What aspects do you think tarnished the Dragonball brand?

Discussion regarding the entirety of the franchise in a general (meta) sense, including such aspects as: production, trends, merchandise, fan culture, and more.
User avatar
SingleFringe&Sparks
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1642
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:55 pm
Location: Mt. Paozu/East District

Re: What aspects do you think tarnished the Dragonball brand

Post by SingleFringe&Sparks » Sat Jun 04, 2016 11:15 am

Cipher wrote:
kei17 wrote:You know, even Toriyama is pissed off by Super. I can't even find anything good in it.
That's one of the really unfortunate aspects of the whole thing -- Toriyama's providing plots I'd have been happy to follow as part of the manga, or in general just handled by him, but something is terribly lost when it passes through Toei's animation and scripting in such a rushed manner.
As much as I hate Toei's Super; I like the manga and find that Toyotaro just envisions the scenarios and symbolism a lot better than Toei's scriptwriters, too bad the manga is just going to be side-lined as a novelty though.
Zephyr wrote:The fandom's collective fetishizing of "moments" is also ridiculous to me. No, not everyone needs a fucking "shine" moment. If that's all you want, then all you want is fanservice, rather than an actual coherent story. And of course those aren't mutually exclusive; you could have a coherent story with "shine" moments! But if a story is perfectly coherent (and I'm really not seeing any compelling arguments that this one is anything but, despite constantly recurring, really poorly reasoned, attempts to argue otherwise), and you're bemoaning the lack of "shine" moments as a reason for the story's poor quality, then you're letting your thirst for "shine" moments obfuscate your ability to detect basic storytelling when it's right in front of you.

User avatar
Footlong Shoe
Patreon Supporter
Posts: 404
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2015 10:47 pm
Location: Durham, NC
Contact:

Re: What aspects do you think tarnished the Dragonball brand

Post by Footlong Shoe » Sat Jun 04, 2016 1:58 pm

Theophrastus wrote:Not saying it's wrong, but that seems slightly at odds with what he was supposed to have said in the introduction to the work in question:
http://www.kanzenshuu.com/manga/spin-of ... oss-epoch/
Even though it’s called a “collaboration”, Oda-kun did almost everything, including the story. I just drew my own characters. This kind of work sure is nice~. I was able to really enjoy drawing it.
He may have enjoyed it, but that doesn't necessarily mean he wants to do it again. I think he meant that it was fun, but he doesn't want to go back to drawing it as a weekly series.
Discord/Twitter - @FootlongShoe

Ballistictiger
Newbie
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2016 12:32 am

Re: What aspects do you think tarnished the Dragonball brand

Post by Ballistictiger » Sun Jun 05, 2016 4:15 am

Everything that came up after the end of Z to me feels like it was a cash grab, so that'll be my answer. I loath GT and I really dislike Super. At least to Super's defense, I don't hate everything about it, just 95% of it.

Kuririn Fan
Banned Alternate Account
Posts: 2313
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2015 12:32 pm

Re: What aspects do you think tarnished the Dragonball brand

Post by Kuririn Fan » Sun Jun 05, 2016 9:37 am

sintzu wrote:
Kuririn Fan wrote: Look what happened with GT and Super.

And there are 519 chapters, my dear admins, Trunks special chapter isn't numbered.
Which is a shame cause they both had a lot of potential to be great.

I know but it's easier to say 520 instead of 519 and a special chapter.
519 chapters, last chapter is 519. Z doesnt have 293 episodes because of 2 specials - it has 291.

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20481
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: What aspects do you think tarnished the Dragonball brand

Post by ABED » Sun Jun 05, 2016 9:52 am

Kuririn Fan wrote:
sintzu wrote:
Kuririn Fan wrote: Look what happened with GT and Super.

And there are 519 chapters, my dear admins, Trunks special chapter isn't numbered.
Which is a shame cause they both had a lot of potential to be great.

I know but it's easier to say 520 instead of 519 and a special chapter.
519 chapters, last chapter is 519. Z doesnt have 293 episodes because of 2 specials - it has 291.
The TV specials weren't episode length. That's a bad analogy.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

Kuririn Fan
Banned Alternate Account
Posts: 2313
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2015 12:32 pm

Re: What aspects do you think tarnished the Dragonball brand

Post by Kuririn Fan » Sun Jun 05, 2016 9:54 am

ABED wrote: The TV specials weren't episode length. That's a bad analogy.
Still, both are "special" cases. Last chapter is 519.

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20481
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: What aspects do you think tarnished the Dragonball brand

Post by ABED » Sun Jun 05, 2016 10:01 am

Kuririn Fan wrote:
ABED wrote: The TV specials weren't episode length. That's a bad analogy.
Still, both are "special" cases. Last chapter is 519.
But it's the length of a normal chapter. I find your distinction pedantic. It's not wrong, just pedantic.
Last edited by ABED on Sun Jun 05, 2016 10:02 am, edited 1 time in total.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

Kuririn Fan
Banned Alternate Account
Posts: 2313
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2015 12:32 pm

Re: What aspects do you think tarnished the Dragonball brand

Post by Kuririn Fan » Sun Jun 05, 2016 10:02 am

ABED wrote:
Kuririn Fan wrote:
ABED wrote: The TV specials weren't episode length. That's a bad analogy.
Still, both are "special" cases. Last chapter is 519.
But it's the length of a normal chapter.
Little bit longer, normal chapter is 15 pages, this special one - 19.

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20481
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: What aspects do you think tarnished the Dragonball brand

Post by ABED » Sun Jun 05, 2016 10:05 am

Again, that's incredibly pedantic. What issue do you have with saying Dragon Ball has 520 chapters? Even if it's a special chapter, it's still a chapter. The TV specials weren't episodes.
Last edited by ABED on Sun Jun 05, 2016 10:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

Kuririn Fan
Banned Alternate Account
Posts: 2313
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2015 12:32 pm

Re: What aspects do you think tarnished the Dragonball brand

Post by Kuririn Fan » Sun Jun 05, 2016 10:07 am

ABED wrote:Again, that's incredibly pedantic.
I do not care, the fact stays - last chapter is numbered as #519.
http://www.kanzenshuu.com/manga/chp-519/

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20481
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: What aspects do you think tarnished the Dragonball brand

Post by ABED » Sun Jun 05, 2016 10:08 am

Kuririn Fan wrote:
ABED wrote:Again, that's incredibly pedantic.
I do not care, the fact stays - last chapter is numbered as #519.
http://www.kanzenshuu.com/manga/chp-519/
The main narrative, yes, but there are 520 chapters total as a special chapter is still a chapter.

Back on topic, I wouldn't say it tarnished the brand, but I do think Toriyama's lack of planning does hurt the stories.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

Kuririn Fan
Banned Alternate Account
Posts: 2313
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2015 12:32 pm

Re: What aspects do you think tarnished the Dragonball brand

Post by Kuririn Fan » Sun Jun 05, 2016 10:10 am

ABED wrote:
Kuririn Fan wrote:
ABED wrote:Again, that's incredibly pedantic.
I do not care, the fact stays - last chapter is numbered as #519.
http://www.kanzenshuu.com/manga/chp-519/
The main narrative, yes, but there are 520 chapters total as a special chapter is still a chapter.

Back on topic, I wouldn't say it tarnished the brand, but I do think Toriyama's lack of planning does hurt the stories.
519 numbered chapters.

User avatar
Kamiccolo9
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10371
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2013 9:32 pm
Location: Regensburg, Germany

Re: What aspects do you think tarnished the Dragonball brand

Post by Kamiccolo9 » Sun Jun 05, 2016 10:14 am

Kuririn Fan wrote: 519 numbered chapters.
For the love of God, we get it.
Champion of the 1st Kanzenshuu Short Story Tenkaichi Budokai
Kamiccolo9's Kompendium of Short Stories
Cipher wrote:If Vegeta does not kill Gohan, I will stop illegally streaming the series.
Malik_DBNA wrote:
Scarz wrote:Malik, stop. People are asking me for lewd art of possessed Bra (with Vegeta).
"Achievement Unlocked: Rule 34"

Kuririn Fan
Banned Alternate Account
Posts: 2313
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2015 12:32 pm

Re: What aspects do you think tarnished the Dragonball brand

Post by Kuririn Fan » Sun Jun 05, 2016 10:15 am

Kamiccolo9 wrote:
Kuririn Fan wrote: 519 numbered chapters.
For the love of God, we get it.
But obviously ABED doesnt, since he feels the need to reply every time.

User avatar
Kamiccolo9
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10371
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2013 9:32 pm
Location: Regensburg, Germany

Re: What aspects do you think tarnished the Dragonball brand

Post by Kamiccolo9 » Sun Jun 05, 2016 10:17 am

Kuririn Fan wrote:
Kamiccolo9 wrote:
Kuririn Fan wrote: 519 numbered chapters.
For the love of God, we get it.
But obviously ABED doesnt, since he feels the need to reply every time.
And you're being an obnoxious prick. Just drop it.
Champion of the 1st Kanzenshuu Short Story Tenkaichi Budokai
Kamiccolo9's Kompendium of Short Stories
Cipher wrote:If Vegeta does not kill Gohan, I will stop illegally streaming the series.
Malik_DBNA wrote:
Scarz wrote:Malik, stop. People are asking me for lewd art of possessed Bra (with Vegeta).
"Achievement Unlocked: Rule 34"

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20481
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: What aspects do you think tarnished the Dragonball brand

Post by ABED » Sun Jun 05, 2016 10:20 am

I clearly got it, I simply think you are making too big of a deal about a technicality. Maybe I shouldn't have so we can keep the thread on topic.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

Kuririn Fan
Banned Alternate Account
Posts: 2313
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2015 12:32 pm

Re: What aspects do you think tarnished the Dragonball brand

Post by Kuririn Fan » Sun Jun 05, 2016 10:20 am

Kamiccolo9 wrote: And you're being an obnoxious prick. Just drop it.
How should i respond to this? You could tell me to drop it without calling me names, i dont think that was necessary.

User avatar
Basaku
I Live Here
Posts: 2044
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 3:00 pm
Location: Planet of the Apes

Re: What aspects do you think tarnished the Dragonball brand

Post by Basaku » Sun Jun 05, 2016 10:35 am

Assuming it's true, not exactly sure why would he be pissed at Super. All the main flaws of Super sans animation (Toei's job) come from Toriyama's plot outline so, yeah.

User avatar
Ryuman
Regular
Posts: 599
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2012 12:33 am
Location: Taunton, England

Re: What aspects do you think tarnished the Dragonball brand

Post by Ryuman » Sun Jun 05, 2016 11:21 am

kei17 wrote:
Kid Buu wrote:
kei17 wrote: You know, even Toriyama is pissed off by Super
Really? I heard he wasn't a fan of the animation, but haven't heard anything along the lines of that.
I can't tell you the source because it's insider information, but he surely got turned off and reluctant to keep being involved with Super, so they had to provide him with some basic ideas for the plot of the new Goku Black arc.
This is honsetly one of the worst things I could ever hear in regards to the franchise. I thought handing Toriyama ideas for the Future Trunks arc was just executive meddling, but this is far worse to me somehow. After all this time since BOG, things have been looking great in terms of Toriyama's enthusiasm. He's warmed up again, and it's made me very happy about the franchise. After hearing this, I just don't know how to feel anymore...

User avatar
B
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5563
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 10:15 am
Contact:

Re: What aspects do you think tarnished the Dragonball brand

Post by B » Sun Jun 05, 2016 12:34 pm

I may be misinterpreting what Kei is saying, but not only is it disheartening to hear the show has upset Toriyama, but "having to provide some basic ideas for the plot" sounds like rehashing the Cell arc and Movie 3 is the thing that keeps Toriyama interested. If the brilliant, never-been-done-before idea of an evil Goku was all it took to satiate him, I can't imagine how poor their first idea was.
Keen Observation of Dragon Ball Z Movie 4's Climax wrote:Slug shits to see the genki

Post Reply