"Dragon Ball Super" Series Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Discussion specifically regarding the "Dragon Ball Super" TV series premiering July 2015 in Japan, including individual threads for each episode.
User avatar
sintzu
Banned
Posts: 13583
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:41 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by sintzu » Mon Jun 26, 2017 3:37 pm

TheDevilsCorpse wrote:Toriyama basically stopped maintaining control over the main arc content.
Am I missing something ? Toriyama isn't Super's main writer anymore ?

I haven't been fully keeping up with this topic so can someone fill me in if that's the case ?
July 9th 2018 will be remembered as the day Broly became canon.

User avatar
omaro34
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1969
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2015 7:27 pm
Location: Western Canada

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by omaro34 » Mon Jun 26, 2017 3:44 pm

sintzu wrote:
TheDevilsCorpse wrote:Toriyama basically stopped maintaining control over the main arc content.
Am I missing something ? Toriyama isn't Super's main writer anymore ?

I haven't been fully keeping up with this topic so can someone fill me in if that's the case ?
Who knows? The narrative about this keeps getting changed. The only people that truly know are the people working on Super at Toei, Toyotaro would know, and of course Toriyama himself. Everything else is pointless speculation.
"Kami is the Morgan Freeman of Dragonball Z"

Check out my Piccolo page: https://www.facebook.com/PiccoloTheSuperNamek/?ref=hl

User avatar
Jinzoningen MULE
I Live Here
Posts: 4405
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 8:33 pm
Location: Salt Mines

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by Jinzoningen MULE » Mon Jun 26, 2017 3:50 pm

omaro34 wrote:
sintzu wrote:
TheDevilsCorpse wrote:Toriyama basically stopped maintaining control over the main arc content.
Am I missing something ? Toriyama isn't Super's main writer anymore ?

I haven't been fully keeping up with this topic so can someone fill me in if that's the case ?
Who knows? The narrative about this keeps getting changed. The only people that truly know are the people working on Super at Toei, Toyotaro would know, and of course Toriyama himself. Everything else is pointless speculation.
It's pretty easy to assume that Toriyama's not overly-involved when we have a Yardrat based on an anime-only design, a new Broly, and two widely different interpretation of Super's narratives between anime and manga. In fact, we specifically know that Kale wasn't Toriyama's creation, but comes from the Dragon Ball Room. The origins of the FT Arc also come from an editorial office.

He's still writing the stories, but Toriyama's involvement is far more diluted compared to every other DB project he's been intimately involved with.
Retired.

User avatar
Psykomatik
Regular
Posts: 521
Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2015 7:37 am

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by Psykomatik » Mon Jun 26, 2017 3:52 pm

omaro34 wrote:
sintzu wrote:
TheDevilsCorpse wrote:Toriyama basically stopped maintaining control over the main arc content.
Am I missing something ? Toriyama isn't Super's main writer anymore ?

I haven't been fully keeping up with this topic so can someone fill me in if that's the case ?
Who knows? The narrative about this keeps getting changed. The only people that truly know are the people working on Super at Toei, Toyotaro would know, and of course Toriyama himself. Everything else is pointless speculation.
Toshio, a scenarist from Super, said a lot of times that Toriyama is heavily and directly implicated on every Super episodes, so take it as you want.

User avatar
sintzu
Banned
Posts: 13583
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:41 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by sintzu » Mon Jun 26, 2017 3:55 pm

Jinzoningen MULE wrote:
omaro34 wrote: Who knows? The narrative about this keeps getting changed. The only people that truly know are the people working on Super at Toei, Toyotaro would know, and of course Toriyama himself. Everything else is pointless speculation.
It's pretty easy to assume that Toriyama's not overly-involved when we have a Yardrat based on an anime-only design, a new Broly, and two widely different interpretation of Super's narratives between anime and manga. In fact, we specifically know that Kale wasn't Toriyama's creation, but comes from the Dragon Ball Room. The origins of the FT Arc also come from an editorial office.

He's still writing the stories, but Toriyama's involvement is far more diluted compared to every other DB project he's been intimately involved with.
None of the characters so far seem like Toriyama characters, especially Jerin. I could be wrong cause maybe he was busy with something else and they got the short end of the stick but if the characters are made by Toyotarou and Toei then maybe he just came up with the basic plot of the 8 universes fighting and left the characters to those 2.
Last edited by sintzu on Mon Jun 26, 2017 4:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
July 9th 2018 will be remembered as the day Broly became canon.

User avatar
TheMikado
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5009
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 1:28 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by TheMikado » Mon Jun 26, 2017 3:56 pm

TheDevilsCorpse wrote:
TheMikado wrote:The VERY first response was from a moderator.

As a moderator and trusted source on this site, this was about as authoritative of an answer as you can get here. The remainder of the responses didn't get much better.
To be completely fair, these responses were both from before I was made a moderator and before Toriyama basically stopped maintaining control over the main arc content. Circumstances changed, on both fronts. Toei are taking large liberties with the story, Toyotaro is also contributing designs, etc. It's no long surprising that content is branching out to include stuff Toriyama likely wouldn't have.
LightBing wrote:Does anyone remember that bug character description that was leaked from the website. Did anyone saw him in the last episode?
He's presumably one of the two fighters hiding.
Thank you for the response, I'm just point out that the sometimes the "purity" and "canon" drum gets beaten so loudly and hard that it clouds discussion. There were 5 pages about how it wasn't possible that the filler Yadrat was going to be the same as the Super Yadrat, some pointed to DB Online's depiction due to Toriyama's "involvement" in that making that version of the Yadrat "canon". Of course at the end of the day we are all human with different preferences but the waters are so muddy at this point the idea of "canon" or authenticity should probably be tossed out by now to a certain degree.

User avatar
TheMikado
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5009
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 1:28 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by TheMikado » Mon Jun 26, 2017 3:58 pm

The last interview specifically said Toriyama wrote a "barebones" outline for the universal arc and the production team "fleshed it out".
What ever all that means it suggests a certain amount of liberty and concepts not from Toriyama, where and what they pull for the inspiration are only guesses at this point.

User avatar
FortuneSSJ
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5937
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2013 9:07 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by FortuneSSJ » Mon Jun 26, 2017 4:01 pm

TheMikado wrote:The last interview specifically said Toriyama wrote a "barebones" outline for the universal arc and the production team "fleshed it out".
Toriyama writes "barebones" outlines since Super started. It's up to Toei and Toyotaro to fill up the blanks that connect his plot points.
A world without Dragon Ball is just boring.

Favourite old DB Animators: Masaki Sato and Tadayoshi Yamamuro
Favourite new DB Animators: Yuya Takahashi and Chikashi Kubota

User avatar
omaro34
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1969
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2015 7:27 pm
Location: Western Canada

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by omaro34 » Mon Jun 26, 2017 4:10 pm

sintzu wrote:
Jinzoningen MULE wrote:
omaro34 wrote: Who knows? The narrative about this keeps getting changed. The only people that truly know are the people working on Super at Toei, Toyotaro would know, and of course Toriyama himself. Everything else is pointless speculation.
It's pretty easy to assume that Toriyama's not overly-involved when we have a Yardrat based on an anime-only design, a new Broly, and two widely different interpretation of Super's narratives between anime and manga. In fact, we specifically know that Kale wasn't Toriyama's creation, but comes from the Dragon Ball Room. The origins of the FT Arc also come from an editorial office.

He's still writing the stories, but Toriyama's involvement is far more diluted compared to every other DB project he's been intimately involved with.
None of the characters so far seem like Toriyama characters, especially Jerin. I could be wrong cause maybe he was busy with something else and they got the short end of the stick but if the characters are made by Toyotarou and Toei then maybe he just came up with the basic plot of the 8 universes fighting and left the characters to those 2.
I hear you and Jinzoningen MULE, you both make valid points, but I keep hearing both sides of the spectrum.

Psykomatik pointed out that a scenarist from Super said Toriyama is involved in every episode. Yet characters like Kale aren't a creation from Toriyama which is true. It leaves me confused and uninterested in the topic anymore.

Until we hear from Toriyama himself with 100 percent conviction, my position in this matter remains the same.
"Kami is the Morgan Freeman of Dragonball Z"

Check out my Piccolo page: https://www.facebook.com/PiccoloTheSuperNamek/?ref=hl

User avatar
TheDevilsCorpse
Moderator
Posts: 11378
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 4:34 am
Contact:

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by TheDevilsCorpse » Mon Jun 26, 2017 4:20 pm

sintzu wrote:Am I missing something ? Toriyama isn't Super's main writer anymore ?

I haven't been fully keeping up with this topic so can someone fill me in if that's the case ?
No, he's still writing the underlying plot same as he had been. But he's openly admitted that Toei's writers take his plots and makes changes or shuffle things around to make the version of the story we see on TV. It really started in the Future Trunks Arc, with the drastic changes in the anime and manga in the structure of how the story and mystery unfolds. Add in that Toyotaro, and maybe more, are helping with character designs this arc as well (presumably due to the sheer number of them), and he just has less of a presence than he did before.

Could always change back to how it was before next arc, if we don't have nearly a hundred characters to add into the mix.
Direct translations of the Korean DB Online timeline and guidebook.
My personal "canon" and BP list. (Coming Soon)

HeroR
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8306
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 11:28 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by HeroR » Mon Jun 26, 2017 4:53 pm

TheDevilsCorpse wrote:
sintzu wrote:Am I missing something ? Toriyama isn't Super's main writer anymore ?

I haven't been fully keeping up with this topic so can someone fill me in if that's the case ?
No, he's still writing the underlying plot same as he had been. But he's openly admitted that Toei's writers take his plots and makes changes or shuffle things around to make the version of the story we see on TV. It really started in the Future Trunks Arc, with the drastic changes in the anime and manga in the structure of how the story and mystery unfolds. Add in that Toyotaro, and maybe more, are helping with character designs this arc as well (presumably due to the sheer number of them), and he just has less of a presence than he did before.

Could always change back to how it was before next arc, if we don't have nearly a hundred characters to add into the mix.
The Future Trunks Saga was done the same way as the Champa Saga in the anime. Only the manga change since Toriyama told Toyo to put in some of his own ideas.
Kanassa wrote:
precita wrote:Goku will still be around but take a Buu saga approach backseat.
Goku barely took a backseat in the Buu saga, at best he took a leisurely stroll round back while everyone else cried for him to come back.

User avatar
Lord Frieza
I Live Here
Posts: 3801
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2015 2:36 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by Lord Frieza » Mon Jun 26, 2017 5:18 pm

TheMikado wrote: Snip
Thank you for posting all that, yes that dose give me some insight. Also glad to hear this is not a "cannon" debate, which was what I was worried about.

So basically a lot of people have used the term "Cannon" to shut down your, and others, conversations off hand. They point blank said "Broly and LSS will NEVER be in Super because they are not cannon" and you want to know what they have got to say now. Also will people be able to speculate more freely since Super has proven a lot of supposedly "impossible due to cannon" things can and will happen?

Good post :clap: :thumbup: .

EDIT:
TheMikado wrote:
Thank you for the response, I'm just point out that the sometimes the "purity" and "canon" drum gets beaten so loudly and hard that it clouds discussion. There were 5 pages about how it wasn't possible that the filler Yadrat was going to be the same as the Super Yadrat, some pointed to DB Online's depiction due to Toriyama's "involvement" in that making that version of the Yadrat "canon". Of course at the end of the day we are all human with different preferences but the waters are so muddy at this point the idea of "canon" or authenticity should probably be tossed out by now to a certain degree.
Got to agree here. I've had a few speculations and idea's shut down myself through this. Also I may have been guilty of it myself so I'll try to keep an open mind.

As for the Yadrat now in Super, for my part I never said it could not be a Yardrat because of Cannon or Online. I merely stated that until we got confirmation that it was indeed a Yardrat we could not call it one.
Lord Frieza wrote: True but he is not confirmed to be a Yardratian yet. Yes he looks like the ones from the filler episode by their are some physiological differences. Because of that we cannot assume that to the be the case no matter how likely it may seem.


It could very well be a Yardrat, thats not the point. Until it is officially stated to be one you cannot assume it is. By all mean hypothesize, it would be one based on very compelling evidence, but it is not a fact until it is proven to be the case.


I'm 99% shore your right but it has to be proven conclusively.
Last edited by Lord Frieza on Mon Jun 26, 2017 5:29 pm, edited 2 times in total.

GodKaio-Ken
I Live Here
Posts: 2326
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2016 6:00 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by GodKaio-Ken » Mon Jun 26, 2017 5:27 pm

Lord Frieza wrote:
TheMikado wrote: Snip
Thank you for posting all that, yes that dose give me some insight. Also glad to hear this is not a "cannon" debate, which was what I was worried about.

So basically a lot of people have used the term "Cannon" to shut down your, and others, conversations off hand. They point blank said "Broly and LSS will NEVER be in Super because they are not cannon" and you want to know what they have got to say now. Also will people be able to speculate more freely since Super has proven a lot of supposedly "impossible due to cannon" things can and will happen?

Good post :clap: :thumbup: .
Well technically it isn't Broly and 99% likely it isn't called LSS. However it is obviously BASED on Broly.
Currently watching: My Hero Academia

Last watched: Akame Ga Kill, Hokuto No Ken, Hokuto No Ken 2, Hunter X Hunter

Quote if I were to Hakai someone: "Omae Wa Mou Shindeiru. Hakai!"

User avatar
alakazam^
I Live Here
Posts: 2714
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2004 9:55 am
Location: Portugal

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by alakazam^ » Mon Jun 26, 2017 5:27 pm

omaro34 wrote:Yet characters like Kale aren't a creation from Toriyama which is true.
Where was this said?

User avatar
Big Black Sayian
Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
Posts: 478
Joined: Tue May 24, 2016 9:35 am
Location: New Jersey, USA

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by Big Black Sayian » Mon Jun 26, 2017 5:32 pm

alakazam^ wrote:
omaro34 wrote:Yet characters like Kale aren't a creation from Toriyama which is true.
Where was this said?
I'm curious about this too. I thought the artwork from VJUMP was his his.
Edit: Or was that Toyotaro?
Last edited by Big Black Sayian on Mon Jun 26, 2017 5:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.

HeroR
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8306
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 11:28 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by HeroR » Mon Jun 26, 2017 5:35 pm

Lord Frieza wrote:
TheMikado wrote: Snip
Thank you for posting all that, yes that dose give me some insight. Also glad to hear this is not a "cannon" debate, which was what I was worried about.

So basically a lot of people have used the term "Cannon" to shut down your, and others, conversations off hand. They point blank said "Broly and LSS will NEVER be in Super because they are not cannon" and you want to know what they have got to say now. Also will people be able to speculate more freely since Super has proven a lot of supposedly "impossible due to cannon" things can and will happen?

Good post :clap: :thumbup: .

EDIT:
TheMikado wrote:
Thank you for the response, I'm just point out that the sometimes the "purity" and "canon" drum gets beaten so loudly and hard that it clouds discussion. There were 5 pages about how it wasn't possible that the filler Yadrat was going to be the same as the Super Yadrat, some pointed to DB Online's depiction due to Toriyama's "involvement" in that making that version of the Yadrat "canon". Of course at the end of the day we are all human with different preferences but the waters are so muddy at this point the idea of "canon" or authenticity should probably be tossed out by now to a certain degree.
Got to agree here. I've had a few speculations and idea's shut down myself through this. Also I may have been guilty of it myself so I'll try to keep an open mind.

As for the Yadrat now in Super, for my part I never said it could not be a Yardrat because of Cannon or Online. I merely stated that until we got confirmation that it was indeed a Yardrat we could not call it one.
Lord Frieza wrote: True but he is not confirmed to be a Yardratian yet. Yes he looks like the ones from the filler episode by their are some physiological differences. Because of that we cannot assume that to the be the case no matter how likely it may seem.


It could very well be a Yardrat, thats not the point. Until it is officially stated to be one you cannot assume it is. By all mean hypothesize, it would be one based on very compelling evidence, but it is not a fact until it is proven to be the case.


I'm 99% shore your right but it has to be proven conclusively.
Pet peeve. It's canon not cannon.
Kanassa wrote:
precita wrote:Goku will still be around but take a Buu saga approach backseat.
Goku barely took a backseat in the Buu saga, at best he took a leisurely stroll round back while everyone else cried for him to come back.

User avatar
Lord Frieza
I Live Here
Posts: 3801
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2015 2:36 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by Lord Frieza » Mon Jun 26, 2017 5:37 pm

GodKaio-Ken wrote:
Lord Frieza wrote:
TheMikado wrote: Snip
Thank you for posting all that, yes that dose give me some insight. Also glad to hear this is not a "cannon" debate, which was what I was worried about.

So basically a lot of people have used the term "Cannon" to shut down your, and others, conversations off hand. They point blank said "Broly and LSS will NEVER be in Super because they are not cannon" and you want to know what they have got to say now. Also will people be able to speculate more freely since Super has proven a lot of supposedly "impossible due to cannon" things can and will happen?

Good post :clap: :thumbup: .
Well technically it isn't Broly and 99% likely it isn't called LSS. However it is obviously BASED on Broly.
Your probably right...but he still has a point. Kale and her form still COME from Broly. A character who was not a part of the manga and not cannon my many people definition.

Also while I have said we have not reached the point yet, even by your scoring there is still a 1% chance that with a single sentence we can be dealing with a "Broly is Cannon" scenario.

If that even dose occur.......well just read Mikado's original post.

User avatar
Lord Frieza
I Live Here
Posts: 3801
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2015 2:36 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by Lord Frieza » Mon Jun 26, 2017 5:43 pm

HeroR wrote:
Pet peeve. It's canon not cannon.

Ok you dont know this so I wont get mad. I'm dyslexic, quit severally in fact. While better then I was, I will always mess up words now and then. Also sometime I will never notice I made an error because of how my brain can effects my ability to read as well.

My pet peeve. People telling a dyslexic he spelt something wrong.

User avatar
BlueBasilisk
I Live Here
Posts: 3062
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2017 11:58 am

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by BlueBasilisk » Mon Jun 26, 2017 5:44 pm

Big Black Saiyan wrote:I'm curious about this too. I thought the artwork from VJUMP was his his.
Edit: Or was that Toyotaro?
I think I remember someone saying it was Yamamuro.

User avatar
GodVegetto91
Banned
Posts: 2906
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2015 12:49 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by GodVegetto91 » Mon Jun 26, 2017 5:50 pm

A question to anyone with great translation skills

Did Whis really say: "there is a universe where lives a mortal even A god of destruction can't defeat." ??

Or did he acthally say that IT'S (it's universes') god of destruction can't beat.

Because this would make all the difference. If he said there's a mortal A god of destruction can't beat then it would apply to ALL gods of destruction, rather than the one of the universe said mortal belongs to.

Post Reply