Why did Goku and Chi-Chi have Gohan at only 18 years old?

Discussion regarding the entirety of the franchise in a general (meta) sense, including such aspects as: production, trends, merchandise, fan culture, and more.
precita
Banned
Posts: 6037
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2015 3:10 pm

Why did Goku and Chi-Chi have Gohan at only 18 years old?

Post by precita » Sun Jan 08, 2017 3:53 am

Does anyone else think that's very young to have a kid? I know Goku and Chi-Chi are no ordinary parents, but in real life 18-year old parents just feels like a "mistake" or an unplanned pregnancy. DBZ took place only 4 years after the end of Dragonball, so Goku must have impregnated Chi-Chi not too long after the last tournament, or after that filler arc in Dragonball. Discuss.

User avatar
alexhermit
Not-So-Newbie
Posts: 50
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2016 12:55 am

Re: Why did Goku and Chi-Chi have Gohan at only 18 years old?

Post by alexhermit » Sun Jan 08, 2017 4:00 am

But they never actually did it! Its just a plot hole created by Toriyama. I dont even think that such a thing like sex exists in dragon ball. Hell Goku never kissed Chi-Chi so what kind of relationship do you think they must have had!??

chichi I'm going fishing! chi chi I'm home!!
Last edited by alexhermit on Sun Jan 08, 2017 4:01 am, edited 1 time in total.

DragonBallFoodie
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1392
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2016 5:12 pm
Location: Zambia, Southern Africa

Re: Why did Goku and Chi-Chi have Gohan at only 18 years old?

Post by DragonBallFoodie » Sun Jan 08, 2017 4:00 am

18 is okay. It's the age of consent.
"Don't take pleasure in destruction!" / "I will not let you destroy my world!"
A true hero goes beyond not the limits of power, but the limits that divide countries and people.

User avatar
Gog
I Live Here
Posts: 4099
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2016 7:33 am
Location: Dio's World.

Re: Why did Goku and Chi-Chi have Gohan at only 18 years old?

Post by Gog » Sun Jan 08, 2017 5:05 am

alexhermit wrote:But they never actually did it! Its just a plot hole created by Toriyama. I dont even think that such a thing like sex exists in dragon ball. Hell Goku never kissed Chi-Chi so what kind of relationship do you think they must have had!??
Or Chi chi and Goku don't know the concept of kissing, so he's probably used to rubbing his face against her face instead

User avatar
nickzambuto
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1705
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2015 7:53 pm

Re: Why did Goku and Chi-Chi have Gohan at only 18 years old?

Post by nickzambuto » Sun Jan 08, 2017 5:28 am

It seems appropriate given both their personalities. I mean it's not like they had to worry about any practical things that hold people back like money.

mabalia
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 174
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2016 3:43 pm

Re: Why did Goku and Chi-Chi have Gohan at only 18 years old?

Post by mabalia » Sun Jan 08, 2017 6:07 am

Correction: the time between DB and DBZ is 5 years. You have to consider the time of pregnancy and Gohan is already 4 years old in DBZ.

A curious thing is that now we don't know if Goku and Chichi have the same age, after DB Minus was published. It says that Goku is only two years younger than Bulma where previously sources stated he was 4 years younger than her. So Goku could be 20 years old and Chichi 18 years old when they married.

They're country people and it's common for them to marry young. Chichi obviously didnt care for money at the time or she wouldn't left her dad's house. Goku won the tournament and the first prize money, so for a time it was enough. And Mount Paozu provides food and water for them.

I think to have a son this early is Chichi's idea. She wanted a son, I guess.

User avatar
Gaffer Tape
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 6128
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 5:25 pm
Contact:

Re: Why did Goku and Chi-Chi have Gohan at only 18 years old?

Post by Gaffer Tape » Sun Jan 08, 2017 10:35 am

The idea of a couple waiting to have children is a fairly modern, urban concept. Goku and Chichi are neither modern nor urban. A common reason for putting off marriage or children is to further one's education. Another common reason is to pursue one's career. Goku and Chichi are doing neither. Outside of those kind of factors, it is fairly common for a young couple to immediately have children. Add to that the probability that Goku and Chichi, like the old-fashioned rural couples they resemble, probably have little knowledge of or access to contraception, and it's no wonder they immediately have a child.
Do you follow the most comprehensive and entertaining Dragon Ball analysis series on YouTube? If you do, you're smart and awesome and fairly attractive. If not, see what all the fuss is about without even having to leave Kanzenshuu:

MistareFusion's Dragon Ball Dissection Series Discussion Thread! (Updated 2/16/26!)
Current Episode: The Airtight Case for Slice of Life! - Dragon Ball Dissection: The Resurrection 'F' Arc Part 1

User avatar
Ki Breaker
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 6572
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 12:15 am
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland

Re: Why did Goku and Chi-Chi have Gohan at only 18 years old?

Post by Ki Breaker » Sun Jan 08, 2017 10:50 am

This makes me think how much thinking has shifted to being "modern" age..

It completely normal to have kids even earlier than that in rural areas, the only thing stopping us form that is the need to sustain that family.
The Lord moves in mysterious ways but you don't have to. Please use your blinker

User avatar
DBZAOTA482
Banned
Posts: 6995
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2012 4:04 pm
Contact:

Re: Why did Goku and Chi-Chi have Gohan at only 18 years old?

Post by DBZAOTA482 » Sun Jan 08, 2017 11:42 am

Goku and Chi-Chi were both 19 during the 23rd Tenkaichi Budokai which was when they just got together. Where the hell did you get the impression they had Gohan at 18?
fadeddreams5 wrote:
DBZGTKOSDH wrote:... Haven't we already gotten these in GT? Goku dies, the DBs go away, and the Namekian DBs most likely won't be used again because of the Evil Dragons.
Goku didn't die in GT. The show sucked him off so much, it was impossible to keep him in the world of the living, so he ascended beyond mortality.
jjgp1112 wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2020 6:31 am I'm just about done with the concept of reboots and making shows that were products of their time and impactful "new and sexy" and in line with modern tastes and sensibilities. Let stuff stay in their era and give today's kids their own shit to watch.

I always side eye the people who say "Now my kids/today's kids can experience what I did as a child!" Nigga, who gives a fuck about your childhood? You're an adult now and it was at least 15 years ago. Let the kids have their own experience instead of picking at a corpse.

User avatar
Gaffer Tape
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 6128
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 5:25 pm
Contact:

Re: Why did Goku and Chi-Chi have Gohan at only 18 years old?

Post by Gaffer Tape » Sun Jan 08, 2017 11:59 am

DBZAOTA482 wrote:Goku and Chi-Chi were both 19 during the 23rd Tenkaichi Budokai which was when they just got together. Where the hell did you get the impression they had Gohan at 18?
Goku claims he's 12 at the 21st Budoukai. Three years later, he'd be 15. Three years later, he'd be 18. With a nine-month gestation resulting in a four-year-old child after a five-year gap... yeah, they'd most likely still be 18 at his conception but could possibly be 19.
Do you follow the most comprehensive and entertaining Dragon Ball analysis series on YouTube? If you do, you're smart and awesome and fairly attractive. If not, see what all the fuss is about without even having to leave Kanzenshuu:

MistareFusion's Dragon Ball Dissection Series Discussion Thread! (Updated 2/16/26!)
Current Episode: The Airtight Case for Slice of Life! - Dragon Ball Dissection: The Resurrection 'F' Arc Part 1

User avatar
DBZAOTA482
Banned
Posts: 6995
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2012 4:04 pm
Contact:

Re: Why did Goku and Chi-Chi have Gohan at only 18 years old?

Post by DBZAOTA482 » Sun Jan 08, 2017 12:29 pm

Gaffer Tape wrote:
DBZAOTA482 wrote:Goku and Chi-Chi were both 19 during the 23rd Tenkaichi Budokai which was when they just got together. Where the hell did you get the impression they had Gohan at 18?
Goku claims he's 12 at the 21st Budoukai. Three years later, he'd be 15. Three years later, he'd be 18. With a nine-month gestation resulting in a four-year-old child after a five-year gap... yeah, they'd most likely still be 18 at his conception but could possibly be 19.
The Red Ribbon Army arc took place a few months after the 21st Tenkaichi Budokai, which was 8 months after the beginning of the series (where Goku is still 12).
fadeddreams5 wrote:
DBZGTKOSDH wrote:... Haven't we already gotten these in GT? Goku dies, the DBs go away, and the Namekian DBs most likely won't be used again because of the Evil Dragons.
Goku didn't die in GT. The show sucked him off so much, it was impossible to keep him in the world of the living, so he ascended beyond mortality.
jjgp1112 wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2020 6:31 am I'm just about done with the concept of reboots and making shows that were products of their time and impactful "new and sexy" and in line with modern tastes and sensibilities. Let stuff stay in their era and give today's kids their own shit to watch.

I always side eye the people who say "Now my kids/today's kids can experience what I did as a child!" Nigga, who gives a fuck about your childhood? You're an adult now and it was at least 15 years ago. Let the kids have their own experience instead of picking at a corpse.

rereboy
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10262
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 8:42 pm

Re: Why did Goku and Chi-Chi have Gohan at only 18 years old?

Post by rereboy » Sun Jan 08, 2017 12:33 pm

precita wrote:Does anyone else think that's very young to have a kid? I know Goku and Chi-Chi are no ordinary parents, but in real life 18-year old parents just feels like a "mistake" or an unplanned pregnancy. DBZ took place only 4 years after the end of Dragonball, so Goku must have impregnated Chi-Chi not too long after the last tournament, or after that filler arc in Dragonball. Discuss.
Real life doesn't apply, it's a fantasy world. In any case, even in the real world, 18 years old is an adult age and even a while back, like late XIX century or beginning of XX century, it was pretty normal to have kids at even younger ages. Don't confuse what is the tendency nowadays with what was tendency in other times or is the tendency is a fantasy world.

User avatar
Kamiccolo9
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10371
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2013 9:32 pm
Location: Regensburg, Germany

Re: Why did Goku and Chi-Chi have Gohan at only 18 years old?

Post by Kamiccolo9 » Sun Jan 08, 2017 12:35 pm

Where I live, it's hardly atypical for couples to have kids from 17-19. As Gaffer mentioned above, education is generally the cause for delaying having kids, not some moral or social standard.
Champion of the 1st Kanzenshuu Short Story Tenkaichi Budokai
Kamiccolo9's Kompendium of Short Stories
Cipher wrote:If Vegeta does not kill Gohan, I will stop illegally streaming the series.
Malik_DBNA wrote:
Scarz wrote:Malik, stop. People are asking me for lewd art of possessed Bra (with Vegeta).
"Achievement Unlocked: Rule 34"

User avatar
JulieYBM
Patreon Supporter
Posts: 18563
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 10:25 pm
Location: 🏳️‍⚧️🍉

Re: Why did Goku and Chi-Chi have Gohan at only 18 years old?

Post by JulieYBM » Sun Jan 08, 2017 12:37 pm

I don't see why they couldn't have kids at eighteen. Both of them are perfectly capable of killing animals to eat for survival and they clearly had their own home.
💙💜💖 She/Her 💙💜💖

User avatar
Gaffer Tape
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 6128
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 5:25 pm
Contact:

Re: Why did Goku and Chi-Chi have Gohan at only 18 years old?

Post by Gaffer Tape » Sun Jan 08, 2017 12:46 pm

DBZAOTA482 wrote:The Red Ribbon Army arc took place a few months after the 21st Tenkaichi Budokai, which was 8 months after the beginning of the series (where Goku is still 12).
Not according to the timeline. The 21st Budoukai takes place on May 7th. Goku gets his first Dragon Ball on May 8th. It's a plot hole (several plot holes), plain and simple. But he is still 12.
Do you follow the most comprehensive and entertaining Dragon Ball analysis series on YouTube? If you do, you're smart and awesome and fairly attractive. If not, see what all the fuss is about without even having to leave Kanzenshuu:

MistareFusion's Dragon Ball Dissection Series Discussion Thread! (Updated 2/16/26!)
Current Episode: The Airtight Case for Slice of Life! - Dragon Ball Dissection: The Resurrection 'F' Arc Part 1

User avatar
floofychan333
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1378
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 10:03 pm
Location: Ottawa, Canada

Re: Why did Goku and Chi-Chi have Gohan at only 18 years old?

Post by floofychan333 » Sun Jan 08, 2017 2:23 pm

They probably did it once and were unlucky enough to get pregnant after only once.
"All of you. All of you must have KILL all the SEASONS!" -Dough (Tenshinhan), Speedy Dub of Movie 9.

"My opinion of Norihito's Sumitomo's new score is... well, very mixed. The stuff that's good is pretty darn good, but the stuff that's bad makes elevator music sound like Jerry freaking Goldsmith." -Kenisu

User avatar
nickzambuto
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1705
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2015 7:53 pm

Re: Why did Goku and Chi-Chi have Gohan at only 18 years old?

Post by nickzambuto » Mon Jan 09, 2017 7:21 pm

floofychan333 wrote:They probably did it once and were unlucky enough to get pregnant after only once.
I wouldn't call it unlucky. Disregarding the fact that they needed around Gohan in order to save the world, the three of them were a very happy and content family before Raditz showed up. Those five years were probably some of the best in Chi-Chi's life.

User avatar
TheGreatness25
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5004
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 9:36 am

Re: Why did Goku and Chi-Chi have Gohan at only 18 years old?

Post by TheGreatness25 » Mon Jan 09, 2017 8:44 pm

How did we get to the conclusion that they were 18? Goku and Chichi are the same age, right? So let's go by Goku's age: 12 in the beginnig of Dragon Ball, 13 during the 21st Tenkaichi Budokai, 16 during the 22nd Tenkaichi Budokai, 19 during the 23rd Tenkaichi Budokai, 24 in Dragon Ball Z. Goku and Chichi had Gohan even they were 20. Chichi having the same age as Goku comes from the Daizenshuu.

I'm pretty sure it was just convenient to give Goku a kid at 20. Nice and even number lol

User avatar
Lord Frieza
I Live Here
Posts: 3801
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2015 2:36 pm

Re: Why did Goku and Chi-Chi have Gohan at only 18 years old?

Post by Lord Frieza » Mon Jan 09, 2017 8:57 pm

They just did, there's likely no big reason behind it. Goku likely had no idea of what sex or protection was and Chi-Chi.....we dont know. Chi-Chi was raised in an almost princess like environment, in the country side by just here father. Most of her ideas about romance seem to have come from magazines. There could also be some potential cultural factors we are unaware of. Taking all that into account she either didn't fully understand the whole birds and the bees thing (I cannot honestly see Ox King trying to talk to his little girl about sex or if he did, doing it right) or she just took it as red that when she got married she would become a house wife and mother and just rolled with it because thats what she thought it was supposed to be like for what ever reason.

User avatar
Gaffer Tape
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 6128
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 5:25 pm
Contact:

Re: Why did Goku and Chi-Chi have Gohan at only 18 years old?

Post by Gaffer Tape » Tue Jan 10, 2017 9:15 am

TheGreatness25 wrote:How did we get to the conclusion that they were 18? Goku and Chichi are the same age, right? So let's go by Goku's age: 12 in the beginnig of Dragon Ball, 13 during the 21st Tenkaichi Budokai, 16 during the 22nd Tenkaichi Budokai, 19 during the 23rd Tenkaichi Budokai, 24 in Dragon Ball Z. Goku and Chichi had Gohan even they were 20. Chichi having the same age as Goku comes from the Daizenshuu.

I'm pretty sure it was just convenient to give Goku a kid at 20. Nice and even number lol
Regardless of the fact that it makes no sense, Goku states he is 12 during the 21st Budoukai. In fact, that's the ONLY time he says he's 12. And since each subsequent Budoukai is officially listed to be on the same date every time, that would make him 15 at the 22nd and 18 at the 23rd. So while claiming he's 13 at that point smoothes over a plot hole, it has no basis in the story itself and directly contradicts what the manga actually says.

So that's how people come to the conclusion they were 18.
Do you follow the most comprehensive and entertaining Dragon Ball analysis series on YouTube? If you do, you're smart and awesome and fairly attractive. If not, see what all the fuss is about without even having to leave Kanzenshuu:

MistareFusion's Dragon Ball Dissection Series Discussion Thread! (Updated 2/16/26!)
Current Episode: The Airtight Case for Slice of Life! - Dragon Ball Dissection: The Resurrection 'F' Arc Part 1

Post Reply