"Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Discussion specifically regarding the "Dragon Ball Super" TV series premiering July 2015 in Japan, including individual threads for each episode.
User avatar
Lord Beerus
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 21430
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 5:20 pm
Location: A temple on a giant tree
Contact:

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Lord Beerus » Wed Dec 28, 2016 11:26 am

LightBing wrote:Assuming that Toyotarõ didn't blatantly messed up, which is the least likely scenario taking into account his concern for minimal strength logic. This can easily be explained as Vegeta keeping his Mutated SSJ2 transformation, which we know is far superior to SSJ3 Goku and therefore fits in the powerscale.
Seems to me like the same situation as SSJG, everyone thought it was gone and Toyotarõ brought it back.

Even if that's the cause, I have to say Toyotarõ messed up for not at the very least implying it. Since this is the first time Vegeta used it since the BoG arc. Have Goku comment on it or something.
Speedster already made a good point about how even if Vegeta was using his SSJ2 mutated form, it still doesn't make sense.

User avatar
LightBing
I Live Here
Posts: 4031
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 7:47 am

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by LightBing » Wed Dec 28, 2016 12:32 pm

Lord Beerus wrote:
LightBing wrote:Assuming that Toyotarõ didn't blatantly messed up, which is the least likely scenario taking into account his concern for minimal strength logic. This can easily be explained as Vegeta keeping his Mutated SSJ2 transformation, which we know is far superior to SSJ3 Goku and therefore fits in the powerscale.
Seems to me like the same situation as SSJG, everyone thought it was gone and Toyotarõ brought it back.

Even if that's the cause, I have to say Toyotarõ messed up for not at the very least implying it. Since this is the first time Vegeta used it since the BoG arc. Have Goku comment on it or something.
Speedster already made a good point about how even if Vegeta was using his SSJ2 mutated form, it still doesn't make sense.
But 10% Blue doesn't equal SSJ.
Even after Goku learns to counter the time-skip, Hit still advices Goku to go Blue which pretty much implies 10% Blue is greater than SSJ.
During the fight SSJ Goku does nothing to Hit, there's even a panel with both the fighters faces where Hit is grinning and Goku clearly struggling since he was getting pretty tired. While it does look like SSJ Goku performed better than Vegeta, both were still equally owed because they were weaker than Hit. Toyotarõ just portrayed the Goku fight in a better light, although it's clear that Goku was being toyed by Hit the whole time.

Finally, Whis explains that Hit's time-skip only works on those weaker or comparable to Hit himself. That's why SSJG which is stronger than 10% Blue breaks the technique. Immediately after hearing this Hit makes a shocked face and says the line "you're on a completely different level".

It goes something like this :
SSJB >>> SSJG >>>>>>>> SSJB(10%) >>>>>>>>>>>>SSJ

Vegeta's Mutated SSJ2 should be close to SSJB (10%) but not quite there yet. Between that gap we can fight SSJ2 Mastered, Black and SSJ3. In this chapter Trunks says that previously Black needed SSJ to defeat him, so Black in base should be that much stronger than SSJ2 Mastered and SSJ3.
Also isn't Black just SSJ in this chapter and not SSJ2? I'm actually not sure.

User avatar
alakazam^
I Live Here
Posts: 2714
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2004 9:55 am
Location: Portugal

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by alakazam^ » Wed Dec 28, 2016 1:47 pm

lord turbo wrote:Dialogue is easy enough to handle, but this outline is vague enough from point a to point b where both parties can make anything up in-between those two points to fill in the blanks when they shouldn't have too. I'm willing to bet he writes his script just as vague and barebone as he did the RoF script which probably explains why there are such considerable discrepancies between the manga and anime, it gets even harder when he tells these guys "Meh, change the story and throw in your own ideas as well, k brah?"
How vague and barebones can it be if it was said he took several months to write it?
lord turbo wrote:Simple math, the events of the 28th Budokai take place 10 years after the defeat of Buu, Pan is 4 years old during this time, meaning she was born 4 y meaning six years after the defeat of Kid Buu. Episode 1 state six months and some time later went by, the Tarble special takes place 2 years after Kid Buu, BoGs saga 4 years after Kid Buu, RoF 5-6 years after Kid Buu.
You can't mix the movies with Super and the OVA. As far as I'm aware, there's nothing saying Battle of Gods takes place four years after Boo besides Toei's timeline that doesn't even make sense with Super. Then, between Pan's birth, Bra's birth, Oob's birth, Dragon Ball wishes and Bloomer's "five year" line in the manga, something has already retconned the end of the manga.

User avatar
DBZGTKOSDH
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 12401
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 7:45 pm
Location: Greece

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by DBZGTKOSDH » Wed Dec 28, 2016 4:04 pm

Lord Beerus wrote:
LightBing wrote:Assuming that Toyotarõ didn't blatantly messed up, which is the least likely scenario taking into account his concern for minimal strength logic. This can easily be explained as Vegeta keeping his Mutated SSJ2 transformation, which we know is far superior to SSJ3 Goku and therefore fits in the powerscale.
Seems to me like the same situation as SSJG, everyone thought it was gone and Toyotarõ brought it back.

Even if that's the cause, I have to say Toyotarõ messed up for not at the very least implying it. Since this is the first time Vegeta used it since the BoG arc. Have Goku comment on it or something.
Speedster already made a good point about how even if Vegeta was using his SSJ2 mutated form, it still doesn't make sense.
But Speedster is wrong, Tokitobashi does work on fighters stronger than Hit.
James Teal (Animerica 1996) wrote:When you think about it, there are a number of similarities between the Chinese-inspired Son Goku and that most American of superhero icons, Superman. Both are aliens sent to Earth shortly after birth to escape the destruction of their homeworlds; both possess super-strength, flight, super-speed, heightened senses and the ability to cast energy blasts. But the crucial difference between them lies not only in how they view the world, but in how the world views them.

Superman is, and always has been, a symbol for truth, justice, and upstanding moral fortitude–a role model and leader as much as a fighter. The more down-to-earth Goku has no illusions about being responsible for maintaining social order, or for setting some kind of moral example for the entire world. Goku is simply a martial artist who’s devoted his life toward perfecting his fighting skills and other abilities. Though never shy about risking his life to save either one person or the entire world, he just doesn’t believe that the balance of the world rests in any way on his shoulders, and he has no need to shape any part of it in his image. Goku is an idealist, and believes that there is some good in everyone, but he is unconcerned with the big picture of the world…unless it has to do with some kind of fight. Politics, society, law and order don’t have much bearing on his life, but he’s a man who knows right from wrong.

User avatar
DBZ Macky
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1171
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2016 1:29 pm
Contact:

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by DBZ Macky » Wed Dec 28, 2016 4:20 pm

Also isn't Black just SSJ in this chapter and not SSJ2? I'm actually not sure.
Probably just a regular Super Saiyan.
He does have lightning though, for most of the fight.

See, this is why I absolutely despise the SS2 design, the only distinguishing factor is the unreliable lightning.
Super Vegetto had lightning too but he was just a regular Super Saiyan (or was he?).

Heck, even Nappa had lightning in that one panel.
Jinzoningen MULE wrote:You're in the DB community, it's always a power level thread to someone.

User avatar
Nejishiki
I Live Here
Posts: 2406
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 11:45 am

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Nejishiki » Wed Dec 28, 2016 5:06 pm

HeroR wrote:It should be pointed out that only the Super anime called Vegeta's rage against Beerus a mutation and it was done by the narrator. In the movie, Vegeta just got a giant and drastic rage boost. I don't know what the Super manga said about it or how it was presented.
The manga continuity has Kuririn question Vegeta's strength and Beerus concluding he's still no Super Saiyan God. That's all there is to be said about Vegeta's outburst for the entirety of the story.
DBZ Macky wrote:Probably just a regular Super Saiyan.
He does have lightning though, for most of the fight.

See, this is why I absolutely despise the SS2 design, the only distinguishing factor is the unreliable lightning.
Super Vegetto had lightning too but he was just a regular Super Saiyan (or was he?).

Heck, even Nappa had lightning in that one panel.
Vegetto is a normal Super Saiyan. You had it right.

HeroR
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8306
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 11:28 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by HeroR » Wed Dec 28, 2016 10:36 pm

Nejishiki wrote:
HeroR wrote:It should be pointed out that only the Super anime called Vegeta's rage against Beerus a mutation and it was done by the narrator. In the movie, Vegeta just got a giant and drastic rage boost. I don't know what the Super manga said about it or how it was presented.
The manga continuity has Kuririn question Vegeta's strength and Beerus concluding he's still no Super Saiyan God. That's all there is to be said about Vegeta's outburst for the entirety of the story.
DBZ Macky wrote:Probably just a regular Super Saiyan.
He does have lightning though, for most of the fight.

See, this is why I absolutely despise the SS2 design, the only distinguishing factor is the unreliable lightning.
Super Vegetto had lightning too but he was just a regular Super Saiyan (or was he?).

Heck, even Nappa had lightning in that one panel.
Vegetto is a normal Super Saiyan. You had it right.
Thanks for the information. Oddly, Rage Vegeta wasn't treated as a big deal in the manga.
Kanassa wrote:
precita wrote:Goku will still be around but take a Buu saga approach backseat.
Goku barely took a backseat in the Buu saga, at best he took a leisurely stroll round back while everyone else cried for him to come back.

User avatar
Hugo Boss
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5075
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2013 3:04 pm
Location: Brazil

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Hugo Boss » Thu Dec 29, 2016 11:41 am

DBZGTKOSDH wrote:
Lord Beerus wrote:
LightBing wrote:Assuming that Toyotarõ didn't blatantly messed up, which is the least likely scenario taking into account his concern for minimal strength logic. This can easily be explained as Vegeta keeping his Mutated SSJ2 transformation, which we know is far superior to SSJ3 Goku and therefore fits in the powerscale.
Seems to me like the same situation as SSJG, everyone thought it was gone and Toyotarõ brought it back.

Even if that's the cause, I have to say Toyotarõ messed up for not at the very least implying it. Since this is the first time Vegeta used it since the BoG arc. Have Goku comment on it or something.
Speedster already made a good point about how even if Vegeta was using his SSJ2 mutated form, it still doesn't make sense.
But Speedster is wrong, Tokitobashi does work on fighters stronger than Hit.
Yeah, it makes sense that it works on people who have battle power greater than his, but it seems tokitobashi has a separated level above his own battle power, which is only surpassed by Super Saiyan God, according to Whis.

For example, ATK/DEF and Sp.ATK/Sp.DEF attributes. SS Goku has ATK points higher than Hit's but tokitobashi is much greater than SS Goku's Sp.DEF. SSB Vegeta at 10% has all attributes much greater than SS Goku but its Sp.DEF still is something tokitobashi can overcome.

User avatar
SSJ Human
Regular
Posts: 627
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 3:35 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by SSJ Human » Fri Dec 30, 2016 8:22 pm

I never would have thought the anime would make the manga suffer, but Super's been proving that as a new feat to break. The whole Future Trunks arc feels incredibly rushed in the manga to the point where I'm really hoping Chapter 20 isn't just everything from the last five episodes of the arc in the anime merged into one chapter. Toyotaro would be better off cutting out Merged Zamasu but seems unlikely given the whole everything has to have the same ending.

User avatar
Doctor.
Banned
Posts: 10558
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:02 am
Location: Portugal

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Doctor. » Fri Dec 30, 2016 8:29 pm

SSJ Human wrote:I never would have thought the anime would make the manga suffer, but Super's been proving that as a new feat to break. The whole Future Trunks arc feels incredibly rushed in the manga to the point where I'm really hoping Chapter 20 isn't just everything from the last five episodes of the arc in the anime merged into one chapter. Toyotaro would be better off cutting out Merged Zamasu but seems unlikely given the whole everything has to have the same ending.
I don't see how the anime is to blame for Toyotaro being unable to properly pace his chapters. When the man wastes half a chapter in a meaningless karting gag and an entire chapter on Vegeta's beatdown on Black when a few pages would have sufficed, then he's clearly the one to blame.

User avatar
ChronoTwigger
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1225
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 9:45 pm
Location: PizzaLand

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by ChronoTwigger » Fri Dec 30, 2016 9:01 pm

I think, after reading the last chapters, that two things happened.
A: Previous arcs in the manga were well received as the show was a little controversial. They were used as reference. Now, Zamasu arc if not 100% perfect, was at least engaging. That's why the manga seems inferior.

B: the "promotional" nature of the manga is rising, more and more. It's a quick resume of the show with some extra insertions to justify the price. It remind me the various "promo" manga of Pokemon published in CoroCoro magazine, where things are added like a speaking Clefairy. Just an engage product in a broader franchise.
I learned english listening to songs. So I don't know anything about. The day you had to learn play piano by just listening .mp3, you'll understand.

User avatar
Jinzoningen MULE
I Live Here
Posts: 4405
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 8:33 pm
Location: Salt Mines

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Jinzoningen MULE » Fri Dec 30, 2016 10:52 pm

I have a feeling that if he did decide to skip the carting game and Vegeta bit, everyone would go back to complaining about how "It seems like he's following a checklist" or "why should I read this when I can just watch the anime?". It's obvious to me that he's doing his best to make this product something worth existing. Whether or not you agree with that, keep in mind; Toyotaro's manga is promotional, it's not prioritized. It's not even the only thing he's working on, and he cranks out 40 pages a month, that's a lot! You absolutely can't expect a manga with less pages per month than Toriyama's to compete with an anime that moves 5 times quicker than the original. Yet Toyotaro does, and like it or not, he does a great job at having things move along while letting the manga keep an identity of its own. In fact, if the Zamasu Arc were being made in movie format (they all should be, but let's not go down that rabbit hole), I'd have the movie based off Toyotaro's interpretation any day of the week, with some tweaks made, of course. That's worth something, and it irks me to see the work get verbally stomped on by people who wouldn't know how to do a better job if you gave them an entire lifetime.
Retired.

User avatar
Ki Breaker
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 6572
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 12:15 am
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Ki Breaker » Fri Dec 30, 2016 11:10 pm

Jinzoningen MULE wrote:I have a feeling that if he did decide to skip the carting game and Vegeta bit, everyone would go back to complaining about how "It seems like he's following a checklist" or "why should I read this when I can just watch the anime?". It's obvious to me that he's doing his best to make this product something worth existing. Whether or not you agree with that, keep in mind; Toyotaro's manga is promotional, it's not prioritized. It's not even the only thing he's working on, and he cranks out 40 pages a month, that's a lot! You absolutely can't expect a manga with less pages per month than Toriyama's to compete with an anime that moves 5 times quicker than the original. Yet Toyotaro does, and like it or not, he does a great job at having things move along while letting the manga keep an identity of its own. In fact, if the Zamasu Arc were being made in movie format (they all should be, but let's not go down that rabbit hole), I'd have the movie based off Toyotaro's interpretation any day of the week, with some tweaks made, of course. That's worth something, and it irks me to see the work get verbally stomped on by people who wouldn't know how to do a better job if you gave them an entire lifetime.
Pretty much, these are facts right here :clap:
The Lord moves in mysterious ways but you don't have to. Please use your blinker

User avatar
simtek34
OMG CRAZY REGEN
Posts: 938
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2016 3:40 pm
Location: Minnesota
Contact:

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by simtek34 » Fri Dec 30, 2016 11:27 pm

Manga Chapter 15 from Viz is here! They use Majin Boo and not Djinn Boo. But they still use Lord of Lords for East Kaiōshin. I'm really digging the alt logo though. It took a while of getting used to.

Yet, they still use Hercule though...

Newbie — 06/27/2016
Not-So-Newbie — ???
Beyond Newbie — ???
Beyond-The-Beyond-Newbie — 12/20/2016
Regular — 02/05/2017
OMG CRAZY REG — 06/14/2017

Xbox Live: PlushGerm24109
Everywhere else: simtek34

User avatar
Jinzoningen MULE
I Live Here
Posts: 4405
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 8:33 pm
Location: Salt Mines

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Jinzoningen MULE » Sat Dec 31, 2016 12:12 am

simtek34 wrote:Manga Chapter 15 from Viz is here! They use Majin Boo and not Djinn Boo. But they still use Lord of Lords for East Kaiōshin. I'm really digging the alt logo though. It took a while of getting used to.

Yet, they still use Hercule though...
They already used Majin Boo in an earlier chapter, the one with the farting gag, so we already knew that. To be honest, I'd rather them use Djinn for consistency's sake. Either way, I like the translation work so far.
Retired.

User avatar
Duo
I Live Here
Posts: 3221
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 11:14 pm
Location: West Michigan
Contact:

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Duo » Sat Dec 31, 2016 2:22 am

Jinzoningen MULE wrote:I have a feeling that if he did decide to skip the carting game and Vegeta bit, everyone would go back to complaining about how "It seems like he's following a checklist" or "why should I read this when I can just watch the anime?". It's obvious to me that he's doing his best to make this product something worth existing. Whether or not you agree with that, keep in mind; Toyotaro's manga is promotional, it's not prioritized. It's not even the only thing he's working on, and he cranks out 40 pages a month, that's a lot! You absolutely can't expect a manga with less pages per month than Toriyama's to compete with an anime that moves 5 times quicker than the original. Yet Toyotaro does, and like it or not, he does a great job at having things move along while letting the manga keep an identity of its own. In fact, if the Zamasu Arc were being made in movie format (they all should be, but let's not go down that rabbit hole), I'd have the movie based off Toyotaro's interpretation any day of the week, with some tweaks made, of course. That's worth something, and it irks me to see the work get verbally stomped on by people who wouldn't know how to do a better job if you gave them an entire lifetime.
This entire post cannot possibly be re-stated enough. Props to you from the bottom of my heart.

User avatar
MathSSJ
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 152
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2015 11:28 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by MathSSJ » Sat Dec 31, 2016 10:13 am

Jinzoningen MULE wrote: and it irks me to see the work get verbally stomped on by people who wouldn't know how to do a better job if you gave them an entire lifetime.
That's not how criticism works...

User avatar
TheMikado
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5009
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 1:28 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by TheMikado » Sat Dec 31, 2016 10:29 am

MathSSJ wrote:
Jinzoningen MULE wrote: and it irks me to see the work get verbally stomped on by people who wouldn't know how to do a better job if you gave them an entire lifetime.
That's not how criticism works...
The problem is that Toyotaro's work isn't technically bad at all by any standards. People are confusing preference with quality. The equivalent of calling Picasso a horrible artist because you don't like his style of art. That's why it's so infuriating because it simply comes off as immensely ignorant. There are certainly legitimate critiques, but calling the work as a whole trash is beyond a stretch.

User avatar
LightBing
I Live Here
Posts: 4031
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 7:47 am

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by LightBing » Sat Dec 31, 2016 11:30 am

Some people here can't hide their bias against the manga. The manga is far from perfect and we can spend some time talking about it's flaws and weaknesses, but the way some people word their critiques and sometimes even create artificial problems, makes it clear they don't want to have a discussion and are into bashing mode.

One criticism I don't quite understand is Vegeta beating up Black in this chapter.
Vegeta is the second most important character in Super and is having it's first fight of the arc, against the main villain. A fight that is used to further show Black's development power wise(he needed SSJ to beat Trunks before) and how both characters view the situation. Together with more of Black's personality and his plans.
All taking us to a cliffhanger, which because we already know about it lacks any impact. If we didn't, I'm certain it wouldn't be something people didn't even cared to comment about.

So with all of the above, why is it a problem that almost a full chapter is dedicated to it? The fight isn't about "pleasing Vegeta fanboys" like some people like to reduce it to. It's used as a mechanism to further the story.

User avatar
TheMikado
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5009
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 1:28 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by TheMikado » Sat Dec 31, 2016 11:42 am

Honestly I think the big gripe is the powerscaling which I would say is part of the problem in the latest chapter. Right now we have no idea how or why Vegeta was able to wreck Black so easily. If it's something that was to be explained in the next chapter then the foreshadowing of it was poorly executed. Anyway I think this is a chapter that will probably need to be taken in context with the surrounding chapters to make sense.

Post Reply