Interesting claims, right? I respond to the kid with this:NinjaPoeBear2@aol.com wrote: The Japanese translation has jinzouningen as Artificial Humans. The basis on this states that while 17 and 18 were once human, Dr. Gero ended up turning them into 99% machine. The only things that remain, that are human, are 17's and 18's exterior, and anything he allowed them to keep.
Also, numbers 8, 13, 14, 15, as well as 16 and 19 were not human to begin with. So they would be in terms "Androids" and "Artificial Humans". And since they were not human to begin with, they cannot be considered "Cyborgs".
And finally, with numbers 17, 18, and 20, in order for them to be a "bionic human", they still have to have most of their humanity, as well as still contain their biological parts. This is no longer true with any other them. Their bones and everything else were replaced with robotics, and very little internal organics were kept. [Example would be the fact that Dr.Gero's brain is his only internal organism.]
So in conclusion, 17 and 18 are more machine than human now. And since they were never given "bionic enhancements", and their memories are stored in a computer-based brain, they are not cyborgs. And since they only have their external and one internal organism(s), that makes them robots. As in Artificial Humans... Or in this case, Androids.
And also... Take note on the Toei version of Dragon Ball Z, since you seemingly hate the "dubbed" version for the wrong reason. They also noted that Dr. Gero was able to control 17 and 18 with a remote control. This was noted that he was able to turn them on or off when he needed to. And if they were "cyborgs", this would not be possible.
My years on this subject and I rest my case.^_^
-Philip O. Eissler
--------------------------
You're absolutely wrong. Please note this picture: http://www.cyborgmemoirs.com/shrine/truthoftwins.jpg
I don't know where you got this information that 17 and 18 have more mechanical parts than human, but it's incorrect. Even it were true, they would still be cyborgs because they were human to begin with.
#20, Dr. Gero, is also a cyborg. His human brain remains, making him a cyborg. It doesn't matter that his whole body may be artificial - the fact that his human brain still remains and controls that body is all the proof needed to prove he is a cyborg.
As for the remote control that Gero created and the way FUNiMation handled the translation, it still doesn't prove 17 and 18 are androids. At all. The twins do not have their own ki anymore and are powered by eternal energy generators. It's very possible that Gero installed an on/off switch in their generators. I've never heard this line about Gero being able to turn the twins off and on with that remote control, however. What I do know for a fact is that due to the twins' rebellious nature, Gero implanted bombs inside them, using the remote control, which would detonate the bombs, as a threat to control them. You can't really rely on the English dub to prove your points, since the translation differs slightly from time to time.
Did you read the Cyborg or Android section of http://www.lovelycyborg.com at all?
-number18
I'm like what? How can anyone be so ignorant? Amazed, I respond with this:NinjaPoeBear2@aol.com wrote: Actually... No.
And if you want to say otherwise, you are sadly mistaken. Because I have been doing reasearch on this longer than you have, and have taken facts from Toei's version, FUNimation's version, Planet Namek, and the manga (translated by a friend who has a minor in Japanese).
The the word in question means "Artificial Human". Not Cyborg.
The fact is, it was officially stated that Dr.Gero only used two humans for his project, three including himself. It is also officially stated that their bone structures and 99% of their internal organs were removed... Replaced with robotics. So because of this, despite any cybernetics included, they are machines that used to be humans.
Also, again, as I stated, the others were NOT human to begin with. So they cannot be called Cyborgs. Thus, you cannot call all of them Androids, and three of them Cyborgs. Thus, the two REAL correct terms here are "Artificial Human" (as in robots that once were human or look human) and Android (since none of them are human anymore.
Again, you can use any definitions stated in the dictionary. But they do not validate anything without any facts stated by Akira Toriyama himself, much less Toei. And Teoi even said "Artificial Humans", and Toei also stated that Dr.Gero had blueprints involving the two.
And if you want to be this pompous over something you are wrong about, I will drag out the facts even further. I also been researching this for 6 years, and counting. And most of my oiginal research comes from my friend who has been fan since the time DBZ's Cell Era was shown on Japanese TV for the first time. And did reasearch on those characters a year later.
So who am I going to believe? You? Or how about Planet Namek, Akira Toriyama, Toei, and my friend?
Again, I rest my case.
--------------------------
Hm. You're wrong. I'm right. And I'm going to sum things up real nice and easy for you.
1- You have absolutely no proof for anything that you're claiming.
2- You don't know what a cyborg is.
3- You didn't look at that picture I linked for you. It's about #17 and #18. Here it is again. http://www.cyborgmemoirs.com/shrine/truthoftwins.jpg Read it right to left.
4- You apparently have never seen any of the episodes or chapters of the manga, English or Japanese, where someone states that #18 is still human
5- In all your six grand years of research, you also must have never come across that little part in the 7th Daizenshuu where Toriyama states that before they were cyborgs, #17 and #18 were a pair of notorious delinquents.
6- "Artificial human" is the literal translation of the word "jinzouningen," just like "honorable hand-washing place" is the literal translation of the Japanese word for "bathroom." Jinzouningen doens't just mean android. It's not used so literally by Japanese people. That's why the term can be so easily applied to all of Gero's creations. Please visit this link http://linear.mv.com/cgi-bin/j-e/dict, put in the word "cyborg" and tell me what Japanese word you get as a result.
Again, you have absolutely no hard evidence for anything that you claim. None. No real facts, links, scans, research papers - nothing.
The kid then responds with this...
I had to read and reread his email about 3 times to make any sort of sense of it. I respond with this:NinjaPoeBear2@aol.com wrote: Right...
And everything Akira Toriyama himself wrote was wrong. Everything Toei translated from the manga to the anime are wrong. All because they cleary contradict what you state.
So I guess you are a pompous idiot for saying all of that. As well as you claimed with me. So watch Dragon Ball Z: The History of Trunks (Toei's version with english subtitles), as it was translated by a guy majored in Japanese and used to work on Toriyama.net. Who is also one of the biggest Akira Toriyama fans out there. Read the manga translated by Viz. Both primarily say "Artificial Human".
And also, how long have you been researching this, without the manga? Because the manga, not the dictionary, is the correct source.
Also... Ask Temple o' Trunks and Daizenshuu EX. They would both say "Artificial Human" is the correct term. And they may also add the fact that Planet Namek was the most correct form of information. Next to R.Talsorian's third book, which covers 17 and 18, and info on them. Since it was approved by Toei.
And finally... How many RPGs have you worked on? None, I bet. How many DBZ articles have you written, much less written and had published? None on both accounts, I bet. And note 1 for the RPG for me, and 2 for the published articles for me.
So yeah... I know more about this than you do. I follow the terminology, WHILE following the facts Toriyama himself have written... As well as what Toei translated into the anime version. And what proof do you have? The fact you use the dictionary? Huh. Dictionary facts vs. creator's facts. Gee... I wonder what is more correct.
So I guess you lost, bub. And when I comment your site, I will just regard it as you made it be. A "bootleg version of a fan site, with the owner showing no regard to the real facts because they go against what is said in the dictionary". 'Nuff said.
So do your research, and until then... Anything you say will be based on complete ignorance to the truth. And no matter what you say, or claim, it will not change the facts written long before you became a fan of the series.
--------------------------
Your ignorance is astounding and almost as amazing as your grammar is terrible.
Let me just recap your argument here with a sentence by sentence breakdown...
And everything Akira Toriyama himself wrote was wrong.
Akira Toriyama wrote that 17 and 18 were humans, twins, and cyborgs. There are multiple sources I can quote to prove this. Where are yours?
Everything Toei translated from the manga to the anime are wrong. All because they cleary contradict what you state.
Clearly? Get me some evidence of this evident contradiction.
So I guess you are a pompous idiot for saying all of that.
Saying all of what? That the twins are cyborgs? Which they are.
As well as you claimed with me.
Huh?
So watch Dragon Ball Z: The History of Trunks (Toei's version with english subtitles), as it was translated by a guy majored in Japanese and used to work on Toriyama.net. Who is also one of the biggest Akira Toriyama fans out there.
The History of Trunks makes no mention of the origins of the twins and only refers to them as jinzouningen, which, if you had followed that little dictionary link I sent you, is a multi-faceted term.
Read the manga translated by Viz. Both primarily say "Artificial Human".
No, it doesn't actually. The Viz-translated manga uses the term android. In fact Shonen Jump clearly states that 17 and 18 are technically cyborgs. http://www.cyborgmemoirs.com/shrine/18isacyborg.jpg There's proof for you.
Also... Ask Temple o' Trunks and Daizenshuu EX. They would both say "Artificial Human" is the correct term.
They would also agree with me on the fact that 17, 18 and 20 are all cyborgs. Just for kicks, I'll ask them myself what they think.
And they may also add the fact that Planet Namek was the most correct form of information.
Was it really? I remember visiting that site years ago and finding "Cyborg 18" in their character guide. It's a shame Planet Namek doesn't even exist anymore, though. It's be gone for ages.
Next to R.Talsorian's third book, which covers 17 and 18, and info on them. Since it was approved by Toei.
I've never heard of this author before. Show me a link to his book on amazon.com.
And finally... How many RPGs have you worked on? None, I bet.
What bearing could this possibly have on the argument at hand? I'll tell you - it has no bearing whatsoever. As for RPGs, I've been running an rpg for 7 years. I'll give you the email addresses of everyone in my campaign if you'd like to verify that.
How many DBZ articles have you written, much less written and had published?
How many DBZ articles have I written? Well, I do run an entire website on #18, a DBZ character, which is regularly updated with juicy, well-written content.
None on both accounts, I bet. And note 1 for the RPG for me, and 2 for the published articles for me.
Scan that published DBZ article for me? I really wanna know where it was published. The internet doesn't count.
You know, I was going to break down the last few things you said too, but it's so nonsensical and ludicrous that I couldn't even bring myself to do it.
The bottomline to all of this, however, is that you're still not giving me any sort of evidence to ANY of the claims you're making. You don't make sense...and I can only logically conclude that you're borderline retarded or seriously mislead.
-number18
--------------------------
Midway through writing that response, he sends me this email...
I send him this email...NinjaPoeBear2@aol.com wrote: Subject: Viz also contradicts you. And they get permission from Toriyama himself, when needed.
Also...
I wanted to point out that Viz translated it in the main Cell Era part of the manga as "Android". And with their translations, they tend to have everything approved by Toriyama... Especially edits.
So go to www.shonenjump.com, and read their translatons (on their site). And even ask them if Androids was part of the manga. Mainly they will say either "yes", or "it was Artificial Humans, but we got permission from Akira Toriyama to change it to Androids".
I rest my case.
I'll post his inevitably stupid response when I get it. Till then, your thoughts?
--------------------------
Here are some scans from Shonen Jump, by Viz...you know, the publisher that apparently contradicts what I'm saying. Read carefully...
page 1 - http://www.cyborgmemoirs.com/shrine/29.jpg
page 2 - http://www.cyborgmemoirs.com/shrine/30.jpg
Proof the twins are cyborgs - http://www.cyborgmemoirs.com/shrine/31.jpg
More proof - http://www.cyborgmemoirs.com/shrine/18isacyborg.jpg
A little chart about all of Gero's creations - note what it says about 16 through 20-
http://www.cyborgmemoirs.com/shrine/androidabc.jpg
You really shoulda checked out my website entirely before coming at me like this. It's making you look extremely foolish.
-number18
--------------------------
I can't even imagine what this kid is going to respond with next. Oh the drama unfolds!!