


https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKYvuG ... q45b9QZbmA
Moderators: Kanzenshuu Staff, General Help
Robo4900 wrote:Mouse is BRILLIANT SCIENTIST dumb.
CAT LOVES FOOD dumb.
Jack is just kinda dumb.Spoiler:
Kamiccolo9 wrote:I mean, you're pretty open about looking at cartoon porn. Why would you do that? It's fiction. The proportions of these women are not possible to reach in reality.JacobYBM wrote:No, why would it? It's fiction. The strength of the characters is not possible to reach in reality.Original Thread Topic wrote:Did Dragon Ball ever motivate you to exercise?
They are direct recordings from Fuji TV during first or second emission, arent they? :O Where did you get that information?clutchins wrote:Just so everyone knows, these are fansubs, not direct recordings from Japan. Still cool, though. Thanks for sharing.
Kamiccolo9 wrote:I mean, you're pretty open about looking at cartoon porn. Why would you do that? It's fiction. The proportions of these women are not possible to reach in reality.JacobYBM wrote:No, why would it? It's fiction. The strength of the characters is not possible to reach in reality.Original Thread Topic wrote:Did Dragon Ball ever motivate you to exercise?
What do you mean exactly by "original broadcast"? I have been always thinking that AnimeLabs have received their Japanese Tapes from persons who actually recorded Episodes when there was transmission on Fuji TV in 90s.clutchins wrote:Let me clarify what I meant: These are fansubs, not what we around here would call "original broadcast" from Fuji TV, which is what I had gotten my hopes up for. Yes, the fansub tapes themselves are sourced from Fuji TV, but only through several generations of recording.
I'm really referring to the quality of the tapes, not the origin. The difference between "original broadcast" tapes and "fansub" tapes is quality. A lot of people on this forum are familiar with the original broadcast tapes that kei17 has stockpiled over the last decade or however long it's been. These tapes, which I believe are mostly betamax, are recordings of the series on Fuji TV as it aired back in the day. Few, if not all of them are supposedly not duplicated over, meaning that they aren't copies of copies of copies like fansub tapes in America are infamous for.Vegitasama992 wrote:What do you mean exactly by "original broadcast"? I have been always thinking that AnimeLabs have received their Japanese Tapes from persons who actually recorded Episodes when there was transmission on Fuji TV in 90s.clutchins wrote:Let me clarify what I meant: These are fansubs, not what we around here would call "original broadcast" from Fuji TV, which is what I had gotten my hopes up for. Yes, the fansub tapes themselves are sourced from Fuji TV, but only through several generations of recording.
Kamiccolo9 wrote:I mean, you're pretty open about looking at cartoon porn. Why would you do that? It's fiction. The proportions of these women are not possible to reach in reality.JacobYBM wrote:No, why would it? It's fiction. The strength of the characters is not possible to reach in reality.Original Thread Topic wrote:Did Dragon Ball ever motivate you to exercise?
Now I understood, so only Kei17 got first release directly from Fuji Studio not TV?clutchins wrote:I'm really referring to the quality of the tapes, not the origin. The difference between "original broadcast" tapes and "fansub" tapes is quality. A lot of people on this forum are familiar with the original broadcast tapes that kei17 has stockpiled over the last decade or however long it's been. These tapes, which I believe are mostly betamax, are recordings of the series on Fuji TV as it aired back in the day. Few, if not all of them are supposedly not duplicated over, meaning that they aren't copies of copies of copies like fansub tapes in America are infamous for.Vegitasama992 wrote:What do you mean exactly by "original broadcast"? I have been always thinking that AnimeLabs have received their Japanese Tapes from persons who actually recorded Episodes when there was transmission on Fuji TV in 90s.clutchins wrote:Let me clarify what I meant: These are fansubs, not what we around here would call "original broadcast" from Fuji TV, which is what I had gotten my hopes up for. Yes, the fansub tapes themselves are sourced from Fuji TV, but only through several generations of recording.
Sorry for the confusion. I do appreciate what you uploaded by the way.
No. But his tapes have been well kept and aren't copies of copies like 99% of VHS fansubs are. With stuff on tape, you lost quality copying unlike today there is no quality loss copying a digital file.Vegitasama992 wrote:Now I understood, so only Kei17 got first release directly from Fuji Studio not TV?clutchins wrote:I'm really referring to the quality of the tapes, not the origin. The difference between "original broadcast" tapes and "fansub" tapes is quality. A lot of people on this forum are familiar with the original broadcast tapes that kei17 has stockpiled over the last decade or however long it's been. These tapes, which I believe are mostly betamax, are recordings of the series on Fuji TV as it aired back in the day. Few, if not all of them are supposedly not duplicated over, meaning that they aren't copies of copies of copies like fansub tapes in America are infamous for.Vegitasama992 wrote: What do you mean exactly by "original broadcast"? I have been always thinking that AnimeLabs have received their Japanese Tapes from persons who actually recorded Episodes when there was transmission on Fuji TV in 90s.
Sorry for the confusion. I do appreciate what you uploaded by the way.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCyda69 ... bAPjdTQQqA
Technically, you can degrade a digital file, but not really in the same way as you would a tape.sangofe wrote:With stuff on tape, you lost quality copying unlike today there is no quality loss copying a digital file.
Kamiccolo9 wrote:I mean, you're pretty open about looking at cartoon porn. Why would you do that? It's fiction. The proportions of these women are not possible to reach in reality.JacobYBM wrote:No, why would it? It's fiction. The strength of the characters is not possible to reach in reality.Original Thread Topic wrote:Did Dragon Ball ever motivate you to exercise?
Because they exist at all? Because they are likely the best color reference in the entire world?LordCrumb wrote:People really need to stop talking about Kei17 and his recordings. No one is going to see them other than him, so why keep bringing it up?
Kamiccolo9 wrote:I mean, you're pretty open about looking at cartoon porn. Why would you do that? It's fiction. The proportions of these women are not possible to reach in reality.JacobYBM wrote:No, why would it? It's fiction. The strength of the characters is not possible to reach in reality.Original Thread Topic wrote:Did Dragon Ball ever motivate you to exercise?
Everything is clear to me now. I thought that Kei17 got Dragon Ball Betamax Tapes directly from Fuji Studio but however his recordings are really well-kept and they look like it was 2000 years. One of his video for an example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PC2zzUFCTPc I have always known that my Fansubs are multiply copies so that's why quality is worse. But when I saw Kei17 Recordings my first thought was he remastered it from VHS Player because I would never say this recording comes from 1986-1987 years.VegettoEX wrote:A couple items that will hopefully clarify things:
Formats like VHS are what we might consider "lossy". They degrade in quality each time they're copied on that format.
To get subtitles onto a VHS tape (like in a fansub), you have to: (1) record it off the television > (2) make a copy of that copy laying subtitles over top. A fansub is ALREADY a second-generation copy by the time it's made. Each copy of that copy is going to have a further degradation in audio and video quality. We're not talking about "reruns" (an episode airing again at a later date on the same television channel); we're talking about someone hooking two VCRs up together to make copies.
So a VHS fansub can have the CONTENT of the "original broadcast" (like, literally the episode opening theme through the ending theme, and maybe even the commercials in between) but its quality is already two levels deep by the time it's fansubbed. This is further compromised by VHS-to-VHS copies, which can only get exponentially worse each time.
Formats like Beta and SVHS are able to achieve and maintain a higher quality of audio and video fidelity than standard VHS. Around these parts, when people refer to "original broadcast quality," they're referring to a recording on a format better than VHS. In this specific case, kei17 happens to have Beta recordings of the original broadcast. These are not fansubs; these are the initial, raw, first-time recordings from what aired on television. They have not been further copied beyond that (I mean, maybe he's made digital copies for preservation, but that's not relevant here).
So again, these first-time, Beta recordings have a significantly higher fidelity of audio and video than even your direct-from-the-fansubbers copy of (insert episode here). They are not even in the running together.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betamax#H ... io_upgrade Here you can find your answerBansho64 wrote:Random question, but are Betamax Tapes better or worse than VHS tapes? I just lost all of my VHS Toonami Kai recordings and my VCR so I'm trying to decide what I'm gonna use next to record Kai.