What material is included in Super but is NOT by Toriyama?
- VegettoEX
- Kanzenshuu Co-Owner & Administrator
- Posts: 17786
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2004 3:10 pm
- Location: New Jersey
- Contact:
Re: What material is included in Super but is NOT by Toriyama?
It's literally just the script for the first episode; like, the words the voice actors say aloud. Nothing about it says Akira Toriyama specifically.
Can we please not use that individual as a source for anything ever?
Can we please not use that individual as a source for anything ever?
:: [| Mike "VegettoEX" LaBrie |] ::
:: [| Kanzenshuu - Co-Founder/Administrator, Podcast Host, News Manager (note: our "job" titles are arbitrary and meaningless) |] ::
:: [| Website: January 1998 |] :: [| Podcast: November 2005 |] :: [| Fusion: April 2012 |] :: [| Wiki: 20XX |] ::
:: [| Kanzenshuu - Co-Founder/Administrator, Podcast Host, News Manager (note: our "job" titles are arbitrary and meaningless) |] ::
:: [| Website: January 1998 |] :: [| Podcast: November 2005 |] :: [| Fusion: April 2012 |] :: [| Wiki: 20XX |] ::
Re: What material is included in Super but is NOT by Toriyama?
The guy who put that Toriyama thingy is GojitaAF, who i don't know if reliable or not. But the time-frame provided in that script actually makes the Vegeta taking Trunks to the park episode sensible, explains why Trunks, Goten, and Marron still looks like kids and Oob just being born. Although the problem is that it entirely contradicts Pan's age.LightBing wrote:I remember that. Not sure if it was confirmed that it was written by Mr.Toriyama. The main differences were what you said about the timeline and Goten being in kindergarten, which honestly sound very Toriyama like to forget his age. If memory doesn't fail me, it's buried in the announcement thread.
That old script is still the reason I think we're not more than three years past the Boo Arc and not following BoG timeline.
EDIT:
As said above, looks nothing specific said about Toriyama after all. Nice to have a confirmation.
Re: What material is included in Super but is NOT by Toriyama?
I'm mainly replying to OP' saying "copy vegeta and the universe thing are not in the manga, ".THEGOKU wrote:I think we he is trying to say is that because in BOG that did not occur it is something that doesn't come from Toriyama or at least a strong possibility of that.Helios518 wrote:Go to chapter 4 page 11 of the super manga and you see the universal punch and shockwave.
Why I use "Geran" instead of "Jiren"
Spoiler:
Re: What material is included in Super but is NOT by Toriyama?
In keeping on topic with who is involved with what. If this is supposed to take place between the end of the Kid Buu fight and the End of Z (I read that when the show first began to air I have no source to confirm) I would imagine that Toriyama must oversee everything that goes on which could be why characters like Trunks and Goten are still roughly the same age they were even though time has passed in the show clearly with the birth of Pan. My point being that whenever it gets close to the end of Super leading into the end of Z that Toriyama would have more say on what goes on in the series. But since GT was all Toei and didn't have success and how Toriyama was disappointed with that God awful film whose name I won't mention I am sure he is involved in Super just not heavily involved. He just keeps the train on the track.
Re: What material is included in Super but is NOT by Toriyama?
Considering Toriyama-san provides bullet points, meaning essential aspects of what the story is about but is not really the story writer, a lot of what happens and how it is presented is not from him. Just like a game's story is written by a Scenario Writer while people like Director and others bring in some essential ideas (with some exceptions).LSSJGODSSJ4Gogeta wrote:So the question is whats not by toriyama in super, and furthermore do you consider it "canon" if It's just by toei and not toriyama. I have a feeling things like copy vegeta and the universal punches eventually destroying the universe was toei, seams not to fit what toriyama was going for. copy vegeta and the universe thing are not in the manga, and the universe thing doesn't fit with supreme kai from what I see due to the connection thing to beerus.
So would you call super's stuff not from toriyama canon? What do you think they made up?
"Citation needed."
"too lazy
feel free to take it with grain of salt or discredit me altogether, I'm not losing any sleep"
"too lazy
feel free to take it with grain of salt or discredit me altogether, I'm not losing any sleep"
Re: What material is included in Super but is NOT by Toriyama?
Gohan's restarting training. Toriyama doesn't care about him.
And of course Goten. I bet he should be considered non canon even for Z
And of course Goten. I bet he should be considered non canon even for Z
Re: What material is included in Super but is NOT by Toriyama?
So for all we know Toriyama could actually have had even less involvement in Super (anime) than GT??Ajay wrote:Where did this idea come from that he provided episode 1's script? Episode 1 was written by Yukinori Fukushima.
We have no idea about the extent of Toriyama's involvement. All we know is what we've been told, and everything else is pure guesswork based on what turns up in the manga.
Re: What material is included in Super but is NOT by Toriyama?
Well didn't he just provide the characters for GT?TheMikado wrote:So for all we know Toriyama could actually have had even less involvement in Super (anime) than GT??Ajay wrote:Where did this idea come from that he provided episode 1's script? Episode 1 was written by Yukinori Fukushima.
We have no idea about the extent of Toriyama's involvement. All we know is what we've been told, and everything else is pure guesswork based on what turns up in the manga.
Re: What material is included in Super but is NOT by Toriyama?
Well, not really. We know he at least provides those bullet points of the story as well as does design the more relevant charas.TheMikado wrote:So for all we know Toriyama could actually have had even less involvement in Super (anime) than GT??Ajay wrote:Where did this idea come from that he provided episode 1's script? Episode 1 was written by Yukinori Fukushima.
We have no idea about the extent of Toriyama's involvement. All we know is what we've been told, and everything else is pure guesswork based on what turns up in the manga.
For GT he did the character design of the good side, some other concept art and the logo. The person we know of as the most involved in the story of GT is Aya Matsui. I do not know about other names but apparently she has left at one point so others must be important as well.
"Citation needed."
"too lazy
feel free to take it with grain of salt or discredit me altogether, I'm not losing any sleep"
"too lazy
feel free to take it with grain of salt or discredit me altogether, I'm not losing any sleep"
Re: What material is included in Super but is NOT by Toriyama?
They didn't say anything about him rewriting the movies' stories for their arcs so he might not have been involved with them or at least not like he is with the other 2 arcs.
In terms of the U6 & Trunks arcs, if something is exclusive to the manga or anime then it might not be from him but if it's in both like the major plot points then they're from him.
Form example, Trunks and Goku both fought as Ssj2's but the way it was handled was different in both versions so the fight was from him but the details were left to the writers.
In terms of the U6 & Trunks arcs, if something is exclusive to the manga or anime then it might not be from him but if it's in both like the major plot points then they're from him.
Form example, Trunks and Goku both fought as Ssj2's but the way it was handled was different in both versions so the fight was from him but the details were left to the writers.
If it weren't for that which we don't speak of, Toriyama might not have gotten back into the franchise.THEGOKU wrote:Toriyama was disappointed with that God awful film whose name I won't mention.
He had little to no involvement with GT but with Super he's writing the main plot and designing the characters.TheMikado wrote:So for all we know Toriyama could actually have had even less involvement in Super (anime) than GT??
Last edited by sintzu on Thu Aug 25, 2016 4:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
July 9th 2018 will be remembered as the day Broly became canon.
- YonedgeHP
- Regular
- Posts: 661
- Joined: Sun May 29, 2016 12:36 pm
- Location: Barcelona, Catalonia (Kingdom of Spain)
- Contact:
Re: What material is included in Super but is NOT by Toriyama?
Toriyama writes the major plot outline.TheMikado wrote:So for all we know Toriyama could actually have had even less involvement in Super (anime) than GT??Ajay wrote:Where did this idea come from that he provided episode 1's script? Episode 1 was written by Yukinori Fukushima.
We have no idea about the extent of Toriyama's involvement. All we know is what we've been told, and everything else is pure guesswork based on what turns up in the manga.
Between you and the Namekian I think I've lost my touch at genocide. -PSN Xenoverse 2 account: Yonedge-HP. Freeza's race Ki blast avatar: Yonedge.
Filler and canon discussions are "meh"
English is not my first language!
Filler and canon discussions are "meh"
English is not my first language!
Re: What material is included in Super but is NOT by Toriyama?
My point is that the manga, movies, and anime are so different that this outline obviously can't be very detailed or allows a lot of interpretation.YonedgeHP wrote:Toriyama writes the major plot outline.TheMikado wrote:So for all we know Toriyama could actually have had even less involvement in Super (anime) than GT??Ajay wrote:Where did this idea come from that he provided episode 1's script? Episode 1 was written by Yukinori Fukushima.
We have no idea about the extent of Toriyama's involvement. All we know is what we've been told, and everything else is pure guesswork based on what turns up in the manga.
He designed the characters for GT too. Depending on how this goes we could later find out he was either intimately involved or his involvement was over exaggerated.He had little to no involvement with GT but with Super he's writing the main plot and designing the characters.
- DBZGTKOSDH
- Namekian Warrior
- Posts: 12401
- Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 7:45 pm
- Location: Greece
Re: What material is included in Super but is NOT by Toriyama?
Toriyama doesn't give bullet points, as far as we know, he wrote story drafts for the Universe 6 & Future Trunks arcs.Cetra wrote:Well, not really. We know he at least provides those bullet points of the story as well as does design the more relevant charas.TheMikado wrote:So for all we know Toriyama could actually have had even less involvement in Super (anime) than GT??Ajay wrote:Where did this idea come from that he provided episode 1's script? Episode 1 was written by Yukinori Fukushima.
We have no idea about the extent of Toriyama's involvement. All we know is what we've been told, and everything else is pure guesswork based on what turns up in the manga.
For GT he did the character design of the good side, some other concept art and the logo. The person we know of as the most involved in the story of GT is Aya Matsui. I do not know about other names but apparently she has left at one point so others must be important as well.
James Teal (Animerica 1996) wrote:When you think about it, there are a number of similarities between the Chinese-inspired Son Goku and that most American of superhero icons, Superman. Both are aliens sent to Earth shortly after birth to escape the destruction of their homeworlds; both possess super-strength, flight, super-speed, heightened senses and the ability to cast energy blasts. But the crucial difference between them lies not only in how they view the world, but in how the world views them.
Superman is, and always has been, a symbol for truth, justice, and upstanding moral fortitude–a role model and leader as much as a fighter. The more down-to-earth Goku has no illusions about being responsible for maintaining social order, or for setting some kind of moral example for the entire world. Goku is simply a martial artist who’s devoted his life toward perfecting his fighting skills and other abilities. Though never shy about risking his life to save either one person or the entire world, he just doesn’t believe that the balance of the world rests in any way on his shoulders, and he has no need to shape any part of it in his image. Goku is an idealist, and believes that there is some good in everyone, but he is unconcerned with the big picture of the world…unless it has to do with some kind of fight. Politics, society, law and order don’t have much bearing on his life, but he’s a man who knows right from wrong.
Re: What material is included in Super but is NOT by Toriyama?
To be more specific, my guess is that he hasn't written the material that occurs outside the main arcs. That includes the training before Freeza's arrival, some of the build-up to Champa's tournament (including Gohan training with Piccolo, I'm guessing), the Super Water arc, and likely some of Trunks's interactions with various characters in the present.
I could believe either way when it comes to his involvement in major divergent plot points like Vegeta being the first one to request training from Whis and achieving Blue from Whis' training rather than the ritual.
I could believe either way when it comes to his involvement in major divergent plot points like Vegeta being the first one to request training from Whis and achieving Blue from Whis' training rather than the ritual.
Re: What material is included in Super but is NOT by Toriyama?
DBZGTKOSDH wrote:Toriyama doesn't give bullet points, as far as we know, he wrote story drafts for the Universe 6 & Future Trunks arcs.Cetra wrote:Well, not really. We know he at least provides those bullet points of the story as well as does design the more relevant charas.TheMikado wrote:
So for all we know Toriyama could actually have had even less involvement in Super (anime) than GT??
For GT he did the character design of the good side, some other concept art and the logo. The person we know of as the most involved in the story of GT is Aya Matsui. I do not know about other names but apparently she has left at one point so others must be important as well.
Herms even mentioned in a video with Geekdom that we do not know how great Toriyama-san's involvement is but that he gives bullet points which fits perfectly with my "at least bullet points". Considering there are vast differences between manga and anime, "drafts" might be a generous word.
"Citation needed."
"too lazy
feel free to take it with grain of salt or discredit me altogether, I'm not losing any sleep"
"too lazy
feel free to take it with grain of salt or discredit me altogether, I'm not losing any sleep"
Re: What material is included in Super but is NOT by Toriyama?
^ right, exactly my point. You have people who believe he stopped just short of writing full on scripts where others like me think he actually contributed very little to the Super series/anime. An I think Toei kept it vague enough to make the fandom generate their own narrative as well as preventing Toriyama from legally speaking on it to prevent another "GT" not canon scenario.
-
Faisal Shourov
- Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
- Posts: 462
- Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2016 11:10 am
Re: What material is included in Super but is NOT by Toriyama?
Copy Vegeta Arc for sure
Toyotarō: … I get the feeling I’ve just heard something amazing (laughs). Lord Beerus and Whis turn up in Dragon Ball Super, and have become an unsurpassable wall for Goku and the gang. What do the two of them mean to you?
Toriyama: Well… First off, right now I don’t have any plans for Goku and Vegeta to surpass Beerus and Whis.
Toriyama: Well… First off, right now I don’t have any plans for Goku and Vegeta to surpass Beerus and Whis.
Re: What material is included in Super but is NOT by Toriyama?
Having "SCRIPT BY AKIRA TORIYAMA" on a product is a huge selling point for Toei. If he was genuinely responsible for any script-work, we would absolutely know.
They can't do that, so we end up with stuff like this:
Super is very different. Instead of comments like that, you just have things along the lines of the above, and then the series composer saying, "Both the story and characters spring from Akira Toriyama-sensei’s pen, a Dragon Ball nobody has ever seen before. In order to be faithful to the scenario sensei has given us, and also to make an anime series that everyone can enjoy, I shall do my very best to make this series together with director [Kimitoshi] Chioka."
By industry definitions, a scenario is just an outline of a story. Its level of detail can vary greatly, but it does not specify everything that happens, instead focusing on enough for a reader to understand the intentions of the story. It's essentially just a sequence of events and locations, often used when pitching an idea to a company. In Super's case, they simply take this and the script writers turn it into a fully-fledged story. Of course, Toriyama contributes character designs too, so his involvement there is a little more full-on. Perhaps he adds little notes and gets carried away in places. We really don't know.
I think it's fairly obvious that the Copy Vegeta arc was Toei's idea. So far, we've had character designs for everything Toriyama has done on Super. They always love to use that stuff to promote the series in V Jump. Had Toriyama actually done any work on that, we'd know. We would almost certainly have his sketches for those characters if he had actually had any involvement there.
Toyotaro's manga is helpful to an extent when attempting to determine what comes from Toriyama and what doesn't, but it's important to remember that Toriyama praised and encouraged Toyotaro's own additions. We also know Toyotaro has a relationship with the production at Toei, so there's a back and forth there to account for, too. And of course, it's a promotional manga, so there's always the chance it skips over parts of Toriyama's scenario just to cover the essential parts in time.
It's hard to really get much more than just the very basics, unfortunately. It's all guess-work. We probably won't ever know for certain.
They can't do that, so we end up with stuff like this:
This is very different from the verbiage used for Resurrection 'F', which explicitly goes out of its way to talk about Toriyama's script. The number of times I saw Toriyama's quote "[I've written it] as though it were a continuation of the manga when it was in serialization" was astounding.Overseen by Dragon Ball’s original creator, Akira Toriyama and produced with Fuji Television, Dragon Ball Super will draw on its historic past to create a bold, new universe welcoming to fans and endearing to new viewers.
Dragon Ball Super is a gem of an original story, from an original draft provided by manga author Akira Toriyama-sensei!
It’s the start of the “‘Future’ Trunks Arc”, a new plot line with story and characters based an original draft by Akira Toriyama.
Super is very different. Instead of comments like that, you just have things along the lines of the above, and then the series composer saying, "Both the story and characters spring from Akira Toriyama-sensei’s pen, a Dragon Ball nobody has ever seen before. In order to be faithful to the scenario sensei has given us, and also to make an anime series that everyone can enjoy, I shall do my very best to make this series together with director [Kimitoshi] Chioka."
By industry definitions, a scenario is just an outline of a story. Its level of detail can vary greatly, but it does not specify everything that happens, instead focusing on enough for a reader to understand the intentions of the story. It's essentially just a sequence of events and locations, often used when pitching an idea to a company. In Super's case, they simply take this and the script writers turn it into a fully-fledged story. Of course, Toriyama contributes character designs too, so his involvement there is a little more full-on. Perhaps he adds little notes and gets carried away in places. We really don't know.
I think it's fairly obvious that the Copy Vegeta arc was Toei's idea. So far, we've had character designs for everything Toriyama has done on Super. They always love to use that stuff to promote the series in V Jump. Had Toriyama actually done any work on that, we'd know. We would almost certainly have his sketches for those characters if he had actually had any involvement there.
Toyotaro's manga is helpful to an extent when attempting to determine what comes from Toriyama and what doesn't, but it's important to remember that Toriyama praised and encouraged Toyotaro's own additions. We also know Toyotaro has a relationship with the production at Toei, so there's a back and forth there to account for, too. And of course, it's a promotional manga, so there's always the chance it skips over parts of Toriyama's scenario just to cover the essential parts in time.
It's hard to really get much more than just the very basics, unfortunately. It's all guess-work. We probably won't ever know for certain.
Follow me on Twitter for countless shitposts.
Deadtuber.
Deadtuber.
Re: What material is included in Super but is NOT by Toriyama?
You don't think there's a non-zero chance that, sometime after Super has ended, we'll get a look at Toriyama's draft materials? Those would kind of be the holy grail for a guide-book inclusion at this point.Ajay wrote:It's hard to really get much more than just the very basics, unfortunately. It's all guess-work. We probably won't ever know for certain.
- DBZGTKOSDH
- Namekian Warrior
- Posts: 12401
- Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 7:45 pm
- Location: Greece
Re: What material is included in Super but is NOT by Toriyama?
I really doubt he skips anything. We were told that he takes Toriyama's story draft & expands on it, with no mention of skipping anything. But we've seen that he doesn't expand on everything in detail, like the finale of the U6 arc.Ajay wrote:And of course, it's a promotional manga, so there's always the chance it skips over parts of Toriyama's scenario just to cover the essential parts in time.
James Teal (Animerica 1996) wrote:When you think about it, there are a number of similarities between the Chinese-inspired Son Goku and that most American of superhero icons, Superman. Both are aliens sent to Earth shortly after birth to escape the destruction of their homeworlds; both possess super-strength, flight, super-speed, heightened senses and the ability to cast energy blasts. But the crucial difference between them lies not only in how they view the world, but in how the world views them.
Superman is, and always has been, a symbol for truth, justice, and upstanding moral fortitude–a role model and leader as much as a fighter. The more down-to-earth Goku has no illusions about being responsible for maintaining social order, or for setting some kind of moral example for the entire world. Goku is simply a martial artist who’s devoted his life toward perfecting his fighting skills and other abilities. Though never shy about risking his life to save either one person or the entire world, he just doesn’t believe that the balance of the world rests in any way on his shoulders, and he has no need to shape any part of it in his image. Goku is an idealist, and believes that there is some good in everyone, but he is unconcerned with the big picture of the world…unless it has to do with some kind of fight. Politics, society, law and order don’t have much bearing on his life, but he’s a man who knows right from wrong.








