Who killed more people during the destruction of the future timeline: Zamasu or Zen'o?

Discussion specifically regarding the "Dragon Ball Super" TV series premiering July 2015 in Japan, including individual threads for each episode.

Moderators: Kanzenshuu Staff, General Help

Animelover5487
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 106
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2016 2:19 pm

Who killed more people during the destruction of the future timeline: Zamasu or Zen'o?

Post by Animelover5487 » Tue Nov 22, 2016 12:44 pm

Zamasu became one with the multiverse and started overwriting all it's laws, Goku and the others then attacked him in which he responded by wildly firing blasts at everything we know during this assault everyone on Earth died but it wasn't confirmed if anyone else on any other planet or universe died from this. However, if they didn't die from this they definitely died when Future Zen'o destroyed everything in the multiverse, including the Afterlife so who would you say killed more Zamasu or Zen'o?

User avatar
Hugo Boss
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5039
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2013 3:04 pm
Location: Brazil

Re: Who killed more people during the destruction of the future timeline: Zamasu or Zen'o?

Post by Hugo Boss » Tue Nov 22, 2016 4:00 pm

By the point Black appeared on Earth, he had killed practically every human in other worlds. I think there wasn't anyone left to kill besides Zamasu himself when the Omni King destroyed the omniverse.

User avatar
GodVegetto91
Banned
Posts: 2906
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2015 12:49 pm

Re: Who killed more people during the destruction of the future timeline: Zamasu or Zen'o?

Post by GodVegetto91 » Tue Nov 22, 2016 11:11 pm

Omni-King. Black only killed live on several planets in U7. And all the gods which is a number less than 40.
Zeno on the other hand just took out an entire multiverse! Which obviously includes all of their "otherworlds" And we all know how full heaven and hell are there. In otherworld resides the entire history of beings that came before and the billions of years the multiverse exists. Countless people have died in a timespan of billions of years. (So heaven and hell should be pretty full by now) and Omni-King wiped it all out. The entire timeline.

User avatar
Lionel
I Live Here
Posts: 2393
Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2015 2:54 am

Re: Who killed more people during the destruction of the future timeline: Zamasu or Zen'o?

Post by Lionel » Thu Nov 24, 2016 11:39 pm

Zamasu believed the deaths of Goku, Vegeta, and Trunks were the culmination of the Zero Mortal Plan. Three individual, albeit powerful mortals alone shouldn't personify such a momentous occasion. He may have been speaking in terms of their deaths being a situational triumph over the greatest opposition he's seemingly come across; by actualising the deaths of these vile ningen who flaunt the essence of gods, the total defences created by said ningen will crumble as not even its greatest warriors could hold the line against the indomitable will of an all-powerful god. The victory is symbolical rather than being literal and substantive. Systematically killing untold numbers of populations as you're vying to safeguard each individual habitated planet's ecosystem constitutes for a long and diligent procedure. Because of this time-consuming need for discretion, progress would have been slowed to a moderate pace. An exact number of species' extinctions isn't known -- our only information concerning how many was a reference from Trunks when Black first appeared, "he has already destroyed a number of planets and its people."

Destroying whole planets for no explainable reason is a kettle of fish in its own right. I thought the objective of Zamasu, and by extension, Black, was to annihilate the corrupt pollutive ningen so natural life could return to its original unaltered state; a wholesale destruction of planets in tandem with their populations is counterfactual to their proclamations. There wouldn't be a need for posturing or intimidation because in Black's mind, Trunks is already a man set to die. My only explanation to rationalise this disparity in logic is that Black, at points throughout the eradication process, needed to uproot some entrenched ningen who may have been concealed or residing in the wilderness of these planets. Rather than limit the damage to surrounding environments by employing strictly low-grade munitions, he settles with haphazardly destroying everything for greater effectiveness. It's unlikely for him to mend the broken pieces by using his Kaio-based creation abilities so those worlds are irrevocably gone. I suppose convenience is more important than integrity -- at least until he turned his sights on Earth and began sluggishly tormenting the populace in anticipation of opponents who could inadvertently strengthen his body.

Back to the original question -- context is important for interpreting what it is Black meant. How Black's statement was phrased, it seemed like he was referring to a proximate amount, not a general indeterminate quantity. "Several" can refer to more than two, but less than a huge sum. Black spent much of his time searching for a universe without an acting God of Destruction. Following this discovery in Universe 7, he proceeds to kill Gowasu and align with Future Zamasu in that timeline. We can assume they gathered the Super Dragon Balls for Zamasu's wish of immortality afterwards. Some time elapses and Black arrives on Earth -- things eventually escalate to where Zamasu's essence has personified the atmosphere itself. He destroys what fragments of population still remained. Pan out to Zamasu physically enclosing Earth with his gaseous form and we can see what appears to be rotational emissions of his essence shaped like disembodied faces scattering out into Space. They didn't appear to be moving at too quick of a pace, but then this is from an outsider's viewpoint. I question if the emissions could have enveloped all too much of the universe in the short window of time he had.

Look at it like this -- Jupiter has an elliptical orbit, meaning its relative distance from Earth is ever fluctuating. Using November 4th of this year as a measuring point, as the month and day happen to coincide with Bulma and Popo traveling to Jupiter on the Child of Kataz's old ship, the relative distance between Jupiter and Earth would have been 940.67 million kilometres. Since this is the anime we're talking about, I took into account the amount of time needed for CoK's ship to reach Jupiter, which looked to be 5 seconds. A normal human constructed engine would have required an estimated 4339 years and 3 months to reach Namek, according to Bulma. The Namekian ship made it in 34 days, which is the percentage equivalent of 0.002% Bulma's calculations. Now those faces didn't appear to be all that rapid in their pace. It seems far-fetched to assume they could have reached all of the way to Namek in the short time they had before destruction, let alone other universes.

My final opinion is Zamasu's influence was concentrated mostly in the Milky Way before Zeno obliterated him. Zeno's body count would be much, much greater as it involved everything being destroyed, not just an unspecified number of planets.

Gig
Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
Posts: 394
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2016 3:24 am

Re: Who killed more people during the destruction of the future timeline: Zamasu or Zen'o?

Post by Gig » Fri Nov 25, 2016 3:58 am

I'm not really sure about what many may that Zeno destroyed also the "other world/after life/gods world", other than the "mortals' world". It has not been stated. Hey, we are not even sure he destroyed all the other 11 universes... and what about his own palace? Who knows!

Will
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 295
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2016 11:25 am

Re: Who killed more people during the destruction of the future timeline: Zamasu or Zen'o?

Post by Will » Fri Nov 25, 2016 5:41 am

GodVegetto91 wrote:Omni-King. Black only killed live on several planets in U7. And all the gods which is a number less than 40.
Zeno on the other hand just took out an entire multiverse! Which obviously includes all of their "otherworlds" And we all know how full heaven and hell are there. In otherworld resides the entire history of beings that came before and the billions of years the multiverse exists. Countless people have died in a timespan of billions of years. (So heaven and hell should be pretty full by now) and Omni-King wiped it all out. The entire timeline.
Black said he destroyed the humans of several planet before Earth, he never said these planet were from the U7 only.
Image

User avatar
Fionordequester
I Live Here
Posts: 2879
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 6:33 pm

Re: Who killed more people during the destruction of the future timeline: Zamasu or Zen'o?

Post by Fionordequester » Fri Nov 25, 2016 5:43 am

I'm gonna translate Lionel's speech for you all, alright?
Lionel wrote:Zamasu believed the deaths of Goku, Vegeta, and Trunks were the culmination of the Zero Mortal Plan. Three individual, albeit powerful mortals alone shouldn't personify such a momentous occasion. He may have been speaking in terms of their deaths being a situational triumph over the greatest opposition he's seemingly come across; by actualising the deaths of these vile ningen who flaunt the essence of gods, the total defences created by said ningen will crumble as not even its greatest warriors could hold the line against the indomitable will of an all-powerful god. The victory is symbolical rather than being literal and substantive. Systematically killing untold numbers of populations as you're vying to safeguard each individual habitated planet's ecosystem constitutes for a long and diligent procedure. Because of this time-consuming need for discretion, progress would have been slowed to a moderate pace. An exact number of species' extinctions isn't known -- our only information concerning how many was a reference from Trunks when Black first appeared, "he has already destroyed a number of planets and its people."
Translation wrote:Zamasu believed Goku, Vegeta, and Trunks was the most significant thing to come of the Zero Mortal Plan; this is illogical. Maybe Zamasu thought this way because those three were his greatest opponents? Their death, then, would symbolize the death of all those evil mortals who abuse the godlike qualities they've been given. I mean, who else would be able to stop an all-powerful god, except those three?

Plus, it's really hard to kill all mortals without accidentally destroying their worlds, so progress is already slow enough as it is. We don't know how hard he tried to spare other species' besides humans, because all Trunks told us was that Black "already destroyed a number of planets and their people".
Lionel wrote:Destroying whole planets for no explainable reason is a kettle of fish in its own right. I thought the objective of Zamasu, and by extension, Black, was to annihilate the corrupt pollutive ningen so natural life could return to its original unaltered state; a wholesale destruction of planets in tandem with their populations is counterfactual to their proclamations. There wouldn't be a need for posturing or intimidation because in Black's mind, Trunks is already a man set to die. My only explanation to rationalise this disparity in logic is that Black, at points throughout the eradication process, needed to uproot some entrenched ningen who may have been concealed or residing in the wilderness of these planets. Rather than limit the damage to surrounding environments by employing strictly low-grade munitions, he settles with haphazardly destroying everything for greater effectiveness. It's unlikely for him to mend the broken pieces by using his Kaio-based creation abilities so those worlds are irrevocably gone. I suppose convenience is more important than integrity -- at least until he turned his sights on Earth and began sluggishly tormenting the populace in anticipation of opponents who could inadvertently strengthen his body.

Translation wrote:Destroying whole planets for no explainable reason is dumb. I thought Zamasu and Black were just trying to kill the mortals, so that the environments could be restored to their former glory; can't really do that if you're bombing the hell out of them! Black's "sadistic bully" sthick is pointless if Trunks is dying anyway.

The only way I can think of Zamasu justifying this is if some mortals were just too deeply entrenched for him to avoid causing some collateral damage. So instead of painstakingly pulling out each weed one-by-one, he settled for just torching the whole fricken garden; because that was faster. It's unlikely he'd be able to undo the damage either; so those worlds are just permanently gone. Seems he chose "convenience" over "integrity"; except when it came to Earth. Then he was MORE than happy to take his time! That way he could get opponents who'd accidentally make him stronger!
Lionel wrote:Back to the original question -- context is important for interpreting what it is Black meant. How Black's statement was phrased, it seemed like he was referring to a proximate amount, not a general indeterminate quantity. "Several" can refer to more than two, but less than a huge sum. Black spent much of his time searching for a universe without an acting God of Destruction. Following this discovery in Universe 7, he proceeds to kill Gowasu and align with Future Zamasu in that timeline. We can assume they gathered the Super Dragon Balls for Zamasu's wish of immortality afterwards. Some time elapses and Black arrives on Earth -- things eventually escalate to where Zamasu's essence has personified the atmosphere itself. He destroys what fragments of population still remained. Pan out to Zamasu physically enclosing Earth with his gaseous form and we can see what appears to be rotational emissions of his essence shaped like disembodied faces scattering out into Space. They didn't appear to be moving at too quick of a pace, but then this is from an outsider's viewpoint. I question if the emissions could have enveloped all too much of the universe in the short window of time he had.
Translation wrote:Back to the original question -- context is important for understanding what Black meant. I'd guess he was speaking more metaphorically than literally when he said he "destroyed" worlds. "Several" can refer to any amount that's more than two, but not by enough to be considered "a lot". Black spent much of his time looking for a universe without an active God of Destruction [I'm not sure how this last sentence connects with either the previous one or the next one; maybe you could clarify that for us Lionel?]

So he finds Universe 7, kills Gowasu, and recruits Future Zamasu in that timeline. They gather the Super Dragon Balls for Zamasu's wish, time passes, Black comes to Earth, and then things escalate to where Zamasu's become one with the atmosphere itself and destroys all remaining survivors. Zamasu covers the Earth with his gaseous form, as well as a ton of disembodied faces spiraling out into Space.

They don't SEEM to be moving that fast, though. That COULD have been animated that way just for the audience's benefit...but let's just assume that Zamasu really WAS moving as slowly as he seemed. If that's the case, I don't see how he'd corrupt so much of the universe in such a short amount of time.
Lionel wrote:Look at it like this -- Jupiter has an elliptical orbit, meaning its relative distance from Earth is ever fluctuating. Using November 4th of this year as a measuring point, as the month and day happen to coincide with Bulma and Popo traveling to Jupiter on the Child of Kataz's old ship, the relative distance between Jupiter and Earth would have been 940.67 million kilometres. Since this is the anime we're talking about, I took into account the amount of time needed for CoK's ship to reach Jupiter, which looked to be 5 seconds. A normal human constructed engine would have required an estimated 4339 years and 3 months to reach Namek, according to Bulma. The Namekian ship made it in 34 days, which is the percentage equivalent of 0.002% Bulma's calculations. Now those faces didn't appear to be all that rapid in their pace. It seems far-fetched to assume they could have reached all of the way to Namek in the short time they had before destruction, let alone other universes.
Translation wrote:This is fine; it's hard to describe calculations like this without going all techno-babbly

Lionel wrote:My final opinion is Zamasu's influence was concentrated mostly in the Milky Way before Zeno obliterated him. Zeno's body count would be much, much greater as it involved everything being destroyed, not just an unspecified number of planets.
Translation wrote:In conclusion, I'd say Zamasu only REALLY affected the Milky Way by the time Zeno oblitereated him; which means Zeno's body count is far higher.
Is that better, guys?
Kataphrut wrote:It's a bit of a Boy Who Cried Wolf situation to me...Basically, the boy shouldn't have cried wolf when the wolves just wanted to Go See Yamcha. If not, they might have gotten some help when the wolves came back to Make the Donuts.
Chuquita wrote:I liken Gokû Black to "guy can't stand his job, so instead of quitting and finding a job he likes, he instead sets fire not only to his workplace so he doesn't have to work there, but tries setting fire to every store in the franchise of that company".

User avatar
GodVegetto91
Banned
Posts: 2906
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2015 12:49 pm

Re: Who killed more people during the destruction of the future timeline: Zamasu or Zen'o?

Post by GodVegetto91 » Fri Nov 25, 2016 9:52 am

Will wrote:
GodVegetto91 wrote:Omni-King. Black only killed live on several planets in U7. And all the gods which is a number less than 40.
Zeno on the other hand just took out an entire multiverse! Which obviously includes all of their "otherworlds" And we all know how full heaven and hell are there. In otherworld resides the entire history of beings that came before and the billions of years the multiverse exists. Countless people have died in a timespan of billions of years. (So heaven and hell should be pretty full by now) and Omni-King wiped it all out. The entire timeline.
Black said he destroyed the humans of several planet before Earth, he never said these planet were from the U7 only.
Image
Still doesn't make a bit of difference.

User avatar
ShadowBardock89
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1365
Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2008 6:40 pm

Re: Who killed more people during the destruction of the future timeline: Zamasu or Zen'o?

Post by ShadowBardock89 » Fri Nov 25, 2016 10:11 am

Gig wrote:I'm not really sure about what many may that Zeno destroyed also the "other world/after life/gods world", other than the "mortals' world". It has not been stated. Hey, we are not even sure he destroyed all the other 11 universes... and what about his own palace? Who knows!
Exactly. The Omni-King wiped out EVERYTHING!!! Not just Universe 7 of Trunks' timeline, but the other universes, too! That includes their respective afterlife as well.
http://www.kanzenshuu.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=40715&start=20#p1439892
http://dba.bn-ent.net/character/barduck.html
https://i.imgur.com/86hOk5i.gif

User avatar
gofishus
Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
Posts: 344
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2016 2:59 pm
Contact:

Re: Who killed more people during the destruction of the future timeline: Zamasu or Zen'o?

Post by gofishus » Fri Nov 25, 2016 6:49 pm

GodVegetto91 wrote:Omni-King. Black only killed live on several planets in U7. And all the gods which is a number less than 40.
Zeno on the other hand just took out an entire multiverse! Which obviously includes all of their "otherworlds" And we all know how full heaven and hell are there. In otherworld resides the entire history of beings that came before and the billions of years the multiverse exists. Countless people have died in a timespan of billions of years. (So heaven and hell should be pretty full by now) and Omni-King wiped it all out. The entire timeline.
I'm still not convinced that Zeno wiped out the timeline, the existence of the time ring for that timeline and the fact that Trunks can go back to it refute this assumption

Post Reply