Daizenshuu EX DB wiki...again
Moderators: Kanzenshuu Staff, General Help
- Piccolo Daimao
- Kicks it Old-School
- Posts: 8749
- Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 7:23 am
I think it would be good to have Future & Present Trunks as two different pages. Essentially, they are the same character, but they follow two completely different timelines. And yes, as aforementioned by JulieYBM, it will allow for more breathing space when it comes down to the specifics of their characters. For example, Present Trunks in GT. I dunno, but it seems like maybe a page with both Future and Present Trunks on it, including both incarnations' information and all, would be a bit cramped. And that's not what we want.
But how about Nappa? He doesn't have as much information as the other main characters in the series, but he is still an important character in the series. DB Wiki have a character page on Nappa, and there is plenty of information on there (albeit, some of it unneeded). Wikipedia decided to have him included on a "list of Dragon Ball characters" instead (actually, I don't see him anywhere on that list anymore). I think Nappa should have a page to himself, though. I'm not yet decided on the idea that all minor characters should have a page to themself, but at least minor characters who have actually been, like, how to put it...more in the spotlight, if you know what I mean.
But how about Nappa? He doesn't have as much information as the other main characters in the series, but he is still an important character in the series. DB Wiki have a character page on Nappa, and there is plenty of information on there (albeit, some of it unneeded). Wikipedia decided to have him included on a "list of Dragon Ball characters" instead (actually, I don't see him anywhere on that list anymore). I think Nappa should have a page to himself, though. I'm not yet decided on the idea that all minor characters should have a page to themself, but at least minor characters who have actually been, like, how to put it...more in the spotlight, if you know what I mean.
Last edited by Piccolo Daimao on Sun Nov 01, 2009 8:08 am, edited 1 time in total.
Holden Caulfield in [b][i]The Catcher in the Rye[/i][/b] wrote:I hope to hell when I do die somebody has sense enough to just dump me in the river or something. Anything except sticking me in a goddam cemetery. People coming and putting a bunch of flowers on your stomach on Sunday, and all that crap. Who wants flowers when you're dead? Nobody.
- VegettoEX
- Kanzenshuu Co-Owner & Administrator
- Posts: 17740
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2004 3:10 pm
- Location: New Jersey
- Contact:
Individual characters will have individual pages.
We are not catering to an audience of general members that don't want in-depth information on each character. We're the exact opposite of that.
Nappa gets his own page. Appule gets his own page. Farmer gets his own page. OK, maybe not him.
We are not catering to an audience of general members that don't want in-depth information on each character. We're the exact opposite of that.
Nappa gets his own page. Appule gets his own page. Farmer gets his own page. OK, maybe not him.
:: [| Mike "VegettoEX" LaBrie |] ::
:: [| Kanzenshuu - Co-Founder/Administrator, Podcast Host, News Manager (note: our "job" titles are arbitrary and meaningless) |] ::
:: [| Website: January 1998 |] :: [| Podcast: November 2005 |] :: [| Fusion: April 2012 |] :: [| Wiki: 20XX |] ::
:: [| Kanzenshuu - Co-Founder/Administrator, Podcast Host, News Manager (note: our "job" titles are arbitrary and meaningless) |] ::
:: [| Website: January 1998 |] :: [| Podcast: November 2005 |] :: [| Fusion: April 2012 |] :: [| Wiki: 20XX |] ::
- Innagadadavida
- I Live Here
- Posts: 3480
- Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 12:25 am
- Location: Arkansas, USA
- VegettoEX
- Kanzenshuu Co-Owner & Administrator
- Posts: 17740
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2004 3:10 pm
- Location: New Jersey
- Contact:
I would separate them out. They are two different characters from two different timelines.Innagadadavida wrote:What about Future Trunks and Trunks. According to us, are they going to be the same character or not?VegettoEX wrote:Individual characters will have individual pages.
Of course, since we can do this however we want, we can have all sorts of extra clarifications and links to the "other Trunks".
:: [| Mike "VegettoEX" LaBrie |] ::
:: [| Kanzenshuu - Co-Founder/Administrator, Podcast Host, News Manager (note: our "job" titles are arbitrary and meaningless) |] ::
:: [| Website: January 1998 |] :: [| Podcast: November 2005 |] :: [| Fusion: April 2012 |] :: [| Wiki: 20XX |] ::
:: [| Kanzenshuu - Co-Founder/Administrator, Podcast Host, News Manager (note: our "job" titles are arbitrary and meaningless) |] ::
:: [| Website: January 1998 |] :: [| Podcast: November 2005 |] :: [| Fusion: April 2012 |] :: [| Wiki: 20XX |] ::
- Herms
- Kanzenshuu Admin Emeritus
- Posts: 10550
- Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 6:40 pm
- Location: Jupiter
- Contact:
What about other alternate timeline people, like Future Gohan and the Cell which Trunks kills?
Kanzenshuu: Is that place still around?
Sometimes, I tweet things
We might, if they screamed all the time, for no good reason.
Sometimes, I tweet things
We might, if they screamed all the time, for no good reason.
- VegettoEX
- Kanzenshuu Co-Owner & Administrator
- Posts: 17740
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2004 3:10 pm
- Location: New Jersey
- Contact:
I'm with ya'. "Future Gohan" at least got some screen time, a different appearance, back-history, etc.JulieYBM wrote:Future Gohan, I think, would be deserving of his own article (if just barely), but the Cell Trunks kills, I think, really doesn't constitute one.
The Trunks that Cell killed? All we know is that he existed

:: [| Mike "VegettoEX" LaBrie |] ::
:: [| Kanzenshuu - Co-Founder/Administrator, Podcast Host, News Manager (note: our "job" titles are arbitrary and meaningless) |] ::
:: [| Website: January 1998 |] :: [| Podcast: November 2005 |] :: [| Fusion: April 2012 |] :: [| Wiki: 20XX |] ::
:: [| Kanzenshuu - Co-Founder/Administrator, Podcast Host, News Manager (note: our "job" titles are arbitrary and meaningless) |] ::
:: [| Website: January 1998 |] :: [| Podcast: November 2005 |] :: [| Fusion: April 2012 |] :: [| Wiki: 20XX |] ::
- Herms
- Kanzenshuu Admin Emeritus
- Posts: 10550
- Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 6:40 pm
- Location: Jupiter
- Contact:
You've got it backwards: I said the Cell who Trunks kills, the imperfect form Cell which Trunks kills in his own timeline at the very end of the android/Cell arc. Obviously he's not the most major character, but he's around for longer than the farmer with a shotgun, and if we're going to be going super-duper in-depth and have seperate pages for alternate timeline versions of the same character, he might be worth a page.VegettoEX wrote:The Trunks that Cell killed? All we know is that he existed :P. That's something that would be worth including in the standard "Future Trunks" article.
Kanzenshuu: Is that place still around?
Sometimes, I tweet things
We might, if they screamed all the time, for no good reason.
Sometimes, I tweet things
We might, if they screamed all the time, for no good reason.
- VegettoEX
- Kanzenshuu Co-Owner & Administrator
- Posts: 17740
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2004 3:10 pm
- Location: New Jersey
- Contact:
Oh-oh-oh~Herms wrote:You've got it backwards: I said the Cell who Trunks kills, the imperfect form Cell which Trunks kills in his own timeline at the very end of the android/Cell arc. Obviously he's not the most major character, but he's around for longer than the farmer with a shotgun, and if we're going to be going super-duper in-depth and have seperate pages for alternate timeline versions of the same character, he might be worth a page.VegettoEX wrote:The Trunks that Cell killed? All we know is that he existed. That's something that would be worth including in the standard "Future Trunks" article.
Well, the Trunks that Cell kills also exists

I dunno about that Cell. Sure, he's got screen time, but along the lines of that timeline's 17 and 18, is there enough to really dedicate something other than a confusing single-page-entry for him? I'm all for ignoring all conventions from Wikipedia and Wikia stuffage (since, like I said, we're not catering to those audiences)... but I want it to be coherent, too. If it's just a minor variation on the character, then maybe it's not necessary. That Cell is still Cell trying to absorb everyone and get "perfect", so his motivations are pretty much the same... it's just that his circumstances are different.
I suppose you could say the same for Future Gohan, too, but...
I say we just take it as it comes once it gets off the ground. If it looks like an extra page makes sense, sure!
:: [| Mike "VegettoEX" LaBrie |] ::
:: [| Kanzenshuu - Co-Founder/Administrator, Podcast Host, News Manager (note: our "job" titles are arbitrary and meaningless) |] ::
:: [| Website: January 1998 |] :: [| Podcast: November 2005 |] :: [| Fusion: April 2012 |] :: [| Wiki: 20XX |] ::
:: [| Kanzenshuu - Co-Founder/Administrator, Podcast Host, News Manager (note: our "job" titles are arbitrary and meaningless) |] ::
:: [| Website: January 1998 |] :: [| Podcast: November 2005 |] :: [| Fusion: April 2012 |] :: [| Wiki: 20XX |] ::
I figured--looking at the set up of the Character History section of the article...
"Second Time Machine Discovered/More Interesting Name"
Blah, Blah, blah...
"Ginger Town Massacre/MIN"
Piccolo confronts Cell, Blah, blah, blah.
"The Hunt For the Artificial Humans"
Blah, blah, interrupts Piccolo's fight with #17, absorbes Artificial Humans, fights Vegeta and Trunks, announces Cell Games.
"The Cell Games"
Blah, blah.
"Trunks' Return to the Future"
Fights Trunks, dies (only...more detailed of course)!
"Second Time Machine Discovered/More Interesting Name"
Blah, Blah, blah...
"Ginger Town Massacre/MIN"
Piccolo confronts Cell, Blah, blah, blah.
"The Hunt For the Artificial Humans"
Blah, blah, interrupts Piccolo's fight with #17, absorbes Artificial Humans, fights Vegeta and Trunks, announces Cell Games.
"The Cell Games"
Blah, blah.
"Trunks' Return to the Future"
Fights Trunks, dies (only...more detailed of course)!
Confusing multiple timelines make it difficult to word this, but the Cell that Trunks kills is technically the Cell that was going to take his time machine, go back and cause trouble. Because of the way time travel in Dragon Ball works, I suppose he isn't literally the Cell that ends up going back in time...but as far as we know, his life leading up to getting killed by Trunks is exactly the same as the Cell we know. The only difference is Trunks killed him instead of vice versa.VegettoEX wrote:Oh-oh-oh~Herms wrote:You've got it backwards: I said the Cell who Trunks kills, the imperfect form Cell which Trunks kills in his own timeline at the very end of the android/Cell arc. Obviously he's not the most major character, but he's around for longer than the farmer with a shotgun, and if we're going to be going super-duper in-depth and have seperate pages for alternate timeline versions of the same character, he might be worth a page.VegettoEX wrote:The Trunks that Cell killed? All we know is that he existed. That's something that would be worth including in the standard "Future Trunks" article.
Well, the Trunks that Cell kills also exists.
I dunno about that Cell. Sure, he's got screen time, but along the lines of that timeline's 17 and 18, is there enough to really dedicate something other than a confusing single-page-entry for him? I'm all for ignoring all conventions from Wikipedia and Wikia stuffage (since, like I said, we're not catering to those audiences)... but I want it to be coherent, too. If it's just a minor variation on the character, then maybe it's not necessary. That Cell is still Cell trying to absorb everyone and get "perfect", so his motivations are pretty much the same... it's just that his circumstances are different.
I suppose you could say the same for Future Gohan, too, but...
I say we just take it as it comes once it gets off the ground. If it looks like an extra page makes sense, sure!
So yeah, probably just worth sticking on the end of Trunks and Cell's histories.
- Piccolo Daimao
- Kicks it Old-School
- Posts: 8749
- Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 7:23 am
Future Gohan deserves a page to himself. He is completely different from the Gohan in the present timeline, has a different appearance, backstory etc. The Cell that Trunks kills, I don't think he needs a page to himself. Shouldn't we just stick him on somewhere in Cell's individual page? He is essentially the same Cell that goes back in time and attempts to absorb #17 & #18. The only difference is that he's killed in Trunks' timeline.
I know that what I'm saying looks like I'm contradicting myself. If all that I've aforementioned is true, shouldn't we just incorporate Future Gohan into Gohan's main page and Present Trunks into Future Trunks' page? But the thing is, it's all about difference. Present Trunks has enough difference between him and Future Trunks for the present Trunks to benefit from a single page. Future Gohan has enough difference between him and Present Gohan for the future Gohan to benefit from a single page. The Cell that Trunks kills is barely different from the Cell who Gohan killed, considering their appearance and backstory.
Future #17 & Future #18 is tricky, however. They do have different personalities and different motivations, and they are killed while their present timeline counterparts are not. Maybe they will benefit from their own pages? I don't know. There seems to be too many situations concerning different versions of characters and the like to firmly decide on whether they should have an individual page or not. I guess somehow we'll come to a conclusion. And if we don't like it, we can always change it. But not too many changes, that's the problem with Wikipedia. They are always making changes that can be percieved as unnecessary when no-one had a problem with them in the first place.
I know that what I'm saying looks like I'm contradicting myself. If all that I've aforementioned is true, shouldn't we just incorporate Future Gohan into Gohan's main page and Present Trunks into Future Trunks' page? But the thing is, it's all about difference. Present Trunks has enough difference between him and Future Trunks for the present Trunks to benefit from a single page. Future Gohan has enough difference between him and Present Gohan for the future Gohan to benefit from a single page. The Cell that Trunks kills is barely different from the Cell who Gohan killed, considering their appearance and backstory.
Future #17 & Future #18 is tricky, however. They do have different personalities and different motivations, and they are killed while their present timeline counterparts are not. Maybe they will benefit from their own pages? I don't know. There seems to be too many situations concerning different versions of characters and the like to firmly decide on whether they should have an individual page or not. I guess somehow we'll come to a conclusion. And if we don't like it, we can always change it. But not too many changes, that's the problem with Wikipedia. They are always making changes that can be percieved as unnecessary when no-one had a problem with them in the first place.
Holden Caulfield in [b][i]The Catcher in the Rye[/i][/b] wrote:I hope to hell when I do die somebody has sense enough to just dump me in the river or something. Anything except sticking me in a goddam cemetery. People coming and putting a bunch of flowers on your stomach on Sunday, and all that crap. Who wants flowers when you're dead? Nobody.
Might as well copy and paste the Battle Power Guide on Kanzentai. :pKendamu wrote:I think the farmer and the shotgun should have their own separate pages. Also, a separate page for Yamucha's nunchaku that I never remember him actually using. I mean, the Scouter is probably going to get its own page, right?VegettoEX wrote:Farmer gets his own page. OK, maybe not him.
- linkdude20002001
- I Live Here
- Posts: 2613
- Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 4:22 pm
- Location: Marysville, Washington
That would be hilarious having a page about "Farmer with a Shotgun's Shotgun".Kendamu wrote:I think the farmer and the shotgun should have their own separate pages. Also, a separate page for Yamucha's nunchaku that I never remember him actually using. I mean, the Scouter is probably going to get its own page, right?VegettoEX wrote:Farmer gets his own page. OK, maybe not him.

When did Yamcha ever have nunchaku?
The Many English Dubs of DB, DBZ, and DBGT
Viz Release Censorship Guide
Scsigs: "Y'know, it actually makes sense that they waited till today to announce [the 30th Anniversary] set. It's Akira Toriyama's birthday."
Shaddy: "I too want my legacy destroyed as a birthday gift."
Viz Release Censorship Guide
Scsigs: "Y'know, it actually makes sense that they waited till today to announce [the 30th Anniversary] set. It's Akira Toriyama's birthday."
Shaddy: "I too want my legacy destroyed as a birthday gift."
And in movie1, so far as Sprite Satan saw in DB movie1...Kendamu wrote:When everyone was going to try to help out GOku during the end of the Red Ribbon arc. He had them in-hand but Goku had already taken everyone out by that point.linkdude20002001 wrote:When did Yamcha ever have nunchaku?

Dr Gero, in Budokai 2 wrote:Go, my Saiba Rangers!
Akira Toriyama, in Son Goku Densetsu wrote:You really can’t go by rumors (laughs).
- Piccolo Daimao
- Kicks it Old-School
- Posts: 8749
- Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 7:23 am
Maybe Yamcha's nunchaku could be in a list of minor weapons or objects that the characters use or do not use throughout the series? I'm not sure about ones that actually play some sort of part in the series or are actually used, like Goku's Nyoibo or Trunks' sword.Kendamu wrote:When everyone was going to try to help out Goku during the end of the Red Ribbon arc. He had them in-hand but Goku had already taken everyone out by that point.linkdude20002001 wrote:When did Yamcha ever have nunchaku?
Holden Caulfield in [b][i]The Catcher in the Rye[/i][/b] wrote:I hope to hell when I do die somebody has sense enough to just dump me in the river or something. Anything except sticking me in a goddam cemetery. People coming and putting a bunch of flowers on your stomach on Sunday, and all that crap. Who wants flowers when you're dead? Nobody.