Forget about the math? You're the one who brought up by saying Goku was 180,000. And what's wrong with Vegeta being stronger at this point? Heck, not even being stronger, just being greater than 10% of the hero's power?That's why power levels are so irritating, it leads to things like this. It makes no sense from a writing perspective to not have the hero of the story be stronger than Vegeta at that point, even before taking into account momentary power boosts like Kaio-ken. Forget about the math.
That's not my main issue. My main issue is that you constantly rag on other characters for cheap power-ups yet let Goku's slip with little to no justification ("he trained for one week, it makes sense that he'd completely outstrip all the gains he made training for ten years from King Piccolo to Raditz by becoming eleven times stronger, and that other characters could do the same training for YEARS and not even double in power").I get it, "shit" means you are REALLY irritated. It's a fantasy, so it makes sense to me and many others that Goku becomes insanely strong after heavy gravity training.
"That power up should have drawn out all of Gohan's dormant power"I've never rewritten the story.
"Power levels don't mean anything"
"Goku was 180,000"
"Goku didn't actually do that, it's because of a retcon" (trying to make it look like it's not in Goku's character to do this and that somehow he didn't)
Shouldn't it be considered relevant insofar that it relates to the story-telling of the Namek saga?At this point, how about just making a seperate thread for all this power level talk? It's off-topic and is overwhelming the original conversation.