"Jaco the Galactic Patrolman" discussion (incl. "DB Minus")

Discussion regarding the entirety of the franchise in a general (meta) sense, including such aspects as: production, trends, merchandise, fan culture, and more.
User avatar
VegettoEX
Kanzenshuu Co-Owner & Administrator
Posts: 17801
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2004 3:10 pm
Location: New Jersey
Contact:

Re: "Jaco the Galactic Patrolman" discussion (Tankōbon April

Post by VegettoEX » Mon Apr 07, 2014 8:20 pm

It's more DB than it is Jaco, and while I think you get slightly more out of it having read Jaco, it's far from being essential.
:: [| Mike "VegettoEX" LaBrie |] ::
:: [| Kanzenshuu - Co-Founder/Administrator, Podcast Host, News Manager (note: our "job" titles are arbitrary and meaningless) |] ::
:: [| Website: January 1998 |] :: [| Podcast: November 2005 |] :: [| Fusion: April 2012 |] :: [| Wiki: 20XX |] ::

User avatar
MagicBox
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1476
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 6:09 pm
Location: On The Forums... Duh!
Contact:

Re: "Jaco the Galactic Patrolman" discussion (Tankōbon April

Post by MagicBox » Mon Apr 07, 2014 11:00 pm

Flame Dragon wrote:What do we do now? Change all anime versions to follow the retcon? Kinda dumb especially since DB Kai, the version that was SUPPOSED TO FOLLOW THE MANGA, already covered this scene.
I'm not really sure what you're asking for here. Dragon Ball Kai started five years ago; how were they to know that Toriyama would tell an origin story half a decade later? Besides, a lot of fans thought that starting Kai with the Burdock stuff was a very odd/confusing choice, so take that however you will.

I hesitate to call this a retcon, by the way. Toriyama's never told a story with Burdock before, and thus, he's not changing any established facts from his comic. He shouldn't have to limit himself by following what Toei did (especially when they only told their story by piecing together vague clues from the manga in the first place). I'm sure they would have loved to have the Minus chapter back in 1990.
Flame Dragon wrote:So what now? Everybody that saw this scene from the anime is wrong? So now if a fan says "this is how Goku was born", now he can get told there are two versions of the Bardock special that are completely different, and that the anime version that he watched was false. Wouldn't that fan feel bad for discovering this? Who's in the right now? Who's wrong? Who knows.
I don't understand this concern with being "wrong." Are you worried about fans making fun of you for prefering one version over another? Toei took bits and pieces from the manga and told their interpretation of Goku's origin story. Toriyama told his interpretation separate from the cartoon. Both versions are "right." That hypothetical fan you mentioned isn't going to "feel bad" for discovering that the Minus chapter exists. Gaining knowledge and context is never a bad thing. The only one who should feel bad is whoever would rudely tell him that either the anime or manga is "false," because anyone who does that is a kill-joy.
auspx wrote:What Raditz tells Goku when they meet, about Goku's "mission" to kill the Earthlings and conquer the planet, doesn't make much sense now,does it? Roshi is talking about baby Goku being discovered in the woods by Grandpa Gohan, not a 3 year old toddler in a suit of space armor.
As far as I'm concerned, these are too easily explained to be considered "plotholes." Raditz had every right to believe that Goku had been given a mission to conquer Earth; he clearly says that Saiyans send their children to do exactly that. Why else would he have been sent there? Burdock was being very secretive about that whole "Hey, Freeza's up to something" hypothesis of his. He probably just told Raditz to stay put where he was and that his little brother had been sent to Earth. He wasn't going to explain why; why would he need to as long as his sons are safe?

This chapter also explains why Raditz imagines Goku as a newborn (sans armor) when he arrives on Earth; he's only ever seen him floating in the incubation chamber.

And I think that "baby" line is being taken too seriously. Anyone over the age of five sees a kid that young and immediately thinks "baby." You might hear the word "toddler" thrown around if you're talking to a group of moms, but I hardly think using the word "baby" creates a plothole. As mentioned earlier, let's not forget that Muten Roshi is the one talking here. A three-year-old is a baby in the eyes of a 300-year-old geezer.
auspx wrote:It doesn't even make sense now for Goku to have amnesia after his head injury, what exactly did his saiyan parents teach him? Nothing.
So then... how did it make sense before? Before Jaco, everyone assumed Goku was sent to Earth as a newborn. What exactly is a newborn going to lose when he gets amnesia? Newborns don't know anything.

Even if Goku wasn't given a mission to conquer Earth, that's what was ultimately going to happen. Saiyans are a warrior race; Kakarrotto was going to grow up to be a very, very violent person. He was a very real threat to the planet. It's outright stated in both Dragon Ball and Jaco: pre-amnesia Goku was a little asshole. The head injury turned him into a nice person. Whether he was given a mission or not, he absolutely needed that bump on the head. It still makes sense.
AjayLikesGaming wrote:I feel like you should at least make an effort to develop your new characters and take the time to write dialogue that actually sounds like it belongs in the franchise and not some pre-school fan fiction. Perhaps that's a translation issue but even in terms of structure and basic logic, it was heavily flawed.
I actually do agree with this. I don't know if it was Viz's translation or not, but I did think some of the dialogue was a little awkwardly written and I would have liked to see a personality from Gine. I may be defending Minus, but I certainly don't think it was a masterpiece.

I'll be the weirdo and say that I actually did enjoy how Burdock was portrayed. He's still shown as a blood-thirsty Saiyan warrior, slaughtering aliens. I enjoyed his "whatever" attitude to the Saiyans who tried to talk to him. He may have a soft spot for his family, but he was still acting like a dick to everyone else. You can only do so much in 16 pages, but I didn't feel like the character was being betrayed as much as people are saying.
JeffJarrett wrote:Vegeta saved because of not following orders also contradicts what was said by Dodoria or Freeza in the manga: Freeza wanting to keep Prince Vegeta because he was a strong warrior and, so, destroying Planet Vegeta while Prince Vegeta wasn't there.
I still think this works fine. Once Freeza found out Vegeta was still alive, he could have just shrugged it off and thought "Well, I guess I can keep him around for now." It's easier to keep an eye on a handful of Saiyans than it is to keep track of thousands.

Bleh, I normally try to stay away from this "in-universe" stuff. My head...
"Magic's Detective Agency" - The Ultimate Guide to Changes in Detective Conan

"Magic's DiGiMONMUSiC Database" - The Ultimate Guide to Digimon CDs

User avatar
medama_oyaji
Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
Posts: 362
Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2011 10:42 am

Re: "Jaco the Galactic Patrolman" discussion (Tankōbon April

Post by medama_oyaji » Tue Apr 08, 2014 12:04 am

Makaioshin wrote:
DBZGTKOSDH wrote:Guys, Goku was obviously sent to Earth both to be saved and to destroy it. I think it's very obvious given to what we know.
This was what I was thinking. He is still an "infiltrator baby."
I didn't get this sense at all when I read it. When Gine says "Being an infiltration baby can be very dangerous!" she doesn't yet understand Bardock's intentions. And Bardock specifically warns Goku not to look at the moon...

A positive I can say about this chapter is that I liked the art. It was cool to see a Saiyan village, their homes look typical for Toriyama but with even MORE little round windows, and maybe a little more organic. They kinda look like the big bugs from Nausicaa. I also like the panel of little Vegeta & Radditz. But where's Nappa (or Tarble for that matter, ha ha)? I was super curious to see if Nappa would be bald even as a child :lol: I also like the drawing of Goku in the incubator. Very cute!

Flipping through the chapter again, I'm also noticing the background Saiyans, like that other lady in Gine's shop. I thought the background characters was something that Toriyama really excelled at with Jaco as well. Looks like he's having fun.

User avatar
Tanooki Kuribo
I Live Here
Posts: 4563
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 12:23 am
Location: Manhattan, New York
Contact:

Re: "Jaco the Galactic Patrolman" discussion (Tankōbon April

Post by Tanooki Kuribo » Tue Apr 08, 2014 12:18 am

I just read it. I don't think I liked it, and that's a shame cause I love Bardock! It seems you really just have an option here on what origin story feels right for you. DB- and the Bardock TV Special apparently can't co-exists, you have to pick one and just go with it. And me, I pick the Bardock TV Special.

User avatar
eledoremassis02
I Live Here
Posts: 4211
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2011 5:40 pm

Re: "Jaco the Galactic Patrolman" discussion (Tankōbon April

Post by eledoremassis02 » Tue Apr 08, 2014 12:33 am

Tanooki Kuribo wrote:I just read it. I don't think I liked it, and that's a shame cause I love Bardock! It seems you really just have an option here on what origin story feels right for you. DB- and the Bardock TV Special apparently can't co-exists, you have to pick one and just go with it. And me, I pick the Bardock TV Special.
This was a lot different than what I expected and a lot different than the special. It's a mixed bag for me. I think it would have been cool to see an extended version of the special where say...Bardock goes to find his wife and tells her about Goku leaving and how he's going to fight Frieza and she warms him not to do so because she's worried he won't survive in his condition or something and mentioning how he must have changed since he wants to save the Saiyans (who have no problem killing their own) and Bardock saying (like in the manga) "I must have gotten it from you because you're such a softy" . The special had some building up and a tragic story line.

This manga not so much. But then again this is Toriyama and Dragon Ball so that's where I say it's a mixed bag.

As for Goku being older. It does kinda change the whole way you think about Dragon Ball since what we've known. I mean Goku still wont remember anything anyway with maybe seeing his parents once.

User avatar
B
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5563
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 10:15 am
Contact:

Re: "Jaco the Galactic Patrolman" discussion (Tankōbon April

Post by B » Tue Apr 08, 2014 1:19 am

Finally read it, it wasn't bad, perhaps inconsequential. It didn't undo Episode of Bardock like I had thought it did.
Keen Observation of Dragon Ball Z Movie 4's Climax wrote:Slug shits to see the genki

User avatar
RandomGuy96
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8881
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:57 pm
Location: San Diego, California, USA

Re: "Jaco the Galactic Patrolman" discussion (Tankōbon April

Post by RandomGuy96 » Tue Apr 08, 2014 1:32 am

Does EOB even fit as-is? In EOB, Freeza uses a different attack to destroy Vegeta than he does in the manga flashback.
The Monkey King wrote:
RandomGuy96 wrote:
dbgtFO wrote: Please elaborate as I do not know what you mean by "pushing Vegeta's destruction"
He's probably referring to the Bardock special. Zarbon was the one who first recommended destroying Planet Vegeta because the saiyans were rapidly growing in strength.
It was actually Beerus disguised as Zarbon #StayWoke
Herms wrote:The fact that the ridiculous power inflation is presented so earnestly makes me just roll my eyes and snicker. Like with Freeza, where he starts off over 10 times stronger than all his henchmen except Ginyu (because...well, just because), then we find out he can transform and get even more powerful, and then he reveals he can transform two more times, before finally coming out with the fact that he hasn't even been using anywhere near 50% of his power. Oh, and he can survive in the vacuum of space. All this stuff is just presented as the way Freeza is, without even an attempt at rationalizing it, yet the tone dictates we're supposed to take all this silly grasping at straws as thrilling danger. So I guess I don't really take the power inflation in the Boo arc seriously, but I don't take the power inflation in earlier arcs seriously either, so there's no net loss of seriousness. I think a silly story presented as serious is harder to accept than a silly story presented as silly.

User avatar
Jackal puFF
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1684
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 2:24 pm
Contact:

Re: "Jaco the Galactic Patrolman" discussion (Tankōbon April

Post by Jackal puFF » Tue Apr 08, 2014 3:38 am

Not really fond of Goku being 3 when he was sent to Earth.. It just messes with your brain.. That kind of retcon. Like it really makes you think haha.. I totally expected a better looking Gine. Nothing special really.

User avatar
SaiyamanMS
OMG CRAZY REGEN
Posts: 975
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 6:08 am
Location: Australia
Contact:

Re: "Jaco the Galactic Patrolman" discussion (Tankōbon April

Post by SaiyamanMS » Tue Apr 08, 2014 5:28 am

I loved Jaco. Battle of Gods too. Even in his forgetful old age, Toriyama is still a master of writing his own characters. Bardock however, isn't his character. If we had never met him before, I'd say this was a fine little addition, but the story of the Bardock TV special was done so much better and it's a shame to see it pretty much entirely tossed to the side by this.

Episode of Bardock wasn't all that great either, but Ooishi didn't toss out the whole special with her story and the Bardock portrayed there had at least a bit more semblance to his animated counterpart. (In fact, Toriyama's Bardock here seems to be going even more in the softer direction EoB portrayed.)

RocktheDragon
Regular
Posts: 586
Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2014 7:03 pm
Location: North Orange County, California
Contact:

Re: "Jaco the Galactic Patrolman" discussion (Tankōbon April

Post by RocktheDragon » Tue Apr 08, 2014 8:28 am

Even though I'm not a fan of Dragon Ball Minus, I have to say that it's nice to have something new to talk about in the DB universe. It's great to see the variety of reactions, on either side. And I think that whatever your opinion might be on this special one off chapter, it has at least provided us with a fresh topic to discuss (beats going over redundant topics that have been done to death).
Kyle Broflovski wrote:It's all real. Think about it. Haven't Luke Skywalker and Santa Claus affected your lives more than most real people in this room? I mean, whether Jesus is real or not, he - he's had a bigger impact on the world than any of us have. And the same can be said for Bugs Bunny and - and Superman and Harry Potter. They've changed my life - changed the way I act on the earth. Doesn't that make them kind of real? They might be imaginary but, but they're more important than most of us here. And they're all gonna be around here long after we're dead. So, in a way, those things are more realer than any of us.

User avatar
Blade
I Live Here
Posts: 2267
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 2:45 pm
Location: Contrary to popular belief, not on Kanzenshuu forums.

Re: "Jaco the Galactic Patrolman" discussion (Tankōbon April

Post by Blade » Tue Apr 08, 2014 8:43 am

Just gonna call this now, but I think we'll see a 20-30 minute Anime special ala Episode of Bardock for Dragonball Minus.

I think the fact they went the way they did with the 'Vomic' for Jaco makes a traditionally animated feature less likely for those chapters.
'Multiculturalism means nothing in Japan, for every outside culture must pass first through the Japanese filter, rendering it entirely Japanese in the process.' - Julian Cope.

User avatar
Makaioshin
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1445
Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 3:51 pm
Location: Kokomo

Re: "Jaco the Galactic Patrolman" discussion (Tankōbon April

Post by Makaioshin » Tue Apr 08, 2014 9:19 am

Blade wrote:Just gonna call this now, but I think we'll see a 20-30 minute Anime special ala Episode of Bardock for Dragonball Minus.

I think the fact they went the way they did with the 'Vomic' for Jaco makes a traditionally animated feature less likely for those chapters.
There really isn't enough going on in Minus itself to make a special out of it. If anything I say we'll get a Jaco animated special that starts with Minus and ends with the last chapter of Jaco.

User avatar
Blade
I Live Here
Posts: 2267
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 2:45 pm
Location: Contrary to popular belief, not on Kanzenshuu forums.

Re: "Jaco the Galactic Patrolman" discussion (Tankōbon April

Post by Blade » Tue Apr 08, 2014 9:41 am

Makaioshin wrote:
Blade wrote:Just gonna call this now, but I think we'll see a 20-30 minute Anime special ala Episode of Bardock for Dragonball Minus.

I think the fact they went the way they did with the 'Vomic' for Jaco makes a traditionally animated feature less likely for those chapters.
There really isn't enough going on in Minus itself to make a special out of it. If anything I say we'll get a Jaco animated special that starts with Minus and ends with the last chapter of Jaco.
You wouldn't think so, would you? But keep in mind that Toei are the true masters of stretching out paltry chapters of manga into episodes. See One Piece.
'Multiculturalism means nothing in Japan, for every outside culture must pass first through the Japanese filter, rendering it entirely Japanese in the process.' - Julian Cope.

User avatar
B
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5563
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 10:15 am
Contact:

Re: "Jaco the Galactic Patrolman" discussion (Tankōbon April

Post by B » Tue Apr 08, 2014 10:25 am

I could see a final, solitary special that tells the entirety of Jaco, including DB-. I don't think Minus will get one by itself because it's so short, they would basically need to write a story for what Bardock was doing on that planet before being called back to Vegeta, and I'm not sure Jaco would get animated without an explicit Dragon Ball connection.
Keen Observation of Dragon Ball Z Movie 4's Climax wrote:Slug shits to see the genki

User avatar
TheDevilsCorpse
Moderator
Posts: 11378
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 4:34 am
Contact:

Re: "Jaco the Galactic Patrolman" discussion (Tankōbon April

Post by TheDevilsCorpse » Tue Apr 08, 2014 11:03 am

I think the 12 Jaco chapters are too long to be adapted as a typical, single special though, and DB- itself is too short as is. Honestly, I'm not sure anything related to Jaco will get animated, but after the awesomeness that is this promotional video, I want them too.

If they only want a full Dragon Ball focused special, they could stretch out DB- into one if they add content to it. They could extend the opening battle with Bardock and end with part of chapter 11 of Jaco, showing Goku landing on Earth and a small cameo of Jaco's failure too. If they wanted to actually extend the story, I would prefer if they had Toriyama be the one to contribute the ideas though...maybe with the King and Queen? Or Nappa? Some minor Beerus interactions with Freeza? The actual battle with Freeza attacking planet Vegeta?
Direct translations of the Korean DB Online timeline and guidebook.
My personal "canon" and BP list. (Coming Soon)

User avatar
Freeza Soldier #156
Regular
Posts: 611
Joined: Fri Nov 22, 2013 6:41 pm
Location: Florida

Re: "Jaco the Galactic Patrolman" discussion (Tankōbon April

Post by Freeza Soldier #156 » Tue Apr 08, 2014 12:55 pm

Blade wrote:
Makaioshin wrote:
Blade wrote:Just gonna call this now, but I think we'll see a 20-30 minute Anime special ala Episode of Bardock for Dragonball Minus.

I think the fact they went the way they did with the 'Vomic' for Jaco makes a traditionally animated feature less likely for those chapters.
There really isn't enough going on in Minus itself to make a special out of it. If anything I say we'll get a Jaco animated special that starts with Minus and ends with the last chapter of Jaco.
You wouldn't think so, would you? But keep in mind that Toei are the true masters of stretching out paltry chapters of manga into episodes. See One Piece.
Very true. Let's not forget the Trunks special. They took a 19 page side story and turned it into a 45+ minute special.

User avatar
Luso Saiyan
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1593
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 10:33 am
Location: Portugal

Re: "Jaco the Galactic Patrolman" discussion (Tankōbon April

Post by Luso Saiyan » Tue Apr 08, 2014 4:18 pm

B wrote:Finally read it, it wasn't bad, perhaps inconsequential. It didn't undo Episode of Bardock like I had thought it did.
The problem is not with Episode of Bardock, but with the TV special.

User avatar
Marco Polo
I Live Here
Posts: 2973
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2012 9:44 pm

Re: "Jaco the Galactic Patrolman" discussion (Tankōbon April

Post by Marco Polo » Tue Apr 08, 2014 4:54 pm

Why do people say Nappa is not in DB-? He's the guy who greets Bardock when Bardock arrives on planet Vegeta.

User avatar
Mewzard
I Live Here
Posts: 2009
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2008 9:02 pm
Location: Oklahoma
Contact:

Re: "Jaco the Galactic Patrolman" discussion (Tankōbon April

Post by Mewzard » Tue Apr 08, 2014 5:21 pm

Luso Saiyan wrote:
B wrote:Finally read it, it wasn't bad, perhaps inconsequential. It didn't undo Episode of Bardock like I had thought it did.
The problem is not with Episode of Bardock, but with the TV special.
Outside of drawing a shot of Bardock and having him killed by Freeza, nothing else of the special was used in the manga, so he was free to do whatever he wanted with it. It's his story. Hell, if you want to complain about this, why not criticize Toei from completely changing Trunks' Origin from the manga version?

I rather liked Trunks already being SSJ prior to Gohan's death. The world was horrible enough to push a Saiyan to change, but even as a SSJ, he would have just been a dead body if he went with Gohan (it was far more of a massacre in the manga).

The Barduck special still exists if you want to watch it, it just doesn't gel with the continuity that Toriyama is establishing post-Original manga. Yo! Son Goku and his Friends Return, Battle of Gods, Jaco the Galactic Patrolman and DB Minus...Dunno if DB Online's story ideas are still in and if EoB counts.
RIDER KIIIIIIICK!

User avatar
TheDevilsCorpse
Moderator
Posts: 11378
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 4:34 am
Contact:

Re: "Jaco the Galactic Patrolman" discussion (Tankōbon April

Post by TheDevilsCorpse » Tue Apr 08, 2014 5:34 pm

Mewzard wrote:Dunno if DB Online's story ideas are still in and if EoB counts.
Episode of Bardock would be implied not to count since it is a continuation of the TV Special, but I suppose it doesn't have to be removed. The only real issue that could remove it is the content with Bardock's TV Special team.

DBO has baby arriving in AGE 737, so it's out.
Direct translations of the Korean DB Online timeline and guidebook.
My personal "canon" and BP list. (Coming Soon)

Post Reply