GT 1st arc

Discussion regarding the entirety of the franchise in a general (meta) sense, including such aspects as: production, trends, merchandise, fan culture, and more.
User avatar
Kunzait_83
I Live Here
Posts: 3044
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2004 5:19 pm

Re: GT 1st arc

Post by Kunzait_83 » Mon Feb 15, 2016 1:41 pm

Kuririn Fan wrote:And Super 17 arc is mostly hated because the whole premise doesn't make any fucking sense.
Yep I totally get that. And my point is its ultimately 7 fucking episodes; so as nonsensical as most of it is, really who can get TOO mad at it when by relative Dragon Ball standards you can miss most of it by violently sneezing. Its such a brief "blip" on the series radar. A shitty blip yeah, but still just a blip.

I'm not questioning the dislike in and of itself, just the level of passion that I often see for it.
http://80s90sdragonballart.tumblr.com/

Kunzait's Wuxia Thread
Journey to the West, chapter 26 wrote:The strong man will meet someone stronger still:
Come to naught at last he surely will!
Zephyr wrote:And that's to say nothing of how pretty much impossible it is to capture what made the original run of the series so great. I'm in the generation of fans that started with Toonami, so I totally empathize with the feeling of having "missed the party", experiencing disappointment, and wanting to experience it myself. But I can't, that's how life is. Time is a bitch. The party is over. Kageyama, Kikuchi, and Maeda are off the sauce now; Yanami almost OD'd; Yamamoto got arrested; Toriyama's not going to light trash cans on fire and hang from the chandelier anymore. We can't get the band back together, and even if we could, everyone's either old, in poor health, or calmed way the fuck down. Best we're going to get, and are getting, is a party that's almost entirely devoid of the magic that made the original one so awesome that we even want more.
Kamiccolo9 wrote:It grinds my gears that people get "outraged" over any of this stuff. It's a fucking cartoon. If you are that determined to be angry about something, get off the internet and make a stand for something that actually matters.
Rocketman wrote:"Shonen" basically means "stupid sentimental shit" anyway, so it's ok to be anti-shonen.

User avatar
DBZ_323
Newbie
Posts: 18
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2016 8:05 pm

Re: GT 1st arc

Post by DBZ_323 » Mon Feb 15, 2016 4:53 pm

Agreed. I always thought that the Black Star Dragon Balls and Baby arcs were two parts of one whole, and I never understood the separation
Manga Dimension: Jaco the Galactic Patrolman - Dragon Ball - Dragon Ball! Yo Son Goku and His Friends Return - Dragon Ball Z: Ressurection F - Dragon Ball Super

Revived Anime Dimension: Dragon Ball Kai - Dragon Ball Super

Anime Dimension: Dragon Ball - Dragon Ball Z - Dragon Ball Z Movies - Dragon Ball GT

Kuririn Fan
Banned Alternate Account
Posts: 2313
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2015 12:32 pm

Re: GT 1st arc

Post by Kuririn Fan » Tue Feb 16, 2016 11:03 am

Kunzait_83 wrote:
Kuririn Fan wrote:And Super 17 arc is mostly hated because the whole premise doesn't make any fucking sense.
Yep I totally get that. And my point is its ultimately 7 fucking episodes; so as nonsensical as most of it is, really who can get TOO mad at it when by relative Dragon Ball standards you can miss most of it by violently sneezing. Its such a brief "blip" on the series radar. A shitty blip yeah, but still just a blip.

I'm not questioning the dislike in and of itself, just the level of passion that I often see for it.
Because that's the reason for non canon argument. If it didn't have that, GT could fit nicely and have an ending better than the manga.

User avatar
Hellspawn28
Patreon Supporter
Posts: 15698
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 9:50 pm
Location: Maryland, USA

Re: GT 1st arc

Post by Hellspawn28 » Tue Feb 16, 2016 11:19 am

Kuririn Fan wrote: Also, i heard it was supposed to end with ep 40, but for some reason Toei continued.
I think fans think that because of Heroes Legacy was release right after the Bebi saga. I'm pretty sure Toei wanted GT to have a long run since it came out right after DBZ ended. Ratings drop pretty bad early on which probably made Toei change their mind quick and decided to end it sooner then later.
Last edited by Hellspawn28 on Thu May 05, 2016 12:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
She/Her
PS5 username: Guyver_Spawn_27
LB Profile: https://letterboxd.com/Hellspawn28/

User avatar
Lord Beerus
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 21430
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 5:20 pm
Location: A temple on a giant tree
Contact:

Re: GT 1st arc

Post by Lord Beerus » Tue Feb 16, 2016 8:21 pm

DBZ_323 wrote:Agreed. I always thought that the Black Star Dragon Balls and Baby arcs were two parts of one whole, and I never understood the separation
I always though FUNimation separated the arcs so that they could make more money by splitting the one arc into two arcs and sell them individually and separately when it came to home releases for GT. I mean, for all intents and purposes, the Black Star Dragon Balls and Baby arcs are essentially one arc.

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20480
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: GT 1st arc

Post by ABED » Tue Feb 16, 2016 8:44 pm

Lord Beerus wrote:
DBZ_323 wrote:Agreed. I always thought that the Black Star Dragon Balls and Baby arcs were two parts of one whole, and I never understood the separation
I always though FUNimation separated the arcs so that they could make more money by splitting the one arc into two arcs and sell them individually and separately when it came to home releases for GT. I mean, for all intents and purposes, the Black Star Dragon Balls and Baby arcs are essentially one arc.
They didn't sell them as arcs. The sets were split by the number of dvds.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

User avatar
Lord Beerus
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 21430
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 5:20 pm
Location: A temple on a giant tree
Contact:

Re: GT 1st arc

Post by Lord Beerus » Tue Feb 16, 2016 9:46 pm

ABED wrote:
Lord Beerus wrote:
DBZ_323 wrote:Agreed. I always thought that the Black Star Dragon Balls and Baby arcs were two parts of one whole, and I never understood the separation
I always though FUNimation separated the arcs so that they could make more money by splitting the one arc into two arcs and sell them individually and separately when it came to home releases for GT. I mean, for all intents and purposes, the Black Star Dragon Balls and Baby arcs are essentially one arc.
They didn't sell them as arcs. The sets were split by the number of dvds.
Well, they did sell the first 16 episodes as "The Lost Episodes".

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20480
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: GT 1st arc

Post by ABED » Tue Feb 16, 2016 9:53 pm

There were 20 single DVDs and 4 sets of 5 DVDs.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

User avatar
Herms
Kanzenshuu Admin Emeritus
Posts: 10550
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 6:40 pm
Location: Jupiter
Contact:

Re: GT 1st arc

Post by Herms » Wed Feb 17, 2016 3:04 am

LuckyCat wrote:I think this site has debunked that rumor. The rumor doesn't really make sense, either. Producing 2 more seasons of anime would absolutely cost more than whatever profit expectations there could be for a low profile PS game promotion.
We've never done a full-fledged investigation or anything like that, but it would definitely be a good entry for the Intended Endings or Rumor Guide.

Basically, it's another of those stories that gets tossed around a lot, but seems to have no legitimate, first-hand source. None that I've ever seen, anyway.

At first glance it sounds plausible, but as noted, when you stop and think about it, the logic seems to fall apart. On the other hand, I've never looked up the numbers on Final Bout's sales vs the cost of making the last third of GT, so maybe it really would have payed out for them.

More than anything, the whole idea sounds like an extreme simplification of how the franchise's business model actually works: the TV anime as a whole exists largely to help sell merchandise in general. That's the skimmy on why Kai Phase I got the axe: regardless of what the ratings were like, it didn't move enough merchandise. That's how things work. However, the idea that they'd make 20+ anime episodes solely in order to help sell one (and only one) specific tie-in product seems questionable. It's simplifying the equation too much.
Kanzenshuu: Is that place still around?
Sometimes, I tweet things
We might, if they screamed all the time, for no good reason.

Kuririn Fan
Banned Alternate Account
Posts: 2313
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2015 12:32 pm

Re: GT 1st arc

Post by Kuririn Fan » Thu Feb 18, 2016 11:27 am

Yeah, it's definitely a good entry for rumours or intended endings. That one wiki states that it was supposed to end with ep 40 as a fact and the Final Bout reasoning floats around the fandom like many other rumours.

User avatar
TheMikado
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5009
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 1:28 pm

Re: GT 1st arc

Post by TheMikado » Thu Feb 18, 2016 11:42 am

I can see why they would be considered separate arcs. The feeling of them is entirely different. The Black Star arc is more original DB in nature while the Baby Arc is pretty much DBZ. For reference traditional Dragonball arcs had adventure/goal feel culminating with a large powerful enemy or encounter. DBZ Arcs were basically a series of increasingly power enemies culminating into one final "ultimate form" enemy. I can see why it would be done both ways. For the Black Star arc their top enemy was General Rilldo/Dr. Myuu and the mutant machine gang. Baby Arc just happened to spring forth from the previous arc like most dragonball arcs do. I.E. Saiyan arc and Frieza arc are separate even though one comes directly from the other.

Kuririn Fan
Banned Alternate Account
Posts: 2313
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2015 12:32 pm

Re: GT 1st arc

Post by Kuririn Fan » Thu Feb 18, 2016 1:09 pm

Its one arc, because the BSDB arc doesnt end when Baby appers, they still collect them in eps 25,26,27 and Piccolo dying in ep 40 finally puts an ending on them.

User avatar
Hellspawn28
Patreon Supporter
Posts: 15698
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 9:50 pm
Location: Maryland, USA

Re: GT 1st arc

Post by Hellspawn28 » Thu Feb 18, 2016 3:45 pm

I think the people get the idea of GT ending with Bebi is because:

1. Heroes Legacy was release right after Bebi
2. Final Bout being release around that time with Bebi Oozaru as a end game boss. "Final" in the title give fans the idea that it will be tie in with the final game.

Knowing Toei, I think Toei wanted GT to lasted for a decade similar how DBZ did since GT was made right after DBZ came out. Toei won't want to end a big money maker so soon. I think the bad sales for GT most likely cause them to change things over time.
She/Her
PS5 username: Guyver_Spawn_27
LB Profile: https://letterboxd.com/Hellspawn28/

User avatar
TenshinFan
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 270
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 5:10 pm
Location: Seattle

Re: GT 1st arc

Post by TenshinFan » Wed May 04, 2016 6:11 am

I think it's just as reasonable to split 1-15 from 16-40 or just have two arcs, 1-40 and 41-64 + movie. The first 15 episodes are admittedly pretty lame. Except 1 and 2, those are two of the best in all of GT. But, damn. Don Kea is super lame. The Ledgic fight lasts a whopping 45 seconds. Tsunuma is hard to get through. Para Para brothers, Luud, Doll taki... these are some of the worst moments in GT, and I think fans have trouble sitting through them, which leaves a bad impression on the series. However, as soon as Mu, Rilldo, and M2 debut... it is game on. Super Saiyan 3 Kid Goku, and Super Saiyan adult Trunks before we know it. So badass. Yes I know the Black Star Dragon Balls kind of lead in to it. But to me it's the same distinction as the Pilaf Saga blending into the Tournament Saga, or the 22nd bleeding into Piccolo Daimao, or the Saiyan Saga bleeding into Namek and then into Freeza. It's like a sub-arc. Thematically different but part of the same overarching story.

Kuririn Fan
Banned Alternate Account
Posts: 2313
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2015 12:32 pm

Re: GT 1st arc

Post by Kuririn Fan » Wed May 04, 2016 11:43 am

TenshinFan wrote:I think it's just as reasonable to split 1-15 from 16-40 or just have two arcs, 1-40 and 41-64 + movie. The first 15 episodes are admittedly pretty lame. Except 1 and 2, those are two of the best in all of GT. But, damn. Don Kea is super lame. The Ledgic fight lasts a whopping 45 seconds. Tsunuma is hard to get through. Para Para brothers, Luud, Doll taki... these are some of the worst moments in GT, and I think fans have trouble sitting through them, which leaves a bad impression on the series. However, as soon as Mu, Rilldo, and M2 debut... it is game on. Super Saiyan 3 Kid Goku, and Super Saiyan adult Trunks before we know it. So badass. Yes I know the Black Star Dragon Balls kind of lead in to it. But to me it's the same distinction as the Pilaf Saga blending into the Tournament Saga, or the 22nd bleeding into Piccolo Daimao, or the Saiyan Saga bleeding into Namek and then into Freeza. It's like a sub-arc. Thematically different but part of the same overarching story.
But they also collect the Dragon Balls in episodes 25,26 and 27. I think this split exists because of "Lost episodes"...

User avatar
TenshinFan
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 270
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 5:10 pm
Location: Seattle

Re: GT 1st arc

Post by TenshinFan » Thu May 05, 2016 2:46 am

Kuririn Fan wrote:
TenshinFan wrote:I think it's just as reasonable to split 1-15 from 16-40 or just have two arcs, 1-40 and 41-64 + movie. The first 15 episodes are admittedly pretty lame. Except 1 and 2, those are two of the best in all of GT. But, damn. Don Kea is super lame. The Ledgic fight lasts a whopping 45 seconds. Tsunuma is hard to get through. Para Para brothers, Luud, Doll taki... these are some of the worst moments in GT, and I think fans have trouble sitting through them, which leaves a bad impression on the series. However, as soon as Mu, Rilldo, and M2 debut... it is game on. Super Saiyan 3 Kid Goku, and Super Saiyan adult Trunks before we know it. So badass. Yes I know the Black Star Dragon Balls kind of lead in to it. But to me it's the same distinction as the Pilaf Saga blending into the Tournament Saga, or the 22nd bleeding into Piccolo Daimao, or the Saiyan Saga bleeding into Namek and then into Freeza. It's like a sub-arc. Thematically different but part of the same overarching story.
But they also collect the Dragon Balls in episodes 25,26 and 27. I think this split exists because of "Lost episodes"...
Don't get me wrong, I thought it was a heinous decision for Funimation to withhold the first 15 episodes until later overseas. Of course they should be seen first, especially the first 2. Also, Toriyama's most solid contributions to GT were the adventures of the trio of Goku, Trunks, and Pan (and Giru) traversing alien worlds. That's where the GT comes from, Grand Tour, and some of AT's most beautiful original colour artwork depicts these scenes. Initially it was meant to be different than Z, and sort of harking back to the younger days. He spent the effort redesigning most of the humans and saiyans and their ageing, and intended the scope to be less dramatic or cosmic. He never designed a villain. Just a simple adventure tale. That's why GT 1-15 I think parallel's DB volumes 1 and 2, the Pilaf, pre-21st arc. Minor characters, beasts, and aliens compose the villains, who never pose an ultra serious threat. The focus of the plot is put back on the titular Dragon Balls, and let's face it, it's been a while.

However, when you hit about episode 16, the tone changes dramatically. Maybe for the same reasons as DB's tone change with the fight-centric Tournament Saga, who knows. Probably to reel in fans, and virtually every fan on this board prefers the Baby Saga to the Black Star Saga, and I would even say a plurality prefer the 21st Saga over the Pilaf Saga. After the "Lost Episodes"/Black Star Saga/First 15, we get the introductions of Dr Mu, Planet M2, and General Rilldo. A far cry from puny adversaries like Redict/Ledgic, Don Kea, Para Para Bros, Doll Taki, Luud, even Mutchi Motchi, all of whom are handled with ease by Goku, who's Super Saiyan 1 form, even as a kid, seems like over kill. It's about time for Trunks to turn it on, plus Kid Goku as SSj3 is really badass. Then it kicks overdrive with Baby and Vegeta etc. The first time the series goes from "spirit of Dragon Ball" to "next level threat since Majin Buu."

User avatar
sintzu
Banned
Posts: 13583
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:41 pm

Re: GT 1st arc

Post by sintzu » Thu May 05, 2016 3:31 am

1st impressions are everything so Funimation skipping the 1st 15 episodes was the best thing that happened to GT cause if that was my 1st introduction to it then I'm sure I'd hate the whole show like a lot of fans do.

They had very little to do with the Baby arc so them also being extremely bad is enough of a reason to skip them and go straight into Baby after the 1st 2 episodes.
July 9th 2018 will be remembered as the day Broly became canon.

Kuririn Fan
Banned Alternate Account
Posts: 2313
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2015 12:32 pm

Re: GT 1st arc

Post by Kuririn Fan » Thu May 05, 2016 3:33 am

They tried to copy the least popular arc of Dragon Ball in those 15 episodes and failed miserably. Don't get me wrong, i like the first arc (of the manga), it's a cute little intro arc, but even Toriyama admitted that it wasn't very popular and that's why he introduced Tenkaichi Budokai. Why Toei thought that making Goku kid again and be a bad copy of the least popular arc is a good idea is beyond me.

User avatar
TenshinFan
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 270
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 5:10 pm
Location: Seattle

Re: GT 1st arc

Post by TenshinFan » Thu May 05, 2016 3:49 am

Kuririn Fan wrote:They tried to copy the least popular arc of Dragon Ball in those 15 episodes and failed miserably. Don't get me wrong, i like the first arc (of the manga), it's a cute little intro arc, but even Toriyama admitted that it wasn't very popular and that's why he introduced Tenkaichi Budokai. Why Toei thought that making Goku kid again and be a bad copy of the least popular arc is a good idea is beyond me.
Oh by all means, the Pilaf Saga is hands down better than the Black Star. Just trying to provide some perspective to considering Black Star and Baby as two separate arcs, granted, that they lead in fairly directly. Plus I feel like 40 episodes is pretty long to be one arc. So I'd go Black Star, then Baby, then a bit of a break maybe the Movie, then the brief distraction of Super 17 leading to the Shenrons. 15-25-24 makes a cleaner division than 40-7-17.

Kuririn Fan
Banned Alternate Account
Posts: 2313
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2015 12:32 pm

Re: GT 1st arc

Post by Kuririn Fan » Thu May 05, 2016 3:53 am

TenshinFan wrote:
Kuririn Fan wrote:They tried to copy the least popular arc of Dragon Ball in those 15 episodes and failed miserably. Don't get me wrong, i like the first arc (of the manga), it's a cute little intro arc, but even Toriyama admitted that it wasn't very popular and that's why he introduced Tenkaichi Budokai. Why Toei thought that making Goku kid again and be a bad copy of the least popular arc is a good idea is beyond me.
Oh by all means, the Pilaf Saga is hands down better than the Black Star. Just trying to provide some perspective to considering Black Star and Baby as two separate arcs, granted, that they lead in fairly directly. Plus I feel like 40 episodes is pretty long to be one arc. So I'd go Black Star, then Baby, then a bit of a break maybe the Movie, then the brief distraction of Super 17 leading to the Shenrons. 15-25-24 makes a cleaner division than 40-7-17.
Fair enough, just like canon - there is no one right answer and everyone has their own.
I'll go with 40-7-17, it just feels that there are 3 arcs with beginnings, middles and endings.

Post Reply