jcogginsa wrote:Not gonna lie, I think it's a bit silly to have Goku turn SSJ3 for a Kamehameha Ult. If he's gonna be SSJ3, use Dragonfist XD
I don't think its set like that, there was one gameplay video from an interview that shown him doing the same ultimate as an SS1 as well. But yes, Dragonfist needs to be in the game, preferably as his SS3 Ult.
DBZAOTA482 wrote:Well... fighting games in general are pretty niche so naturally a game like FighterZ would alienate a subset of the DB fandom. Even Budokai isn't completely safe from this over since Tenkaichi came out.
I see it more as just ignorance from casuals and BT3 fanboys that are spoiled by huge rosters saying this, while not in the know that Namco-Bandai isn't going to make BT4 or RB3 because (1. BT was published by Atari, and Spike left Namco after their poor track record after BT3) and (2. Raging Blast sold poorly, so it doesn't make financial sense to retreat that. They wanted to make Ultimate Tenkaichi because of the people complaining about RB2 not being as good as BT3 - even though people were complaining about BT3 being too hard, so they had to dumb down the mechanics (Namco told me this on FB) but then Spike screwed it up, because those same people demanded for QTE mechanics (When Ninja Storm was popular) and ruined the gameplay claiming thats what they wanted. Now we're back to square one with that side of the fandom. People want to exhaust the hype of BT3 with the same demands for the same type of game every year. Thats the problem with casuals.
Zephyr wrote:The fandom's collective fetishizing of "moments" is also ridiculous to me. No, not everyone needs a fucking "shine" moment. If that's all you want, then all you want is fanservice, rather than an actual coherent story. And of course those aren't mutually exclusive; you could have a coherent story with "shine" moments! But if a story is perfectly coherent (and I'm really not seeing any compelling arguments that this one is anything but, despite constantly recurring, really poorly reasoned, attempts to argue otherwise), and you're bemoaning the lack of "shine" moments as a reason for the story's poor quality, then you're letting your thirst for "shine" moments obfuscate your ability to detect basic storytelling when it's right in front of you.