Why did Goku and Chi-Chi have Gohan at only 18 years old?

Discussion regarding the entirety of the franchise in a general (meta) sense, including such aspects as: production, trends, merchandise, fan culture, and more.
User avatar
TheGreatness25
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5005
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 9:36 am

Re: Why did Goku and Chi-Chi have Gohan at only 18 years old?

Post by TheGreatness25 » Tue Jan 10, 2017 12:47 pm

Gaffer Tape wrote:Regardless of the fact that it makes no sense, Goku states he is 12 during the 21st Budoukai. In fact, that's the ONLY time he says he's 12. And since each subsequent Budoukai is officially listed to be on the same date every time, that would make him 15 at the 22nd and 18 at the 23rd. So while claiming he's 13 at that point smoothes over a plot hole, it has no basis in the story itself and directly contradicts what the manga actually says.

So that's how people come to the conclusion they were 18.
I don't know know what part "doesn't make sense." I really did think that Goku said that he was 13 during the 21st Tenkaichi Budokai; I wasn't trying to "smooth" anything over. I checked it and he does say that he's 12, so I stand corrected. Oh well. But hey, thanks for the condescending, snarky answer anyway.

User avatar
TheZFighter
Regular
Posts: 538
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2014 9:40 am

Re: Why did Goku and Chi-Chi have Gohan at only 18 years old?

Post by TheZFighter » Tue Jan 10, 2017 6:22 pm

Do we know for definite that Gohan's birth was planned?
Z-Fighters fan.

Goku, Yamcha, Krillin, Tien, Chiaotzu, Yajirobe, Gohan, Piccolo, Vegeta, Future Trunks, Android 18, Goten, Trunks and Majin Buu.

precita
Banned
Posts: 6037
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2015 3:10 pm

Re: Why did Goku and Chi-Chi have Gohan at only 18 years old?

Post by precita » Tue Jan 10, 2017 6:25 pm

TheZFighter wrote:Do we know for definite that Gohan's birth was planned?
It obviously wasn't. I seriously doubt either Goku or Chi-Chi know anything about condoms.

User avatar
TheGreatness25
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5005
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 9:36 am

Re: Why did Goku and Chi-Chi have Gohan at only 18 years old?

Post by TheGreatness25 » Tue Jan 10, 2017 6:27 pm

It's s shonen manga and anime, not a Lifetime movie. I don't think that we should concern ourselves with accidental pregnancies, birth control use, etc. I'm merely suggesting that perhaps we're diving a little deeply when we start thinking of those things. I'm pretty sure they never crossed Akira Toriyama's mind.

mabalia
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 174
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2016 3:43 pm

Re: Why did Goku and Chi-Chi have Gohan at only 18 years old?

Post by mabalia » Tue Jan 10, 2017 7:49 pm

Country people of nowadays knows contraceptive methods. I can't say for sure if Chichi knew it or not, but if the place where she lived, Mount Frypan, live other people too, some women could give her the talk and explain to her. Chichi spent her teenage years, besides training martial arts, trying to learn how to be a good wife and that's usually a topic that magazines like the types she reads treats. So yes, I think she knows and Gohan was a planed and wanted baby.

I know people thinks she fails at being a good wife, but it's good to recognize that at least she tried. 8)

User avatar
Gaffer Tape
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 6135
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 5:25 pm
Contact:

Re: Why did Goku and Chi-Chi have Gohan at only 18 years old?

Post by Gaffer Tape » Tue Jan 10, 2017 11:51 pm

TheGreatness25 wrote:I don't know know what part "doesn't make sense." I really did think that Goku said that he was 13 during the 21st Tenkaichi Budokai; I wasn't trying to "smooth" anything over. I checked it and he does say that he's 12, so I stand corrected. Oh well. But hey, thanks for the condescending, snarky answer anyway.
Ahem. I was talking about the plot hole in the story where either eight months have passed, yet the Dragon Balls are active again, or a whole year has passed, yet Goku is 12 both at the beginning and end of that time frame. That's what doesn't make sense and what fans typically try to smooth over. In fact, this is the second time in this thread that the concept has come up. I assure you that my editorial comments on the narrative of Dragon Ball had nothing to do with you personally, and there was no condescension or snark in my post. I implore you to re-read my initial response to you with that information in mind and hopefully it will read a bit more as I intended it.
Do you follow the most comprehensive and entertaining Dragon Ball analysis series on YouTube? If you do, you're smart and awesome and fairly attractive. If not, see what all the fuss is about without even having to leave Kanzenshuu:

MistareFusion's Dragon Ball Dissection Series Discussion Thread! (Updated 6/8/26!)
Current Episode: The 2013-2015 Dragon Ball Dissection Fashion Extravaganza! - DBD: The Resurrection 'F' Arc Part 5

User avatar
Kid Buu
I Live Here
Posts: 4306
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 4:02 am
Location: United Kingdom

Re: Why did Goku and Chi-Chi have Gohan at only 18 years old?

Post by Kid Buu » Wed Jan 11, 2017 12:12 am

I'm surprised you find them having kids at 18 odd, but are willing to accept marriage at 18. :eh:
Rocketman wrote:"Shonen" basically means "stupid sentimental shit" anyway, so it's ok to be anti-shonen.

User avatar
miguelnuva1
I Live Here
Posts: 2919
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2012 9:23 pm

Re: Why did Goku and Chi-Chi have Gohan at only 18 years old?

Post by miguelnuva1 » Wed Jan 11, 2017 5:33 am

I assume they were married long enough to turn 19 then Gohan was born.

I believe its stated Goku trains with Roshi 8 months and never turns 13 from the start of DB through the 21 Budokai meaning he has to turn 19 at most 4 months into Chi-Chi being pregnant.

Chi-Chi could be 18 or 19 depending on her birthday.

User avatar
Nejishiki
I Live Here
Posts: 2406
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 11:45 am

Re: Why did Goku and Chi-Chi have Gohan at only 18 years old?

Post by Nejishiki » Wed Jan 11, 2017 7:04 am

miguelnuva1 wrote:I assume they were married long enough to turn 19 then Gohan was born.

I believe its stated Goku trains with Roshi 8 months and never turns 13 from the start of DB through the 21 Budokai meaning he has to turn 19 at most 4 months into Chi-Chi being pregnant.

Chi-Chi could be 18 or 19 depending on her birthday.
Yes, Turtle Hermit claims they will train for eight months. Goku claims he's 14 during the 21st Tenkaichi Budoukai. The Dragon Ball hunt lasted a little over a week, at best. After they summon Shen Long, Goku meets Turtle Hermit for training the next day.

rereboy
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10262
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 8:42 pm

Re: Why did Goku and Chi-Chi have Gohan at only 18 years old?

Post by rereboy » Wed Jan 11, 2017 7:47 am

precita wrote:
TheZFighter wrote:Do we know for definite that Gohan's birth was planned?
It obviously wasn't. I seriously doubt either Goku or Chi-Chi know anything about condoms.
They got married and Chichi seems traditional. I would be surprised if they (or at least Chichi) didn't considered having kids as the normal progression.

User avatar
Bruma rabu
Regular
Posts: 517
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2016 10:12 pm

Re: Why did Goku and Chi-Chi have Gohan at only 18 years old?

Post by Bruma rabu » Fri Jan 13, 2017 8:21 pm

I'm sure chi-chi wanted a kid as soon as possible, she's been planing their marriage for about 6-7 years. The moment they got the night to them selves chi-chi went to work.
Bulma is awesome... but chi-chi is best waifu :wink:

User avatar
Gog
I Live Here
Posts: 4099
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2016 7:33 am
Location: Dio's World.

Re: Why did Goku and Chi-Chi have Gohan at only 18 years old?

Post by Gog » Fri Jan 13, 2017 8:26 pm

Because they wanted too? Honestly no reason for them to not have a kid at that age, if you ask me

Post Reply