The good and bad of Boo as a villain

Discussion regarding the entirety of the franchise in a general (meta) sense, including such aspects as: production, trends, merchandise, fan culture, and more.
User avatar
DonAce
Not-So-Newbie
Posts: 58
Joined: Thu May 07, 2015 3:35 am

The good and bad of Boo as a villain

Post by DonAce » Wed Nov 30, 2016 1:57 pm

I always felt like a lot of the discussion of the villains in Dragon Ball stay focused on a lot of the other more popular villains like Cell, Freeza, but I don't see a lot discussion about Boo as a villain. True, he is really inconsistent in terms of the way he behaves depending on what state he's in, but I feel like there's a lot to be said about him. He does lose quite a bit of personality once he ceases being Fat Boo, but we do get a cool looking and a sort of "chaos incarnate" kind of villain in the other forms of the other Boos. What do you all have to say?

precita
Banned
Posts: 6037
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2015 3:10 pm

Re: The good and bad of Boo as a villain

Post by precita » Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:18 pm

Buu being a mindless killing machine after Fat Buu was a nice change of pace for a villain. Sometimes just going with the "ultimate evil" trope and a villain with no morals is fun.

Super Buu and Kid Buu were just maniacs who wanted to kill everything and anything, and it worked well in the context of the story. I also like that he was a shape shifter which made for some cool fights that you can't do with any other villain. You can see him blown to bits and reform, extend his arms and legs, rip off a piece of his body like silly putty, etc.

User avatar
sintzu
Banned
Posts: 13583
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:41 pm

Re: The good and bad of Boo as a villain

Post by sintzu » Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:15 pm

I didn't like his origin being a copy of Cell's but thankfully Toriyama changed it.

Buu's multiple personalities was a plus for me cause it was like having 3 villains in 1 which was completely different from Cell and Freeza who more or less acted the same in all their forms.
July 9th 2018 will be remembered as the day Broly became canon.

Cipher
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 6409
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 11:54 pm
Location: Nagano
Contact:

Re: The good and bad of Boo as a villain

Post by Cipher » Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:39 pm

1) Boo's ever-changing look and personality really aids the frenzied feeling of the final arc.

2) I like the role each plays. His first form is a typical Toriyama joke -- the eternal god-killing monster we've heard of for so much of the arc is this bizarre, cheerful genie thing -- but becomes really fun to follow during the lull in the middle of the arc as he meets Mr. Satan while the main cast preps Gotenks. "Super" Boo is appropriately strange and creepy and effective in returning tension to the arc in an unexpected way. Pure Boo is more of an obstacle than a character, but it helps to remove dialogue and personality from the villain at a point when drama between the main characters is taking center stage. Pure Boo works because he's still strange enough to be entertaining, but he isn't chewing scenery or stealing the show. I'm glad we don't end on the hammy villainy of Gotenks- or Gohan-Boo, who really do feel like Cell-lite, but thankfully aren't more than interlude forms/personalities.

Also, can I just say? I love the way we get Super Boo. Boo spawning a copy of himself who winds up eating him is one of the weirdest, most unexpected things in the series.

User avatar
DonAce
Not-So-Newbie
Posts: 58
Joined: Thu May 07, 2015 3:35 am

Re: The good and bad of Boo as a villain

Post by DonAce » Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:20 pm

Cipher wrote:1) Boo's ever-changing look and personality really aids the frenzied feeling of the final arc.

2) I like the role each plays. His first form is a typical Toriyama joke -- the eternal god-killing monster we've heard of for so much of the arc is this bizarre, cheerful genie thing -- but becomes really fun to follow during the lull in the middle of the arc as he meets Mr. Satan while the main cast preps Gotenks. "Super" Boo is appropriately strange and creepy and effective in returning tension to the arc in an unexpected way. Pure Boo is more of an obstacle than a character, but it helps to remove dialogue and personality from the villain at a point when drama between the main characters is taking center stage. Pure Boo works because he's still strange enough to be entertaining, but he isn't chewing scenery or stealing the show. I'm glad we don't end on the hammy villainy of Gotenks- or Gohan-Boo, who really do feel like Cell-lite, but thankfully aren't more than interlude forms/personalities.

Also, can I just say? I love the way we get Super Boo. Boo spawning a copy of himself who winds up eating him is one of the weirdest, most unexpected things in the series.
Yeah, a lot of what you said here reflects my feeling on the guy. Sure, he isn't quite the sickly polite tyrant of Freeza or anything, but he is a very strange creature, almost incomprehensible in a way. What he lacks in personality in his later forms he makes up for in just being a cool monster almost kind of like a Godzilla. Sure, Godzilla doesn't really say anything but he is a very cool creature with strange powers which is sometimes all you need. Pure Boo pounding his chest like a primal gorilla and having him Goku through the ground the way he does really go a long way to making me enjoy him in a cool monster kind of way rather than as a more classical villain.

User avatar
kinisking
I Live Here
Posts: 4987
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2015 2:21 pm
Location: United States.

Re: The good and bad of Boo as a villain

Post by kinisking » Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:11 pm

I love all forms of boo. He's my favorite villian. His kid boo design might just be the best in the series. I love his goofy antics and his special abilities also. Btw, Boo is more popular than Cell in Japan so he's got that going for him.
Jinzoningen MULE wrote: Maybe I should start making it a point not to comment when I'm not sure of something. Too many people know what they're talking about around here.
Disclaimer: I might get into a disagreement with you. Sometimes I might even get feisty about it. I'll never harbor negative feelings because of it though. I hope you feel the same way!
I made a bet with Alee9977 that Vegeta won't be beaten quickly by an opponent. If I lose, I switch my avatar to Vegeta getting beat by hit. If I win, he switches it to Vegeta holding Black by his hair. This will last a month.

User avatar
RandomGuy96
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8881
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:57 pm
Location: San Diego, California, USA

Re: The good and bad of Boo as a villain

Post by RandomGuy96 » Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:49 pm

Super Buu and Fat Buu are my in my top three favorite Dragon Ball villains. I've ranted about why many times before.
The Monkey King wrote:
RandomGuy96 wrote:
dbgtFO wrote: Please elaborate as I do not know what you mean by "pushing Vegeta's destruction"
He's probably referring to the Bardock special. Zarbon was the one who first recommended destroying Planet Vegeta because the saiyans were rapidly growing in strength.
It was actually Beerus disguised as Zarbon #StayWoke
Herms wrote:The fact that the ridiculous power inflation is presented so earnestly makes me just roll my eyes and snicker. Like with Freeza, where he starts off over 10 times stronger than all his henchmen except Ginyu (because...well, just because), then we find out he can transform and get even more powerful, and then he reveals he can transform two more times, before finally coming out with the fact that he hasn't even been using anywhere near 50% of his power. Oh, and he can survive in the vacuum of space. All this stuff is just presented as the way Freeza is, without even an attempt at rationalizing it, yet the tone dictates we're supposed to take all this silly grasping at straws as thrilling danger. So I guess I don't really take the power inflation in the Boo arc seriously, but I don't take the power inflation in earlier arcs seriously either, so there's no net loss of seriousness. I think a silly story presented as serious is harder to accept than a silly story presented as silly.

User avatar
DBZAOTA482
Banned
Posts: 6995
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2012 4:04 pm
Contact:

Re: The good and bad of Boo as a villain

Post by DBZAOTA482 » Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:59 pm

+All his forms are all very different and enjoyable, except maybe Booten and especially Boohan where he basically became a generic arrogant villain.
+He's really unpredictable and scary
+He has the highest on-screen kill count of all villains
-He's too OP
-His backstory is lackluster
-No personal connection with any of the heroes
fadeddreams5 wrote:
DBZGTKOSDH wrote:... Haven't we already gotten these in GT? Goku dies, the DBs go away, and the Namekian DBs most likely won't be used again because of the Evil Dragons.
Goku didn't die in GT. The show sucked him off so much, it was impossible to keep him in the world of the living, so he ascended beyond mortality.
jjgp1112 wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2020 6:31 am I'm just about done with the concept of reboots and making shows that were products of their time and impactful "new and sexy" and in line with modern tastes and sensibilities. Let stuff stay in their era and give today's kids their own shit to watch.

I always side eye the people who say "Now my kids/today's kids can experience what I did as a child!" Nigga, who gives a fuck about your childhood? You're an adult now and it was at least 15 years ago. Let the kids have their own experience instead of picking at a corpse.

precita
Banned
Posts: 6037
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2015 3:10 pm

Re: The good and bad of Boo as a villain

Post by precita » Thu Dec 01, 2016 12:59 am

Yeah, it says a lot that when Buu becomes intelligent during Gotenks and Gohan Buu forms...he becomes less appealing.

He more or less starts acting like a Cell clone at that point, and his character waned. Thankfully Kid Buu came around not too long after and was a great finish.

User avatar
ShadowBardock89
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1365
Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2008 6:40 pm

Re: The good and bad of Boo as a villain

Post by ShadowBardock89 » Thu Dec 01, 2016 2:05 am

What makes Buu special than the previous main villains is that he really does not have a long term goal (Vegeta and Freeza had immortality as a goal and Cell had "perfection" to complete). Its just spur of the moment. He truly is a monster with no qualms or remorse.
http://www.kanzenshuu.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=40715&start=20#p1439892
http://dba.bn-ent.net/character/barduck.html
https://i.imgur.com/86hOk5i.gif

User avatar
nickzambuto
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1705
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2015 7:53 pm

Re: The good and bad of Boo as a villain

Post by nickzambuto » Thu Dec 01, 2016 3:12 am

So do we prefer his original backstory as a creation of Babidi, or the revised backstory where he has existed since the dawn of the universe?

User avatar
Desassina
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1554
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2015 9:04 am

Re: The good and bad of Boo as a villain

Post by Desassina » Thu Dec 01, 2016 6:45 am

I prefer a mix of both: there was an evil that existed since the dawn of the universe; Bibidi materialized it in the form of Boo. It wasn't by science, but wizardry, and that's why Baby, for example, could only shape shift without the immortality. If you play Phantasy Star on the Genesis, you'll realize that Boo is Dark Force, while his evil is Profound Darkness :wink:

User avatar
dragonballhero
Regular
Posts: 507
Joined: Sat May 30, 2015 2:17 pm

Re: The good and bad of Boo as a villain

Post by dragonballhero » Thu Dec 01, 2016 4:26 pm

Heck, his story arc is my favorite arc in all of Dragon Ball Z. Personally, I loved how Toriyama was able to make the Majin Buu arc both unbelievably dark in terms of the stakes, yet still be the most most light-hearted arc in all of DBZ, more or less.

In terms of dark tones, we have the death of (almost) EVERY single character on Earth, obviously including characters you wouldn't EVER expect to die in Dragon Ball as a whole such as Gohan, Goten, Chi-Chi, Bulma, Trunks, Videl, Ox-King, 18, Marron, Oolong, Puar, Mr. Popo, and every other character either who doesn't participate in battle at all, doesn't fight OFTEN, and/or has just been lucky enough to not die in battle up to this point.

In terms of light-hearted things, we had Gohan going to school with other kids his age for the first time, the antics of the Great Saiyaman, the wacky stuff going on at the World Tournament, almost ANYTHING related to Goten, Trunks, Gotenks, Fat Buu, Hercule, Bee, and ESPECIALLY Vegito.

User avatar
RedShift
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 102
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2016 8:23 pm

Re: The good and bad of Boo as a villain

Post by RedShift » Fri Dec 02, 2016 1:10 am

I have always hated Fat Buu's childish personality and squeaky voice. He's also mentally deficient until he absorbs Piccolo and can form proper sentences. He is, narrativly speaking irrelevant and adds nothing to the story by himself. He's more like a force of nature that the cast needs to stop.

On the other hand, Majin Buu is what I would imagine would happen if a genie fell off the deep end. He's so full of bullshit hax and raw power that nobody can keep up with him for very long. He's very nearly a out of context problem for the cast. At least until they introduced fusion.

I really wish that Gotenks fusion never wore off inside Buu. Having Vegito show up to help Gohan, then Gohan gets absorbed out of desperation. It wouldn't have changed much, but it would have had a lot more fireworks.

User avatar
FoolsGil
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5038
Joined: Tue May 21, 2013 10:37 pm

Re: The good and bad of Boo as a villain

Post by FoolsGil » Fri Dec 02, 2016 3:58 am

The good: Buu is just one big clusterf*ck and watching everything unfold was half the fun.

The bad: Buu exists because the heroes were poorly written.

User avatar
Akyon
Regular
Posts: 722
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2015 5:02 am

Re: The good and bad of Boo as a villain

Post by Akyon » Fri Dec 02, 2016 6:24 am

I can't say he did much for me personally honestly. I'd easily rank him the worst canon villain Dragonball's ever had.

I think the fact he basically came out of no where was a bit jarring. The sudden introduction of high powered magic was weird too. With so many people using ki, you would have thought someone other than Babidi and Roshi's sister would have used magic throughout the course of the story.

His arc overall felt very last minute, which I suppose it was, but unlike Cell or the Androids there was no build up to this creature appearing, and unlike these villains from the future; Buu having had existed since the dawn of time and hidden on Earth, you would have thought someone who had as profound an effect on the spiritual world would have been mentioned at least once in passing before hand.

He lacked direction, motivation or a defined overall personality. A lot of people seem to think of this as a pro; saying he's chaotic and that's refreshing and exciting, but honestly to me he just seems like an incredibly poorly written villain. Basically Broly with less motivation(and that's saying something) and more unique skills.
Favourite User quote:
Vice wrote:"Look at all these characters getting some shine in the buildup for the tournament of power, maybe we'll get to see some other characters do some stuff instead of the same old shit."
1. Goku (Universe 7) has eliminated 6 competitor & Vegeta (Universe 7) has eliminated 6 competitors


"Fuck."

User avatar
Lord Beerus
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 21430
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 5:20 pm
Location: A temple on a giant tree
Contact:

Re: The good and bad of Boo as a villain

Post by Lord Beerus » Fri Dec 02, 2016 7:52 pm

Majin Boo changes in behaviour were quite unique in themselves. He started out a bit of blank slate but then his child like innocence really shows how easily he could be moulded into a completely different person. The epitome of "nature vs nurture".

precita
Banned
Posts: 6037
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2015 3:10 pm

Re: The good and bad of Boo as a villain

Post by precita » Fri Dec 02, 2016 7:55 pm

Akyon wrote:
He lacked direction, motivation or a defined overall personality. A lot of people seem to think of this as a pro; saying he's chaotic and that's refreshing and exciting, but honestly to me he just seems like an incredibly poorly written villain. Basically Broly with less motivation(and that's saying something) and more unique skills.
Its not so much Buu's lack of personality, its what he does and how his character keeps changing. His fights were all unique and great too because he was a shape shifter, I loved his fight with Gotenks in the time chamber in particular because he kept getting blown up. He would extend his arms and legs to fight Goku, Gohan, and the others, etc.

He was a monster with no real motive but it was played both comically and serious at the same time that it was fun.

User avatar
Baggie_Saiyan
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10315
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2013 5:22 pm
Location: Atlantis.

Re: The good and bad of Boo as a villain

Post by Baggie_Saiyan » Sat Dec 03, 2016 2:08 pm

I was enjoying him until the Kid Buu mess where he there was nothing fun about him anymore they were just fighting someone OP who squabbles like a baby and that's it.

User avatar
Attitudefan
I Live Here
Posts: 2963
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 9:51 pm
Location: Canada

Re: The good and bad of Boo as a villain

Post by Attitudefan » Mon Dec 05, 2016 2:29 am

One thing I liked about Buu was how, at every moment, the end was nigh. Piccolo Daimao came close but even he let up and waited (alloting that every certain time of month a district is destroyed rather than demolishing everything) whereas with Buu, the end was imminent every second. I think that's pretty cool. Plus, Super Buu did Perfect Cell better than Cell. Super Buu (Gohan absorbed fyi) is relentless. He's so evil!
My favourite art style (and animation) outside Toriyama who worked on Dragon Ball: Katsuyoshi Nakatsuru, Masaki Satō, Minoru Maeda, Takeo Ide, Hisashi Eguchi, Katsumi Aoshima, Tomekichi Takeuchi, Masahiro Shimanuki, Kazuya Hisada

Post Reply