"Dragon Ball Super" Series Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Discussion specifically regarding the "Dragon Ball Super" TV series premiering July 2015 in Japan, including individual threads for each episode.
User avatar
kinisking
I Live Here
Posts: 4987
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2015 2:21 pm
Location: United States.

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by kinisking » Tue Aug 16, 2016 2:02 am

omaro34 wrote:
kinisking wrote:I don't understand the complaints about Future trunks in Super. People calling him a pansy make no sense.
Why would Future Trunks be getting hate? I haven't seen any.
You'd be surprised. Not here but on YouTube and instagram it's crazy. Some people are saying he's a wuss or sucks compared to his DBZ self... when he's exactly the same character. It's like they expect him to destroy black like he did with Freeza or the Android but don't realize there wouldn't be an arc in that case.
Jinzoningen MULE wrote: Maybe I should start making it a point not to comment when I'm not sure of something. Too many people know what they're talking about around here.
Disclaimer: I might get into a disagreement with you. Sometimes I might even get feisty about it. I'll never harbor negative feelings because of it though. I hope you feel the same way!
I made a bet with Alee9977 that Vegeta won't be beaten quickly by an opponent. If I lose, I switch my avatar to Vegeta getting beat by hit. If I win, he switches it to Vegeta holding Black by his hair. This will last a month.

Pannaliciour
OMG CRAZY REGEN
Posts: 774
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2015 6:04 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by Pannaliciour » Tue Aug 16, 2016 4:02 am

Haha like he could destroy 17, 18 and Cell the first time.

User avatar
kinisking
I Live Here
Posts: 4987
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2015 2:21 pm
Location: United States.

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by kinisking » Tue Aug 16, 2016 5:18 am

Pannaliciour wrote:Haha like he could destroy 17, 18 and Cell the first time.
Exactly. I hate the fans who expect the characters to always be absolute bad asses. They have weak moments and they're better for it.
Jinzoningen MULE wrote: Maybe I should start making it a point not to comment when I'm not sure of something. Too many people know what they're talking about around here.
Disclaimer: I might get into a disagreement with you. Sometimes I might even get feisty about it. I'll never harbor negative feelings because of it though. I hope you feel the same way!
I made a bet with Alee9977 that Vegeta won't be beaten quickly by an opponent. If I lose, I switch my avatar to Vegeta getting beat by hit. If I win, he switches it to Vegeta holding Black by his hair. This will last a month.

User avatar
dbs fanboy
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1190
Joined: Tue May 24, 2016 4:08 pm
Location: Spain

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by dbs fanboy » Tue Aug 16, 2016 6:46 am

kinisking wrote:
omaro34 wrote:
kinisking wrote:I don't understand the complaints about Future trunks in Super. People calling him a pansy make no sense.
Why would Future Trunks be getting hate? I haven't seen any.
You'd be surprised. Not here but on YouTube and instagram it's crazy. Some people are saying he's a wuss or sucks compared to his DBZ self... when he's exactly the same character. It's like they expect him to destroy black like he did with Freeza or the Android but don't realize there wouldn't be an arc in that case.
Mah, Youtube is the place where dbs receives more hate, even when an episode or something is well done, people bash it, and i'm not talking about valid criticism, no, I'm talking about the typical guy that watches ep 47, call it "bad animation" and then compare it to a shot from a dbz movie implying that he/she, is complaining about art and not animation.
I really miss ma boy, Black :( :cry:


dbgtFO wrote:

Pannaliciour
OMG CRAZY REGEN
Posts: 774
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2015 6:04 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by Pannaliciour » Tue Aug 16, 2016 7:04 am

Trunks is a bad ass character, he has great moments. Thats what you get if you have Vegeta's blood mixed with Bulma's blood.

User avatar
Khin
I Live Here
Posts: 2540
Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2015 12:33 am
Location: West City
Contact:

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by Khin » Tue Aug 16, 2016 7:16 am

I wonder if Goku will use Kaiou-ken again. I know it was probably a Toei addition when Goku used it in the previous arc, but it would be quite stupid if Goku wouldn’t use it in times of desperate situations in this arc or in the future arcs.

User avatar
kinisking
I Live Here
Posts: 4987
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2015 2:21 pm
Location: United States.

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by kinisking » Tue Aug 16, 2016 10:28 am

Khin wrote:I wonder if Goku will use Kaiou-ken again. I know it was probably a Toei addition when Goku used it in the previous arc, but it would be quite stupid if Goku wouldn’t use it in times of desperate situations in this arc or in the future arcs.
I'm pretty sure king Kai specifically told him not to do it again in 43. Too lazy to check though.
Jinzoningen MULE wrote: Maybe I should start making it a point not to comment when I'm not sure of something. Too many people know what they're talking about around here.
Disclaimer: I might get into a disagreement with you. Sometimes I might even get feisty about it. I'll never harbor negative feelings because of it though. I hope you feel the same way!
I made a bet with Alee9977 that Vegeta won't be beaten quickly by an opponent. If I lose, I switch my avatar to Vegeta getting beat by hit. If I win, he switches it to Vegeta holding Black by his hair. This will last a month.

User avatar
Khin
I Live Here
Posts: 2540
Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2015 12:33 am
Location: West City
Contact:

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by Khin » Tue Aug 16, 2016 10:33 am

kinisking wrote:I'm pretty sure king Kai specifically told him not to do it again in 43. Too lazy to check though.
Kaio also told Goku not to go beyond regular Kaiou-ken back in the Saiyan Arc, but Goku still used x3 and x4 because he had no other choice otherwise he would get destroyed, along with the Earth. If this happens again, like Black becoming so much stronger than Goku that even Super Saiyan Blue wouldn't do any good, wouldn't it be extremely stupid for him not to use even just a regular Kaiou-ken ?

User avatar
Anime Kitten
I Live Here
Posts: 4275
Joined: Mon May 23, 2016 3:53 pm
Contact:

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by Anime Kitten » Tue Aug 16, 2016 11:52 am

Pannaliciour wrote: Ok but why in Trunks timeline? I know he can go there because of the Time Ring but why Trunks timeline. Humanity is everywhere not only in the timeline of Trunks (Universe 7). The only reason could be that Goku died in that Timeline.

And btw Black knew about Vegeta. Zam hasn't met Vegeta (yet). So if Zam steals Goku's body in Trunks timeline, in a timeline where Vegeta is dead, how did he know Vegeta. Either Black isn't related at all with Zam or by stealing Goku's body he knows Goku's personal stuff (like Vegeta and the wannabe kamehameha wave)
Exactly. We don't know where Zamasu is going yet, or why he'd go to the FUTURE of Universe 7. I'm hoping we get a slow process of piecing this together instead of a huge revelation all at once.
MyAnimeList | AniList
Discord: suchmisfortune

User avatar
omaro34
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1969
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2015 7:27 pm
Location: Western Canada

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by omaro34 » Tue Aug 16, 2016 11:54 am

kinisking wrote:
omaro34 wrote:
kinisking wrote:I don't understand the complaints about Future trunks in Super. People calling him a pansy make no sense.
Why would Future Trunks be getting hate? I haven't seen any.
You'd be surprised. Not here but on YouTube and instagram it's crazy. Some people are saying he's a wuss or sucks compared to his DBZ self... when he's exactly the same character. It's like they expect him to destroy black like he did with Freeza or the Android but don't realize there wouldn't be an arc in that case.
Lol that's funny. I think it's because in the minds of casual DBZ fans they remember the Future Trunks that made the badass entrance on Earth by giving his enemies the death stare, casually stroking his hair and smirking while he took out Freeza & King Cold with ease.

But you're right, he hasn't changed personality-wise. The people on Youtube and Instagram that bash characters with no real justification just do it for nostalgic purposes. Those are the people that never watched the original Dragonball but have seen the Bruce Falcouner DBZ, and watched the first Broly movie 10 times.
"Kami is the Morgan Freeman of Dragonball Z"

Check out my Piccolo page: https://www.facebook.com/PiccoloTheSuperNamek/?ref=hl

GodKaio-Ken
I Live Here
Posts: 2326
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2016 6:00 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by GodKaio-Ken » Tue Aug 16, 2016 1:08 pm

Khin wrote:
kinisking wrote:I'm pretty sure king Kai specifically told him not to do it again in 43. Too lazy to check though.
Kaio also told Goku not to go beyond regular Kaiou-ken back in the Saiyan Arc, but Goku still used x3 and x4 because he had no other choice otherwise he would get destroyed, along with the Earth. If this happens again, like Black becoming so much stronger than Goku that even Super Saiyan Blue wouldn't do any good, wouldn't it be extremely stupid for him not to use even just a regular Kaiou-ken ?
Agreed on all accounts. Obviously from my name I loved it buthe writers really wrote themselves into a hole where it looks dumb if he didn't use it.

I posted a theory a while back saying it would be kind of cool if Goku didlose his power by using the move and had to work to regain it somehow while other characters dealt with a serious threat. Create some drama.
Currently watching: My Hero Academia

Last watched: Akame Ga Kill, Hokuto No Ken, Hokuto No Ken 2, Hunter X Hunter

Quote if I were to Hakai someone: "Omae Wa Mou Shindeiru. Hakai!"

User avatar
TekTheNinja
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1647
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 11:36 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by TekTheNinja » Tue Aug 16, 2016 4:01 pm

omaro34 wrote:
kinisking wrote:
omaro34 wrote:
Why would Future Trunks be getting hate? I haven't seen any.
You'd be surprised. Not here but on YouTube and instagram it's crazy. Some people are saying he's a wuss or sucks compared to his DBZ self... when he's exactly the same character. It's like they expect him to destroy black like he did with Freeza or the Android but don't realize there wouldn't be an arc in that case.
Lol that's funny. I think it's because in the minds of casual DBZ fans they remember the Future Trunks that made the badass entrance on Earth by giving his enemies the death stare, casually stroking his hair and smirking while he took out Freeza & King Cold with ease.

But you're right, he hasn't changed personality-wise. The people on Youtube and Instagram that bash characters with no real justification just do it for nostalgic purposes. Those are the people that never watched the original Dragonball but have seen the Bruce Falcouner DBZ, and watched the first Broly movie 10 times.
Trunks is fine, but He'd better fight again this arc or else he actually will look lame. The arc is named after him after all, so it only makes sense to get a chance to actually see him in action more.

User avatar
Baggie_Saiyan
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10315
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2013 5:22 pm
Location: Atlantis.

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by Baggie_Saiyan » Tue Aug 16, 2016 4:07 pm

kinisking wrote:
Khin wrote:I wonder if Goku will use Kaiou-ken again. I know it was probably a Toei addition when Goku used it in the previous arc, but it would be quite stupid if Goku wouldn’t use it in times of desperate situations in this arc or in the future arcs.
I'm pretty sure king Kai specifically told him not to do it again in 43. Too lazy to check though.
I think Kaio told him not to be reckelss instead of flat out not doing it again.

User avatar
nite_jay
OMG CRAZY REGEN
Posts: 929
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2016 10:52 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by nite_jay » Tue Aug 16, 2016 4:27 pm

I think it would be cool if Goku tries to do SSGSSx10 but fails. That could lead to him being incapacitated and SSR Black having no real threats.

User avatar
Anime Kitten
I Live Here
Posts: 4275
Joined: Mon May 23, 2016 3:53 pm
Contact:

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by Anime Kitten » Tue Aug 16, 2016 4:32 pm

nite_jay wrote:I think it would be cool if Goku tries to do SSGSSx10 but fails. That could lead to him being incapacitated and SSR Black having no real threats.
It would also be a nice callback to the Delayed Onset Ki Disorder.
MyAnimeList | AniList
Discord: suchmisfortune

dblack
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 117
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 3:30 am

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by dblack » Tue Aug 16, 2016 5:43 pm

Gowasu having rings to each timeline makes me think most of the gods are main-timeline specific. Omni-King, Beerus, Whis, etc. Regular Kai exist in each because Supreme Kai helped Trunks vs Dabura. (Unless it was secretly Zamasu).
Would make sense why Zamasu would start with an alt timeline, no gods to get in his way. Also would make sense why everyone keeps talking about the consequences of time travel. They would see creating godless world's as a horrible consequence.
Curious to me Whis/Beerus were interested enough in Black to go to Uni10, but refuse to go to the future even to watch the fight. I don't think they're allowed.
I hope Zamasu starting in Uni 7 is because Goku's a moron and told him he'd wreck all the uni 7 Kai.

User avatar
Xeztin
I Live Here
Posts: 2244
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2015 7:15 pm
Location: Toyotarō's Place

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by Xeztin » Tue Aug 16, 2016 5:47 pm

Don't know if it's been posted or not but SSR aura apparently:
[spoiler]Image[/spoiler]

User avatar
TheDevilsCorpse
Moderator
Posts: 11378
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 4:34 am
Contact:

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by TheDevilsCorpse » Tue Aug 16, 2016 6:31 pm

I mean...maybe? But that card is like a month old. Granted it can only be obtained recently, but it was announced forever ago. Really though, Heroes takes a lot of liberties with card art. So chances could be that it's just to look cool.

Image
Direct translations of the Korean DB Online timeline and guidebook.
My personal "canon" and BP list. (Coming Soon)

User avatar
SaiyanZ
OMG CRAZY REGEN
Posts: 814
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 11:04 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by SaiyanZ » Wed Aug 17, 2016 3:31 am

The opening implies that Zamasu is taken aback and/or overwhelmed by some force, maybe some Majin-esque thing that amplifies his negative thoughts?
Tim Duncan is dope and forever.

My favorite anime and manga (characters included): https://myanimelist.net/profile/SaiyanZ?q=SaiyanZ

Dbzfan94
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5744
Joined: Mon Dec 16, 2013 5:16 pm
Location: Mt. Paozu

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by Dbzfan94 » Wed Aug 17, 2016 12:55 pm

nite_jay wrote:I think it would be cool if Goku tries to do SSGSSx10 but fails. That could lead to him being incapacitated and SSR Black having no real threats.
I'm too used to Dokkan Battle as seeing SSR Black makes me think of that game. SSJR is going to be what I use lol

Post Reply