Dragon Ball Z Season Set Entire Collection release.

Kingdom Heartless · Post by **Kingdom Heartless** » Fri Oct 16, 2009 1:15 pm

http://www.ezydvd.com.au/item.zml/809765

No major information yet, but clearly just a complete Season Set collection.

B · Post by B » Fri Oct 16, 2009 1:17 pm

You'd think FUNimation would make a stink about it. I guess they're just not doing it.

JulieYBM · Post by **JulieYBM** » Fri Oct 16, 2009 1:26 pm

I think it might just be an store shipping of all nine sets, rather than an actual FUNimation product.

Post by **VegettoEX** » Fri Oct 16, 2009 1:28 pm

JulieYBM wrote:I think it might just be an store shipping of all nine sets, rather than an actual FUNimation product.

I was thinking either that, or a Madman-only packaging.

Kingdom Heartless · Post by **Kingdom Heartless** » Fri Oct 16, 2009 1:29 pm

Nah, I'd say it will be a Madman set-up with it's own box, like they did with the Dragon Ball collections and Dragon Ball Z movies.

Nothing outstanding, but thought I'd post it anyway.

Would be pretty cool to see what sort of box-art they would use. Probably just a compilation of the cover images.

Kingdom Heartless · Post by **Kingdom Heartless** » Sat Oct 17, 2009 10:51 am

Just for an average for people who don't want to do the math, that's around $43AUS a set, rather than $60.

Chances are it will also be a fair bit cheaper at JB Hi-Fi.

EDIT: Oh, here we go!

Love the cover... although it makes absolutely no sense!

http://www.jbhifionline.com.au/dvd/dvd- ... set/464221

JB Hi-Fi are usually pretty specific, and will say if it's in a box, so since it just says "54 DVD Set," I assume it will be more like a big pile of disc holders in a massive case.

linkdude20002001 · Post by **linkdude20002001** » Sat Oct 17, 2009 11:48 am

Wow! I like that box art!

It makes no sense to use it with DBZ, but it's awesome nonetheless.

SuperSaiyan3Goku · Post by **SuperSaiyan3Goku** » Sat Oct 17, 2009 2:19 pm

That cover is pretty awesome, though. It has kid Goku 2 times, Dragonball adult Goku, DBZ Goku, and random characters spread throughout. What else could a DB fan want?

SHINOBI-03 · Post by **SHINOBI-03** » Sat Oct 17, 2009 2:24 pm

AU$389.97

No thanks!

Castor Troy · Post by **Castor Troy** » Sat Oct 17, 2009 2:48 pm

They should have used that art for a Dragonball complete set.

DaemonCorps · Post by **DaemonCorps** » Sat Oct 17, 2009 3:16 pm

Castor Troy wrote:They should have used that art for a Dragonball complete set.

Was thinking the same thing. Assuming they're just doing one massive casing, I would've thought that since the series is significantly longer than DB, that they'd at least split it into two cases and stuff both of 'em in a box or a la something like the James Bond set... except with the episodes in order, that is

.

ChibiKenji · Post by **ChibiKenji** » Sat Oct 17, 2009 8:12 pm

It's also listed at DVD Crave for $332.71, coming to around $36.88 "per season" compared to the $50-$60 they retail at by themselves, making for a saving of some $160-odd.

I'm actually tempted to buy this. I know the upcoming Dragon Boxes are going to be a significantly better product, but to be able to get the entire series (well, except for the bits they cut from the top and bottom

) in one hit without having to import from the US or pay whatever exorbitant price they would have slapped on them if Madman end up releasing them here is pretty tempting.

Kingdom Heartless · Post by **Kingdom Heartless** » Sat Oct 17, 2009 11:35 pm

I hope Madman does up posters for the release of the cover art and sells them at Supanova like they sometimes do.

Captain Awesome · Post by **Captain Awesome** » Sun Oct 18, 2009 6:56 am

Thanks Madman.

No don't worry, we didn't want the Dragon box, you just keep doing what you are doing

.

piccolo-san785 · Post by **piccolo-san785** » Mon Oct 19, 2009 10:06 pm

The box art is kind of cool but whack at the same time.

B · Post by B » Mon Oct 19, 2009 10:32 pm

The art itself is nice, but it looks like a bootleg video game cover with everything else on it.

And the gigantic rating on the FRONT of the cover just seems tacky.

piccolo-san785 · Post by **piccolo-san785** » Mon Oct 19, 2009 10:49 pm

B wrote:The art itself is nice, but it looks like a bootleg video game cover with everything else on it.

And the gigantic rating on the FRONT of the cover just seems tacky.

ha ha very funny

Kingdom Heartless · Post by **Kingdom Heartless** » Mon Oct 19, 2009 11:16 pm

B wrote:The art itself is nice, but it looks like a bootleg video game cover with everything else on it.

And the gigantic rating on the FRONT of the cover just seems tacky.

Well I don't mind the ratings, since you don't have to cross examine them to see the rating. It doesn't make sense to me that America is so uptight about ratings, yet make them so inconspicuous on the case.

Innagadadavida · Post by **Innagadadavida** » Mon Oct 19, 2009 11:22 pm

Kingdom Heartless wrote:Well I don't mind the ratings, since you don't have to cross examine them to see the rating. It doesn't make sense to me that America is so uptight about ratings, yet make them so inconspicuous on the case.

How is America uptight about ratings? There are ratings, and if a movie is rated R and you're under 17 you can't buy the ticket without a parent. But other than that, the ratings only serve as guidelines basically. I don't think of America being uptight about ratings at all. Then again, I've only lived in America and I don't have a frame of reference so who knows.

Kingdom Heartless · Post by **Kingdom Heartless** » Mon Oct 19, 2009 11:39 pm

Innagadadavida wrote:
Kingdom Heartless wrote:Well I don't mind the ratings, since you don't have to cross examine them to see the rating. It doesn't make sense to me that America is so uptight about ratings, yet make them so inconspicuous on the case.
How is America uptight about ratings? There are ratings, and if a movie is rated R and you're under 17 you can't buy the ticket without a parent. But other than that, the ratings only serve as guidelines basically. I don't think of America being uptight about ratings at all. Then again, I've only lived in America and I don't have a frame of reference so who knows.

Sorry, I didn't mean any offence by it. But in terms of sexual content, America can be pretty uptight. Violence, not so much.

Was watching Taken, and thought, you can electrocute a man by sticking nails in his leg in a PG-13 movie, but you can't drop the F bomb in a sexual nature?

I just meant that they were kind of strict when rating a movie... how well they enforce the ratings, I don't know. But I feel if you're going to give a movie and R rating, it should be easy to tell if the movie is R.