Non-thread-worthy discussions

Discussion regarding the entirety of the franchise in a general (meta) sense, including such aspects as: production, trends, merchandise, fan culture, and more.

Moderators: Kanzenshuu Staff, General Help

User avatar
Zephyr
I Live Here
Posts: 4353
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 9:20 pm

Re: Non-thread-worthy discussions

Post by Zephyr » Mon Dec 09, 2024 1:29 pm

JulieYBM wrote: Mon Dec 09, 2024 1:17 pm
Zephyr wrote: Mon Dec 09, 2024 12:52 pm Unrelated to whether or not all of the movies exist in the same timeline as one another, the Garlic Jr. arc does at least ask the viewer to believe that DBZ Movie 1 and the Saiyan arc both happened in the same timeline. Somehow.
I mean, repetitiveness aside, is it that big a stretch?
Well, no, aside from both stories having a lot of the same things happening "for the first time", and thus being incompatible as is, it's not that big of a stretch.

To be clear I'm not saying that the incompatibility is a huge deal or anything. Just that sometimes things get implicitly placed in continuity together despite incompatibilities, and it's not something that's isolated to crazy side stuff like Plan to Eradicate the Saiyans. Sometimes that's just part of the asking price of watching the TV show.

User avatar
Hellspawn28
Patreon Supporter
Posts: 15506
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 9:50 pm
Location: Maryland, USA

Re: Non-thread-worthy discussions

Post by Hellspawn28 » Mon Dec 09, 2024 2:24 pm

Zephyr wrote: Mon Dec 09, 2024 12:52 pm Unrelated to whether or not all of the movies exist in the same timeline as one another, the Garlic Jr. arc does at least ask the viewer to believe that DBZ Movie 1 and the Saiyan arc both happened in the same timeline. Somehow.
I found that hard because Goku didn't know Piccolo had weight clothes. I view DBZ Movie 1 in a timeline where Raditz never show up.
She/Her
PS5 username: Guyver_Spawn_27
LB Profile: https://letterboxd.com/Hellspawn28/

Vhanos
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 187
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 4:04 am

Re: Non-thread-worthy discussions

Post by Vhanos » Mon Dec 09, 2024 4:10 pm

For something that is non worthy of its own thread, this is whole thing of where the movies could take place during the tv series sounds like it deserves its own thread.

User avatar
Grimlock
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8518
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 4:11 pm
Location: Cybertron.

Re: Non-thread-worthy discussions

Post by Grimlock » Mon Dec 09, 2024 4:42 pm

There is a very nice thread, check that one out.

If you mean creating another one nowadays, then it is blatantly proven not to be worthy at all. You have my full support if you decide to create a thread to say "X is cannon, Y is not cannon", though. I'm sure there is something new we can get out of that instead.

User avatar
dbgtFO
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 7941
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 5:07 pm
Contact:

Re: Non-thread-worthy discussions

Post by dbgtFO » Mon Dec 09, 2024 4:58 pm

jjgp1112 wrote: Sat Dec 07, 2024 1:15 am
dbgtFO wrote: Sat Dec 07, 2024 1:02 am What does everyone think about Goku[...]
I can only go off the Viz translaton for what she says in the manga but assuming it's not changed too much, the anime decided to take another opportunity to make something way more problematic by having Chi-Chi say something to the effect of "Well, I guess the man of the house has spoken" which...yeah 😬

Edit: Just checked...both Kai and the Viz manga have the line as "it's always the women left to sit at home and cry" while the original Z anime it's "The woman always backs down eventually" Still worse but admittedly not as problematic as I for whatever reason remembered it being.
Huh I didn't think that would be the case in regards to the woman always backing down. With Chi Chi being based on the steretypical tiger mom, I thought usually the woman would get her way.

User avatar
MasenkoHA
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 6954
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2017 9:38 pm

Re: Non-thread-worthy discussions

Post by MasenkoHA » Mon Dec 09, 2024 8:33 pm

Zephyr wrote: Mon Dec 09, 2024 1:29 pm
JulieYBM wrote: Mon Dec 09, 2024 1:17 pm
Zephyr wrote: Mon Dec 09, 2024 12:52 pm Unrelated to whether or not all of the movies exist in the same timeline as one another, the Garlic Jr. arc does at least ask the viewer to believe that DBZ Movie 1 and the Saiyan arc both happened in the same timeline. Somehow.
I mean, repetitiveness aside, is it that big a stretch?
Well, no, aside from both stories having a lot of the same things happening "for the first time", and thus being incompatible as is, it's not that big of a stretch.

To be clear I'm not saying that the incompatibility is a huge deal or anything. Just that sometimes things get implicitly placed in continuity together despite incompatibilities, and it's not something that's isolated to crazy side stuff like Plan to Eradicate the Saiyans. Sometimes that's just part of the asking price of watching the TV show.
In general Toei has a pretty flimsy concern for continuity. "This counts until it doesn't and it will count again when we need it to"

Like just objectively the first Z movie cannot fit. Not just because of the deja vu of the plot but because it only works before the start of Z but it can't be before Z because Bulma and the others know who Gohan is but they met him for the first time at the beginning of the tv series. There is no handwave or work around that. Goku refers to him by name when getting the dragon radar from Bulma and Kuririn refers to him as Goku's kid when Garlic Jr is opening the Dead Zone. And of course the redux of Goku and Piccolo teaming up for the first time and seeing Gohan's power for the first time.


Hire Dragon also shows up in the Garlic Jr arc and subsequent anime only episodes but he debuted in a movie even further removed from canon than the Garlic Jr movie. There isn't even a "well it would fit here if you completely disregard these details" handwave for that one. Sure, you can handwave "Gohan met Hire Dragon between the Freeza and Garlic Jr arcs in a different way than what we saw in Tree of Might" but let's be real there is no re-introduction to Hire Dragon. The audience is expected to remember him from the the third Z movie the one that couldn't happen

User avatar
SuperSaiyaManZ94
I Live Here
Posts: 2753
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 9:01 pm
Location: Alabama, USA

Re: Non-thread-worthy discussions

Post by SuperSaiyaManZ94 » Tue Dec 10, 2024 8:42 pm

MasenkoHA wrote: Mon Dec 09, 2024 8:33 pm
Zephyr wrote: Mon Dec 09, 2024 1:29 pm
JulieYBM wrote: Mon Dec 09, 2024 1:17 pm

I mean, repetitiveness aside, is it that big a stretch?
Well, no, aside from both stories having a lot of the same things happening "for the first time", and thus being incompatible as is, it's not that big of a stretch.

To be clear I'm not saying that the incompatibility is a huge deal or anything. Just that sometimes things get implicitly placed in continuity together despite incompatibilities, and it's not something that's isolated to crazy side stuff like Plan to Eradicate the Saiyans. Sometimes that's just part of the asking price of watching the TV show.
In general Toei has a pretty flimsy concern for continuity. "This counts until it doesn't and it will count again when we need it to"

Like just objectively the first Z movie cannot fit. Not just because of the deja vu of the plot but because it only works before the start of Z but it can't be before Z because Bulma and the others know who Gohan is but they met him for the first time at the beginning of the tv series. There is no handwave or work around that. Goku refers to him by name when getting the dragon radar from Bulma and Kuririn refers to him as Goku's kid when Garlic Jr is opening the Dead Zone. And of course the redux of Goku and Piccolo teaming up for the first time and seeing Gohan's power for the first time.


Hire Dragon also shows up in the Garlic Jr arc and subsequent anime only episodes but he debuted in a movie even further removed from canon than the Garlic Jr movie. There isn't even a "well it would fit here if you completely disregard these details" handwave for that one. Sure, you can handwave "Gohan met Hire Dragon between the Freeza and Garlic Jr arcs in a different way than what we saw in Tree of Might" but let's be real there is no re-introduction to Hire Dragon. The audience is expected to remember him from the the third Z movie the one that couldn't happen
Yeah, and so just about the only of the Z movies you can really slot in where there isn't any major continuity/story/timeline clashes is Bojack Unbound and Wrath of the Dragon because those pretty much cleanly fit in at specific points between gaps with the former occuring post Cell Games but before the seven year time skip and in the latter's case after the Majin Buu arc but prior to the ten year time skip to End of Z.

All the others OTOH, yeah no otherwise the vast majority of them just can't be placed in relation to the show's timeline.
DB collection related goals as of now:

1.) Find decent priced copy of Dragon Box Z Vol. 4 (Done)

2.) Collect rest of manga

3.) Get rest of Daizenshuu (2-7)

User avatar
Noah
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8276
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2015 10:56 pm
Location: Virtual World

Re: Non-thread-worthy discussions

Post by Noah » Tue Dec 10, 2024 11:01 pm

Kid Buu wrote: Sun Dec 08, 2024 9:10 am Always had it in my head-canon that Movie 4 took place in a universe where the Genki Dama defeated Freeza.
I remember reading somewhere theories along the lines of how different outcomes would result in alternate realities that are the Z movies, like for example, Movie 3 would be if Goku had arrived in time to fight the Saiyans before they even used the Saibamen, and Movie 5 would be if he had agreed to go back to Earth after defeating Freeza, instead of staying to train on Yardrat.
乃亜

Top 10 DB/Z/GT Songs

Are we too old to enjoy new Dragon Ball movies/series?

User avatar
jjgp1112
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 7676
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 10:15 pm
Location: Crooklyn

Re: Non-thread-worthy discussions

Post by jjgp1112 » Tue Dec 10, 2024 11:12 pm

Some version of Cooler's Revenge could fit as well, but you'd have to have Goku go Super Saiyan off the bat and upgrade Cooler's strength. Maybe after Cooler transforms and kicks Goku's ass he busts out the Spirit Bomb/Toei Punch

Movie 7 could take place in the timeline that OG Future Trunks traveled to after they took care of 17 and 18. Too bad that means Movie 7 Trunks is doomed though :cry:
Yamcha: Do you remember the spell to release him - do you know all the words?
Bulma: Of course! I'm not gonna pull a Frieza and screw it up!
Master Roshi: Bulma, I think Frieza failed because he wore too many clothes!
Cold World (Fanfic)
"It ain't never too late to stop bein' a bitch." - Chad Lamont Butler

User avatar
Chuquita
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 15233
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2004 2:16 am
Location: New Jersey
Contact:

Re: Non-thread-worthy discussions

Post by Chuquita » Wed Dec 11, 2024 2:52 am

Remember how we'd get episode titles in advance for Super via magazines? Sometimes there would even be short, vague episode summaries?

It'd be nice if that happened with Daima. Probably won't happen though, since its circumstances are so different.
On hiatus.

my tumblr

User avatar
MasenkoHA
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 6954
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2017 9:38 pm

Re: Non-thread-worthy discussions

Post by MasenkoHA » Wed Dec 11, 2024 7:08 am

jjgp1112 wrote: Tue Dec 10, 2024 11:12 pm Some version of Cooler's Revenge could fit as well, but you'd have to have Goku go Super Saiyan off the bat and upgrade Cooler's strength. Maybe after Cooler transforms and kicks Goku's ass he busts out the Spirit Bomb/Toei Punch
Meh I think you can slot Cooler's Revenge during the 3 year training with the Androids as is without too much trouble.

Goku not going Super Saiyan right off the bat doesn't mean he couldn't. It's not unlike Goku to hold back, so we can chalk it up to him trying to fight Cooler in his base form until he knew he needed to go Super Saiyan.

Gohan is back to his Namek bowl cut but that could just be Chi Chi giving him the same stupid haircut again.

No reference to Vegeta (Toei might have assumed he was staying dead when the movie went into production?) but we can just say he had temporarily left earth again and was still working on being a Super Saiyan or something

User avatar
AtlasFlame18
Not-So-Newbie
Posts: 50
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2019 3:30 pm

Re: Non-thread-worthy discussions

Post by AtlasFlame18 » Wed Dec 11, 2024 12:22 pm

Since the topic was brought up I thought it'd be interesting to see what the point of divergence for every DBZ movie.

Dead Zone: Takes place before Raditz's arrival in the anime but realistically it'd be in a world where Raditz never comes to Earth.

The World's Strongest & Tree of Might: The point of divergence would be that Goku leaves King Kai's planet early and waits in King Yemma's office until he's wished back

Lord Slug: Goku defeats Frieza with the Spirit Bomb

Cooler’s Revenge & Return of Cooler: Goku returns to Earth after defeating Frieza and does not go to Yardrat.

Super Android 13: Piccolo kills Cell when they first meet and somehow the Z-Fighters defeat 16, 17, & 18 without the Saiyans needing to enter the Room of Spirit & Time.

Broly: The Legendary Super Saiyan, Broly: Second Coming, Bio Broly: The wait for the Cell Games is longer than in canon. Allowing for other enemies to appear & Cell decides to stay out of it. (This is the hardest one to determine due to the Seasons being different & Gohan being able to go Super Saiyan in the first movie but then Goku is dead in the 2nd & 3rd movies implying the Cell Games did still happen. )

Bojack Unbound: Realistically the Galaxy Soldiers could just appear in the 7 year time jump and their existence itself is the point of divergence

Fusion Reborn: Goku defeats Majin Buu as a Super Saiyan 3

Wrath of the Dragon: Realistically it could take place after Daima and before Yo! Son Goku & his friends return but the point of divergence is most likely the fact that Kashvar succeeded in awakening Hirudegarn on Planet Konatz.

Plan to Eradicate the (Super) Saiyans: The point of divergence here is so convulated that it is nearly impossible to determine. Turles, Slug, Cooler, & Broly all exist in this continuity meaning some variation of these events happened that still allows for the timeline to progress in a way where everyone still becomes Super Saiyan but still have not fought Cell yet.


These are the ways I could headcanon a point of divergence but honestly it could be for entirely different reasons I haven't thought of.

User avatar
jjgp1112
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 7676
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 10:15 pm
Location: Crooklyn

Re: Non-thread-worthy discussions

Post by jjgp1112 » Wed Dec 11, 2024 12:23 pm

MasenkoHA wrote: Wed Dec 11, 2024 7:08 am
jjgp1112 wrote: Tue Dec 10, 2024 11:12 pm Some version of Cooler's Revenge could fit as well, but you'd have to have Goku go Super Saiyan off the bat and upgrade Cooler's strength. Maybe after Cooler transforms and kicks Goku's ass he busts out the Spirit Bomb/Toei Punch
Meh I think you can slot Cooler's Revenge during the 3 year training with the Androids as is without too much trouble.

Goku not going Super Saiyan right off the bat doesn't mean he couldn't. It's not unlike Goku to hold back, so we can chalk it up to him trying to fight Cooler in his base form until he knew he needed to go Super Saiyan.

Gohan is back to his Namek bowl cut but that could just be Chi Chi giving him the same stupid haircut again.

No reference to Vegeta (Toei might have assumed he was staying dead when the movie went into production?) but we can just say he had temporarily left earth again and was still working on being a Super Saiyan or something
The problem I have though is that the framing of the fight and the transformation in particular makes it seem as if Goku still had no control over the form and needed to get pushed over the edge to use it, whereas I think it's pretty reasonable to assume that if Goku could control SSJ, he'd have at least gone to it the moment Cooler transformed. The way the fight goes, it's basically a retread of the Frieza fight - base Goku is going toe to toe, Cooler busts out the Index Finger of Doom:

Image

Image,

And brings out his MAX POWA, Goku tries a 20x Kaioken Kamehameha and its gets tanked, then snaps and goes Super Saiyan.

Cooler's "There will be no more Saiyan blood left!" definitely makes it clear Toei didn't think Vegeta was getting wished back, but like you said - as it were, he could be in space, he could be KO'd from training, he could be shagging Bulma...there's plenty of reasonable handwaves for his absence.
Yamcha: Do you remember the spell to release him - do you know all the words?
Bulma: Of course! I'm not gonna pull a Frieza and screw it up!
Master Roshi: Bulma, I think Frieza failed because he wore too many clothes!
Cold World (Fanfic)
"It ain't never too late to stop bein' a bitch." - Chad Lamont Butler

User avatar
MasenkoHA
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 6954
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2017 9:38 pm

Re: Non-thread-worthy discussions

Post by MasenkoHA » Wed Dec 11, 2024 3:32 pm

Noah wrote: Tue Dec 10, 2024 11:01 pm
Kid Buu wrote: Sun Dec 08, 2024 9:10 am Always had it in my head-canon that Movie 4 took place in a universe where the Genki Dama defeated Freeza.
I remember reading somewhere theories along the lines of how different outcomes would result in alternate realities that are the Z movies, like for example, Movie 3 would be if Goku had arrived in time to fight the Saiyans before they even used the Saibamen, and Movie 5 would be if he had agreed to go back to Earth after defeating Freeza, instead of staying to train on Yardrat.
Yamucha has Kaio's kanji on the back of his gi, Goku has his Go gi he switched to while travrling to Namek and Bulma and Gohan have their haircuts they got for the trip to Namek. The Z warriors definitely died and were brought back and its meant to be after Namek. Easier to say it exist in a timeline where Freeza was defeated in his first form or they all got off Namek without having to deal with him (the one reference to Freeza was said by characters who wouldn't necessarily know if Freeza was dead or not)
jjgp1112 wrote: Wed Dec 11, 2024 12:23 pm
MasenkoHA wrote: Wed Dec 11, 2024 7:08 am
jjgp1112 wrote: Tue Dec 10, 2024 11:12 pm Some version of Cooler's Revenge could fit as well, but you'd have to have Goku go Super Saiyan off the bat and upgrade Cooler's strength. Maybe after Cooler transforms and kicks Goku's ass he busts out the Spirit Bomb/Toei Punch
Meh I think you can slot Cooler's Revenge during the 3 year training with the Androids as is without too much trouble.

Goku not going Super Saiyan right off the bat doesn't mean he couldn't. It's not unlike Goku to hold back, so we can chalk it up to him trying to fight Cooler in his base form until he knew he needed to go Super Saiyan.

Gohan is back to his Namek bowl cut but that could just be Chi Chi giving him the same stupid haircut again.

No reference to Vegeta (Toei might have assumed he was staying dead when the movie went into production?) but we can just say he had temporarily left earth again and was still working on being a Super Saiyan or something
The problem I have though is that the framing of the fight and the transformation in particular makes it seem as if Goku still had no control over the form and needed to get pushed over the edge to use it, whereas I think it's pretty reasonable to assume that if Goku could control SSJ, he'd have at least gone to it the moment Cooler transformed. The way the fight goes, it's basically a retread of the Frieza fight - base Goku is going toe to toe, Cooler busts out the Index Finger of Doom:

Image

Image,

And brings out his MAX POWA, Goku tries a 20x Kaioken Kamehameha and its gets tanked, then snaps and goes Super Saiyan.

Cooler's "There will be no more Saiyan blood left!" definitely makes it clear Toei didn't think Vegeta was getting wished back, but like you said - as it were, he could be in space, he could be KO'd from training, he could be shagging Bulma...there's plenty of reasonable handwaves for his absence.
True, its definitely meant to take place, like, a few weeks after Namek and Toei was working off the assumption that Vegeta wasn't being brought back, Super Saiyan could only be brought on by intense rage, and Goku wasn't going to stay in space for a year, but I find the discrepancies easier to handwave and place it right after Trunks warning compared to trying to say Z movie 1 takes place before the tv series and everyone got their memories wiped and Z movie 6 and 7 take place during the Cell Games wait but Gohan lost the abilty to turn Super Saiyan and temporarily grew his hedgehog hair back in like...a day.

User avatar
Hellspawn28
Patreon Supporter
Posts: 15506
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 9:50 pm
Location: Maryland, USA

Re: Non-thread-worthy discussions

Post by Hellspawn28 » Wed Dec 11, 2024 4:52 pm

I always believe that Fusion Reborn takes place in a timeline where Gohan finished Super Buu. It could explain why he is on Earth with Videl and the others. He also killed Freeza without transforming. Pre-Elder Kaioshin training Gohan would probably not able to kill Freeza in a single blow due to lack of training for 7 years. Furthermore, based on Beerus's statement, Goku in base is still marginally weaker than Freeza in final form.
She/Her
PS5 username: Guyver_Spawn_27
LB Profile: https://letterboxd.com/Hellspawn28/

User avatar
Koitsukai
I Live Here
Posts: 4763
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2018 5:02 pm

Re: Non-thread-worthy discussions

Post by Koitsukai » Thu Dec 12, 2024 10:17 am

Alternate scenarios for Namek for some movies:
- beating Freeza in his 1st form (probably for Slug)
- beating Freeza with a Genki Dama (Cooler movie)
- beating Freeza before he hits Namek's core (Cooler movie as well, maybe if Goku doesn't activate SS again vs Freeza, he won't be able to do it at will later on, although, vs Cooler he never laments on not being able to turn SS like on Namek)

Fusion Reborn shouldn't work if Buu is killed before the kids learn how to fuse. Either Gotenks took Buu out or Gohan did.

User avatar
Grimlock
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8518
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 4:11 pm
Location: Cybertron.

Re: Non-thread-worthy discussions

Post by Grimlock » Fri Dec 13, 2024 7:28 pm

Robo4900 wrote: Fri Dec 13, 2024 5:52 pmThat's a great way to just... let people get away with shouting their opinions over everyone else.

Like, that's obvious, isn't it? "Just agree with the popular opinion no matter what your opinion is" is just a horribly toxic ideology, and a deeply unsatisfying line of argument.
(I'm moving this to another thread so as to not get too off-topic in your own thread).

I agree, but that's not to me you should be saying this. What I said was to prevent from happening to her what happened to me. But you are right, we shouldn't just agree with what the majority say, in fact, I even have a saying for that:
Grimlock wrote: Tue Oct 19, 2021 11:27 am Again, the majority of people saying or believing in someone or something does not make that someone or something real or fact.
VegettoEX wrote: Fri Dec 13, 2024 6:05 pmWhat we ask for are helpful, thoughtful posts.
Which I provide on a regular basis, just click on my number posts to see it for yourself.
VegettoEX wrote: Fri Dec 13, 2024 6:05 pmYou are free to challenge viewpoints and ask for further clarification.
Which I tried to do even in that shitshow, but when you have people who openly admit to be "a psychopath with a pathological need to "win" arguments like they are as well as getting mad and lose their patience", then it's clear that not only that conversation was never going to be constructive, a moderation would be in order to prevent that. But of course the moderation would blame me for the way the conversation went, because why would it be any different?

If I knew I was dealing with people who are "psychopath with a pathological need to "win" arguments", I would never have even considered a conversation with them, because I know nothing good can come out of it.
VegettoEX wrote: Fri Dec 13, 2024 6:05 pmYou are not free to whine, carry on, and play the victim because you're getting called out on your attitude multiple times over by multiple people.
Me warning others not to make the mistake I did barely categorizes as "whining and playing the victim". Quite the contrary, I'm providing, as you call it, "helpful posts", in an attempt to prevent the same thing that happened to me, to happen to them. But sure, you are free to make your reality.
VegettoEX wrote: Fri Dec 13, 2024 6:05 pmThere's a lot of good conversation happening on social lately about how there's always "that one guy" who's not technically "breaking the rules" but is just a pain the absolute ass to deal with on a regular basis, and how you don't need to strictly follow the letter of the law when it comes to permanently removing them, because going by the spirit of the law is better in the long run and makes for a better environment for the 99.99999999% rest of the userbase. We don't like doing this, but we did have to in somewhat recent memory, and I think it's fair to say it made an IMMEDIATE difference -- literally day and night.
I can only assume you are referring to Cure Dragon 255 here, well, the difference is that I don't challenge people to a conversation every day like they created threads non-stop every day. So when you say things like "you're getting called out on your attitude multiple times over by multiple people.", it gives off the impression that I do this every day and every day I get called out. That is not what happened. That never happened at all. That only happened in that specific conversation and because I was dealing with a lot of people that think contrary to me. That does not warrant any calling out. Especially when I did challenge other people's viewpoints in the past and that never happened before.
VegettoEX wrote: Fri Dec 13, 2024 6:05 pmI don't want that to happen to you. You seem to have worthwhile things to say, a good base of information kicking around in your head, and a true love for the series. It’s clear you get something valuable and fulfilling out of being here. Maybe let's reconsider again? (This is less a request and more a final warning.)
While I thank you for those words, which are true and somewhat kind, so I greatly appreciate that, I do not care what you do with your "warnings". If you are not going to moderate this fairly, then it stands to reason things like this, and why so many abandoned here. I will never echo opinions that I don't agree with, sometimes I will challenge viewpoints like I have always done on this forum (which you yourself witnessed and even joined in a couple of them. Sure, it may become a bit "heated" along the way, but as long as respect is there, what's the harm?) and if you are going to have a problem with that now, after nearly ten years, then do what you gotta do. But like I said before, the evidences are there and they speak for themselves. You'd just be making a martyr of myself.

And just so we are clear, the other two times I was called out, upon reviewing I acknowledged I was wrong and apologized for it. So this is not me being "confrontational", because I know that this time I'm right and that this time I have to stand up for myself and not let any unfairness bullshit befall me.

User avatar
Robo4900
I Live Here
Posts: 4421
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2016 2:24 pm
Location: In another time and place...

Re: Non-thread-worthy discussions

Post by Robo4900 » Fri Dec 13, 2024 8:25 pm

I feel like you're making very much a You Issue into an issue for me and KBABZ, when neither of us asked for it.

I don't think either I or KBABZ have ever had any bad encounters with the mods here (I think I may have annoyed Ajay or VegettoEX on a personal level once or twice – but again, pretty sure it's just minor shit?), and while I would be lying if I said neither of us have ever had any issues with how this site is run and moderated, I would also be lying to say that we don't feel comfortable to share whatever opinions we have here. (And similarly, I'd be lying if I said either of us had any serious beef with the mods or admins themselves.)

Mind you, aside from the trivia-writing threads KBABZ and I have revived after a hiatus, I don't really come here anymore. It's not really my scene, not these days. Not for any dramatic reason either – it's just not me anymore I guess. The general environment and the sorts of discussions here just aren't interesting to me for the most part.

But, further to that... If KBABZ or I felt like we'd be trodden on if we shared our opinions in an honest, clear, and reasonable way, we probably wouldn't be posting here at all. And if someone was stepping on us for that, we would either call them out as a dickhead, or call on the mods on the basis of them being a dickhead (as per community guidelines against dickheadery). See: Us calling you out for telling us to conform to popular opinion. (Not saying you're a dickhead, just pointing out we're happy to defend ourselves. We're adults, we can handle having to stand up for ourselves.)

All this is to say... "Don't stray from the popular opinions! It will be bad for you!" is a really weird thing to say, and I think it says a lot more about your own behaviour than it does about Dragon Ball fans – or indeed this forum.

But uh... If you have an issue with how the fans behave or how this forum is run (and it sounds like you do), you can always just... leave.
The point of Dragon Ball is to enjoy it. Never lose sight of that.

User avatar
Grimlock
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8518
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 4:11 pm
Location: Cybertron.

Re: Non-thread-worthy discussions

Post by Grimlock » Fri Dec 13, 2024 8:44 pm

Ah, the classic "this doesn't concern me... Until it happens to me". Typical.

I think I said everything I had to say about this, so.... Good luck out there, I guess?

User avatar
Shaddy
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1642
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2015 7:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Non-thread-worthy discussions

Post by Shaddy » Sun Dec 15, 2024 8:34 am

Grimlock wrote: Fri Dec 13, 2024 8:44 pmAh, the classic "this doesn't concern me... Until it happens to me". Typical.
Your own behavior isn't a thing that "happened to you", dude.

Post Reply