I was re-reading through the Super manga, and I noticed an aspect of the Goku/Hit fight that always bothered me. The way Hit's Time-Skip technique is described is inconsistent with the way it is later visually portrayed. Allow me to explain. Goku firstly describes the technique as so (as per the Viz translation): "You can skip time 0.1 seconds into the future, right? So, right from when you vanished, I tried to predict where you'd move to in that time." Hit rebukes by saying he can just move in ways Goku can't predict, to which Goku replies: "Your hands. Your hands stay in your pockets and you hide your feet under your coat all so you can mask your movements. Doesn't that mean you can't change whatever movement you've already started?"
From this description, one can infer that Hit's technique functions in such a way where he essentially just teleports 0.1 seconds into the future. He can't change his movements because he's not in control of his actions when time is skipped, they're already predetermined; he's essentially just skipping ahead on a Youtube video. This is why Goku can keep up with him simply by a) adjusting his timing to react attacks 0.1 seconds faster, and b) predicting when Hit is going to activate the technique and where he is going to attack from through his stance and twitching motions.
However, see how the technique is visually portrayed later in the same chapter:
This, to me, is a departure from the way the technique was described. Here, it seems like Hit is simply just stopping time. He seems to have complete control over his actions and is conscious of the frozen time around him, whereas from the description that Hit and Goku provided earlier on in the chapter, one would assume he wouldn't even be conscious of his movements after activating his technique (after all, if he were, why wouldn't he be able to change the movement he had already started? If it was just "time freeze," why wouldn't he attack while time was frozen, instead of waiting until the time interval finished and risk getting hit?).
Perhaps I'm just misunderstanding, but this looks like an incongruity between visuals and narrative. Perhaps some of the members who speak japanese can better clarify how the technique was described originally?