Dragonball Z was not that good in the beginning..

Discussion regarding the entirety of the franchise in a general (meta) sense, including such aspects as: production, trends, merchandise, fan culture, and more.
User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20481
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: Dragonball Z was not that good in the beginning..

Post by ABED » Tue Sep 06, 2016 5:56 pm

MajinMan wrote:I honestly think that Raditz should not have been revealed as Goku's brother. It does not serve a purpose and adds no extra drama other than "Goku's brother is an evil alien bastard omg." The fact that we never see or hear from him ever again proves that he could have just been a random Saiyan that was sent to earth by Vegeta and Nappa to recruit Goku to their squad.
It makes sense from a plot perspective. Who but someone from Goku's family would think of coming to Earth to get Goku besides a family member?
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

User avatar
Jinzoningen MULE
I Live Here
Posts: 4405
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 8:33 pm
Location: Salt Mines

Re: Dragonball Z was not that good in the beginning..

Post by Jinzoningen MULE » Tue Sep 06, 2016 6:01 pm

MajinMan wrote:I honestly think that Raditz should not have been revealed as Goku's brother. It does not serve a purpose and adds no extra drama other than "Goku's brother is an evil alien bastard omg." The fact that we never see or hear from him ever again proves that he could have just been a random Saiyan that was sent to earth by Vegeta and Nappa to recruit Goku to their squad.
That would have also been acceptable for me. It's pretty obvious that Toriyama intended to do something with him, but scrapped the idea.
Retired.

User avatar
TheMikado
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5009
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 1:28 pm

Re: Dragonball Z was not that good in the beginning..

Post by TheMikado » Tue Sep 06, 2016 6:03 pm

ABED wrote:
MajinMan wrote:I honestly think that Raditz should not have been revealed as Goku's brother. It does not serve a purpose and adds no extra drama other than "Goku's brother is an evil alien bastard omg." The fact that we never see or hear from him ever again proves that he could have just been a random Saiyan that was sent to earth by Vegeta and Nappa to recruit Goku to their squad.
It makes sense from a plot perspective. Who but someone from Goku's family would think of coming to Earth to get Goku besides a family member?
Anyone who knew where he was headed in the original canon, like say the one who programmed the space pod or the brokers intending to sell the planet. I would have thought they'd have an idea of what planets were targeted and who they sent based in the child's power level. As I recall they specifically sent Goku to earth because it was easy to conquer and he was so weak so they had at least some Intel on both earth and Goku.

User avatar
MajinMan
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1237
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2014 3:42 am
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Dragonball Z was not that good in the beginning..

Post by MajinMan » Tue Sep 06, 2016 6:17 pm

ABED wrote:
MajinMan wrote:I honestly think that Raditz should not have been revealed as Goku's brother. It does not serve a purpose and adds no extra drama other than "Goku's brother is an evil alien bastard omg." The fact that we never see or hear from him ever again proves that he could have just been a random Saiyan that was sent to earth by Vegeta and Nappa to recruit Goku to their squad.
It makes sense from a plot perspective. Who but someone from Goku's family would think of coming to Earth to get Goku besides a family member?
Toriyama would have written it in another way. They could have told us that Vegeta had overheard that a Saiyan was sent to Earth before Planet Vegeta's demise. He would then tell Raditz (who isn't Goku's brother) to go recruit him so they can strengthen their squad. Raditz would arrive on Earth, and then things would play out mostly the same without the whole "I'm your brother" factor.
Heroes come and go, but legends are forever.

60.

Rest in peace.

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20481
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: Dragonball Z was not that good in the beginning..

Post by ABED » Tue Sep 06, 2016 7:12 pm

TheMikado wrote:
ABED wrote:
MajinMan wrote:I honestly think that Raditz should not have been revealed as Goku's brother. It does not serve a purpose and adds no extra drama other than "Goku's brother is an evil alien bastard omg." The fact that we never see or hear from him ever again proves that he could have just been a random Saiyan that was sent to earth by Vegeta and Nappa to recruit Goku to their squad.
It makes sense from a plot perspective. Who but someone from Goku's family would think of coming to Earth to get Goku besides a family member?
Anyone who knew where he was headed in the original canon, like say the one who programmed the space pod or the brokers intending to sell the planet. I would have thought they'd have an idea of what planets were targeted and who they sent based in the child's power level. As I recall they specifically sent Goku to earth because it was easy to conquer and he was so weak so they had at least some Intel on both earth and Goku.
Those people were dead and Vegeta doesn't strike me as the kind of guy that would go to a third class fighter for help.
It's pretty obvious that Toriyama intended to do something with him, but scrapped the idea.
How is it obvious? Raditz served his purpose? Making him Goku's brother does in fact add something to the story by characterizing the Saiyans as only caring about power. Even their family members don't matter to them.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

User avatar
Nejishiki
I Live Here
Posts: 2406
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 11:45 am

Re: Dragonball Z was not that good in the beginning..

Post by Nejishiki » Tue Sep 06, 2016 10:20 pm

It works for Goku's character. It establishes that family doesn't mean blood, but bond. The nuance is lost if the character isn't closely related to him. Sure, you could remove the brotherly ties, but I think that makes it more "random" than it would experiencing Goku react to a legitimate link to his race. Really, it's because so many treat families as a major component to their lives that it's interesting to test Goku's values with that knowledge. The person, not their title, should be judged, which is something he does often. It works on the other side for Raditz, too. He quickly dismisses their link once they frustrate him enough. He doesn't blink an eye over getting rid of both his nephew and brother once it's clear they won't be useful to him. You get a subtle look into Saiyan culture observing this behavior, which was another point to his introduction.

Cipher
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 6409
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 11:54 pm
Location: Nagano
Contact:

Re: Dragonball Z was not that good in the beginning..

Post by Cipher » Tue Sep 06, 2016 11:25 pm

I have mixed feelings on the opening thirty-some episodes. The training filler is largely fantastic, though it does last forever, and it's hard to appreciate what it would have been like tuning in real time, rather than marathoning it through home releases and faster-paced TV airings more than a decade later. I suppose with the manga, it might have just been fun extra content either way.

At any rate, the pacing is better than the nadir of the Namek arc adaptation, which just collapses sometime around the Ginyu Tokusentai's arrival.

I will say that the first episode of Z is fucking terrible. Twenty minutes of Gohan running around in the wilderness to show us nothing the manga doesn't pack into his first two introductory panels (which are adapted next episode anyway!). There's nothing really funny or interesting about it. Probably on my short list of least-favorite single episodes in the series.

User avatar
Jinzoningen MULE
I Live Here
Posts: 4405
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 8:33 pm
Location: Salt Mines

Re: Dragonball Z was not that good in the beginning..

Post by Jinzoningen MULE » Tue Sep 06, 2016 11:29 pm

Cipher wrote:I have mixed feelings on the opening thirty-some episodes. The training filler is largely fantastic, though it does last forever, and it's hard to appreciate what it would have been like tuning in real time, rather than marathoning it through home releases and faster-paced TV airings more than a decade later. I suppose with the manga, it might have just been fun extra content either way.

At any rate, the pacing is better than the nadir of the Namek arc adaptation, which just collapses sometime around the Ginyu Tokusentai's arrival.

I will say that the first episode of Z is fucking terrible. Twenty minutes of Gohan running around in the wilderness to show us nothing the manga doesn't pack into his first two introductory panels (which are adapted next episode anyway!). There's nothing really funny or interesting about it. Probably on my short list of least-favorite single episodes in the series.
I liked that episode... It was cute.
Retired.

Cipher
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 6409
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 11:54 pm
Location: Nagano
Contact:

Re: Dragonball Z was not that good in the beginning..

Post by Cipher » Tue Sep 06, 2016 11:41 pm

Jinzoningen MULE wrote:I liked that episode... It was cute.
I guess I like "cute" in Dragon Ball when it's both cute and funny. Toriyama nails that all the time. That episode just feels phoned in.

Obviously your mileage may vary.
Last edited by Cipher on Tue Sep 06, 2016 11:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Jinzoningen MULE
I Live Here
Posts: 4405
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 8:33 pm
Location: Salt Mines

Re: Dragonball Z was not that good in the beginning..

Post by Jinzoningen MULE » Tue Sep 06, 2016 11:42 pm

Cipher wrote:
Jinzoningen MULE wrote:I liked that episode... It was cute.
I guess I like "cute" in Dragon Ball when it's both cute and funny. Toriyama nails that all the time. That episode just feels phoned in.

Obviously your mileage may vary.
I'm a sap for any situation where kid Goku or Gohan are doing cute things. It's something I wish we got to see more of in DBS with Goten, Trunks, & Pan.
Retired.

User avatar
sintzu
Banned
Posts: 13583
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:41 pm

Re: Dragonball Z was not that good in the beginning..

Post by sintzu » Wed Sep 07, 2016 12:44 am

Friezacooler wrote:People that hate the pacing of DBZ and near releastic consistency would proply praise super for it's tom and Jerry antics or illogical fangirl powerscaling.
I hate Z's pacing and have complained countless times about Super's quality.
July 9th 2018 will be remembered as the day Broly became canon.

User avatar
Friezacooler
Regular
Posts: 694
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 2:13 am

Re: Dragonball Z was not that good in the beginning..

Post by Friezacooler » Wed Sep 07, 2016 1:26 am

sintzu wrote:
Friezacooler wrote:People that hate the pacing of DBZ and near releastic consistency would proply praise super for it's tom and Jerry antics or illogical fangirl powerscaling.
I hate Z's pacing and have complained countless times about Super's quality.
nothing wrong with the pacing of Z anime as the manga is there as an alternative. instate if we look at Super's extremely bad anime quality and we judge the super manga instate then we still stuck with the fangirlism and illogical powerscaling. Which indeed is complete opposite of what the Z anime was about, as it was avoiding to be like doctor slump or other toons with ton of suspension of disbelief.

User avatar
DBZAOTA482
Banned
Posts: 6995
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2012 4:04 pm
Contact:

Re: Dragonball Z was not that good in the beginning..

Post by DBZAOTA482 » Tue Oct 04, 2016 11:32 pm

Lujin_16 wrote:In my opinion the fight with Raditz was rushed than until episode 21 nothing special is happened..At Episode 21 came Vegeta & Nappa it was good really actionpacked but i think

not that great....At Episode 40 with Planet Namek Dragonball Z has started to become great like Dragonball Super with episode 37(Trunks Arc)
But Saiyan lore, Goku coming in grips with his heritage, Piccolo discovering his past and coming out of his father's shadow, Gohan's introduction and coming-of-age story, and Vegeta... :o
fadeddreams5 wrote:
DBZGTKOSDH wrote:... Haven't we already gotten these in GT? Goku dies, the DBs go away, and the Namekian DBs most likely won't be used again because of the Evil Dragons.
Goku didn't die in GT. The show sucked him off so much, it was impossible to keep him in the world of the living, so he ascended beyond mortality.
jjgp1112 wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2020 6:31 am I'm just about done with the concept of reboots and making shows that were products of their time and impactful "new and sexy" and in line with modern tastes and sensibilities. Let stuff stay in their era and give today's kids their own shit to watch.

I always side eye the people who say "Now my kids/today's kids can experience what I did as a child!" Nigga, who gives a fuck about your childhood? You're an adult now and it was at least 15 years ago. Let the kids have their own experience instead of picking at a corpse.

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20481
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: Dragonball Z was not that good in the beginning..

Post by ABED » Wed Oct 05, 2016 6:08 am

Goku coming in grips with his heritage, Piccolo coming out of his father's shadow
I love early DBZ. It's the best part of that show, but you make these things sound deeper than they actually were. Goku never really struggles with his heritage. It's not a huge arc for his character. Remember when he smiles after telling Kaio that he's a Saiyan? And Piccolo getting out of his father's shadow, I think you need to expand on that because there are a couple ways to interpret it.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

User avatar
Draconic
I Live Here
Posts: 2096
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2015 3:44 pm
Location: Romania

Re: Dragonball Z was not that good in the beginning..

Post by Draconic » Wed Oct 05, 2016 3:02 pm

While I really don't agree, since the Saiyan arc is my favorite in the series, I think the problem is that while the overall story is great, the episodes themselves aren't that good in the beginning (with a few exceptions). I really don't know how I was able to keep watching the series when I was a kid, with one episode weekly. When binge watching the show now the story flows much better than one episode a week.
This problem gets remedied after a while, but by that point the overall pacing goes down in quality. There are much better single episodes in the Namek, Cell and Buu arcs than there are in this early portion.
Check out the videos below, made by yours truly!

Goku vs Beerus BOG/Super mash-up https://gofile.io/d/kKKnMe

Vegeta vs Freeza ROF/Super mash-up https://gofile.io/d/MKPepW

User avatar
DBZAOTA482
Banned
Posts: 6995
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2012 4:04 pm
Contact:

Re: Dragonball Z was not that good in the beginning..

Post by DBZAOTA482 » Wed Oct 05, 2016 4:48 pm

ABED wrote:
Goku coming in grips with his heritage, Piccolo coming out of his father's shadow
I love early DBZ. It's the best part of that show, but you make these things sound deeper than they actually were. Goku never really struggles with his heritage. It's not a huge arc for his character. Remember when he smiles after telling Kaio that he's a Saiyan? And Piccolo getting out of his father's shadow, I think you need to expand on that because there are a couple ways to interpret it.
Goku refused to accept that he was a Saiyan but he learns more pieces of his past that makes it undeniable and he even succumbs to his Saiyan urges. It's only after Vegeta gets killed by Freeza does he proudly claims himself as a Saiyan.

Everyone's perception of Piccolo was based on what his father did (except Goku and Gohan's) since he's the demon reincarnated but as we're shown, which is evident even from the beginning, he is a far cry from his father.
fadeddreams5 wrote:
DBZGTKOSDH wrote:... Haven't we already gotten these in GT? Goku dies, the DBs go away, and the Namekian DBs most likely won't be used again because of the Evil Dragons.
Goku didn't die in GT. The show sucked him off so much, it was impossible to keep him in the world of the living, so he ascended beyond mortality.
jjgp1112 wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2020 6:31 am I'm just about done with the concept of reboots and making shows that were products of their time and impactful "new and sexy" and in line with modern tastes and sensibilities. Let stuff stay in their era and give today's kids their own shit to watch.

I always side eye the people who say "Now my kids/today's kids can experience what I did as a child!" Nigga, who gives a fuck about your childhood? You're an adult now and it was at least 15 years ago. Let the kids have their own experience instead of picking at a corpse.

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20481
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: Dragonball Z was not that good in the beginning..

Post by ABED » Wed Oct 05, 2016 5:01 pm

Goku refused to accept that he was a Saiyan but he learns more pieces of his past that makes it undeniable and he even succumbs to his Saiyan urges. It's only after Vegeta gets killed by Freeza does he proudly claims himself as a Saiyan.
Go back to my Kaio-sama example. He refuses to accept it for a minute. He moved on very quickly.
Everyone's perception of Piccolo was based on what his father did (except Goku and Gohan's) since he's the demon reincarnated but as we're shown, which is evident even from the beginning, he is a far cry from his father.
He IS his father. He was all his father's memories and abilities, plus, Piccolo did in fact try to do what he/his father tried before. Piccolo's odd, he's a reincarnation/son, so everyone's perceptions of him are justifiable. Goku's perceptions of Piccolo are simply that he's a strong warrior. He's different from his dad, but only becomes so later on. He wasn't some misunderstood person who was persecuted so he turns to evil, which is what you seem to imply.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

User avatar
Bansho64
I Live Here
Posts: 2036
Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2015 12:59 am

Re: Dragonball Z was not that good in the beginning..

Post by Bansho64 » Wed Oct 05, 2016 5:12 pm

I'm afraid I'm not understanding the argument here? Aren't you two agreeing with each other?

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20481
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: Dragonball Z was not that good in the beginning..

Post by ABED » Wed Oct 05, 2016 5:52 pm

Bansho64 wrote:I'm afraid I'm not understanding the argument here? Aren't you two agreeing with each other?
No, he's saying Goku had a far harder time accepting his Saiyan heritage than I believe he did.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

User avatar
DBZAOTA482
Banned
Posts: 6995
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2012 4:04 pm
Contact:

Re: Dragonball Z was not that good in the beginning..

Post by DBZAOTA482 » Wed Oct 05, 2016 6:38 pm

ABED wrote:Go back to my Kaio-sama example. He refuses to accept it for a minute. He moved on very quickly.
I checked and he did call himself as a Saiyan when King Kai mentioned his planet had gravity as great as Planet Vegeta. Still didn't embrace it his heritage.
He IS his father. He was all his father's memories and abilities, plus, Piccolo did in fact try to do what he/his father tried before. Piccolo's odd, he's a reincarnation/son, so everyone's perceptions of him are justifiable. Goku's perceptions of Piccolo are simply that he's a strong warrior. He's different from his dad, but only becomes so later on. He wasn't some misunderstood person who was persecuted so he turns to evil, which is what you seem to imply.
Gohan was told by Goku that Piccolo wasn't nearly as evil as his father which is most likely why he was cool with feeding Piccolo a senzu since he knew he wouldn't do shit. It was also stated somewhere Piccolo hadn't kill anyone prior to the tournament and even had normal conversations with people.
fadeddreams5 wrote:
DBZGTKOSDH wrote:... Haven't we already gotten these in GT? Goku dies, the DBs go away, and the Namekian DBs most likely won't be used again because of the Evil Dragons.
Goku didn't die in GT. The show sucked him off so much, it was impossible to keep him in the world of the living, so he ascended beyond mortality.
jjgp1112 wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2020 6:31 am I'm just about done with the concept of reboots and making shows that were products of their time and impactful "new and sexy" and in line with modern tastes and sensibilities. Let stuff stay in their era and give today's kids their own shit to watch.

I always side eye the people who say "Now my kids/today's kids can experience what I did as a child!" Nigga, who gives a fuck about your childhood? You're an adult now and it was at least 15 years ago. Let the kids have their own experience instead of picking at a corpse.

Post Reply