Why was the acting so good in the 3 movies?

Discussion regarding the entirety of the franchise in a general (meta) sense, including such aspects as: production, trends, merchandise, fan culture, and more.
User avatar
Bansho64
I Live Here
Posts: 2036
Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2015 12:59 am

Why was the acting so good in the 3 movies?

Post by Bansho64 » Thu Feb 18, 2016 11:56 pm

I noticed that the acting in the 3 movies done by the ocean is pretty good compared to the actual series. Does anyone share this opinion and have an answer?

User avatar
jjgp1112
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 7795
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 10:15 pm
Location: Crooklyn

Re: Why was the acting so good in the 3 movies?

Post by jjgp1112 » Fri Feb 19, 2016 12:29 am

A completely different approach and direction, pretty much. I'm not sure to what extent Funimation was involved in the script and direction.
Yamcha: Do you remember the spell to release him - do you know all the words?
Bulma: Of course! I'm not gonna pull a Frieza and screw it up!
Master Roshi: Bulma, I think Frieza failed because he wore too many clothes!
Cold World (Fanfic)
"It ain't never too late to stop bein' a bitch." - Chad Lamont Butler

Kakacarrottop
OMG CRAZY REGEN
Posts: 935
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2014 11:34 pm
Location: Australia

Re: Why was the acting so good in the 3 movies?

Post by Kakacarrottop » Fri Feb 19, 2016 12:31 am

It's because the films were most likely produced by the people at Pioneer. Ocean's previous DB dubs were written and voice directed by Barry Watson and the FUNimation crew. The Westwood dub, while separate from FUNimation, still used their crappy scripts and also had other problems like a rushed production schedule.

Better writters + voice directors = better acting
"I will literally dress as Goku and walk around jumping up and down, pretending to fly, in public if this ever gets an official release"

- ShadowDude112 on Ocean's Kai dub

User avatar
DBZAOTA482
Banned
Posts: 6995
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2012 4:04 pm
Contact:

Re: Why was the acting so good in the 3 movies?

Post by DBZAOTA482 » Fri Feb 19, 2016 12:31 am

Probably because they were dubbed after FUNimation abandoned them but before they stopped caring altogether.
fadeddreams5 wrote:
DBZGTKOSDH wrote:... Haven't we already gotten these in GT? Goku dies, the DBs go away, and the Namekian DBs most likely won't be used again because of the Evil Dragons.
Goku didn't die in GT. The show sucked him off so much, it was impossible to keep him in the world of the living, so he ascended beyond mortality.
jjgp1112 wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2020 6:31 am I'm just about done with the concept of reboots and making shows that were products of their time and impactful "new and sexy" and in line with modern tastes and sensibilities. Let stuff stay in their era and give today's kids their own shit to watch.

I always side eye the people who say "Now my kids/today's kids can experience what I did as a child!" Nigga, who gives a fuck about your childhood? You're an adult now and it was at least 15 years ago. Let the kids have their own experience instead of picking at a corpse.

User avatar
TheBlackPaladin
I Live Here
Posts: 3772
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2010 10:05 pm

Re: Why was the acting so good in the 3 movies?

Post by TheBlackPaladin » Fri Feb 19, 2016 12:33 am

Bansho64 wrote:I noticed that the acting in the 3 movies done by the ocean is pretty good compared to the actual series. Does anyone share this opinion and have an answer?
Yes and yes.

Here's the thing...it's my belief that actors get way too much flack for things that are not entirely their fault. They're not faultless, but there are a lot of things that affect how a performance will be received that are not at all in their control, and these include (but are certainly not limited to):

-The director's direction.
-How well the script was adapted.
-How good the provided translations are.
-How well the engineer mixes the audio.
-Which of the multiple takes the director and engineer decide to use.
-How much time the producers and upper management give the staff to complete the dub.

So, the reason the three movies had generally better "acting" than the TV series from the Ocean cast is because it wasn't really the acting that improved, but rather, all of the factors that I've mentioned above. FUNimation, while still technically the producers, pretty much handed the dubbing of the movies off to Pioneer. Different people in charge meant better results, in this case. They had great translations, which led to great scripts that didn't "talk down" to the audience, the sound mixing was great, and the dub director for those movies, Karl Willems, was--and for that matter, is--one of the most respected directors in the Canadian voice acting business (he also directed the dub for Death Note, which is generally considered to be one of the best English dubs an anime has ever received).

If anything, the Pioneer/Ocean dubs of the first three movies are proof of how the acting can improve due to factors other than the actors involved.
A "rather haggard" translation of a line from Future Gohan in DBZ, provided to FUNimation by Toei:
"To think of fighting that is this fun...so, it was pleasant fight, as many as, therefore is a feeling which is good the fight where."

User avatar
eledoremassis02
I Live Here
Posts: 4212
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2011 5:40 pm

Re: Why was the acting so good in the 3 movies?

Post by eledoremassis02 » Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:25 am

DBZAOTA482 wrote:Probably because they were dubbed after FUNimation abandoned them but before they stopped caring altogether.
Is this true? If thats the case I would have loved to see Pioneer dub the series!

User avatar
Bansho64
I Live Here
Posts: 2036
Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2015 12:59 am

Re: Why was the acting so good in the 3 movies?

Post by Bansho64 » Fri Feb 19, 2016 2:07 am

TheBlackPaladin wrote:
Bansho64 wrote:I noticed that the acting in the 3 movies done by the ocean is pretty good compared to the actual series. Does anyone share this opinion and have an answer?
Yes and yes.

Here's the thing...it's my belief that actors get way too much flack for things that are not entirely their fault. They're not faultless, but there are a lot of things that affect how a performance will be received that are not at all in their control, and these include (but are certainly not limited to):

-The director's direction.
-How well the script was adapted.
-How good the provided translations are.
-How well the engineer mixes the audio.
-Which of the multiple takes the director and engineer decide to use.
-How much time the producers and upper management give the staff to complete the dub.

So, the reason the three movies had generally better "acting" than the TV series from the Ocean cast is because it wasn't really the acting that improved, but rather, all of the factors that I've mentioned above. FUNimation, while still technically the producers, pretty much handed the dubbing of the movies off to Pioneer. Different people in charge meant better results, in this case. They had great translations, which led to great scripts that didn't "talk down" to the audience, the sound mixing was great, and the dub director for those movies, Karl Willems, was--and for that matter, is--one of the most respected directors in the Canadian voice acting business (he also directed the dub for Death Note, which is generally considered to be one of the best English dubs an anime has ever received).

If anything, the Pioneer/Ocean dubs of the first three movies are proof of how the acting can improve due to factors other than the actors involved.
If only those factors could've been included in the TV series.... They were at their best in the movies. They even kept the Kikuchi music in the movies which really keeps the atmosphere like it was in the japanese version.

User avatar
Man-Child
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 214
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2015 3:06 am

Re: Why was the acting so good in the 3 movies?

Post by Man-Child » Fri Feb 19, 2016 10:28 am

I never really noticed a big a shift in acting, as opposed to the scripts just being that much better than on the show.

User avatar
TheBlackPaladin
I Live Here
Posts: 3772
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2010 10:05 pm

Re: Why was the acting so good in the 3 movies?

Post by TheBlackPaladin » Fri Feb 19, 2016 2:26 pm

Man-Child wrote:I never really noticed a big a shift in acting, as opposed to the scripts just being that much better than on the show.
That can make the acting seem better, though. I think sometimes people think they "hate" a voice actor's performance, when in reality, what they really hate about it is all the corny stuff they're given to say, and they subconsciously attribute it to the actor.
A "rather haggard" translation of a line from Future Gohan in DBZ, provided to FUNimation by Toei:
"To think of fighting that is this fun...so, it was pleasant fight, as many as, therefore is a feeling which is good the fight where."

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20486
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: Why was the acting so good in the 3 movies?

Post by ABED » Fri Feb 19, 2016 3:03 pm

A good director and the right material can make all the difference. I've seen actors that I thought were terrible give good performances because they had the right material. Conversely, I've seen bad directors and bad writing drag down great actors. Just imagine what season 3 would have been like if everything else stayed the same except if they kept the original music, but hired a good director and had good scripts.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

User avatar
TheBlackPaladin
I Live Here
Posts: 3772
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2010 10:05 pm

Re: Why was the acting so good in the 3 movies?

Post by TheBlackPaladin » Fri Feb 19, 2016 3:30 pm

ABED wrote:Just imagine what season 3 would have been like if everything else stayed the same except if they kept the original music, but hired a good director and had good scripts.
It probably still would have been the low point of the in-house cast just because a lot of the actors were new, but still, this "low point" would have been a huge upgrade from the low point that actually came to be.
A "rather haggard" translation of a line from Future Gohan in DBZ, provided to FUNimation by Toei:
"To think of fighting that is this fun...so, it was pleasant fight, as many as, therefore is a feeling which is good the fight where."

User avatar
Man-Child
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 214
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2015 3:06 am

Re: Why was the acting so good in the 3 movies?

Post by Man-Child » Fri Feb 19, 2016 4:38 pm

TheBlackPaladin wrote:
Man-Child wrote: That can make the acting seem better, though. I think sometimes people think they "hate" a voice actor's performance, when in reality, what they really hate about it is all the corny stuff they're given to say, and they subconsciously attribute it to the actor.
Very true. I don't think any actor couldve taken some of the awful dialogue from that era and made it sound good, which is why I try not to blame Ocean for their work on the show at the time. Barry Watson on the other hand...
Last edited by Man-Child on Mon Feb 22, 2016 7:32 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20486
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: Why was the acting so good in the 3 movies?

Post by ABED » Fri Feb 19, 2016 5:19 pm

TheBlackPaladin wrote:
ABED wrote:Just imagine what season 3 would have been like if everything else stayed the same except if they kept the original music, but hired a good director and had good scripts.
It probably still would have been the low point of the in-house cast just because a lot of the actors were new, but still, this "low point" would have been a huge upgrade from the low point that actually came to be.
I get that, but my point was like your last statement, compared to what we got it would've been FAR better. I think instead of an F for that season, we could have gotten as high as a D+.
Very true. I don't think any actor couldve taken the dialogue from that era and made it sound good, which is why I try not to blame Ocean for their work on the show at the time.
In the years since I first saw it, my opinion has changed a little. I think many of those performances are very good in spite of some awful dialog. It's odd, sometimes a good/great actor can look awful with a terrible script and bad direction, but sometimes they can mitigate some of the damage.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

User avatar
Lord Beerus
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 21430
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 5:20 pm
Location: A temple on a giant tree
Contact:

Re: Why was the acting so good in the 3 movies?

Post by Lord Beerus » Fri Feb 19, 2016 5:30 pm

Better direction, scripting, translations and acting. That's all there is too it.

User avatar
Kunzait_83
I Live Here
Posts: 3044
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2004 5:19 pm

Re: Why was the acting so good in the 3 movies?

Post by Kunzait_83 » Sun Feb 28, 2016 9:43 pm

The first three DBZ Movie dubs are the only glimpse we'll ever get into an alternate universe where Pioneer had gotten the full dubbing/distribution rights instead of FUNimation, and released the whole series as a straight to video release same as other "legitimate" anime of the time (ala Ranma, Patlabor, Urusei Yatsura, Evangelion etc.) instead of on television as a chintzy hatchet job "Saturday morning kids' Pew Pew!" effort (ala Robotech, Voltron, Ronin Warriors, Sailor Moon, the whole 4Kids oeuvre, etc).

This makes a HUGE difference on the end product as those are two wildly opposing approaches to anime dubbing which cater to two entirely different types of audiences altogether, particularly within the context of the 90s.

If anything the three Pioneer movie dubs, well handled as they were, were still hobbled somewhat by needing to retain a number of questionable casting choices (and naming/translation conventions) from the Saban-produced syndicated series of the time. If Pioneer did the entire thing from scratch from the getgo, the dub that would result of that would very likely still be different from what is currently seen in the 3 DBZ movies. As those stand, they're the closest approximation we'll ever get into that sort of "what if" scenario of FUNimation (or another TV-dependent company like FUNimation) never being a part of the picture at all whatsoever.

From my own vantage point, as someone who'd already been an active anime/DB fan well before the Cartoon Network days, I'd have much, MUCH preferred if things had turned out that way instead: with Pioneer just releasing the whole series first to VHS, then shortly thereafter to DVD as just another of the era's domestic anime video releases, and Dragon Ball never having to have been a part of the atrocious 90s American children's television industry in any way, shape, or form.

In that scenario, there'd have been at the bare minimum a very passable dub along with dual language releases from the jump. That's it. No fuss, no muss, no bullshit overwrought fanboy drama. Just another set of anime tapes/discs on the Suncoast, FYE, and Mom & Pop video store racks alongside all the other stuff at the time from AnimEigo, Central Park Media, Viz, ADV, etc. without in any way needing to consider the completely ridiculous, nonsensically puritanical whims of what is seen as "appropriate" for mainstream American children's television as being a factor in the slightest.

There'd have likely been a ton of other fallout from this as well: no Cartoon Network DBZ airings, possibly even no "Toonami anime phenomenon" at all as well. I'm also just as fine with those possibilities as well: but again, that's coming from someone who never in any way “needed” those things as a “gateway” to have gotten into anime or Dragon Ball at all in the first place.
http://80s90sdragonballart.tumblr.com/

Kunzait's Wuxia Thread
Journey to the West, chapter 26 wrote:The strong man will meet someone stronger still:
Come to naught at last he surely will!
Zephyr wrote:And that's to say nothing of how pretty much impossible it is to capture what made the original run of the series so great. I'm in the generation of fans that started with Toonami, so I totally empathize with the feeling of having "missed the party", experiencing disappointment, and wanting to experience it myself. But I can't, that's how life is. Time is a bitch. The party is over. Kageyama, Kikuchi, and Maeda are off the sauce now; Yanami almost OD'd; Yamamoto got arrested; Toriyama's not going to light trash cans on fire and hang from the chandelier anymore. We can't get the band back together, and even if we could, everyone's either old, in poor health, or calmed way the fuck down. Best we're going to get, and are getting, is a party that's almost entirely devoid of the magic that made the original one so awesome that we even want more.
Kamiccolo9 wrote:It grinds my gears that people get "outraged" over any of this stuff. It's a fucking cartoon. If you are that determined to be angry about something, get off the internet and make a stand for something that actually matters.
Rocketman wrote:"Shonen" basically means "stupid sentimental shit" anyway, so it's ok to be anti-shonen.

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20486
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: Why was the acting so good in the 3 movies?

Post by ABED » Sun Feb 28, 2016 11:08 pm

But who knows if we would have gotten all of the series given its sheer size. Yeah, it sucks that DB went through what it did, but I'm not sure we would have ever gotten the whole series legally subbed. Plus, I wouldn't give up the Kai dub for anything. As an added bonus, Kelamis is no longer Goku.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

Post Reply