Like I have repetitively told you, my sole reason to think Freeza increased in power is because it would be illogical in-universe for him to not increase it while fighting a SSJ. I don't base my opinion on anything more than that, nor do I think my opinion is fact since there is room for interpretation.Galan007 wrote: 1.) I never said you were unintelligent. I said there was no intelligible way to defend your initial rationale.
2.) Your initial rationale was: "Freeza wasn't suppressed, because Cold never said he wasn't using his full power." Yes, I do believe that logic is silly, because it allows us to overlay our own personal opinions onto a scene, even when NO evidence supports said opinions. It's no different than: "Goku never said that Raditz couldn't stop time, therefore Raditz could stop time." Again, that sort of logic borders on a no-limits fallacy, and no-limits fallacies are silly. If a no-limits fallacy wasn't your intention, then great! I'm just describing to you how it looks to me.
You shouldn't take things so personally. I haven't insulted you any more than you have insulted me(if you perceived any of my previous responses as insults, it was unintentional on my end), so I don't know why you're back-handedly threatening me via the report function..? This is an internet-based discussion forum. I am allowed to have a different opinion than you.
And like I also already told you, my examples regarding Cold and Gohan were just examples to demonstrate how your logic of assuming what it means when characters don't state something is flawed and can be used to assume various things, including the opposite of your opinion. But I don't base my opinion on any of that. Those examples were just a response to your argument. You are still insisting that I'm basing my opinion on what Cold said or didn't say, but, like I said, my opinion isn't based on that at all. That is just an example to show you how your own argument is flawed.
And finally, what you stated was "there's really no intelligible way to defend the silly rationale you were trying to sell". That has nothing to do with expressing or defending your own opinion. That's just a passive-aggressive way of belittling my opinion and arguments, while associating my opinion and myself with the terms "silly" and "intelligible" and also claiming that nothing else besides what you are saying has validity. Such a tone is ultimately inappropriate for a good discussion and almost always leads to the toxic degeneration of the discussion and topic. Since I'm not a moderator, instead of responding to you in kind or just reporting you right away, I just warned you that if you have that tone in further discussions, I will, eventually, report it and leave the situation to the judgment of the moderators. I'm not taking it personally at all. If I did, I would just respond to you in kind.