What is the lamest thing to come out of modern DBZ?

Discussion regarding the entirety of the franchise in a general (meta) sense, including such aspects as: production, trends, merchandise, fan culture, and more.
User avatar
DBZAOTA482
Banned
Posts: 6995
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2012 4:04 pm
Contact:

Re: What is the lamest thing to come out of modern DBZ?

Post by DBZAOTA482 » Wed Oct 12, 2016 1:07 pm

Lord Beerus wrote:
TheMikado wrote:Whether the action the character takes is stupid or not, at least it's explained. The thing this comment does is it prevents a debate on whether the events before and after are nonsensical which is valuable as it doesn't take us out of universe. In-universe, we as the audience are thinking "Man, Piccolo, that wasn't a good idea at all." Rather than "I must have missed something in the story because I don't understand how these events unfolded." This is the key difference in what is causing the issues with Super. Small comments help to link the in-universe events, whether or not we agree on the reasoning, the reasoning is still being made by an in-universe character and not an out of universe audience.
Explaining why you did something reckless and stupid, doesn't negate the fact that is was still reckless and stupid.
DBZAOTA482 wrote:Because he can't.
Why not?
He would fight them both at once which is not good and he didn't how strong the androids were.
fadeddreams5 wrote:
DBZGTKOSDH wrote:... Haven't we already gotten these in GT? Goku dies, the DBs go away, and the Namekian DBs most likely won't be used again because of the Evil Dragons.
Goku didn't die in GT. The show sucked him off so much, it was impossible to keep him in the world of the living, so he ascended beyond mortality.
jjgp1112 wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2020 6:31 am I'm just about done with the concept of reboots and making shows that were products of their time and impactful "new and sexy" and in line with modern tastes and sensibilities. Let stuff stay in their era and give today's kids their own shit to watch.

I always side eye the people who say "Now my kids/today's kids can experience what I did as a child!" Nigga, who gives a fuck about your childhood? You're an adult now and it was at least 15 years ago. Let the kids have their own experience instead of picking at a corpse.

User avatar
TheMikado
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5009
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 1:28 pm

Re: What is the lamest thing to come out of modern DBZ?

Post by TheMikado » Wed Oct 12, 2016 1:19 pm

DBZAOTA482 wrote:
Lord Beerus wrote:
TheMikado wrote:Whether the action the character takes is stupid or not, at least it's explained. The thing this comment does is it prevents a debate on whether the events before and after are nonsensical which is valuable as it doesn't take us out of universe. In-universe, we as the audience are thinking "Man, Piccolo, that wasn't a good idea at all." Rather than "I must have missed something in the story because I don't understand how these events unfolded." This is the key difference in what is causing the issues with Super. Small comments help to link the in-universe events, whether or not we agree on the reasoning, the reasoning is still being made by an in-universe character and not an out of universe audience.
Explaining why you did something reckless and stupid, doesn't negate the fact that is was still reckless and stupid.
DBZAOTA482 wrote:Because he can't.
Why not?
He would fight them both at once which is not good and he didn't how strong the androids were.
Agree with DBZOTA482 but I never argued that it wasn't stupid and reckless, I'm arguing that reasoning still remains within universe. Like I said your staying that's a stupid decision Piccolo instead of thinking about the scene not making sense overall. One scenario allows you to remain in universe, the other can force your thoughts out of universe.

User avatar
Lord Beerus
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 21430
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 5:20 pm
Location: A temple on a giant tree
Contact:

Re: What is the lamest thing to come out of modern DBZ?

Post by Lord Beerus » Wed Oct 12, 2016 1:27 pm

DBZAOTA482 wrote:
Lord Beerus wrote:
TheMikado wrote:Whether the action the character takes is stupid or not, at least it's explained. The thing this comment does is it prevents a debate on whether the events before and after are nonsensical which is valuable as it doesn't take us out of universe. In-universe, we as the audience are thinking "Man, Piccolo, that wasn't a good idea at all." Rather than "I must have missed something in the story because I don't understand how these events unfolded." This is the key difference in what is causing the issues with Super. Small comments help to link the in-universe events, whether or not we agree on the reasoning, the reasoning is still being made by an in-universe character and not an out of universe audience.
Explaining why you did something reckless and stupid, doesn't negate the fact that is was still reckless and stupid.
DBZAOTA482 wrote:Because he can't.
Why not?
He would fight them both at once which is not good and he didn't how strong the androids were.
Piccolo said himself that he didn't care how strong the androids were and outright stated it take more that that attack from Gero to take him down. So he already had an idea of how strong the androids, well at least Dr Gero anyway. So he could easily went over there and killed Gero easily while Vegeta would have taken care of Android 19.

User avatar
TheMikado
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5009
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 1:28 pm

Re: What is the lamest thing to come out of modern DBZ?

Post by TheMikado » Wed Oct 12, 2016 2:44 pm

That's a lot of assumption from a single attack that "Would take more than that" when being faced with two potentially strong opponents simultaneously. Even if he could over power one what makes you think he can take on both simultaneously?

User avatar
Jackal puFF
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1684
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 2:24 pm
Contact:

Re: What is the lamest thing to come out of modern DBZ?

Post by Jackal puFF » Thu Oct 13, 2016 3:01 am

I'm still mad about Toriyama actually having someone called Black Goku.

User avatar
emi_b7
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 230
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 9:48 pm

Re: What is the lamest thing to come out of modern DBZ?

Post by emi_b7 » Thu Oct 13, 2016 7:51 am

TheMikado wrote:[spoiler]
DBZAOTA482 wrote:
Lord Beerus wrote: Explaining why you did something reckless and stupid, doesn't negate the fact that is was still reckless and stupid.


Why not?
He would fight them both at once which is not good and he didn't how strong the androids were.
[/spoiler]
Agree with DBZOTA482 but I never argued that it wasn't stupid and reckless, I'm arguing that reasoning still remains within universe. Like I said your staying that's a stupid decision Piccolo instead of thinking about the scene not making sense overall. One scenario allows you to remain in universe, the other can force your thoughts out of universe.
What you are saying is 100% true but an arc driven in large part by characters' stupid decisions (like Cell's) can be frustrating, even if those decisions are mostly in character. I don't hate the arc like some people seem to do but I get where they are coming from.
As for Super, yeah, I don't think you have to explain everything when you tell a story but they seem to be leaving a bit much stuff unexplained, I agree with you there.
Jackal puFF wrote:I'm still mad about Toriyama actually having someone called Black Goku.
He is not called "Black Goku", he is called "Goku Black". Actually that's not even his name, that's how Trunks and co call him because Black introduced himself as Son Goku and, knowing that's not Goku, they went with the color of his clothes to differentiate the 2. I don't see the problem with the name, they call him simply "Black" 99% of the time anyway.

User avatar
DBZGTKOSDH
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 12401
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 7:45 pm
Location: Greece

Re: What is the lamest thing to come out of modern DBZ?

Post by DBZGTKOSDH » Thu Oct 13, 2016 4:39 pm

Lord Beerus wrote:Piccolo said himself that he didn't care how strong the androids were and outright stated it take more that that attack from Gero to take him down. So he already had an idea of how strong the androids, well at least Dr Gero anyway. So he could easily went over there and killed Gero easily while Vegeta would have taken care of Android 19.
No, Piccolo only knew that Dr. Gero used a pathetic attack against him, and that he can't use ki blasts against him, nor should he let him touch him. Also, there is 2 of these guys, and one of them has absorbed a lot of energy from a weakened Super Saiyan. Piccolo didn't know exactly how strong Dr. Gero was, and Dr. Gero had barely displayed his abilities, and he also didn't know what else to expect from them, not to mention that these were still the same Artificial Humans that killed Super Saiyans in the future (or so they thought).

So no, he couldn't just jump in and save Goku. What a fucking idiot Piccolo would have been if he had done that.
James Teal (Animerica 1996) wrote:When you think about it, there are a number of similarities between the Chinese-inspired Son Goku and that most American of superhero icons, Superman. Both are aliens sent to Earth shortly after birth to escape the destruction of their homeworlds; both possess super-strength, flight, super-speed, heightened senses and the ability to cast energy blasts. But the crucial difference between them lies not only in how they view the world, but in how the world views them.

Superman is, and always has been, a symbol for truth, justice, and upstanding moral fortitude–a role model and leader as much as a fighter. The more down-to-earth Goku has no illusions about being responsible for maintaining social order, or for setting some kind of moral example for the entire world. Goku is simply a martial artist who’s devoted his life toward perfecting his fighting skills and other abilities. Though never shy about risking his life to save either one person or the entire world, he just doesn’t believe that the balance of the world rests in any way on his shoulders, and he has no need to shape any part of it in his image. Goku is an idealist, and believes that there is some good in everyone, but he is unconcerned with the big picture of the world…unless it has to do with some kind of fight. Politics, society, law and order don’t have much bearing on his life, but he’s a man who knows right from wrong.

Jedi Knifed
Newbie
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2016 2:52 pm

Re: What is the lamest thing to come out of modern DBZ?

Post by Jedi Knifed » Thu Oct 13, 2016 6:19 pm

I think that Episode of Bardock and DragonBall Minus is when this franchise hit rock bottom.

Both stories are so poorly written that it's almost difficult to believe that they aren't fan-fiction. Both stories managed to utterly ruin Bardock by ignoring what made Bardock an interesting character in the first place. It has been said before but it's worth repeating. What made Bardock interesting is that he was just a typical saiyan who tried to do one heroic thing in the end and failed miserably. Turning Bardock into a loving husband and father and a time traveling original super saiyan added absolutely nothing good to the story and only created new plot holes and continuity problems.

But the way Toriyama introduced Goku's mother is even worse. What was the point of introducing her if we don't even see her being Goku's mother. We barely see Gine and kid Goku interact like mother and child. We didn't even see Gine hold kid Goku in her arms. Even though it would have been cliched and predictable a story about Goku's birth day would have been much better than what we got in DragonBall Minus.

User avatar
Noah
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8345
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2015 10:56 pm
Location: Virtual World

Re: What is the lamest thing to come out of modern DBZ?

Post by Noah » Fri Oct 14, 2016 4:41 pm

^ I share this same feeling as well
乃亜

Dragon Ball: The Others Discussion Thread

Are we too old to enjoy new Dragon Ball movies/series?

User avatar
Cure Dragon 255
Banned
Posts: 5658
Joined: Thu May 03, 2012 5:23 pm

Re: What is the lamest thing to come out of modern DBZ?

Post by Cure Dragon 255 » Fri Oct 14, 2016 6:27 pm

I dont think its SUPER because the title says "Out of Modern DBZ" LOL! That said, even then I dont hate Super. Its harmless enough. Now Dragon Ball Z Resurrection F is a whoooole nother story!

User avatar
TheMikado
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5009
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 1:28 pm

Re: What is the lamest thing to come out of modern DBZ?

Post by TheMikado » Fri Oct 14, 2016 6:31 pm

Noah wrote:^ I share this same feeling as well
Those two stories are so awful for the franchise that I literally do no consider them to even exist. I still don't see how people can hate the LSSJ but be ok with time traveling original SSJ.

User avatar
Sailor Haumea
OMG CRAZY REGEN
Posts: 797
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2016 11:28 pm
Location: Oklahoma

Re: What is the lamest thing to come out of modern DBZ?

Post by Sailor Haumea » Fri Oct 14, 2016 6:46 pm

Bardock ISN'T the Original Super Saiyan.

Bardock was the ONLY Saiyan on Planet Plant. The Saiyans didn't arrive until a few centuries before Frieza blew the planet up. The Original Super Saiyan is a completely different character.

Dragon Ball Minus, however, is the single worst thing to ever happen to the franchise. The only good thing about it is Gine.
"That's right, everyone of my race can become a giant gorilla!" - Tullece (AB Groupe dub)

User avatar
HybridSaiyan
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1113
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2015 1:18 pm
Location: UK

Re: What is the lamest thing to come out of modern DBZ?

Post by HybridSaiyan » Sat Oct 15, 2016 6:33 am

THE DREADFUL ART AND ANIMATION OF SUPER. (90% OF THE TIME) IF THEY KEEP THIS UP IT'LL BE THE END OF ALL OF US, NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.

User avatar
Jinzoningen MULE
I Live Here
Posts: 4405
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 8:33 pm
Location: Salt Mines

Re: What is the lamest thing to come out of modern DBZ?

Post by Jinzoningen MULE » Sat Oct 15, 2016 3:31 pm

HybridSaiyan wrote:THE DREADFUL ART AND ANIMATION OF SUPER. (90% OF THE TIME) IF THEY KEEP THIS UP IT'LL BE THE END OF ALL OF US, NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.
We just have to wait it out and hope that Tadayoshi Yamamuro is replaced or retired soon. That will fix many of the problems.
Retired.

User avatar
Alehandrew
Newbie
Posts: 42
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2016 9:38 pm

Re: What is the lamest thing to come out of modern DBZ?

Post by Alehandrew » Sat Oct 15, 2016 5:18 pm

midichlorians....

but seriously, episode of Bardock and DB Minus were pretty low points.

User avatar
Cure Dragon 255
Banned
Posts: 5658
Joined: Thu May 03, 2012 5:23 pm

Re: What is the lamest thing to come out of modern DBZ?

Post by Cure Dragon 255 » Sat Oct 15, 2016 5:49 pm

Again, no they are not. THEY ARENT DBZ. AND DBZ ISNT THE ENTIRE FRANCHISE.

I'm sorry but this makes me mad. DBZ isnt even a thing in the manga and hasnt been a thing since Resurrection F. DB is the franchise.

User avatar
Jinzoningen MULE
I Live Here
Posts: 4405
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 8:33 pm
Location: Salt Mines

Re: What is the lamest thing to come out of modern DBZ?

Post by Jinzoningen MULE » Sat Oct 15, 2016 6:30 pm

Cure Dragon 255 wrote:Again, no they are not. THEY ARENT DBZ. AND DBZ ISNT THE ENTIRE FRANCHISE.

I'm sorry but this makes me mad. DBZ isnt even a thing in the manga and hasnt been a thing since Resurrection F. DB is the franchise.
Or we could just be calm and realize that many fans know the franchise as DBZ, since that's what most of us were introduced to.
Retired.

User avatar
TheMikado
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5009
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 1:28 pm

Re: What is the lamest thing to come out of modern DBZ?

Post by TheMikado » Sat Oct 15, 2016 6:36 pm

Jinzoningen MULE wrote:
Cure Dragon 255 wrote:Again, no they are not. THEY ARENT DBZ. AND DBZ ISNT THE ENTIRE FRANCHISE.

I'm sorry but this makes me mad. DBZ isnt even a thing in the manga and hasnt been a thing since Resurrection F. DB is the franchise.
Or we could just be calm and realize that many fans know the franchise as DBZ, since that's what most of us were introduced to.
Without "DBZ" the franchise would have likely faded away into obscurity.

User avatar
Bansho64
I Live Here
Posts: 2036
Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2015 12:59 am

Re: What is the lamest thing to come out of modern DBZ?

Post by Bansho64 » Sat Oct 15, 2016 6:37 pm

TheMikado wrote: Without "DBZ" the franchise would have likely faded away into obscurity.
What do you mean? Dragon Ball was thriving before the Z portion of the series.

User avatar
TheMikado
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5009
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 1:28 pm

Re: What is the lamest thing to come out of modern DBZ?

Post by TheMikado » Sat Oct 15, 2016 6:38 pm

Bansho64 wrote:
TheMikado wrote: Without "DBZ" the franchise would have likely faded away into obscurity.
What do you mean? Dragon Ball was thriving before the Z portion of the series.
Without the Z portion do you really think we'd be geting a new series and games 20 years later?

Post Reply