It's the translation of chapter 2 of the Revival of F manga.dbzfan7 wrote:This came strictly from the F book translated by Herms. Maybe the movie says it differently. Which was your source?
Is Beerus' existence really necessary?
Re: Is Beerus' existence really necessary?
Re: Is Beerus' existence really necessary?
I saw it...but I don't really trust those kind of translations. Fan subs like those aren't really known for being great, and like the others it has exaggerated profanity. I think I'd trust the F book translated by Herms more since it's the script Toriyama wrote. However even there it seemed there was a flub or two, such as the script saying Freeza recognized Bulma. That wasn't said in the movie though. So this could be a flub from Herms or Toriyama. Eitherway I guess I'll wait to see the english movie since I only saw it in partly Japanese and mostly Portuguese.Hitiro wrote:It's the translation of chapter 2 of the Revival of F manga.dbzfan7 wrote:This came strictly from the F book translated by Herms. Maybe the movie says it differently. Which was your source?
Why Dragon Ball Consistency in something such as power levels matter!
Spoiler:
Re: Is Beerus' existence really necessary?
And what about Whis knocking out Beerus when he is destroying the mini planets around their home? What benefit did Whis get from stopping him from doing that?dbzfan7 wrote:I saw it...but I don't really trust those kind of translations. Fan subs like those aren't really known for being great, and like the others it has exaggerated profanity. I think I'd trust the F book translated by Herms more since it's the script Toriyama wrote. However even there it seemed there was a flub or two, such as the script saying Freeza recognized Bulma. That wasn't said in the movie though. So this could be a flub from Herms or Toriyama. Eitherway I guess I'll wait to see the english movie since I only saw it in partly Japanese and mostly Portuguese.
Re: Is Beerus' existence really necessary?
Ah so they corrected that?dbzfan7 wrote:However even there it seemed there was a flub or two, such as the script saying Freeza recognized Bulma. That wasn't said in the movie though.
That's good to hear. If only they could also acknowledge the fact, that Goku had only seen Freeza in his final form before [F].
Re: Is Beerus' existence really necessary?
Don't really know. Never see any life or anything on them. No idea what they might mean. They apparently may mean more to him than earth since earth only gets a pass because of food. He does bring them back in the next movie since they are visible.Hitiro wrote:And what about Whis knocking out Beerus when he is destroying the mini planets around their home? What benefit did Whis get from stopping him from doing that?dbzfan7 wrote:I saw it...but I don't really trust those kind of translations. Fan subs like those aren't really known for being great, and like the others it has exaggerated profanity. I think I'd trust the F book translated by Herms more since it's the script Toriyama wrote. However even there it seemed there was a flub or two, such as the script saying Freeza recognized Bulma. That wasn't said in the movie though. So this could be a flub from Herms or Toriyama. Eitherway I guess I'll wait to see the english movie since I only saw it in partly Japanese and mostly Portuguese.
Why Dragon Ball Consistency in something such as power levels matter!
Spoiler:
Re: Is Beerus' existence really necessary?
It really makes no sense to save planets that have no benefit to him unless his job is to manage what Beerus destroys. Which would be his job as mentor/retainer.dbzfan7 wrote:Don't really know. Never see any life or anything on them. No idea what they might mean. They apparently may mean more to him than earth since earth only gets a pass because of food. He does bring them back in the next movie since they are visible.
Re: Is Beerus' existence really necessary?
The dub seems to say the planets were innocent, so he knocked Beerus out to stop him. Guess his definition of innocent is pretty slim. Earth is pretty innocent too, and he doesn't really give a crap about it beyond food. Scene seemed to imply if the suishi is bad he'd let Beerus destroy earth. Guess he may somewhat manage the worlds, with a very shrewd perspective. Going by that like Beerus, it seems to me it all depends on the world. Beerus did just that with earth, so earth apparently isn't innocent.Hitiro wrote:It really makes no sense to save planets that have no benefit to him unless his job is to manage what Beerus destroys. Which would be his job as mentor/retainer.dbzfan7 wrote:Don't really know. Never see any life or anything on them. No idea what they might mean. They apparently may mean more to him than earth since earth only gets a pass because of food. He does bring them back in the next movie since they are visible.
Not sure what the Japanese version says. It's pretty interesting. What does Whis define as innocent. Those worlds around his are apparently innocent, but earth is not?
Maybe an empty planet is an innocent one, so that's why they were saved. Earth is innocent and yet not one care in the world Whis would feel if it's destroyed.
Last edited by dbzfan7 on Sun Jun 28, 2015 7:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Why Dragon Ball Consistency in something such as power levels matter!
Spoiler:
Re: Is Beerus' existence really necessary?
I would say those worlds are innocent because they lack any semblance of evil. But Earth usually has that in abundance. Look at the humans who have tried to conquer Earth. Look at the mercenaries that shot Bee and Mr. Satan. I would imagine planets like Namek would be safe from destruction. Whis had no quarrels with Beerus destroying the planet of those aliens that tried to poison Beerus.dbzfan7 wrote:The dub seems to say the planets were innocent, so he knocked Beerus out to stop him. Guess his definition of innocent is pretty slim. Earth is pretty innocent too, and he doesn't really give a crap about it beyond food. Scene seemed to imply if the suishi is bad he'd let Beerus destroy earth. Guess he may somewhat manage the worlds, with a very shrewd perspective. Going by that like Beerus, it seems to me it all depends on the world. Beerus did just that with earth, so earth apparently isn't innocent.Hitiro wrote:It really makes no sense to save planets that have no benefit to him unless his job is to manage what Beerus destroys. Which would be his job as mentor/retainer.dbzfan7 wrote:Don't really know. Never see any life or anything on them. No idea what they might mean. They apparently may mean more to him than earth since earth only gets a pass because of food. He does bring them back in the next movie since they are visible.
Not sure what the Japanese version says. It's pretty interesting. What does Whis define as innocent. Those worlds around his are apparently innocent, but earth is not?
Re: Is Beerus' existence really necessary?
They do not seem to know anything about earth beyond the people they met. Perhaps those small planets are either uninhabited or had just simple animals like Beerus' temple had. So they were innocent because of that. Though perhaps the few things at the party were enough to dictate the earth's fate. What with Boo, the gun, etc.Hitiro wrote:I would say those worlds are innocent because they lack any semblance of evil. But Earth usually has that in abundance. Look at the humans who have tried to conquer Earth. Look at the mercenaries that shot Bee and Mr. Satan. I would imagine planets like Namek would be safe from destruction. Whis had no quarrels with Beerus destroying the planet of those aliens that tried to poison Beerus.dbzfan7 wrote: The dub seems to say the planets were innocent, so he knocked Beerus out to stop him. Guess his definition of innocent is pretty slim. Earth is pretty innocent too, and he doesn't really give a crap about it beyond food. Scene seemed to imply if the suishi is bad he'd let Beerus destroy earth. Guess he may somewhat manage the worlds, with a very shrewd perspective. Going by that like Beerus, it seems to me it all depends on the world. Beerus did just that with earth, so earth apparently isn't innocent.
Not sure what the Japanese version says. It's pretty interesting. What does Whis define as innocent. Those worlds around his are apparently innocent, but earth is not?
That still wouldn't stop Beerus from destroying since I doubt if there was balance, evil wouldn't be gone or there would be no worlds left to piss him off. Knowing Beerus he'd go to other worlds, and if they piss him off, he'd destroy them anyways. Would Whis stop him even though "Balance" once the quota is achieved. He basically destroys to counter the Kaioshin, but I ain't sure the Kaioshin can keep up with Beerus.
Though if God can make a moon in a short amount of time, maybe the Kaioshin can make worlds quickly. Life may be a different story though.
Why Dragon Ball Consistency in something such as power levels matter!
Spoiler:
Re: Is Beerus' existence really necessary?
Eventually the Kaioshin would intervene and offset the worlds that Beerus destroyed by creating new worlds.dbzfan7 wrote:They do not seem to know anything about earth beyond the people they met. Perhaps those small planets are either uninhabited or had just simple animals like Beerus' temple had. So they were innocent because of that. Though perhaps the few things at the party were enough to dictate the earth's fate. What with Boo, the gun, etc.
That still wouldn't stop Beerus from destroying since I doubt if there was balance, evil wouldn't be gone or there would be no worlds left to piss him off. Knowing Beerus he'd go to other worlds, and if they piss him off, he'd destroy them anyways. Would Whis stop him even though "Balance" once the quota is achieved. He basically destroys to counter the Kaioshin, but I ain't sure the Kaioshin can keep up with Beerus.
I don't think the Kaioshin can't keep up with him because Whis can just put him to sleep for decades at a time.
Re: Is Beerus' existence really necessary?
Not sure what Beerus' track record is either, nor how many planets he destroy's per year, decade, etc. If it's like one a decade or so than yeah it shouldn't be that hard. God made a moon in a short time, so they could maybe handle a planet or two. Life I wouldn't be sure about. Not sure either if Elder Kaioshin and Kaioshin have been making worlds at all since, or if they can. I assume Kaioshin might have, but I am unaware if he has done anything since all the Kaioshin were wiped out.Hitiro wrote:Eventually the Kaioshin would intervene and offset the worlds that Beerus destroyed by creating new worlds.dbzfan7 wrote:They do not seem to know anything about earth beyond the people they met. Perhaps those small planets are either uninhabited or had just simple animals like Beerus' temple had. So they were innocent because of that. Though perhaps the few things at the party were enough to dictate the earth's fate. What with Boo, the gun, etc.
That still wouldn't stop Beerus from destroying since I doubt if there was balance, evil wouldn't be gone or there would be no worlds left to piss him off. Knowing Beerus he'd go to other worlds, and if they piss him off, he'd destroy them anyways. Would Whis stop him even though "Balance" once the quota is achieved. He basically destroys to counter the Kaioshin, but I ain't sure the Kaioshin can keep up with Beerus.
I don't think the Kaioshin can't keep up with him because Whis can just put him to sleep for decades at a time.
Balance also seemed to have 5 Kaioshin (or 3 switching in an out, forget what the retcon was), and for some time we've had only a single Kaioshin. So that couldn't have been helpful either.
Apparently Beerus also sealed away Elder Kaioshin, so for a guy who's supposed to preserve balance, I think sealing away a Kaioshin is not what you're supposed to do. Though he was replaced anyways, so I guess it was no big deal.
Why Dragon Ball Consistency in something such as power levels matter!
Spoiler:
- DBZGTKOSDH
- Namekian Warrior
- Posts: 12401
- Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 7:45 pm
- Location: Greece
Re: Is Beerus' existence really necessary?
I think that Beerus is perfect for this job, because he is like a natural disaster. It doesn't matter if the planet is good or bad, you'll get destroyed if you are unlucky.
James Teal (Animerica 1996) wrote:When you think about it, there are a number of similarities between the Chinese-inspired Son Goku and that most American of superhero icons, Superman. Both are aliens sent to Earth shortly after birth to escape the destruction of their homeworlds; both possess super-strength, flight, super-speed, heightened senses and the ability to cast energy blasts. But the crucial difference between them lies not only in how they view the world, but in how the world views them.
Superman is, and always has been, a symbol for truth, justice, and upstanding moral fortitude–a role model and leader as much as a fighter. The more down-to-earth Goku has no illusions about being responsible for maintaining social order, or for setting some kind of moral example for the entire world. Goku is simply a martial artist who’s devoted his life toward perfecting his fighting skills and other abilities. Though never shy about risking his life to save either one person or the entire world, he just doesn’t believe that the balance of the world rests in any way on his shoulders, and he has no need to shape any part of it in his image. Goku is an idealist, and believes that there is some good in everyone, but he is unconcerned with the big picture of the world…unless it has to do with some kind of fight. Politics, society, law and order don’t have much bearing on his life, but he’s a man who knows right from wrong.
Re: Is Beerus' existence really necessary?
I believe the Kaio can also make planets too? There are 80 Kaio's according to the information on them. So I don't think it is an issue of there being only one Kaioshin.dbzfan7 wrote:Not sure what Beerus' track record is either, nor how many planets he destroy's per year, decade, etc. If it's like one a decade or so than yeah it shouldn't be that hard. God made a moon in a short time, so they could maybe handle a planet or two. Life I wouldn't be sure about. Not sure either if Elder Kaioshin and Kaioshin have been making worlds at all since, or if they can. I assume Kaioshin might have, but I am unaware if he has done anything since all the Kaioshin were wiped out.
Balance also seemed to have 5 Kaioshin (or 3 switching in an out, forget what the retcon was), and for some time we've had only a single Kaioshin. So that couldn't have been helpful either.
Apparently Beerus also sealed away Elder Kaioshin, so for a guy who's supposed to preserve balance, I think sealing away a Kaioshin is not what you're supposed to do. Though he was replaced anyways, so I guess it was no big deal.
- Herms
- Kanzenshuu Admin Emeritus
- Posts: 10550
- Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 6:40 pm
- Location: Jupiter
- Contact:
Re: Is Beerus' existence really necessary?
That was indeed something that was changed between Toriyama's original script and the finished film. Here's a previous post outlining the whole thing:dbzfan7 wrote:However even there it seemed there was a flub or two, such as the script saying Freeza recognized Bulma. That wasn't said in the movie though. So this could be a flub from Herms or Toriyama.
Herms wrote:Right, so for the record, here's the increasingly infamous "Freeza remembers Bulma" line from Toriyama's script, as recorded in Volume F:And in contrast, here's the corrected "Freeza just assumes Bulma must have been on Namek" line from the finished film, according to AjayLikesGaming's friend:おや、あなた見覚えがありますよ、たしかナメック星でチラっとお会いしてますね…お友達の孫悟空さんはどこでしょうか?
Freeza: "Oh, I remember you, we met very briefly on Planet Namek, didn’t we?...Where’s your friend Son Goku?”Edit: And now that I think of it, the "Jaco draws crummy picture of Freeza" gag isn't in Toriyama's script either, and was most likely added for the final film to explain how Bulma recognizes Freeza on sight. In the script it's just assumed that Bulma already knows what Freeza looks like."おや?もしかして私の事を知っている所を見るとあなたもナメック星に入らしていたのですか?お友達の孫悟さんは何処でしょうか?"
Freeza: "Oh? Seeing as you know who I am, were you on Namek, too? If so, where is your friend Son Goku?"
This whole thing is pretty minor either way, but in the main series Bulma makes a point of saying how she never got a chance to see Freeza the whole time she was on Namek. It's the whole reason she flies out to see Mecha Freeza when he comes to Earth. So that makes it stand out more than most of the other small inconsistencies in the film, which may be why it ended up getting fixed like this.
Kanzenshuu: Is that place still around?
Sometimes, I tweet things
We might, if they screamed all the time, for no good reason.
Sometimes, I tweet things
We might, if they screamed all the time, for no good reason.
Re: Is Beerus' existence really necessary?
Nice to see, that they care enough to correct these inconsistencies and don't just follow the script word by word.Herms wrote:Spoiler:
- fadeddreams5
- Born 'n Bred Here
- Posts: 5269
- Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2014 10:53 pm
- Location: New York
Re: Is Beerus' existence really necessary?
Kid Buu would be natural disaster. Beerus can be bribed if the planet isn't scheduled to be destroyed but he wants to destroy it anyways.DBZGTKOSDH wrote:I think that Beerus is perfect for this job, because he is like a natural disaster. It doesn't matter if the planet is good or bad, you'll get destroyed if you are unlucky.
"Dragon Ball once became a thing of the past to me, but after that, I got angry about the live action movie, re-wrote an entire movie script, and now I'm complaining about the quality of the new TV anime. It seems Dragon Ball has grown on me so much that I can't leave it alone." - Akira Toriyama on Dragon Ball Super
Re: Is Beerus' existence really necessary?
Kid Buu did a better job at being a God of Destruction by actually not giving a crap about the planet he wants to explode. Beerus is too soft for that title.
- Lord Beerus
- Namekian Warrior
- Posts: 21433
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 5:20 pm
- Location: A temple on a giant tree
- Contact:
Re: Is Beerus' existence really necessary?
You summed it up perfectly, DBZGTKOSDH. Beerus really is like a natural disaster. Who happens to have a large appetite.DBZGTKOSDH wrote:I think that Beerus is perfect for this job, because he is like a natural disaster. It doesn't matter if the planet is good or bad, you'll get destroyed if you are unlucky.
Spoiler:
- DBZGTKOSDH
- Namekian Warrior
- Posts: 12401
- Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 7:45 pm
- Location: Greece
Re: Is Beerus' existence really necessary?
Boo is an uncontrollable monster though. Beerus won't go and destroy the whole universe.fadeddreams5 wrote:Kid Buu would be natural disaster. Beerus can be bribed if the planet isn't scheduled to be destroyed but he wants to destroy it anyways.DBZGTKOSDH wrote:I think that Beerus is perfect for this job, because he is like a natural disaster. It doesn't matter if the planet is good or bad, you'll get destroyed if you are unlucky.
James Teal (Animerica 1996) wrote:When you think about it, there are a number of similarities between the Chinese-inspired Son Goku and that most American of superhero icons, Superman. Both are aliens sent to Earth shortly after birth to escape the destruction of their homeworlds; both possess super-strength, flight, super-speed, heightened senses and the ability to cast energy blasts. But the crucial difference between them lies not only in how they view the world, but in how the world views them.
Superman is, and always has been, a symbol for truth, justice, and upstanding moral fortitude–a role model and leader as much as a fighter. The more down-to-earth Goku has no illusions about being responsible for maintaining social order, or for setting some kind of moral example for the entire world. Goku is simply a martial artist who’s devoted his life toward perfecting his fighting skills and other abilities. Though never shy about risking his life to save either one person or the entire world, he just doesn’t believe that the balance of the world rests in any way on his shoulders, and he has no need to shape any part of it in his image. Goku is an idealist, and believes that there is some good in everyone, but he is unconcerned with the big picture of the world…unless it has to do with some kind of fight. Politics, society, law and order don’t have much bearing on his life, but he’s a man who knows right from wrong.
- fadeddreams5
- Born 'n Bred Here
- Posts: 5269
- Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2014 10:53 pm
- Location: New York
Re: Is Beerus' existence really necessary?
That's sort of what I think of when I read "natural disaster" though. A tornado won't stop cause you feed it pudding. xDDBZGTKOSDH wrote:Boo is an uncontrollable monster though. Beerus won't go and destroy the whole universe.fadeddreams5 wrote:Kid Buu would be natural disaster. Beerus can be bribed if the planet isn't scheduled to be destroyed but he wants to destroy it anyways.DBZGTKOSDH wrote:I think that Beerus is perfect for this job, because he is like a natural disaster. It doesn't matter if the planet is good or bad, you'll get destroyed if you are unlucky.
"Dragon Ball once became a thing of the past to me, but after that, I got angry about the live action movie, re-wrote an entire movie script, and now I'm complaining about the quality of the new TV anime. It seems Dragon Ball has grown on me so much that I can't leave it alone." - Akira Toriyama on Dragon Ball Super




