dbzfan7 wrote:ekrolo2 wrote:GodKaio-Ken wrote:Well he did grow up basically alone after Grandpa-Gohan died. Naive is definitely the word...he has always been morally intelligent but obviously never went to real school of any sorts and was extremely laid back.
There is a lot of original Kid Goku in Super Goku IMO but it seems awkward because it doesn't quite match his progression through Z.
The last moment of common sense he had was when he told Gohan to kill Cell because they didn't want to see what he'd resort to once he (Cell) got desperate.
Goku: Fuck you Gohan, don't be a dumbass and toy with Cell right now. He could be dangerous. Only I can fuck around all I want with dangerous people, instead of stopping them before they do something drastic out of desperation.
Exactly! And if you try to point out how Goku, under Toriyama, is a stagnant bastard who's become increasingly stale and one note well....
This I think sums up thinks nicely:
*Toriyama writes Goku like a Saiyan, someone complains about how annoying it's gotten*
Fuck you! That's how Goku is! - moron fanboy
*Toriyama gives Goku some development that goes against his Saiyan traits*
FUCKING BRILLIANT TORIYAMA-SENSEI-SAMA-DONO-TAICHO! - moron fanboy
HeroR wrote:Calling Goku a morally void bastard is a bit much. He's still a heroic character, he just tend to put a good fight before certain things, unless the enemy make things truly personal for him. At the same time, it isn't like he allowed his enemies to kill people in front of him without caring and he showed visual anger at Freeza after he killed Piccolo and hurt Gohan. A truly morally void bastard wouldn't have cared that Beerus was going to destroy the Earth during the fight, outside of having no oxygen to breath.
And we already know that Goku in Z got some heroic adaptation from Toei and GT was exclusive made by Toei, which is why he came off as more heroic.
Goku only cares about anyone when they're about to die or in danger, he gives precisely negative infinity fucks if HE'S the one who got them into a situation like that to begin with. Super has taken this a step further where killing Piccolo and Future Bulma means nothing to him: Freeza and Black can give him a good fight so fuck dead Piccolo and Future Bulma right in the throat with a loaded shotgun is his stance on the matter.
And a more heroic Goku is fine if you do it like GT did. Goku's whole "Saiyan nature" is less of a character thing now and more of a convenient excuse to write him as an amoral shithead so an easily avoidable story can happen. Because who has the time to think of an actual clever way for Black to escape from a more powerful foe than him?! JUST MAKE GOKU ACT LIKE VEGETA IN THE ANDROID SAGA!
Unless you're Toriyama and you suddenly write him a bit differently at which point well, look at my comment above to see how that works. Character development is bad until it's not, as long as you're Toriyama. You can argue with me about the manga or the movies, but anime Super Goku IS a morally void bastard with no redeeming qualities. You've literally have to cripple him to make him begin to care about anything not even remotely about combat, just look at the Pan episode for proof.
When someone tells you, "Don't present your opinion as fact," what they're actually saying is, "Don't present your opinion with any conviction. Because I don't like your opinion, and I want to be able to dismiss it as easily as possible." Don't fall for it.
How the Black Arc Should End (by Lightbing!):