Was Black the "Evil Goku" you wanted?

Discussion specifically regarding the "Dragon Ball Super" TV series premiering July 2015 in Japan, including individual threads for each episode.

Moderators: Kanzenshuu Staff, General Help

User avatar
DBZAOTA482
Banned
Posts: 6995
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2012 4:04 pm
Contact:

Re: Was Black the "Evil Goku" you wanted?

Post by DBZAOTA482 » Thu Nov 24, 2016 5:39 pm

Black went way beyond that, brotha. He's a much better "Evil Goku" than Tullece.
fadeddreams5 wrote:
DBZGTKOSDH wrote:... Haven't we already gotten these in GT? Goku dies, the DBs go away, and the Namekian DBs most likely won't be used again because of the Evil Dragons.
Goku didn't die in GT. The show sucked him off so much, it was impossible to keep him in the world of the living, so he ascended beyond mortality.
jjgp1112 wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2020 6:31 am I'm just about done with the concept of reboots and making shows that were products of their time and impactful "new and sexy" and in line with modern tastes and sensibilities. Let stuff stay in their era and give today's kids their own shit to watch.

I always side eye the people who say "Now my kids/today's kids can experience what I did as a child!" Nigga, who gives a fuck about your childhood? You're an adult now and it was at least 15 years ago. Let the kids have their own experience instead of picking at a corpse.

HeroR
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8306
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 11:28 pm

Re: Was Black the "Evil Goku" you wanted?

Post by HeroR » Thu Nov 24, 2016 5:44 pm

Doctor. wrote: Goku can turn evil. Goku can do anything. It's up to the writers to make it believable. That's also why I said he could be an antagonist. He doesn't necessarily need to be evil to be an antagonist.
At some point, a character write themselves and there are some things a character won't do without rewriting the character. Goku, as he is, won't turn 'evil'. The closest that is within Goku's character is becoming apathetic or a berserker like Gohan during the Cell Games or himself on Namek. He will never be like Vegeta when he first comes to Earth or even like Cell since Goku has never had an interest in terrorizing weaklings.

As for being an antagonist, the closest I can see is a Marvel Civil War situation, no I don't mean in the super hero registration. I mean in there is a split in ideas among the core cast. Even then, a lot of crap has to happen to reach the point of Goku fighting his own friends, unless you mean an antagonist to a third party.
Kanassa wrote:
precita wrote:Goku will still be around but take a Buu saga approach backseat.
Goku barely took a backseat in the Buu saga, at best he took a leisurely stroll round back while everyone else cried for him to come back.

User avatar
Doctor.
Banned
Posts: 10558
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:02 am
Location: Portugal

Re: Was Black the "Evil Goku" you wanted?

Post by Doctor. » Thu Nov 24, 2016 5:48 pm

HeroR wrote:
Doctor. wrote: Goku can turn evil. Goku can do anything. It's up to the writers to make it believable. That's also why I said he could be an antagonist. He doesn't necessarily need to be evil to be an antagonist.
At some point, a character write themselves and there are some things a character won't do without rewriting the character. Goku, as he is, won't turn 'evil'. The closest that is within Goku's character is becoming apathetic or a berserker like Gohan during the Cell Games or himself on Namek. He will never be like Vegeta when he first comes to Earth or even like Cell since Goku has never had an interest in terrorizing weaklings.

As for being an antagonist, the closest I can see is a Marvel Civil War situation, no I don't mean in the super hero registration. I mean in there is a split in ideas among the core cast. Even then, a lot of crap has to happen to reach the point of Goku fighting his own friends, unless you mean an antagonist to a third party.
Again, Goku can turn evil with the right motivation, any character can. You just don't do such a big change to a character's personality in one arc, it's too drastic, it will feel forced and the audience will hate it. You develop the character through multiple arcs and introduce character flaws and dubious actions every arc and at the point he turns evil, everyone can say the signs were there and that it wasn't something so out there. Of course Goku right now turning evil for no reason would be stupid, I'm not denying that, but you can develop a character in any way you want. Saying a character absolutely can't do something is just being narrow-minded with your writing.

User avatar
Fionordequester
I Live Here
Posts: 2879
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 6:33 pm

Re: Was Black the "Evil Goku" you wanted?

Post by Fionordequester » Thu Nov 24, 2016 6:38 pm

Doctor. wrote:Again, Goku can turn evil with the right motivation, any character can. You just don't do such a big change to a character's personality in one arc, it's too drastic, it will feel forced and the audience will hate it. You develop the character through multiple arcs and introduce character flaws and dubious actions every arc and at the point he turns evil, everyone can say the signs were there and that it wasn't something so out there. Of course Goku right now turning evil for no reason would be stupid, I'm not denying that, but you can develop a character in any way you want. Saying a character absolutely can't do something is just being narrow-minded with your writing.
One thing to keep in mind is that morality is a choice; I do not believe that we are deterministic creatures whose actions are determined only by what did or did not happen to us. See any number of Christians and Jews who were tortured and killed for defying their government, or those who have lost families to events like the Holocaust. In fact, there are many who actually increased their devotion to their moral code despite how terrible their lives became.

Point is, it's not just a matter of "putting Goku in the right situation". If he's not going to choose to be evil...he's just not going to choose to be evil. Period. In fact, he may even become LESS evil theo
Kataphrut wrote:It's a bit of a Boy Who Cried Wolf situation to me...Basically, the boy shouldn't have cried wolf when the wolves just wanted to Go See Yamcha. If not, they might have gotten some help when the wolves came back to Make the Donuts.
Chuquita wrote:I liken Gokû Black to "guy can't stand his job, so instead of quitting and finding a job he likes, he instead sets fire not only to his workplace so he doesn't have to work there, but tries setting fire to every store in the franchise of that company".

User avatar
TheUltimateNinja
I Live Here
Posts: 4020
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2016 12:17 pm

Re: Was Black the "Evil Goku" you wanted?

Post by TheUltimateNinja » Thu Nov 24, 2016 6:50 pm

Doctor. wrote: Again, Goku can turn evil with the right motivation, any character can. You just don't do such a big change to a character's personality in one arc, it's too drastic, it will feel forced and the audience will hate it. You develop the character through multiple arcs and introduce character flaws and dubious actions every arc and at the point he turns evil, everyone can say the signs were there and that it wasn't something so out there. Of course Goku right now turning evil for no reason would be stupid, I'm not denying that, but you can develop a character in any way you want. Saying a character absolutely can't do something is just being narrow-minded with your writing.
Maybe he becomes angry that Vegeta is such a jobber and decides to become evil.

HeroR
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8306
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 11:28 pm

Re: Was Black the "Evil Goku" you wanted?

Post by HeroR » Thu Nov 24, 2016 7:06 pm

Fionordequester wrote:
Doctor. wrote:Again, Goku can turn evil with the right motivation, any character can. You just don't do such a big change to a character's personality in one arc, it's too drastic, it will feel forced and the audience will hate it. You develop the character through multiple arcs and introduce character flaws and dubious actions every arc and at the point he turns evil, everyone can say the signs were there and that it wasn't something so out there. Of course Goku right now turning evil for no reason would be stupid, I'm not denying that, but you can develop a character in any way you want. Saying a character absolutely can't do something is just being narrow-minded with your writing.
One thing to keep in mind is that morality is a choice; I do not believe that we are deterministic creatures whose actions are determined only by what did or did not happen to us. See any number of Christians and Jews who were tortured and killed for defying their government, or those who have lost families to events like the Holocaust. In fact, there are many who actually increased their devotion to their moral code despite how terrible their lives became.

Point is, it's not just a matter of "putting Goku in the right situation". If he's not going to choose to be evil...he's just not going to choose to be evil. Period. In fact, he may even become LESS evil theo
This is what I mean. It was even the main theme of Dark Knight. The Joker put Harvey and Batman through hell and took someone dear to them. Harvey broke and gave into his despair to become Two-Face. Batman stood steadfast and became even more devoted that the world hasn't ended. As the Joker put it, he was incorruptible. Some people simply won't break no matter how much you screw them. And if they do break, they're more likely to turn on themselves than become a raving lunatic. Going even further back, the Killer Joke was all about how there has to be something wrong with you to begin with to have one bad day that turns you into lunatic.

Goku, from what we have seen of him, wouldn't become Two-Face even if you take everything from him. He would most likely become an apathetic blood knight, like Beerus, or a sadistic berserker who mercilessly tears apart those he sees as evil. Nothing in Goku's history shows him becoming a mass murderer who kills innocents or turn on his remaining friends if he had any.
Kanassa wrote:
precita wrote:Goku will still be around but take a Buu saga approach backseat.
Goku barely took a backseat in the Buu saga, at best he took a leisurely stroll round back while everyone else cried for him to come back.

User avatar
dragonballhero
Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
Posts: 493
Joined: Sat May 30, 2015 2:17 pm

Re: Was Black the "Evil Goku" you wanted?

Post by dragonballhero » Thu Nov 24, 2016 8:45 pm

ekrolo2 wrote:
Doctor. wrote:Goku can turn evil. Goku can do anything. It's up to the writers to make it believable. That's also why I said he could be an antagonist. He doesn't necessarily need to be evil to be an antagonist.
The most plausible way to go about it is to do what Super implied with Beerus: he gets monumentally bored with nothing to challenge him so he starts going around, stirring trouble in hopes of meeting a strong opponent and getting progressively more frustrated as he can't find anyone to fill these shoes. I'd even say a messed up version of Oob would work great in this scenario, someone Goku feels a lot of potential in and who's life he destroys so he can inspire this individual to train as hard as possible to fight him some day.
This sounds vaguely familiar to me....

Wait a minute...
[spoiler]Image[/spoiler]

Fun fact: He and Lord Beerus share the same JP voice actor!

User avatar
ekrolo2
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 7865
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2014 8:27 am
Location: Split, Croatia

Re: Was Black the "Evil Goku" you wanted?

Post by ekrolo2 » Thu Nov 24, 2016 8:50 pm

dragonballhero wrote:
ekrolo2 wrote:
Doctor. wrote:Goku can turn evil. Goku can do anything. It's up to the writers to make it believable. That's also why I said he could be an antagonist. He doesn't necessarily need to be evil to be an antagonist.
The most plausible way to go about it is to do what Super implied with Beerus: he gets monumentally bored with nothing to challenge him so he starts going around, stirring trouble in hopes of meeting a strong opponent and getting progressively more frustrated as he can't find anyone to fill these shoes. I'd even say a messed up version of Oob would work great in this scenario, someone Goku feels a lot of potential in and who's life he destroys so he can inspire this individual to train as hard as possible to fight him some day.
This sounds vaguely familiar to me....

Wait a minute...
[spoiler]Image[/spoiler]

Fun fact: He and Lord Beerus share the same JP voice actor!
I don't get the reference :P
When someone tells you, "Don't present your opinion as fact," what they're actually saying is, "Don't present your opinion with any conviction. Because I don't like your opinion, and I want to be able to dismiss it as easily as possible." Don't fall for it.

How the Black Arc Should End (by Lightbing!):

User avatar
dragonballhero
Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
Posts: 493
Joined: Sat May 30, 2015 2:17 pm

Re: Was Black the "Evil Goku" you wanted?

Post by dragonballhero » Thu Nov 24, 2016 9:19 pm

ekrolo2 wrote:
dragonballhero wrote:
ekrolo2 wrote: The most plausible way to go about it is to do what Super implied with Beerus: he gets monumentally bored with nothing to challenge him so he starts going around, stirring trouble in hopes of meeting a strong opponent and getting progressively more frustrated as he can't find anyone to fill these shoes. I'd even say a messed up version of Oob would work great in this scenario, someone Goku feels a lot of potential in and who's life he destroys so he can inspire this individual to train as hard as possible to fight him some day.
This sounds vaguely familiar to me....

Wait a minute...
[spoiler]Image[/spoiler]

Fun fact: He and Lord Beerus share the same JP voice actor!
I don't get the reference :P
What I meant was that Cody (the main protagonist of the Final Fight videogame series) eventually got SOOOO bored with all the peace in Metro City following the events of the first Final Fight videogame, that he himself started picking more and more fights around town, placing him in jail. Mind you, this was all despite his rescuing of the mayor's daughter, AND liberating the ENTIRE city from the rule of the Mad Gear Gang. Yep, he was SOOO bored, that he started picking fights. Something Goku would almost undoubtedly do if given the chance, and that's probably closest we'll see to the REAL Goku becoming an antagonist.

Heck, BEERUS is sort of doing the exact same thing RIGHT NOW, though no one but the Omni-King can incarcerate him causing trouble like that. :roll:

BTW, Koichi Yamadera voiced Cody back in Street Fighter Alpha 3, and Yamadera is currently voicing Beerus in all DB material ever since his first appearance in the film version of BoG.

User avatar
Doctor.
Banned
Posts: 10558
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:02 am
Location: Portugal

Re: Was Black the "Evil Goku" you wanted?

Post by Doctor. » Fri Nov 25, 2016 2:36 pm

HeroR wrote:
Fionordequester wrote:
Doctor. wrote:Again, Goku can turn evil with the right motivation, any character can. You just don't do such a big change to a character's personality in one arc, it's too drastic, it will feel forced and the audience will hate it. You develop the character through multiple arcs and introduce character flaws and dubious actions every arc and at the point he turns evil, everyone can say the signs were there and that it wasn't something so out there. Of course Goku right now turning evil for no reason would be stupid, I'm not denying that, but you can develop a character in any way you want. Saying a character absolutely can't do something is just being narrow-minded with your writing.
One thing to keep in mind is that morality is a choice; I do not believe that we are deterministic creatures whose actions are determined only by what did or did not happen to us. See any number of Christians and Jews who were tortured and killed for defying their government, or those who have lost families to events like the Holocaust. In fact, there are many who actually increased their devotion to their moral code despite how terrible their lives became.

Point is, it's not just a matter of "putting Goku in the right situation". If he's not going to choose to be evil...he's just not going to choose to be evil. Period. In fact, he may even become LESS evil theo
This is what I mean. It was even the main theme of Dark Knight. The Joker put Harvey and Batman through hell and took someone dear to them. Harvey broke and gave into his despair to become Two-Face. Batman stood steadfast and became even more devoted that the world hasn't ended. As the Joker put it, he was incorruptible. Some people simply won't break no matter how much you screw them. And if they do break, they're more likely to turn on themselves than become a raving lunatic. Going even further back, the Killer Joke was all about how there has to be something wrong with you to begin with to have one bad day that turns you into lunatic.

Goku, from what we have seen of him, wouldn't become Two-Face even if you take everything from him. He would most likely become an apathetic blood knight, like Beerus, or a sadistic berserker who mercilessly tears apart those he sees as evil. Nothing in Goku's history shows him becoming a mass murderer who kills innocents or turn on his remaining friends if he had any.
We're getting into very ethical and moral viewpoints here, but I personally believe even the purest of souls can break under specific circumstances. In the context of DB, now that I think about it, the Super Saiyan segment of the Namek arc was supposed to be Goku's "evil moment" and he held his personality together by the end and didn't succumb, so that's probably the closest he'd get, but I don't think that it's that out there that he'd change permanently with the right build-up and development beforehand. Well, you could say he stops being Goku at the point he turns evil, and I'd argue that's precisely the point.

TheMohawkAndroid
Newbie
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 1:12 pm

Re: Was Black the "Evil Goku" you wanted?

Post by TheMohawkAndroid » Tue Nov 29, 2016 2:53 pm

Can't really see Goku being evil otherwise so yea I thought he was a cool villain. I really like Turles so I dunno how much opinion counts here.

User avatar
omaro34
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1967
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2015 7:27 pm
Location: Western Canada

Re: Was Black the "Evil Goku" you wanted?

Post by omaro34 » Tue Nov 29, 2016 4:20 pm

YES, WAY BETTER THAN TULLECE
"Kami is the Morgan Freeman of Dragonball Z"

Check out my Piccolo page: https://www.facebook.com/PiccoloTheSuperNamek/?ref=hl

User avatar
Booze Sama
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 129
Joined: Mon Feb 29, 2016 12:13 pm

Re: Was Black the "Evil Goku" you wanted?

Post by Booze Sama » Tue Nov 29, 2016 4:40 pm

No, Tullece was/is. However, I wanted Black to be what "Superboy Prime" was to DC.

User avatar
kinisking
I Live Here
Posts: 4987
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2015 2:21 pm
Location: United States.

Re: Was Black the "Evil Goku" you wanted?

Post by kinisking » Tue Nov 29, 2016 7:50 pm

Black was so much better than expected. I didn't want an evil goku, and thank God we didn't get one.
Jinzoningen MULE wrote: Maybe I should start making it a point not to comment when I'm not sure of something. Too many people know what they're talking about around here.
Disclaimer: I might get into a disagreement with you. Sometimes I might even get feisty about it. I'll never harbor negative feelings because of it though. I hope you feel the same way!
I made a bet with Alee9977 that Vegeta won't be beaten quickly by an opponent. If I lose, I switch my avatar to Vegeta getting beat by hit. If I win, he switches it to Vegeta holding Black by his hair. This will last a month.

GodKaio-Ken
I Live Here
Posts: 2326
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2016 6:00 pm

Re: Was Black the "Evil Goku" you wanted?

Post by GodKaio-Ken » Tue Nov 29, 2016 8:44 pm

Fionordequester wrote:
Doctor. wrote:Again, Goku can turn evil with the right motivation, any character can. You just don't do such a big change to a character's personality in one arc, it's too drastic, it will feel forced and the audience will hate it. You develop the character through multiple arcs and introduce character flaws and dubious actions every arc and at the point he turns evil, everyone can say the signs were there and that it wasn't something so out there. Of course Goku right now turning evil for no reason would be stupid, I'm not denying that, but you can develop a character in any way you want. Saying a character absolutely can't do something is just being narrow-minded with your writing.
One thing to keep in mind is that morality is a choice; I do not believe that we are deterministic creatures whose actions are determined only by what did or did not happen to us. See any number of Christians and Jews who were tortured and killed for defying their government, or those who have lost families to events like the Holocaust. In fact, there are many who actually increased their devotion to their moral code despite how terrible their lives became.

Point is, it's not just a matter of "putting Goku in the right situation". If he's not going to choose to be evil...he's just not going to choose to be evil. Period. In fact, he may even become LESS evil theo
I agree with this 100%. Even trying to slowly write it into his character would be a comlete and utter failure. He's over 40 years old in Super if you count ROSAT as well as the time he was dead. He is mentally mature and his moral code isn't going to change for no reason. Slowly becoming evil would be ridiculous considering no signs showed for 40+ years of life.

Yes you CAN write it to happen. That doesn't mean it's a good idea....and this view isn't "narrow minded" as someone else rudely stated. Rather its taking into account how sentient beings actually act.

Let's face it...nothing Goku faces can make him "Evil" at this point. He has died, his friends have died, planets have been destroyed, his wife and child have been killed (in the future) he's seen a doomed timeline and even become friends with Zeno. Please someone tell me what would make Goku turn evil at this point because Id love to hear it.

As to morality I'd argue anyone who can be broken is incredibly weak and never had any morals to begin with.

The only way for there to be an evil Goku that makes ANY sense is either a Clone raised to be that way or someone making a wish with the Super Dragon Balls.
Currently watching: My Hero Academia

Last watched: Akame Ga Kill, Hokuto No Ken, Hokuto No Ken 2, Hunter X Hunter

Quote if I were to Hakai someone: "Omae Wa Mou Shindeiru. Hakai!"

User avatar
Nekis13
Regular
Posts: 540
Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2015 10:46 pm

Re: Was Black the "Evil Goku" you wanted?

Post by Nekis13 » Tue Nov 29, 2016 11:35 pm

Never expected to get an Evil Goku.

Didn't really see Black as an Evil Goku.

But he still delivered. Like, A LOT.
stay edgy

DeviantArt Thing: Drawings and stuff, also Dragon Ball

Nano
Not-So-Newbie
Posts: 87
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2016 6:01 pm

Re: Was Black the "Evil Goku" you wanted?

Post by Nano » Wed Nov 30, 2016 12:05 am

I didn't like it. The entire saga was bad IMHO. Way too much time traveling bullshit. Time traveling always screws up a story. It makes things way too complicated... Especially when there's a multiverse involved.

Black Goku is another Ginyu Goku concept. It's just a rehashed idea.

Akira Toriyama ruined Super.

They should of just had Goku hit his head where he did as a baby and turn back into his evil saiyan self and went from there.
I love Dragon Ball so much that I'm constantly complaining about how horrible Super is.

Black Goku / Future Trunks saga... was/is garbage.

Top 5 Favorite DBS Characters = Beerus, Whis, still waiting on the last 3 lol...

GodKaio-Ken
I Live Here
Posts: 2326
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2016 6:00 pm

Re: Was Black the "Evil Goku" you wanted?

Post by GodKaio-Ken » Wed Nov 30, 2016 12:57 am

Nano wrote:I didn't like it. The entire saga was bad IMHO. Way too much time traveling bullshit. Time traveling always screws up a story. It makes things way too complicated... Especially when there's a multiverse involved.

Black Goku is another Ginyu Goku concept. It's just a rehashed idea.

Akira Toriyama ruined Super.

They should of just had Goku hit his head where he did as a baby and turn back into his evil saiyan self and went from there.
I don't see why you feel the need to post so much about a show you apparently hate so much. I mean don't get me wrong its totally your right...but if you dislike it so so so much you can probably find something more productive to do for yourself and the world.

Also the Goku not hitting his head thing is so contrived and basic. It's lazy lazy lazy writing but I guess some people think thats better. Not that Super has great writing to begin with but the entire idea makes 0 sense.
Currently watching: My Hero Academia

Last watched: Akame Ga Kill, Hokuto No Ken, Hokuto No Ken 2, Hunter X Hunter

Quote if I were to Hakai someone: "Omae Wa Mou Shindeiru. Hakai!"

Fishman
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 162
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 12:17 pm

Re: Was Black the "Evil Goku" you wanted?

Post by Fishman » Wed Nov 30, 2016 2:50 am

DBZAOTA482 wrote:Black went way beyond that, brotha. He's a much better "Evil Goku" than Tullece.
Goku Black wasn't even a better Captain Ginyu, much less Tullece.
Super Saiyan Blue is not a creative color.
DBZ Movie 3 told a stronger and more believable "Evil Goku" story in 60 minutes than Dragon Ball Super has in 20 episodes. And it did it with better visuals and score.

User avatar
DBZAOTA482
Banned
Posts: 6995
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2012 4:04 pm
Contact:

Re: Was Black the "Evil Goku" you wanted?

Post by DBZAOTA482 » Wed Nov 30, 2016 2:53 am

Fishman wrote:
DBZAOTA482 wrote:Black went way beyond that, brotha. He's a much better "Evil Goku" than Tullece.
Goku Black wasn't even a better Captain Ginyu, much less Tullece.
Captain Ginyu is better than Tullece. :)
fadeddreams5 wrote:
DBZGTKOSDH wrote:... Haven't we already gotten these in GT? Goku dies, the DBs go away, and the Namekian DBs most likely won't be used again because of the Evil Dragons.
Goku didn't die in GT. The show sucked him off so much, it was impossible to keep him in the world of the living, so he ascended beyond mortality.
jjgp1112 wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2020 6:31 am I'm just about done with the concept of reboots and making shows that were products of their time and impactful "new and sexy" and in line with modern tastes and sensibilities. Let stuff stay in their era and give today's kids their own shit to watch.

I always side eye the people who say "Now my kids/today's kids can experience what I did as a child!" Nigga, who gives a fuck about your childhood? You're an adult now and it was at least 15 years ago. Let the kids have their own experience instead of picking at a corpse.

Post Reply