That is a huge relief. I personally dont mind about episode 5 though, I'm more interesting in the touch ups they did for other episodes, if such edits were even done. Would be a shame if this was a episode 5 only deal.
See, that's why random posts in random Korean forums ("i asked Toei lolz") shouldn't be discussed seriously.
It seems even some less noticeable shots were changed.
Noah wrote:Like that was something "new", Really, why not tear Gohan or Krillin arms off for a change? Why always Piccolo? And for god's sake that scene in NEP was awful! It was like Tagoma tearing off Piccolo arm was like someone pulling the branch of a tree! Real lame, it hadn't the feel of a body member being teared off.
That's how Freeza did it to Nail's arm during their battle back on Namek. Even Tenshinhan's arm got ripped by Nappa.
No, it wasn't. The way Freeza dit it to Nail's arm was way more visual and brutal, you'll see next episode, then you can compare.
Ajay wrote:
Sodhi wrote:Dragon ball super Blu-Ray episode set 1 should have come out today. So is something fixed or not?.
Yup! Sure seems so. Though the improvements appear to vary. Some are really good:
Are we too old to enjoy new Dragon Ball movies/series?
Spoiler:
Nickolaidas wrote: Sun Jun 14, 2015 2:10 am
Guys, I'm going to be straight with you. If you feel the show has gotten 'silly' ... it hasn't. You're just 'too old for this shit'. Seriously, 95% of the people in those boards do not fit the target demographic of the show, so don't expect the show to be 'everything you hoped for'. I'm referring to the people here who expect Super to be rich with dark moments, serious storytelling, meaningful characters etc etc. It won't. It's a show for kids. A show for kids being kids. Everyone in those boards has a manchild in him/her, clamoring to get out, and that's fine. But having unrealistic expectations (such as believing the show grew up alongside you) is naïve at best. Honestly, do you take seriously a story where the supposed God of Destruction halts his urges to blow up stuff in order to eat ice cream sundae? That's the show's silliness at full force, take it for what it is. The show hasn't matured one bit, so don't expect it too. Again, I'm not saying that's a bad thing. I'm saying *that* is DB and always will be.
It's not like the second half of the episode was that bad anyway. As long as the major changes are done to the first, everything is fine. At last we can get over this.
"Dragon Ball once became a thing of the past to me, but after that, I got angry about the live action movie, re-wrote an entire movie script, and now I'm complaining about the quality of the new TV anime. It seems Dragon Ball has grown on me so much that I can't leave it alone." - Akira Toriyama on Dragon Ball Super
I wouldn't say it wasn't worth discussing, but treating it as an irrefutable source for a news story would be taking it way too far.
Regardless, I'm just glad it turned out to be wrong and we got some fixes afterall. Episode 5 really needed to be cleaned up a bit, as I feel it was actually the worst looking episode of the franchise and keeping it that way could have lead to some hesitation for a TV deal.
Direct translations of the Korean DB Online timeline and guidebook.
My personal "canon" and BP list. (Coming Soon)
There is little improvement it seems from those still frames. But perhaps the fluidness has improved. Can someone make a video comparison with the same scene split with the tv and dvd versions. That would be very nice to see!
I'm somewhat pleased with the clean-ups on some of the frames. It's a far cry from amazing but it definitely looks better. Aside from generalizing and unfair criticism regarding Super in comparison to Z, I think a major reason we are hearing so many complaints about Super's animation is because of the changes in the visual style. See, in Z, the colors don't pop as much and the line quality leaves much to be desired. Of course, that quality picks up gradually and the drawings and inconsistencies don't appear to be as messy. Then again, I'm drawing more unfair comparisons because I never saw Dragon Ball Z in it's raw, Japanese form when it first aired; I'm assuming many of those inconsistencies have been cleaned up. Here we have Super: it's been about 20 years and the visuals saw an upgrade, which is natural. We have colors that pop more and the line work is digital/vector-based. Keeping that in mind, it is likely much easier to catch everything wrong with it.
The changes in the animation of EP5 may not be that significant, but hey, it's at least something, so I'll take it. Beggars can't be choosers.
Spoiler:
Akira Toriyama wrote:My policy is to try and forget things once they’re over. Since if I don’t discard the old and focus on what’s new, I’ll overload my brain capacity. I still haven’t lived down going, “Who the heck is Tao Pai-pai?” that one time I was talking with Ei’ichiro Oda-kun. But the fact that there are still people reading the series after all this time… All I can say is; “thank you.” Really, that’s all.
Akira Toriyama wrote:Drawing Dragon Ball again reminded me of two things--how much I love it, and how much I never want to do it again.
Kunzait_83 wrote:And if you're upset because all this new material completely invalidates the tabletop RPG rulebook-sized statistical system and flowchart for the characters' "canonical Power Levels" that you'd been working on painstakingly for the last bunch of years now... well I don't think there's a kind, non-blunt way of saying this, but that's 100% entirely your own misguided fault for buying so deeply into all this nonsensical garbage in the first place. And that you also have IMMENSELY skewed and comically backwards priorities in what you think is most important and needed to make a good Dragon Ball story.
Zephyr wrote:Goodness, they wrote idiotic drivel in a children's cartoon meant to advertise toys!? Again!? For the ninetieth episode in a row!? Somebody stop the presses! We have to voice our concern over these Super important issues!
Kamiccolo9 wrote:Fair enough, I concede. Sean Schemmel probably has some kind of hidden talent. Maybe he is an expert at Minesweeper. You're right; calling him "talentless" wasn't fair.
Michsi wrote: Mon Jul 04, 2022 11:29 amIn Super Piccolo got yelled off the stage by Vegeta in the U6 Tournament arc and lost to Jiminy Cricket in the ToP , he deserved 15 new transformations with his theme song played by Metallica in the background.
Unless they were gonna redo the whole episode from scratch, it was sort of a waste of time.
"Dragon Ball once became a thing of the past to me, but after that, I got angry about the live action movie, re-wrote an entire movie script, and now I'm complaining about the quality of the new TV anime. It seems Dragon Ball has grown on me so much that I can't leave it alone." - Akira Toriyama on Dragon Ball Super
Great; but is the new version the one where Goku has three pecks? Still doesn't really match up to the rest of the show, but an improvement is an improvement.
Retan wrote:Great; but is the new version the one where Goku has three pecks?
It's not a third pec, but it is a little odd. They've done it for decades, and I'm still not 100% sure what exactly it's meant to be. I guess it's meant to be a way of fusing the arm to the torso? Not sure.