I just mentioned that she is young enough in-universe to possibly not be noticeably developed yet since she is 12 (in response to your comment of GT demonstrating that she is "flat"). That's "starting an argument" to you...?DBZAOTA482 wrote: rereboy's the only guy I know that would start an argument over animated titties.
Haha, if only Goku kept his tail.Lord Beerus wrote:
rereboy wrote:I just mentioned that she is young enough in-universe to possibly not be noticeably developed yet since she is 12 (in response to your comment of GT demonstrating that she is "flat"). That's "starting an argument" to you...?
I'm sorry, but if anybody started an argument, it wasn't me...
So basically what I'm getting at you is that I'm an idiot and any point I make is automatically invalid?You aren't making any sense... Just because Pan didn't develop further, doesn't mean that she couldn't have because she was still young enough for that to happen. That's not proof or is evident of anything. Not to mention that we were talking about Bra, not Pan.
A "How to make love" tape?!Gyt Kaliba wrote:I can't help but wonder what Goku and Chi Chi are reacting to in the first panel of that comic though.
fadeddreams5 wrote:Goku didn't die in GT. The show sucked him off so much, it was impossible to keep him in the world of the living, so he ascended beyond mortality.DBZGTKOSDH wrote:... Haven't we already gotten these in GT? Goku dies, the DBs go away, and the Namekian DBs most likely won't be used again because of the Evil Dragons.
jjgp1112 wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2020 6:31 am I'm just about done with the concept of reboots and making shows that were products of their time and impactful "new and sexy" and in line with modern tastes and sensibilities. Let stuff stay in their era and give today's kids their own shit to watch.
I always side eye the people who say "Now my kids/today's kids can experience what I did as a child!" Nigga, who gives a fuck about your childhood? You're an adult now and it was at least 15 years ago. Let the kids have their own experience instead of picking at a corpse.
My tumblr blog.Gyt Kaliba wrote:I can't help but wonder what Goku and Chi Chi are reacting to in the first panel of that comic though.
That's not it at all. I'm just saying that I only mentioned that Bra was pretty young in GT and, as such, she still had time to develop. All I did was mention that point and I just disagreed with what you said in response to that because, imo, what you said didn't negate what I mentioned or just didn't make much sense to me (like what you said about Pan).DBZAOTA482 wrote:
So basically what I'm getting at you is that I'm an idiot and any point I make is automatically invalid?
Lord Beerus wrote:
A better response would be "How so, when she was only 12 throughout GT?" instead of basically saying "She's 12, dipshit! Of course she wouldn't have big, round chi-chis!".rereboy wrote:That's not it at all. I'm just saying that I only mentioned that Bra was pretty young in GT and, as such, she still had time to develop. All I did was mention that point and I just disagreed with what you said in response to that because, imo, what you said didn't negate what I mentioned or just didn't make much sense to me (like what you said about Pan).DBZAOTA482 wrote:
So basically what I'm getting at you is that I'm an idiot and any point I make is automatically invalid?
I don't see that as starting an argument, since, imo, my comments were pretty standard comments. Which is why I mentioned that if there's an argument going on here, I don't see how I'm responsible.
I also don't see how that translates into me calling you an idiot or why you would think that, honestly... Just because I disagree with what you said, it doesn't mean I'm attacking you or insulting you, you know?
fadeddreams5 wrote:Goku didn't die in GT. The show sucked him off so much, it was impossible to keep him in the world of the living, so he ascended beyond mortality.DBZGTKOSDH wrote:... Haven't we already gotten these in GT? Goku dies, the DBs go away, and the Namekian DBs most likely won't be used again because of the Evil Dragons.
jjgp1112 wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2020 6:31 am I'm just about done with the concept of reboots and making shows that were products of their time and impactful "new and sexy" and in line with modern tastes and sensibilities. Let stuff stay in their era and give today's kids their own shit to watch.
I always side eye the people who say "Now my kids/today's kids can experience what I did as a child!" Nigga, who gives a fuck about your childhood? You're an adult now and it was at least 15 years ago. Let the kids have their own experience instead of picking at a corpse.
Hmm... Looking back at my posts, I dont think I stated anything anywhere near that level and I certainly didnt think something like that or wanted to say something like that... I don't see any real difference between saying "well, she is really young in GT. She is like 12 or 13 years old. Its perfectly normal if she hasn't developed yet" and what you suggested for a proper post... I'm unsure why you would think that...DBZAOTA482 wrote: A better response would be "How so, when she was only 12 throughout GT?" instead of basically saying "She's 12, dipshit! Of course she wouldn't have big, round chi-chis!".
Seems legit.Scarz wrote:My tumblr blog.Gyt Kaliba wrote:I can't help but wonder what Goku and Chi Chi are reacting to in the first panel of that comic though.
Poor Vegeta indeed if he gets his butt handed to him by Freeza AGAIN in the upcoming movie.Shiyonasan wrote:I
Sums up everything wrong with Dragon Ball Minus (aside from retconning Goku's backstory). An attentive-parent Bardock instead of distant-parent Bardock is just wrong.TheUltimateVegito wrote:
If DBM Bardock was FoG Bardock.
fadeddreams5 wrote:Goku didn't die in GT. The show sucked him off so much, it was impossible to keep him in the world of the living, so he ascended beyond mortality.DBZGTKOSDH wrote:... Haven't we already gotten these in GT? Goku dies, the DBs go away, and the Namekian DBs most likely won't be used again because of the Evil Dragons.
jjgp1112 wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2020 6:31 am I'm just about done with the concept of reboots and making shows that were products of their time and impactful "new and sexy" and in line with modern tastes and sensibilities. Let stuff stay in their era and give today's kids their own shit to watch.
I always side eye the people who say "Now my kids/today's kids can experience what I did as a child!" Nigga, who gives a fuck about your childhood? You're an adult now and it was at least 15 years ago. Let the kids have their own experience instead of picking at a corpse.
