Should Dragon Ball Super have skipped the movie sagas?

Discussion specifically regarding the "Dragon Ball Super" TV series premiering July 2015 in Japan, including individual threads for each episode.
DBZ_Lee
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1191
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2014 4:44 am
Location: Midlands, UK

Re: Should Dragon Ball Super have skipped the movie sagas?

Post by DBZ_Lee » Mon Nov 23, 2015 8:54 pm

Absolutely not. I feel that if they would have gone straight into the Universe 6 Arc, not only would it have been a bit odd jumping right in (they would have had to have had some sort of build up) they would have been unable to show Goku working as a farmer, Vegeta's attempts at getting Whis to train him, Pan being born etc etc.

Simply too much happened between Majin Buu's defeat & BoG, and also between BoG & Freeza's resurrection. The biggest disappointment for me has been the haste in which Toei have gone about re-telling the "F" Arc.
The BoG Arc was re-told rather well in my opinion, and they added quite a few elements which made it very entertaining. It would seem as though Freeza is being rushed due to it not long being released on home video, and they don't want to risk losing too many viewers before the Universe 6 Arc begins.

Also, by re-telling the movies, they were able to give Toyotarō the chance to get far ahead enough with the manga.

User avatar
dbzfan7
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 13045
Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2012 3:55 am
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: Should Dragon Ball Super have skipped the movie sagas?

Post by dbzfan7 » Mon Nov 23, 2015 10:35 pm

DBZ_Lee wrote:Pan being born.
We never saw that. She was just suddenly right out there in existence just like all the other saiyalings and that was that.
Why Dragon Ball Consistency in something such as power levels matter!

User avatar
DragonHermit
Regular
Posts: 585
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 12:07 am

Re: Should Dragon Ball Super have skipped the movie sagas?

Post by DragonHermit » Mon Nov 23, 2015 10:54 pm

I think the two movies should have been retold only if drastic differences happened to the plot (and not just transferring party from Capsule Corp to a boat)
dbzfan7 wrote:
DBZ_Lee wrote:Pan being born.
We never saw that. She was just suddenly right out there in existence just like all the other saiyalings and that was that.
are you a birther?

User avatar
dbzfan7
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 13045
Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2012 3:55 am
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: Should Dragon Ball Super have skipped the movie sagas?

Post by dbzfan7 » Mon Nov 23, 2015 11:01 pm

DragonHermit wrote:
dbzfan7 wrote:
DBZ_Lee wrote:Pan being born.
We never saw that. She was just suddenly right out there in existence just like all the other saiyalings and that was that.
are you a birther?
What? What I meant was we pretty much skipped over Pan being born. Just like Gohan, Trunks, Goten, Marron, etc., she was already born and that was that.
Why Dragon Ball Consistency in something such as power levels matter!

GTX
Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
Posts: 331
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2015 5:12 pm

Re: Should Dragon Ball Super have skipped the movie sagas?

Post by GTX » Tue Nov 24, 2015 9:35 am

Retelling is not the problem I think dragonball need better pacing in this modern anime era .
The question has been asked by you 10000000000 times and we have become very efficient.
I don't care about non canon stuffs like game, guide book, movie, etc
Spare the trouble because GT is CANON
Be quick and be done with it
inactive :P

User avatar
djcoopdawg
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 101
Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2015 12:13 pm
Contact:

Re: Should Dragon Ball Super have skipped the movie sagas?

Post by djcoopdawg » Sat Nov 28, 2015 1:35 pm

Super should have shown what was happening behind the scenes of the movie, showing Champa and Vados being mysterious. Then the show would fill in the gaps between the movies including more of the Frieza empire and Frieza's training.

buutenks
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1888
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 10:42 am

Re: Should Dragon Ball Super have skipped the movie sagas?

Post by buutenks » Sat Nov 28, 2015 6:11 pm

Absolutely not.BOG movie while i enjoyed the fact that beerus and whis were introduced,the fighting itself was boring and movie also tad boring,watched it once and never again.Goku vs beerus fight in the movie bored me to tears except for the last part where goku absorbed the fireball.

Now BOG saga,enjoyed every episode and the beerus vs goku fight was amazing.

Now ROF,i really enjoyed and still enjoy the movie,watched it multiple times and goku vs freeza and vegeta vs freeza is epic also z fighters vs freeza troops is epic also.Plus ssj gohan one shotting sisame was again awesome so ye.

However i still cant wait to see goku vs freeza,vegeta vs freeza in DB Super,I'm sure it will be a fight i will enjoy watching multiple times.Plus z fighters vs freeza troops,gohan vs tagoma/ginyu ^^

So i am glad they retold.

User avatar
FortuneSSJ
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5938
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2013 9:07 pm

Re: Should Dragon Ball Super have skipped the movie sagas?

Post by FortuneSSJ » Sat Nov 28, 2015 6:49 pm

Super shouldn't even take place before EOZ. That's the problem.
People want a DBZ sequel by Toriyama, not a DBZ special edition.

Last week before Super began, Kai ended with Goku leaving with Uub. And now we are again before that. Bad decision.

And retelling the movies is far form a good decision, even though there are being much better than their movie counterparts.
I'm enjoying Super, but this isn't what I wanted.
A world without Dragon Ball is just boring.

Favourite old DB Animators: Masaki Sato and Tadayoshi Yamamuro
Favourite new DB Animators: Yuya Takahashi and Chikashi Kubota

User avatar
Wezenheim
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1009
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2015 2:41 pm

Re: Should Dragon Ball Super have skipped the movie sagas?

Post by Wezenheim » Sun Nov 29, 2015 1:03 am

FortuneSSJ wrote:Super shouldn't even take place before EOZ. That's the problem.
People want a DBZ sequel by Toriyama, not a DBZ special edition.

Last week before Super began, Kai ended with Goku leaving with Uub. And now we are again before that. Bad decision.

And retelling the movies is far form a good decision, even though there are being much better than their movie counterparts.
I'm enjoying Super, but this isn't what I wanted.
Yeah, that's one of my problems with Super actually. We all know how it will eventually end, so there's not much to be nervous about as far as the main cast is concerned. Beerus might get killed off or something, but we know that everything will be alright. I actually think it would be cool to see Oob fight in 'F' and in the U6 arc. That being said though, I'm not totally against Super taking place at the point where it is. It'd be kind of jarring to see Goku go from a mentor back to a student who also has a student. Plus it would kind of take away from Oob and Pan seemingly becoming the "next generation" of fighters. I really want Super to provide extra closure for the final ending, add more to it.

User avatar
Doctor.
Banned
Posts: 10558
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:02 am
Location: Portugal

Re: Should Dragon Ball Super have skipped the movie sagas?

Post by Doctor. » Sun Nov 29, 2015 1:09 am

I don't think the problem is it starting before the 28th TB like I thought before. I mean, I can still watch the Saiyan or the Freeza arc and still feel the same degree of despair, tension and hopelessness as I did when I originally watched them. And then, there's of course the fact that we know that in these kinds of good vs evil stories, good will always win. All that the epilogue does is make it obvious which characters will stay alive, but even so there are new characters that can die (Beerus, Whis, Champa, Vados, the 5th U7 member, U6 character, etc). You don't even need to kill the current characters, you can make them have persona dilemmas that can impose tension in the story, too. And there's also that slightly less likely option of them retconning the epilogue.

If you're not feeling any tension from Super, I think that's more of an issue in its execution rather than anything else. The two films had this problem too.

User avatar
sintzu
Banned
Posts: 13583
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:41 pm

Re: Should Dragon Ball Super have skipped the movie sagas?

Post by sintzu » Sun Nov 29, 2015 1:19 am

They didn't do that good of a job with BOG but it looks like they're putting more effort into the RF arc so hopefully the overall arc will be worth the retelling.
July 9th 2018 will be remembered as the day Broly became canon.

User avatar
DragonHermit
Regular
Posts: 585
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 12:07 am

Re: Should Dragon Ball Super have skipped the movie sagas?

Post by DragonHermit » Sun Nov 29, 2015 1:22 am

Why are people so adamant EOZ will follow after DBS? Toriyama might scrap EOZ altogether. It was just a quick way to cap off Buu saga.

User avatar
Wezenheim
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1009
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2015 2:41 pm

Re: Should Dragon Ball Super have skipped the movie sagas?

Post by Wezenheim » Sun Nov 29, 2015 1:23 am

Doctor. wrote:I don't think the problem is it starting before the 28th TB like I thought before. I mean, I can still watch the Saiyan or the Freeza arc and still feel the same degree of despair, tension and hopelessness as I did when I originally watched them. And then, there's of course the fact that we know that in these kinds of good vs evil stories, good will always win. All that the epilogue does is make it obvious which characters will stay alive, but even so there are new characters that can die (Beerus, Whis, Champa, Vados, the 5th U7 member, U6 character, etc). You don't even need to kill the current characters, you can make them have persona dilemmas that can impose tension in the story, too. And there's also that slightly less likely option of them retconning the epilogue.

If you're not feeling any tension from Super, I think that's more of an issue in its execution rather than anything else. The two films had this problem too.
That's also true. Episode 11 of Super was a good example of how tension can still be utilized. When Beerus stabbed Goku, I was pretty darn surprised and unsure of what would happen next. Like I said, I think Super can still add more to the end and to the series as a whole and if it can do that, I don't see any harm in it taking place when it does. As a whole, I still don't care much for most "prequels" but I'm still enjoying Toyotaro's current manga a lot. I dunno. We'll see.

Dbzfan94
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5744
Joined: Mon Dec 16, 2013 5:16 pm
Location: Mt. Paozu

Re: Should Dragon Ball Super have skipped the movie sagas?

Post by Dbzfan94 » Tue Dec 01, 2015 9:25 am

DragonHermit wrote:Why are people so adamant EOZ will follow after DBS? Toriyama might scrap EOZ altogether. It was just a quick way to cap off Buu saga.
I really hope they show EOZ in some form. If not the events, at least the timeskip. EOZ Goten is really an underrated design. Little Pan is always a delight to see too

User avatar
Vice
Banned
Posts: 512
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 4:20 pm

Re: Should Dragon Ball Super have skipped the movie sagas?

Post by Vice » Tue Dec 01, 2015 3:38 pm

At this point I'm inclined to pretend that movies are the first two seasons of Super and these episodes don't exist. Super has either added nothing that's better than what the movies did, or the stuff they've added is idiotic and nonsensical or meaningless padding. The movies have absolutely done this better.

User avatar
DragonbaIlZ
Newbie
Posts: 18
Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 7:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Should Dragon Ball Super have skipped the movie sagas?

Post by DragonbaIlZ » Tue Dec 01, 2015 6:40 pm

I'm alright with Battle of Gods having it's own arc. It's the introduction of Beerus and Whis and since they're here to stay I feel it's important to have that story brought into Super. FnF on the other hand, I can live without. It was a cool movie, but that's all it felt like to me. Just a movie. Good thing they've made a few changes in the anime to keep things somewhat fresh.

User avatar
SingleFringe&Sparks
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1642
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:55 pm
Location: Mt. Paozu/East District

Re: Should Dragon Ball Super have skipped the movie sagas?

Post by SingleFringe&Sparks » Thu Dec 03, 2015 1:06 am

precita wrote:
fadeddreams5 wrote:
If anybody wants to watch Super in the future, I'd advise them to skip these arcs and watch the movies.
Worse yet is how padded the Beerus episodes were. Did we really need 12 episodes to cover the Battle of Gods movie? The whole thing should have been 6 episodes at the most, (the movie was only an hour and a half if I recall, 6 episodes at 22 minutes each would have been enough), so its ridiculous.
Super might have been a good idea, but it's been a waste of time to watch for the most part and pretending it's something brand new prior to U6 was bad marketing. Most people won't want to sit through Filler/Padding to know what happens, they'd rather just get straight to the meat of the arcs and all of the retcons could have been used just for flashbacks in an actual anime.
Zephyr wrote:The fandom's collective fetishizing of "moments" is also ridiculous to me. No, not everyone needs a fucking "shine" moment. If that's all you want, then all you want is fanservice, rather than an actual coherent story. And of course those aren't mutually exclusive; you could have a coherent story with "shine" moments! But if a story is perfectly coherent (and I'm really not seeing any compelling arguments that this one is anything but, despite constantly recurring, really poorly reasoned, attempts to argue otherwise), and you're bemoaning the lack of "shine" moments as a reason for the story's poor quality, then you're letting your thirst for "shine" moments obfuscate your ability to detect basic storytelling when it's right in front of you.

Post Reply