"Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Discussion specifically regarding the "Dragon Ball Super" TV series premiering July 2015 in Japan, including individual threads for each episode.
User avatar
FortuneSSJ
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5938
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2013 9:07 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by FortuneSSJ » Wed Jan 11, 2017 8:34 pm

Theophrastus wrote: Oh hey, a related post I can piggyback off of. Volume 2 is actually up to 151,433 copies sold now, as of the latest Oricon sales chart release.
Just watched it and holy cow that's awesome! I can't edit my comment anymore, but thanks for putting that here.
Forget breaking the 100+ barrier, the 200K barrier is the new goal! :D
A world without Dragon Ball is just boring.

Favourite old DB Animators: Masaki Sato and Tadayoshi Yamamuro
Favourite new DB Animators: Yuya Takahashi and Chikashi Kubota

User avatar
ParkerAL
Regular
Posts: 608
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2014 11:05 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by ParkerAL » Wed Jan 11, 2017 9:10 pm

kinisking wrote:I just chose those pictures because the anime popped up first in google images. Aren't all my points valid when comparing it to the manga though? Yeah, the anime is slightly different from the manga but I think those changes happened to the manga also.
A big part of why the Saiyan arc and Buu arc look so different in the anime is because of the switch in character designers, going from Minoru Maeda to Tadayoshi Yamamuro. Toriyama's evolving art style played a big part too, but the anime shouldn't be used to represent what his art looked like at a particular time. There are usually subtle differences between the two.
Favorite Movies: Alien, Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back, The Thing, Evil Dead, The Land Before Time
Favorite Shows: Cardcaptor Sakura, Doctor Who, Wallace and Gromit, Wakfu, Yu Yu Hakusho
Favorite Manga: Fullmetal Alchemist, Hunter x Hunter, Dragon Ball
Augenis wrote:The power level view into the series has trained a significant portion of the fan base into real life stereotypical members of the Freeza empire, where each and every individual is reduced to a floating number above their heads and any sudden changes to said number are met with shock and confusion.

User avatar
Miracles
I Live Here
Posts: 3789
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 10:31 am

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Miracles » Thu Jan 12, 2017 3:07 am

Theophrastus wrote:
FortuneSSJ wrote:-Viz Volume 1 cover-

- I don't like the new logo. What's the problem of using a japanese word on the cover of a japanese product?!
- The back cover look cool, but if that means we don't get the rest of Toyotaro's cover art it's a no from me. Unless they put it inside.
- While this one is not Viz fault, I'm still disappointed they didn't bother to ask Toyotaro to draw one final chapter to wrap up his ROF version and include it here. One monthly size chapter was enough to do the job and with that the transition between arcs would be much better.

-Japanese sales-

I was curious about Volume 2 sales, so I just made a quick research and looks like Volume 2 sold more than Volume 1.

Volume 1
Estimate total copies: 30,361

Volume 2
Estimate total copies: 96,274

The numbers are low, but since this is just a promotional manga it would be more fair comparing to other promotional mangas.
Skip arcs, rush stuff, and sometimes have the anime ahead won't do anything good for the sales.

Let's see if Volume 3 breaks the 100k barrier. FT Trunks and Black are the hype!
Oh hey, a related post I can piggyback off of. Volume 2 is actually up to 151,433 copies sold now, as of the latest Oricon sales chart release.
So why is this number good?

User avatar
emperior
I Live Here
Posts: 4347
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2015 1:52 pm
Location: Dragon World
Contact:

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by emperior » Thu Jan 12, 2017 5:31 am

FortuneSSJ wrote:
Theophrastus wrote: Oh hey, a related post I can piggyback off of. Volume 2 is actually up to 151,433 copies sold now, as of the latest Oricon sales chart release.
Just watched it and holy cow that's awesome! I can't edit my comment anymore, but thanks for putting that here.
Forget breaking the 100+ barrier, the 200K barrier is the new goal! :D
I wonder how much more copies would sell if it became weekly...
悟 “Vincit qui se vincit”

What I consider canonical

Neon Z
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1152
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 11:34 am

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Neon Z » Thu Jan 12, 2017 8:41 am

emperior wrote:
FortuneSSJ wrote:
Theophrastus wrote: Oh hey, a related post I can piggyback off of. Volume 2 is actually up to 151,433 copies sold now, as of the latest Oricon sales chart release.
Just watched it and holy cow that's awesome! I can't edit my comment anymore, but thanks for putting that here.
Forget breaking the 100+ barrier, the 200K barrier is the new goal! :D
I wonder how much more copies would sell if it became weekly...
It could remain monthly, but it'd likely get a big boost if it got chapters published by Shounen Jump, like Boruto.

Theophrastus
Regular
Posts: 522
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2014 4:00 pm
Location: United States

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Theophrastus » Thu Jan 12, 2017 9:10 am

Miracles wrote:
Theophrastus wrote:
FortuneSSJ wrote:-Viz Volume 1 cover-

- I don't like the new logo. What's the problem of using a japanese word on the cover of a japanese product?!
- The back cover look cool, but if that means we don't get the rest of Toyotaro's cover art it's a no from me. Unless they put it inside.
- While this one is not Viz fault, I'm still disappointed they didn't bother to ask Toyotaro to draw one final chapter to wrap up his ROF version and include it here. One monthly size chapter was enough to do the job and with that the transition between arcs would be much better.

-Japanese sales-

I was curious about Volume 2 sales, so I just made a quick research and looks like Volume 2 sold more than Volume 1.

Volume 1
Estimate total copies: 30,361

Volume 2
Estimate total copies: 96,274

The numbers are low, but since this is just a promotional manga it would be more fair comparing to other promotional mangas.
Skip arcs, rush stuff, and sometimes have the anime ahead won't do anything good for the sales.

Let's see if Volume 3 breaks the 100k barrier. FT Trunks and Black are the hype!
Oh hey, a related post I can piggyback off of. Volume 2 is actually up to 151,433 copies sold now, as of the latest Oricon sales chart release.
So why is this number good?
It's significantly higher than any other Dragon Ball manga release in the last decade or so. None of the other spin-offs or releases like the Full Color volumes even managed to break into the top 50 charts in the week of their release (when sales are typically highest), never mind appearing on the charts multiple times and selling over 150,000 copies like this volume of Super has.

User avatar
The gr
I Live Here
Posts: 2856
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2016 9:58 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by The gr » Fri Jan 13, 2017 5:02 pm

OK guy I got questions which chapter has the most hate chapter 13 or chapter 19
Mostly active on discord.

User avatar
Jinzoningen MULE
I Live Here
Posts: 4405
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 8:33 pm
Location: Salt Mines

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Jinzoningen MULE » Fri Jan 13, 2017 5:17 pm

The gr wrote:OK guy I got questions which chapter has the most hate chapter 13 or chapter 19
Neither are actually hated by very many fans, those that do are just loud.
Retired.

User avatar
kinisking
I Live Here
Posts: 4987
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2015 2:21 pm
Location: United States.

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by kinisking » Fri Jan 13, 2017 5:24 pm

The gr wrote:OK guy I got questions which chapter has the most hate chapter 13 or chapter 19
Chapter 13 for me at least. It was bad enough that super saiyan came back, but to also bring ssg back?
Jinzoningen MULE wrote: Maybe I should start making it a point not to comment when I'm not sure of something. Too many people know what they're talking about around here.
Disclaimer: I might get into a disagreement with you. Sometimes I might even get feisty about it. I'll never harbor negative feelings because of it though. I hope you feel the same way!
I made a bet with Alee9977 that Vegeta won't be beaten quickly by an opponent. If I lose, I switch my avatar to Vegeta getting beat by hit. If I win, he switches it to Vegeta holding Black by his hair. This will last a month.

User avatar
MyNiggaGoku
Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
Posts: 357
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2016 1:02 pm
Location: Zen-chan's bedroom

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by MyNiggaGoku » Fri Jan 13, 2017 5:30 pm

OK guy I got questions which chapter has the most hate chapter 13 or chapter 19
It's a ''love it or hate it'' situation with these chapters.Others appreciate the changes these chapters made and others just despise them.I,personally,love these chapters and the manga in general.
My Dragon Ball Super 'Canon'

User avatar
dbzfan7
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 13045
Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2012 3:55 am
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by dbzfan7 » Fri Jan 13, 2017 5:34 pm

kinisking wrote:
The gr wrote:OK guy I got questions which chapter has the most hate chapter 13 or chapter 19
Chapter 13 for me at least. It was bad enough that super saiyan came back, but to also bring ssg back?
How can you hate SSG coming back? That was great. It's super dumb they basically throw away a whole transformation. I want it to stick around. It's better than just throwing in the Kaio-Ken, and then being heavily inconsistent with it.
Why Dragon Ball Consistency in something such as power levels matter!

User avatar
SansrivaaL
I Live Here
Posts: 3757
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2015 4:29 pm
Location: Earth

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by SansrivaaL » Fri Jan 13, 2017 5:45 pm

I loved chapter 13, I was glad that SSJG made a return and that Goku can access the form at will, I like Goku's base hair a lot.
One of the main reasons why I prefer the manga over the anime is because of this, and that Goku isnt overly childish in the manga unlike his anime counterpart dude was giggling and having a good laugh plus praising the guy that he knew made Future Trunks' life a living hell and killed Bulma.

User avatar
kinisking
I Live Here
Posts: 4987
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2015 2:21 pm
Location: United States.

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by kinisking » Fri Jan 13, 2017 5:46 pm

dbzfan7 wrote:
kinisking wrote:
The gr wrote:OK guy I got questions which chapter has the most hate chapter 13 or chapter 19
Chapter 13 for me at least. It was bad enough that super saiyan came back, but to also bring ssg back?
How can you hate SSG coming back? That was great. It's super dumb they basically throw away a whole transformation. I want it to stick around. It's better than just throwing in the Kaio-Ken, and then being heavily inconsistent with it.
I love ssg, I really do. But it should have been a one time only thing. He already absorbed ssg's power, it's ridiculous to have him be able to switch into it. Let's say he didn't absorb it in the manga continuity (which would be a huge change for a promotional manga to make), it takes away that it was a form that he needed others to create. Yeah, I guess it's cool that he finally made a godly form his own power but at the same time that's what the allure for Super Saiyan blue was imo. I don't think kaioken is that inconsistent. It makes sense that a god's technique would work with a god transformation. Even then, it doesn't even work most of the time.
Jinzoningen MULE wrote: Maybe I should start making it a point not to comment when I'm not sure of something. Too many people know what they're talking about around here.
Disclaimer: I might get into a disagreement with you. Sometimes I might even get feisty about it. I'll never harbor negative feelings because of it though. I hope you feel the same way!
I made a bet with Alee9977 that Vegeta won't be beaten quickly by an opponent. If I lose, I switch my avatar to Vegeta getting beat by hit. If I win, he switches it to Vegeta holding Black by his hair. This will last a month.

User avatar
MyNiggaGoku
Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
Posts: 357
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2016 1:02 pm
Location: Zen-chan's bedroom

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by MyNiggaGoku » Fri Jan 13, 2017 5:49 pm

dbzfan7 wrote:
kinisking wrote:
The gr wrote:OK guy I got questions which chapter has the most hate chapter 13 or chapter 19
Chapter 13 for me at least. It was bad enough that super saiyan came back, but to also bring ssg back?
How can you hate SSG coming back? That was great. It's super dumb they basically throw away a whole transformation. I want it to stick around. It's better than just throwing in the Kaio-Ken, and then being heavily inconsistent with it.
Yeah SSG's relevance is one of the main reasons I enjoy the manga more.Kaio-Ken is extremely cool but it makes Goku extremely OP...with SSG being a stand alone transformation instead of it being absorbed into the base,the power scaling is much more logical ( though not perfect ) than in the anime
My Dragon Ball Super 'Canon'

User avatar
Jinzoningen MULE
I Live Here
Posts: 4405
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 8:33 pm
Location: Salt Mines

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Jinzoningen MULE » Fri Jan 13, 2017 5:49 pm

kinisking wrote:
dbzfan7 wrote:
kinisking wrote: Chapter 13 for me at least. It was bad enough that super saiyan came back, but to also bring ssg back?
How can you hate SSG coming back? That was great. It's super dumb they basically throw away a whole transformation. I want it to stick around. It's better than just throwing in the Kaio-Ken, and then being heavily inconsistent with it.
I love ssg, I really do. But it should have been a one time only thing. He already absorbed ssg's power, it's ridiculous to have him be able to switch into it.
Actually, he didn't absorb SSG in the manga, it's important to keep our continuities straight when judging things like this. Although I agree that having it always be accessible by Goku takes away from the whole mystique of the legend.
MyNiggaGoku wrote:Kaio-Ken is extremely cool but it makes Goku extremely OP.
On top of it being a lazy concept in general, but Kaio-ken has always been that way.
Last edited by Jinzoningen MULE on Fri Jan 13, 2017 5:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Retired.

User avatar
MyNiggaGoku
Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
Posts: 357
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2016 1:02 pm
Location: Zen-chan's bedroom

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by MyNiggaGoku » Fri Jan 13, 2017 5:52 pm

Jinzoningen MULE wrote:
kinisking wrote:
dbzfan7 wrote:
How can you hate SSG coming back? That was great. It's super dumb they basically throw away a whole transformation. I want it to stick around. It's better than just throwing in the Kaio-Ken, and then being heavily inconsistent with it.
I love ssg, I really do. But it should have been a one time only thing. He already absorbed ssg's power, it's ridiculous to have him be able to switch into it.
Actually, he didn't absorb SSG in the manga, important to keep our continuities straight when judging things like this. Although I agree that having it always be accessible by Goku takes away from the whole mystique of the legend.
You make a pretty good point.In the manga it was never stated or shown that Goku absorbed SSG into his base..so in its continuity it makes sense that SSG is accessible.
My Dragon Ball Super 'Canon'

User avatar
dbzfan7
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 13045
Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2012 3:55 am
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by dbzfan7 » Fri Jan 13, 2017 6:04 pm

kinisking wrote:
dbzfan7 wrote:
kinisking wrote: Chapter 13 for me at least. It was bad enough that super saiyan came back, but to also bring ssg back?
How can you hate SSG coming back? That was great. It's super dumb they basically throw away a whole transformation. I want it to stick around. It's better than just throwing in the Kaio-Ken, and then being heavily inconsistent with it.
I love ssg, I really do. But it should have been a one time only thing. He already absorbed ssg's power, it's ridiculous to have him be able to switch into it. Let's say he didn't absorb it in the manga continuity (which would be a huge change for a promotional manga to make), it takes away that it was a form that he needed others to create. Yeah, I guess it's cool that he finally made a godly form his own power but at the same time that's what the allure for Super Saiyan blue was imo. I don't think kaioken is that inconsistent. It makes sense that a god's technique would work with a god transformation. Even then, it doesn't even work most of the time.
I don't think it should have. Hell it should have been THE form to keep, and not Blue. It makes it an utter waste of time and form that shouldn't have been made, if they barely have any mileage out of it.

Beyond the logic of Kaio-Ken being poor from past history, the bigger problem is it's constantly going to make everyone have it in mind all the time. So now if Goku doesn't use it at certain points, we're all going to say he didn't go all out or he didn't use the Kaio-Ken so it isn't that serious yet...etc. Not to mention it just leads to a ton more confusion in the hierarchy.
Why Dragon Ball Consistency in something such as power levels matter!

User avatar
Bansho64
I Live Here
Posts: 2036
Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2015 12:59 am

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Bansho64 » Fri Jan 13, 2017 6:19 pm

dbzfan7 wrote: I don't think it should have. Hell it should have been THE form to keep, and not Blue. It makes it an utter waste of time and form that shouldn't have been made, if they barely have any mileage out of it.
You just spoke my mind. It's for reasons like this that I'm glad it got some more use in the manga version of the U6 tournament. Plus, I just like the way it looks more. For me, Red> Blue in this case.

User avatar
kinisking
I Live Here
Posts: 4987
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2015 2:21 pm
Location: United States.

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by kinisking » Fri Jan 13, 2017 6:19 pm

Jinzoningen MULE wrote:
kinisking wrote:
dbzfan7 wrote:
How can you hate SSG coming back? That was great. It's super dumb they basically throw away a whole transformation. I want it to stick around. It's better than just throwing in the Kaio-Ken, and then being heavily inconsistent with it.
I love ssg, I really do. But it should have been a one time only thing. He already absorbed ssg's power, it's ridiculous to have him be able to switch into it.
Actually, he didn't absorb SSG in the manga, it's important to keep our continuities straight when judging things like this. Although I agree that having it always be accessible by Goku takes away from the whole mystique of the legend.
My very next sentence is this:
  • Let's say he didn't absorb it in the manga continuity (which would be a huge change for a promotional manga to make), it takes away that it was a form that he needed others to create.
Seriously man? I obviously acknowledge that that's a popular idea (although I'm still not 100% sure I agree with it) and explain why that wouldn't matter to me regardless.
dbzfan7 wrote: I don't think it should have. Hell it should have been THE form to keep, and not Blue. It makes it an utter waste of time and form that shouldn't have been made, if they barely have any mileage out of it.

Beyond the logic of Kaio-Ken being poor from past history, the bigger problem is it's constantly going to make everyone have it in mind all the time. So now if Goku doesn't use it at certain points, we're all going to say he didn't go all out or he didn't use the Kaio-Ken so it isn't that serious yet...etc. Not to mention it just leads to a ton more confusion in the hierarchy.
If that was the case, then it wouldn't be as bad. But I feel like ssb makes it seem so unnecessary. Not necessarily because of power, but because of the other reasons I said before. I always interpreted as ssb being the form where Goku finally made that ssg power his own and ssg ruins that.

Why is the logic poor? It's explained in the show. Super saiyan just wasn't compatible with it. Even ssb is barely compatible. Although your other point is really good imo. They should've just never used it again after King Kai tells him not to.
Jinzoningen MULE wrote: Maybe I should start making it a point not to comment when I'm not sure of something. Too many people know what they're talking about around here.
Disclaimer: I might get into a disagreement with you. Sometimes I might even get feisty about it. I'll never harbor negative feelings because of it though. I hope you feel the same way!
I made a bet with Alee9977 that Vegeta won't be beaten quickly by an opponent. If I lose, I switch my avatar to Vegeta getting beat by hit. If I win, he switches it to Vegeta holding Black by his hair. This will last a month.

User avatar
Jinzoningen MULE
I Live Here
Posts: 4405
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 8:33 pm
Location: Salt Mines

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Jinzoningen MULE » Fri Jan 13, 2017 6:26 pm

kinisking wrote:Let's say he didn't absorb it in the manga continuity...
No, no, I'm stopping you there. We're not "saying" anything, he did not absorb SSG in the manga, it's a fact.
Retired.

Post Reply