. I think the sheer amount of "power debates" that pop up is a testament to how popular, and thus how interesting, they really are. To say there absolutely is something more interesting than a strength debate in a series based on fighting is presumptuous. If they weren't interesting to the millions of DB fans out there, then we wouldn't be talking about them.

User avatar
Gaffer Tape
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 6131
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 5:25 pm
Contact:

Re: Does Gotenks have SSJ2?

Post by Gaffer Tape » Wed Mar 30, 2011 6:25 pm

Personally, I think it's the opposite. Nobody here is actively squashing power debates. It's just the majority of this community doesn't care for/participate them. There's no agenda to get rid of them. It's just that most of us aren't interested in it. I personally don't find them terribly compelling, and my head starts spinning whenever I happen to read one of these threads. But is it fine that you like to discuss them? Sure. VegettoEX was just reminding those who do to play nice and act mature.
Do you follow the most comprehensive and entertaining Dragon Ball analysis series on YouTube? If you do, you're smart and awesome and fairly attractive. If not, see what all the fuss is about without even having to leave Kanzenshuu:

MistareFusion's Dragon Ball Dissection Series Discussion Thread! (Updated 3/16/26!)
Current Episode: Course-Correcting the Movies - Dragon Ball Dissection: The Resurrection 'F' Arc Part 2

Post Reply