You failed to grasp what I was trying to say, thats all

. And I understood your logic.
I will explain better:
It will always be wrong to benefit from someone`s hard work without giving them compensation for it, especially when that work is something copyrighted and therefore protected under law.
But that doesn`t mean that all the situations have the same monetary consequences to the author and to the companies that distribute his or her work.
There are people from who the author and the companies won`t receive any compensation for the product, no matter what happens. But some of those people still get to benefit from the product because they download it.
It is still wrong because they benefit from something they didn`t pay, but if we look at all the scenarios we realize that they would never pay for it, they would rather not have it or they can not afford it.
So we can not say that they are losing money in each download, which is a general misconception. Doesn`t make it right though.