"What's Wrong with Dragon Ball Z"

Discussion regarding the entirety of the franchise in a general (meta) sense, including such aspects as: production, trends, merchandise, fan culture, and more.

Moderators: Kanzenshuu Staff, General Help

User avatar
Onikage725
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1502
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 7:00 pm
Location: Outer Heaven
Contact:

Post by Onikage725 » Thu Apr 17, 2008 7:49 pm

VegettoEX wrote:Everything Mike just wrote.
Hm... seems to me like maybe the problem, then is the show's success. Or would it be more fair to say, "it's introduction to mainstream audiences?"

That lead to its "fad" treatment, which lead to the screaming pre-teen fanbase. Like the affectionately named "Narutards" of today...

EDIT: To laserkid, one could say the "antis" have just as much of a negative impact on the show. It could be seen as near impossible to enjoy DBZ because admitting as such gets you flamed by biased elitists. Then again, I personally think if you let an aspect of fandom keep you from enjoying something, that is truly sad. Bringing up Naruto again, I am not big on that online scene. I can not stand most Naruto communities I have come across. But I got into Naruto at my own pace and watch it in my own time, and really don't care what's going on with them. Ditto YYH. One of my favorite series', despite the fact that every time I try to interact with other fans I run afoul of the legion of Yaoi fangirls trying to cram every characters' penis down every other characters' throat, and calling anyone who isn't in to that a homophobe.
Last edited by Onikage725 on Sat Apr 19, 2008 9:59 am, edited 1 time in total.
To show my appreciation, I'll only beat them half to death.

User avatar
laserkid
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1457
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2004 11:37 pm
Location: Utah
Contact:

Post by laserkid » Thu Apr 17, 2008 10:50 pm

*groan* I'm glad the last time I was active in the YYH fanbase was in the days of the Reikitantei site >.<

Anyway to point, I'm merely saying pointing out the fandom IS vaid when talking about "whats wrong with DBZ" - but there you go proving my point about us, the fandom. I give a thought on how it is valid and you immidiatly run into victim status of anti DBZ people. The first line of defense when someone says something wrong seems to be "We are victims".

To the point about regional fanbases generating a diffrent quality - the article isn't talking about the QUALITY of the show as a percentage of quality - or even saying the show is awful, it's a disertation on what is wrong with DBZ. It isn't saying the quality of the show sucks, nor says the show rocks. It's just pointing out the flaws and this overly defensive, quick to play victim, quick to tear at itself, and others apart over trite issues IS a negative factor of DBZ. It can also be a positive too, when we aren't so weird about things. I remember a time long ago when a group of fans got so fed up with the fanbase they created a group devoted to just not caring so much about the stupid shit.
-Laserkid

User avatar
Chuquita
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 15233
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2004 2:16 am
Location: New Jersey
Contact:

Post by Chuquita » Fri Apr 18, 2008 3:48 am

Well, I'm glad dbz was popular before the advent of fanbase nicknames anyway. I don't like the idea of being called a "tard" to any degree. :? (I don't watch Naruto anymore but if I were a hardcore fan I'd be offended by the nickname. No idea how the actual fans of the show handle the name.)
On hiatus.

my tumblr

User avatar
Onikage725
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1502
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 7:00 pm
Location: Outer Heaven
Contact:

Post by Onikage725 » Fri Apr 18, 2008 10:08 am

laserkid wrote:Anyway to point, I'm merely saying pointing out the fandom IS vaid when talking about "whats wrong with DBZ" - but there you go proving my point about us, the fandom. I give a thought on how it is valid and you immidiatly run into victim status of anti DBZ people. The first line of defense when someone says something wrong seems to be "We are victims".
If someone brought up Judeo-Bolshevism, would it be whiny of someone else to mention the Holocaust? All I'm saying is that I think the article's point here is biased and one-sided. Blame it on the internet, but if you have me pegged as a crazed fanboy who does nothing but sing the show's praises then you are mistaken. Ask Kunzait about my plothole ramblings and gripes with the inconsistent animation and Freeza Saga filler, just to name a few. I just think that saying DBZ fans are a flaw of the show is a one-sided statement. Just as many people who know little of DBZ besides the occasional brush with the dub have taken it as an elitist attitude and force this opinion on others. It's all over the net. I'm speaking from observation. I could give two shits what these people say. This too is a by product of the show and the general anime market. It is cool to hate DBZ, either for being old or too-actiony or just because your friends hate it too. And these people turn off potential fans by acting like if you watch it there is something wrong with you. Part of the "anime of the week" mentality someone pointed out in another thread a little while ago, I suppose.

And to be fair, I didn't "immediately" go into any mode based on your comment. I was reiterating a point I made earlier in the thread in regards to what I percieve as the author's bias. If we can't pick at something DB-related on a DB fan community surrounded by hardcore fans, where can we? I could understand the negative reaction to negative reactions if we were loading up and taking the DaizEX banner over to IGN forums and shooting our mouths off. But since when did it become a crime to vent amongst your peers?

I guess I'm the only one who thinks that this article being written for the casual reader, citing hardcore fans as the reason it is going more in depth on minor flaws (to hold to a higher standard), and then citing that the show's fans are one of these flaws is just extremely hypocritical.
Chuquita wrote:Well, I'm glad dbz was popular before the advent of fanbase nicknames anyway. I don't like the idea of being called a "tard" to any degree. :? (I don't watch Naruto anymore but if I were a hardcore fan I'd be offended by the nickname. No idea how the actual fans of the show handle the name.)
I think the nickname in general applies to a certain subsection. Don't know who I mean? Check gamefaqs or IMDB boards. You know, the ones who spend a great deal of time cooking up Naruto vs DBZ fan polls. That's usually where I see the term creep up.
To show my appreciation, I'll only beat them half to death.

User avatar
laserkid
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1457
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2004 11:37 pm
Location: Utah
Contact:

Post by laserkid » Sat Apr 19, 2008 12:44 am

Onikage725 wrote: If someone brought up Judeo-Bolshevism, would it be whiny of someone else to mention the Holocaust? All I'm saying is that I think the article's point here is biased and one-sided.
Somehow, I don't think people who criticise DBZ don't even cone CLOSE to the massive genocide of a race. Maybe that's just me.
Onikage725 wrote: Blame it on the internet, but if you have me pegged as a crazed fanboy who does nothing but sing the show's praises then you are mistaken. Ask Kunzait about my plothole ramblings and gripes with the inconsistent animation and Freeza Saga filler, just to name a few. I just think that saying DBZ fans are a flaw of the show is a one-sided statement.
Of course there's a good and a bad side to DBZ fandom - if it was all a downside there wouldn't BE a fandom - but the article wasn't written to balance the good and the bad - simply to focus on the bad aspects. I would imagine a whats right with DBZ article could point out aspects of the fandom too. I do not mean to say YOU are a bad fan here either by the way, I just cited your reaction as a typical one that is inherently part of the problem. Not that YOU are a problem, but that THAT attitude that you used to make that post was.
Onikage725 wrote: Just as many people who know little of DBZ besides the occasional brush with the dub have taken it as an elitist attitude and force this opinion on others. It's all over the net. I'm speaking from observation. I could give two shits what these people say. This too is a by product of the show and the general anime market. It is cool to hate DBZ, either for being old or too-actiony or just because your friends hate it too. And these people turn off potential fans by acting like if you watch it there is something wrong with you. Part of the "anime of the week" mentality someone pointed out in another thread a little while ago, I suppose.
I'm surrounded by people who loathe DBZ but my fandom is not so weak so as to falter because my friends don't like it. Moroever my friendhsips are not so weak that my loving of DBZ and their loathing of it has caused us any issues. If you allow your friends to make you part of the "collective opinion" that is your weakness. If they shun you for liking DBZ they aren't true friends anyway.
Onikage725 wrote: And to be fair, I didn't "immediately" go into any mode based on your comment. I was reiterating a point I made earlier in the thread in regards to what I percieve as the author's bias. If we can't pick at something DB-related on a DB fan community surrounded by hardcore fans, where can we? I could understand the negative reaction to negative reactions if we were loading up and taking the DaizEX banner over to IGN forums and shooting our mouths off. But since when did it become a crime to vent amongst your peers?
No ones said anything is a crime here - you have the right to state your opinion no one said elsewise. But this is the internet, you make an argument SOMEONE is going to make a counter argument, if you didn't want to have your assertions disagreed with you shouldn't have published them.
Onikage725 wrote: I guess I'm the only one who thinks that this article being written for the casual reader, citing hardcore fans as the reason it is going more in depth on minor flaws (to hold to a higher standard), and then citing that the show's fans are one of these flaws is just extremely hypocritical.
Most of the people in this thread agree with you so please don't play I'm the only one here. It cites wide fanatacism as a reason it holds it to a high standard because people call it the best thing ever. It then points out that same fanbase has ugliness to it, and it's right there. We aren't a totally awful fanbase but we have flaws, and when those flaws are pointed out a segment of us cries foul for daring to be criticised - when I pointed your comments out it's because you're proving that right.

I don't agree with the article because I get any joy out of it. I said it earlier and I'll say it again I'm a long time member of this fanbase and I have several good friends (and some people I'd rather forget) that I've met here. But self examination is a good thing if only to allow improvement upon oneself as an individual or as a group.

If it bothers you so much to have the fanbase being told as a black mark then instead of going closing your eyes and sticking your head in the sand, and complaining about it, do something about it.
-Laserkid

User avatar
Onikage725
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1502
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 7:00 pm
Location: Outer Heaven
Contact:

Post by Onikage725 » Sat Apr 19, 2008 11:44 am

laserkid wrote: Somehow, I don't think people who criticise DBZ don't even cone CLOSE to the massive genocide of a race. Maybe that's just me.
I'm not implying that the author (or you) are analogous to the Third Reich. But you could have figured that out, concidering I said in my post that I myself criticize the show. I was just using that as an example. I made a counter-point and you dismissed it on the grounds of hardcore fans playing the victim. If you would prefer a less sever compariosn, how about the movie Batman? The Joker berates Batman for countering his complaint of being allowed to fall into the vat by pointing out that the Joker killed his parents. The fact that Batman was playing the counter-victim card doesn't absolve the Joker from A- playing the victim card in the first place and B- having in fact done the deed he was accused of doing.
Of course there's a good and a bad side to DBZ fandom - if it was all a downside there wouldn't BE a fandom - but the article wasn't written to balance the good and the bad - simply to focus on the bad aspects. I would imagine a whats right with DBZ article could point out aspects of the fandom too. I do not mean to say YOU are a bad fan here either by the way, I just cited your reaction as a typical one that is inherently part of the problem. Not that YOU are a problem, but that THAT attitude that you used to make that post was.
I don't mean that the article is unbalanced because it only looks at the bad. That' would be silly. It's whole purpose to to examine flaws. I'm saying that some of the points brought up are unbalanced themselves. In this case, if one was to look at Dragon Ball's negative impact amongst fan communities, it isn't as simple as "DBZ fans is crazy yo." In the wake of the show's US run, there have been as many militant anti's spewing venom as there have been militant pro's making a scene. I just think the volatile nature of the situation as a whole is a bigger "flaw" than simply fans responding.

I'm surrounded by people who loathe DBZ but my fandom is not so weak so as to falter because my friends don't like it. Moroever my friendhsips are not so weak that my loving of DBZ and their loathing of it has caused us any issues. If you allow your friends to make you part of the "collective opinion" that is your weakness. If they shun you for liking DBZ they aren't true friends anyway.
Ditto. It seems more of an internet thing to me. But then, when I was in high school most of the guys loved DBZ (not many of the girls though), and it was in the hight of its popularity here. So I really don't know what the real world street-level situation is like these days.
No ones said anything is a crime here - you have the right to state your opinion no one said elsewise. But this is the internet, you make an argument SOMEONE is going to make a counter argument, if you didn't want to have your assertions disagreed with you shouldn't have published them.
The same holds true in reverse. I responded to you, afterall. And I have no problem whatsoever with my opinion being disagreed with. Written off or invalidated, that's another matter. Maybe I took your response wrong, but it sounded to me like "see, by disagreeing you in fact prove me right." Likewise, the IGN, by publishing the article, open themselves up to criticism. It comes with the territory, and there is nothing wrong with it.

Most of the people in this thread agree with you so please don't play I'm the only one here. It cites wide fanatacism as a reason it holds it to a high standard because people call it the best thing ever. It then points out that same fanbase has ugliness to it, and it's right there. We aren't a totally awful fanbase but we have flaws, and when those flaws are pointed out a segment of us cries foul for daring to be criticised - when I pointed your comments out it's because you're proving that right.

I don't agree with the article because I get any joy out of it. I said it earlier and I'll say it again I'm a long time member of this fanbase and I have several good friends (and some people I'd rather forget) that I've met here. But self examination is a good thing if only to allow improvement upon oneself as an individual or as a group.

If it bothers you so much to have the fanbase being told as a black mark then instead of going closing your eyes and sticking your head in the sand, and complaining about it, do something about it.
I have no problem with criticism, but I still feel the article makes some unfair calls. Recycled animation for example. For a show that old and that long, there really isn't that much of this compared to other shows of the era. A more appropriate complaint would have been the inconsistent animation, when the show would randomly drop in visual quality quite frequently.

But again, stating one's opinion of a published work on a fanboard about the subject is doing no harm. Where I to take your suggestion, "do something about it," and go over to IGN in arms campaigning against the articles injustice... THAT would be making your point about crazy fans who can't take criticism, no?
To show my appreciation, I'll only beat them half to death.

User avatar
caejones
I Live Here
Posts: 3125
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 8:37 am
Contact:

Post by caejones » Sat Apr 19, 2008 1:27 pm

This isn't about the article, but sorta ties in to its comments about the fans and the dub, and I'm not sure that it deserves its own thread...

So on a Bleach group that a friend of mine visits, someone mentioned some sort of obviously fake spoiler, which naturally some people ate up. So my friend responds with, "Hasn't DBZ taught us anything?"
So someone responds with "building off of Joshua's comment," then proceeds to claim that a book released power levels for several major Bleach characters.
... and people believed and argued about it immediately after, until (and possibly after) several reminders came in and pointed out that it was, in fact, a blatent joke.

So... is it DBZ, or twelve year old Anime fans with internet access? If the latter, what does that say about the assertion in the IGN article that the fans are part of the flaws of DBZ? (I don't know how it would validate/invalidate... but if it applies to DBZ, then it probably applies to many other things out there... from other series to politics and religion...).
Dr Gero, in Budokai 2 wrote:Go, my Saiba Rangers!
Akira Toriyama, in Son Goku Densetsu wrote:You really can’t go by rumors (laughs).

User avatar
laserkid
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1457
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2004 11:37 pm
Location: Utah
Contact:

Post by laserkid » Sat Apr 19, 2008 8:51 pm

Onikage725 wrote: I'm not implying that the author (or you) are analogous to the Third Reich. But you could have figured that out, concidering I said in my post that I myself criticize the show. I was just using that as an example. I made a counter-point and you dismissed it on the grounds of hardcore fans playing the victim. If you would prefer a less sever comparison, how about the movie Batman? The Joker berates Batman for countering his complaint of being allowed to fall into the vat by pointing out that the Joker killed his parents. The fact that Batman was playing the counter-victim card doesn't absolve the Joker from A- playing the victim card in the first place and B- having in fact done the deed he was accused of doing.
Uh dude wow. I don't see any relvancy here either. Look when you're dealing with people killing or maiming people its a whole diffrent level then "show sucks" "WAHHH YOU MEAN". I'm simplifying it there on BOTH ends to prove a point. If someone says show sucks saying WAHH YOU MEAN doesn't do anything but make you look stupid. If you can, counterpoint them, if not due to lack of a point to their argument (ie: DBZ sucks because it just does), just roll your eyes and laugh.
Onikage725 wrote: I don't mean that the article is unbalanced because it only looks at the bad. That' would be silly. It's whole purpose to to examine flaws. I'm saying that some of the points brought up are unbalanced themselves. In this case, if one was to look at Dragon Ball's negative impact amongst fan communities, it isn't as simple as "DBZ fans is crazy yo." In the wake of the show's US run, there have been as many militant anti's spewing venom as there have been militant pro's making a scene. I just think the volatile nature of the situation as a whole is a bigger "flaw" than simply fans responding.
I respect that opinion, though disagree - but that's not what I've seen up until this point.

Onikage725 wrote: Ditto. It seems more of an internet thing to me. But then, when I was in high school most of the guys loved DBZ (not many of the girls though), and it was in the hight of its popularity here. So I really don't know what the real world street-level situation is like these days.
I was mainly reffering to the internet as well. In real life I'm an introverted shut in so sadly I don't have many friends "in real life" to talk to about these things.
Onikage725 wrote: The same holds true in reverse. I responded to you, afterall. And I have no problem whatsoever with my opinion being disagreed with. Written off or invalidated, that's another matter. Maybe I took your response wrong, but it sounded to me like "see, by disagreeing you in fact prove me right." Likewise, the IGN, by publishing the article, open themselves up to criticism. It comes with the territory, and there is nothing wrong with it.
I'm not trying to invalidate you but show your statments as evidence of what I'm trying to say. And like I said, you have the right to disagree with the article, and I have the right to disagree with you in part, and in part with the article also (the whole Mr. Popo racist thing is just silly).

Onikage725 wrote: I have no problem with criticism, but I still feel the article makes some unfair calls. Recycled animation for example. For a show that old and that long, there really isn't that much of this compared to other shows of the era. A more appropriate complaint would have been the inconsistent animation, when the show would randomly drop in visual quality quite frequently.

But again, stating one's opinion of a published work on a fanboard about the subject is doing no harm. Where I to take your suggestion, "do something about it," and go over to IGN in arms campaigning against the articles injustice... THAT would be making your point about crazy fans who can't take criticism, no?
I didn't mean do something about someone saying bad things. You can't do much about that. What I meant was if the negative view of the fandom bothers you so much, do something about the fandom. you and I are BOTH a part of this fandom after all. If we want to have the fandom viewe din a better light, that stars with us internally as individuals and how we behave, and then from our fellow fans.

It would be diffrent if the fanbase was viewed negatively with no accuracy to that view.
-Laserkid

User avatar
Onikage725
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1502
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 7:00 pm
Location: Outer Heaven
Contact:

Post by Onikage725 » Sun Apr 20, 2008 5:13 am

laserkid wrote:
Uh dude wow. I don't see any relvancy here either. Look when you're dealing with people killing or maiming people its a whole diffrent level then "show sucks" "WAHHH YOU MEAN". I'm simplifying it there on BOTH ends to prove a point. If someone says show sucks saying WAHH YOU MEAN doesn't do anything but make you look stupid. If you can, counterpoint them, if not due to lack of a point to their argument (ie: DBZ sucks because it just does), just roll your eyes and laugh.
I'll blame it on a communication issue then, 'cuz I don't see the relevancy either. As far as I can tell, you didn't say "show sucks" and I didn't say "WAHHH YOU MEAN." As far as the anti's I was referring to, I was pointing out a situation. I don't have a personal stake in them. I don't really care what anyone thinks about anything I watch. Want proof? I watched Rainbow Brite and the Star Stealer a few days ago while eating breakfast. And it was excellent.

I respect that opinion, though disagree - but that's not what I've seen up until this point.
We're shaped by our experiences, I suppose. Given how divided this fandom is, I don't know how you can lump them together under one heading anway. And obsessed fans are everywhere. It is hardly a DBZ-specific flaw. I tried to merge the Anakin Skywalker and Darth Vader articles on wikipedia once and almost had my virtual head ripped off. That's to say nothing of the time I tried to follow the "use English" guideline and name Fire Emblem Fuuin no Tsurugi "The Sword of Seals" as per NoA at the time. The fanboys freaked that I would dare make a word not be in Japanese. NoA now goes with Binding Sword, but I'll be damned if I'm trying that again.

I'm not trying to invalidate you but show your statments as evidence of what I'm trying to say. And like I said, you have the right to disagree with the article, and I have the right to disagree with you in part, and in part with the article also (the whole Mr. Popo racist thing is just silly).
Now, if he had brought up Kira/Killa I would think he had a point.

I didn't mean do something about someone saying bad things. You can't do much about that. What I meant was if the negative view of the fandom bothers you so much, do something about the fandom. you and I are BOTH a part of this fandom after all. If we want to have the fandom viewe din a better light, that stars with us internally as individuals and how we behave, and then from our fellow fans.
Once again- my issue wasn't with the negative view of the fandom per se. It was with an unbalanced view.

And changing the fandom from the inside is a bit too noble of a task for me, given that it is, at the end of the day, a comic book and cartoon show.
To show my appreciation, I'll only beat them half to death.

Post Reply