Bullza wrote:He offered nothing to the movie. He was always one of DB's worst villains and they just randomly drudged him up out of nowhere only to make him even worse. All of the trio's screentime should have gone to Gohan or Piccolo or just plot that mattered.
I'm sure he was just added to appeal to kids under the age of 10 though. Hopefully they don't pull that nonsense with the next movie.
Sorry you feel that way, but I vehemently disagree. Pilaf and co. were among the series' most memorable villains, and I am way, way, way over the age of 10, and it greatly appealed to me. And while on one hand it is a bit disappointing in a sense that they got far and away more screen time than most of the main cast, what they did with them was so much fun I can't complain.
Since I made my last post, I actually thought up another function that they serve in this movie, and that's due to my remembrance of the audience so loudly gasping when Mai dropped her Dragon Ball. And it actually amazed me when I realized it. They're the audience viewpoint characters! For much of the second act, we're seeing the plot largely through their eyes. I think this is part of the reason they've lost the limitless wealth they had in the main series. It makes it easier for us to relate to them. They might be doing unscrupulous things, but they're presented as the average people who have normal reactions to all the crazy shit going on. Rich people giving away castles. Weirdos asking to be shot. It's all completely insane, and it's Pilaf of all people who's the one pointing all of this out. It's brilliant.
For one thing he wasn't funny to begin with, maybe five year olds found it funny when he drew a poo but that's it.
Yeah, tell that to my theatre, which was composed almost entirely of adults, who were in stitches almost the entire time Pilaf was onscreen, and, as I've already said twice, seriously connected to them and their plot.