TheMikado wrote:That doesn't make sense,
How doesn't it make sense?
Goku fought Zamasu. Goku humiliated him and instigated his hatred for mortals even further. Zamasu, thus, wanted to learn more about Goku and stole Goku's body against his better judgement. When called out on this by Vegetto, he's surprised then makes up some bullshit about Goku "representing the sins of the mortals and the Gods", just showing how truly delusional and blinded he really was.
This isn't hard to grasp. It's a series for 7-year old kids. Zamasu hates Goku, so Zamasu steals his body and kills his family.
TheMikado wrote:Your argument as it stands now is that they haven't gotten to the point in the story where they possible give a plausible explain so it should be openly criticized because we haven't reached that point in the story yet where it makes sense?
No, my argument as it stands now is that I doubt the manga is going to explain squat considering they skimmed through the entire scene where Black tells Goku how he killed him and his family in a couple of panels. The fact that Zamasu's motivation is so underdeveloped proves to me that it's not a big focal point in either Toriyama's notes or Toyotaro's mind. If he explains why Zamasu stole Goku's body specifically, then sure, I'll shut up. Until then, I'm open to criticize because I believe nothing will change.
TheMikado wrote:I assume you also hated every instance in the anime where they explain things later as well?
Everyone does, only the people who go into the series with the mindset to damage control don't, because that's how criticism works. You take what you get at face value. You're not gonna review a movie and not point out the flaws just because they can be fixed in the hinted sequel in a few years, right? No, you're gonna complain about them, then if they patch those issues in the sequel, you'll shut up and admit you were wrong.